Take your lynching outrage and shove it

In 1977 country singer Johnny Paycheck popularized a song entitled “Take this job and shove it.”

Take this job and shove it
I ain’t working here no more
My woman done left
And took all the reasons
I was working for

You better not try to stand in my way
As I’m walking out the door
Take this job and shove it
I ain’t working here no more

The rest of the lyrics can be found here

Yesterday Donald Trump likened the treatment being inflicted on him by the House Democrat Secret Police as a “lynching.”

It was met with much derision- “fury” even.

“That is one word that no president ought to apply to himself,” the South Carolina representative James Clyburn, the House majority whip, said on CNN. “I’m not just a politician … I’m a product of the south. I know the history of that word.”

The California representative Karen Bass, chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told CNN Trump’s “lynching” tweet was consistent with his pattern of throwing out “racial bombs” to give “red meat” to his base when his back is against the wall.

democrats immediately leaped to prove what a collection of hypocritical morons they are

In 1998 Jerry (the Hutt) Nadler accused Republicans of running a “lynch mob” against Bill Clinton

I am the president’s defender in the sense that I haven’t seen anything yet that would rise, in my opinion, to the level of impeachable offense. …

I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob.

Then there was Greg Meeks

Steve Guest

@SteveGuest

Democrats are being total hypocrites right now in response to @realDonaldTrump‘s tweet this morning.

Dem. Rep. Gregory Meeks on Bill Clinton’s impeachment in 1998: “What we are doing here is not a prosecution, it is a persecution and indeed it is a political lynching.”

Here’s CNN

And I can state unequivocally after watching Thursday’s Benghazi House committee hearing and considering the email transcripts, media statements, debates and intense partisan focus on the former secretary of state for the past few years that she has been treated unfairly. Unprofessionally. And frankly, disrespectfully.

I believe that like Justice Clarence Thomas before her, she has been publicly lynched in a way that we Americans only reserve for uppity black men and uppity professional women who don’t know their place. She has been dragged through the media and partisan mud of Capital Hill politics and asked to answer questions that she has already answered. She has been attacked. Accused. And berated by members of Congress who should know better.

How about Harry Reid and John Kerry?

ALX 🇺🇸 🎃 @alx

Nadler: “I wish we could get this over with quickly. … In pushing the process, in pushing the arguments of fairness and due process the Republicans so far have been running a lynch mob.” https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/22/flashback-jerry-nadler-in-1998-accused-republicans-of-running-a-lynch-mob-against-bill-clinton/ 

Nadler in 1998 Accused GOPs of Running ‘Lynch Mob’ Against Clinton

Democrats are outraged about Trump comparing impeachment to lynching, but Nadler in 1998 accused Republicans of “running a lynch mob.”

breitbart.com

ALX 🇺🇸 🎃 @alx

Democratic Senator Harry Reid:
“The Lynch Mob though, Mr. President, now has a new leader”

ALX 🇺🇸 🎃 @alx

Democratic Senator Harry Reid:
“The Lynch Mob though, Mr. President, now has a new leader”

ALX 🇺🇸 🎃 @alx

Democratic Senator @JohnKerry:

“It’s a verbal political Lynching on the floor of the Senate”

Washington Examiner

@dcexaminer

Then-Sen. @JoeBiden on Clinton impeachment:

“…History is going to question whether or not this was just a partisan lynching…” https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1186691273870233601 

Joe Biden

@JoeBiden

Impeachment is not “lynching,” it is part of our Constitution. Our country has a dark, shameful history with lynching, and to even think about making this comparison is abhorrent. It’s despicable. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1186611272231636992 

Wikipedia describes “Lynching” this way

Lynching is a premeditated extrajudicial killing by a group. It is most often used to characterize informal public executions by a mob in order to punish an alleged transgressor, convicted transgressor, or to intimidate a group. It can also be an extreme form of informal group social control, and it is often conducted with the display of a public spectacle (often in the form of hanging) for maximum intimidation.[1] Instances of lynchings and similar mob violence can be found in every society.[2][3][4]

And there is this little tidbit

 Tuskegee Institute records of lynchings between the years 1880 and 1951 show 3,437 African-American victims, as well as 1,293 white victims.

So democrats,

Take your lynching outrage and shove it

I ain’t puttin’ up with it no more

AG Bill Barr Announces Durham Probe is Now a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

Sean Hannity opened his show on Thursday tonight with breaking news —  Attorney General Bill Barr says Prosecutor John Durham’s investigation is now a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION!

