Based on a 2009 article that appeared in the Washington Post and a March 2013 report by CNN, Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) – who authored a resolution calling for the Sergeant at Arms to arrest Lois Lerner for contempt of Congress – should perhaps point to a much more significant crime in response to any concerns that Lerner could become a sympathetic figure if she were arrested. That crime involves Lerner’s alleged illegal backdating of a tax exempt approval letter for an organization whose founder does business with a State Sponsor of Terrorism, business the Post says is illegal.
Here is what the Washington Post’s Dan Eggen wrote nearly five years ago:
p>U.S. legal requirements… mandate disclosure of work for foreign governments and which prohibit doing business with Sudan under sanctions first imposed in the 1990s.
Here is what CNN reported in 2013:
…Sudan, which has been under strict U.S. government sanctions and a trade embargo for nearly 20 years for supporting terrorism and violating human rights.
As Shoebat.com has demonstrated for over a year now, Malik Obama – the brother of the President of the United States – has been “doing business with Sudan” since at least 2010, a year prior to when Lerner granted him tax exempt status.
Stockman was interviewed by Megyn Kelly about his resolution and one of the counterarguments raised by Kelly was that if the Sergeant at Arms is ordered to arrest Lerner, Republicans risk making Lerner a sympathetic figure. Stockman, whom we believe is well aware of the Malik Obama angle to the scandal (based on his trips to Egypt earlier this year), didn’t seem concerned with Lerner garnering sympathy during his interview:
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/07/lois-lerner-caught-washington-post-cnn-accessory-terror-funding/#C4ozj5WYKE7Gifpz.99
There are always two points of view to every story. In political issues those points are usually conservative versus liberal. More often than not that equates to rational versus irrational or intelligent versus stupid. Take your pick, I prefer the latter – intelligent versus stupid. And there is no limit on the number of stupid people you will find and most of them are liberals. Intelligent people are aware of facts and details that seem to be inconvenient truths to stupid people. Here are some examples.
This photo of Steven Spielberg began circulating across Twitter last week. You should read the caption to appreciate this. Just so you know, the photo was taken on the set of Spielberg’s movie Jurassic Park. The comments from the rabid anti-hunting crowd seem to think that Spielberg was responsible for killing the Triceratops dinosaur behind him. Of course, you know the dinosaur is a movie prop but the people passing the image around don’t seem to understand there are no Triceratops alive any more. They all died out millions of years ago. People who are against guns and hunting are either ignorant or not concerned with facts and details, like the fact that crime rates go down as more people acquire concealed carry permits.
Of course, we now know that the Twitter author Jay Branscomb planted this image. Read his latest Twitter post below. As Katie Pavlich over on Townhall.com points out:
But people took it seriously and actually believe Spielberg shot and killed the dinosaur. Here are some examples.
Anti-hunting derangement syndrome strikes again. Whoever you are Jay Branscomb, I salute you.
Now meet Holly Fisher, an attractive young mother of three from Charleston, West Virginia who is both a proud American and a Christian. Holly posted a lighthearted photo of herself on Twitter after the Supreme Court upheld the rights of Hobby Lobby versus Obamacare. Holly posed in front of a local Hobby Lobby store holding a soft drink cup from Chick-fil-A, another Christian oriented business.You can also tell from the photo that she is Pro-Life so there are three things about this picture that would anger liberals and set them off in a rage.
Shortly afterward, Holly received some criticism from liberals on Twitter that the only thing she was missing in the photo was her gun and her bible, a comment on Muslim Democrat Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign statement about those “bitter clingers”. So Holly took another photo of herself to accommodate her critics.
And as you would expect, this angered her liberal critics even more. (Good for you, Holly). Shortly after this photo hit Twitter the liberals started circulating a photo showing Holly Fisher with her gun and her Holy Bible and flag next to a Muslim terrorist who was holding her gun and her Koran in front of her flag, and they wanted to know what was the difference.
Well here is where the informed and intelligent conservatives can easily explain the answer to the liberals question. The Holy Bible being held by Holly Fisher contains the words spoken by Jesus Christ calling upon us to “Love thy neighbor as we would love ourselves.” And the words of God who gave us the Ten Commandments, among which is, Thou Shalt Not Kill. On the other hand, the Muslim woman holding her gun and her Koran later on went out and committed suicide by blowing herself up and killing three other people in the same terrorist act. And her Koran, which is supposed to contain the inspiring words of her Islamic prophet, is filled with commands for Muslims to kill and mutilate everyone who is not a believer in Islam. But these are the inconvenient truths that liberals refuse to think about.