** The Change in Status Gives Investigators Ability to Subpoena Witnesses, Use Grand Jury

 

Shannon Bream

@ShannonBream

BREAKING: NYT Reports that DOJ Durham probe has “shifted” from an administrative review of the Russia investigation “to a criminal inquiry.” We’re digging. More at 11p @FoxNews @FoxNewsNight

** NYT Reports that DOJ Durham probe has “shifted” from an administrative review of the Russia investigation “to a criminal inquiry.”

More from The New York Times, via Conservative Treehouse:

For more than two years, President Trump has repeatedly attacked the Russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal even months after the special counsel closed it. Now, Mr. Trump’s own Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began.

Justice Department officials have shifted an administrative review of the Russia investigation closely overseen by Attorney General William P. Barr to a criminal inquiry, according to two people familiar with the matter. The move gives the prosecutor running it, John H. Durham, the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to impanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges.

…] The move also creates an unusual situation in which the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation into itself.

Mr. Barr’s reliance on Mr. Durham, a widely respected and veteran prosecutor who has investigated C.I.A. torture and broken up Mafia rings, could help insulate the attorney general from accusations that he is doing the president’s bidding and putting politics above justice.

It was not clear what potential crime Mr. Durham is investigating, nor when the criminal investigation was prompted. A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.
[…] Federal investigators need only a “reasonable indication” that a crime has been committed to open an investigation, a much lower standard than the probable cause required to obtain search warrants. However, “there must be an objective, factual basis for initiating the investigation; a mere hunch is insufficient,” according to Justice Department guidelines.

Proof What House Dems Are Doing Is An Attempted Coup – Not An Impeachment.

Remember all of those Obama-era scandals? Those were real Constitutional violations of presidential authority – from Fast and Furious to IRS, Solyndra, etc., any could have been used to push a legitimate impeachment inquiry. When Republicans ruled the House they never did so. Be it lack of courage or not wanting to drag the country through such a mess, President Obama was allowed to continue his two terms largely without having to answer for rampant wrongdoing.

Now? House Democrats are literally waging an attempted coup behind closed doors and without opposition party input or oversight. This is unprecedented and should not be allowed – but it is, all because the entrenched powers of the D.C. status quo want so badly to see a truly independent president working hard for the American people, to be forced from the White House.

Image result for House Democrats Coup

Via The Gateway Pundit:

Speaker Pelosi and the lawless Democrats are running a historic scam on the American people.

For the first time in US history Democrat leaders are running a sham impeachment — that was NEVER voted on in the US House of Representatives — and they are holding the entire proceeding in a secret secluded room away from public viewing and away from cameras.

Democrats are so worried that they will not be able to control the narrative to their criminal operation that they now are refusing to allow Republican lawmakers to view the transcripts from the impeachment proceedings!

NOTE: Voters must be reminded that Senate Republicans could do some serious push back to what House Democrats are attempting here. Figures like Lindsey Graham could hold hearings to counter the illegal in-secret “hearings” being conducted by the Pelosi-led House.

Graham has not done so and that choice by him is a clear indicator he’s either too weak or too controlled by the D.C. elites to be doing the right thing. Instead he, and so many other Senate Republicans are sitting silent and shrugging at the attempted coup of a duly elected POTUS.

Judicial Watch Says Newly Released Messages Show Clinton’s Email, Benghazi Coverups

Judicial Watch

From The Epoch Times:

WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch made public Monday a 2012 email chain showing multiple senior State Department executives used then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured private email to discuss the most sensitive details of the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, died in the assault, which within hours was attributed by the Obama White House to an internet video that critically portrayed Islam and its founder, Mohammed.

Judicial Watch first sought the emails released Monday in a 2014 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, but they were not released to the non-profit government watchdog until earlier this month by a federal court and only after the group threatened to expand its litigation in the case against the State Department.

It was this FOIA litigation that led to the public disclosure of Clinton’s use of the private email system, according to Judicial Watch.

Hundreds of other State Department and White House documents sought in the 2014 suit were previously released but only after years of litigation and discovery, which continues and may soon include deposing Clinton and Cheryl Mills, her former chief of staff.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, who has heard much of the Judicial Watch litigation seeking the documents, has called Clinton’s private email system “one of the gravest modern offenses against government transparency.”

Read the Full Article Here