Why should I believe what Bill said about Hillary at the DNC?

clintonscdl1-portrait-1

American Thinker

Why should I believe a serial sexual predator, congenital liar, serial adulterer, seller of the Lincoln bedroom, seller of pardons, and releaser of Puerto Rican Terrorists and good buddy of convicted pedophile billionaire Jeff Epstein? Why would I believe someone who jacked up his speech prices when his wife became Secretary of State and someone who would just lie about Hussein having WMD’s?

Bill said he was going to correct the cartoonish depiction the Republicans gave of his wife but I believe I have spotted some things he must have left out inadvertently.

He forgot that she took $100,000 in kickbacks on cattle futures, that she pretended not to know about the Jennifer Flowers affair on Sixty Minutes, that she misplaced the Rose Law firm billing records, that somehow 900 FBI files showed up at the White House, that she fired the travel office and then she continually lied about it, that they trashed Billy Dale, that she falsely blamed a right wing conspiracy for that pesky Monica Lewinsky thing, that she trashed women who dared tell the truth about Bill’s habits, that she lied when she claimed Hussein had WMD’s in order to vote for the Iraq war, that she lied about her email system, (willingly violating national security laws and the Freedom of Information Act, that she didn’t lift a finger to save lives in Benghazi and falsely blamed a video, lying to Congress, the public and to the family of those that died.

Maybe he could have pointed out that she said she had absolutely no responsibility for security at our overseas facilities and that she didn’t send or receive one classified document in her four years as Secretary of State.

Maybe Bill could have explained where the world is better off after the last 7½ years of Hillary, Obama and Kerry.  When people say that she is the most qualified person ever to run for President they could possibly list accomplishments.  Traveling, holding a title, knowing peoples’ names and being born a woman are not actual accomplishments.

Continue reading

Why is the media ignoring the fact there were OTHER killers beside racist Micah X Johnson?!

Socialism is not the Answer

This is not the first time the media has ignored the facts. Recently in the San Bernardino shooting, witness reported seeing a third shooter, during a press conference,  police stated they were still looking for the third shooter after the other two were killed.

Witnesses from the Oklahoma City bombing back in 1995 reported seeing a third person but the FBI and the DOJ  both said there was only two. For some time now I have stated to watch the other hand, a corrupt government always has an ace up their sleeve. But hey, that’s just my opinion.

1 Dragon

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vwknjlBGjaU/UgceZyQ_SLI/AAAAAAAAli8/i4lEuKi-Uyw/s1600/government+secrecy+6+(1).jpg

Image via truthliesdeceptioncoverups.info

 

Free Republic
Hey, just wanna put this out there: the media is focused so much on this MX Johnson, but let’s not forget he DID NOT ACT ALONE, despite his claims that he did.

Remember that video from up above, shot on a phone, where the cop is shot a point blank range?

There was more than one shooter, but the media seems to have gone silent on that.

Republicans Might Be Looking to Cave to the Muslim Brotherhood Next Week

blogs.dallasobserver.com

blogs.dallasobserver.com

 

Independent Sentinel

We have witnessed recent radical Islamic terror attacks and thanks to the lack of any real opposition, the left has been able to make the failed terrorism policies of this administration into conversations about gun violence and Islamophobia. Some even blamed the GOP for the Orlanda attack.

Instead of dealing with the issues, side issues become the issues and our legislators come up with more big government programs and waste more money that will never be accounted for. They have just such a program coming up next week.

Senator Ted Cruz conducted a hearing last week in which it was revealed that the Department of Homeland Security under Jeh Johnson has been deleting counter-terrorism research and terminology. It is being done at the request of Muslim Brotherhood organizations.

When Johnson was asked about it by Cruz, he arrogantly stated that he knew nothing of it. He has no intention of checking it out either.

One might have thought the Republicans would put up a fight but they haven’t. So far they have rejected anti-gun measures that take away our Due Process rights and we must be grateful for that. However, they did cave on the terrorism issue in general.

The Republicans will take part in a vote on a new bill H.R. 5611 which throws more big government and more unaccountable money at a department that is meant to grow into a Muslim community counter-terrorism program. The Office for Partnerships to Prevent Terrorism will engage Muslims to counter the terrorism by appointing yet another unelected bureaucrat – an assistant secretary – who will be accountable to no one in Congress.

Continue reading

In Clinton Case, Obama Administration Nullifies 6 Criminal Laws

Zero Hedge

When the Obama Administration, on July 5th, ruled that in regard to Hillary Clinton’s privatized email system while she was Secretary of State, “Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” to a grand jury, because “We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges,” they ignored the following six U.S. criminal laws, each of which undeniably describes very well what she did:

18 U.S. Code § 2232 — Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure

(a) Destruction or Removal of Property To Prevent Seizure

Whoever, before, during, or after any search for or seizure of property by any person authorized to make such search or seizure, knowingly destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of preventing or impairing the Government’s lawful authority to take such property into its custody or control or to continue holding such property under its lawful custody and control, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Impairment of In Rem Jurisdiction

Whoever, knowing that property is subject to the in rem jurisdiction of a United States court for purposes of civil forfeiture under Federal law, knowingly and without authority from that court, destroys, damages, wastes, disposes of, transfers, or otherwise takes any action, or knowingly attempts to destroy, damage, waste, dispose of, transfer, or otherwise take any action, for the purpose of impairing or defeating the court’s continuing in rem jurisdiction over the property, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

Continue reading

FBI Rewrites Federal Law to Let Hillary Off the Hook

https://tariganter.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/ashamed-america.jpg?w=540&h=545

Image via tariganter.wordpress.com

 

Family Security Matters

by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

Yet, Director Comey recommended against prosecution of the law violations he clearly found on the ground that there was no intent to harm the United States.

In essence, in order to give Mrs. Clinton a pass, the FBI rewrote the statute, inserting an intent element that Congress did not require. The added intent element, moreover, makes no sense: The point of having a statute that criminalizes gross negligence is to underscore that government officials have a special obligation to safeguard national defense secrets; when they fail to carry out that obligation due to gross negligence, they are guilty of serious wrongdoing. The lack of intent to harm our country is irrelevant. People never intend the bad things that happen due to gross negligence.

I would point out, moreover, that there are other statutes that criminalize unlawfully removing and transmitting highly classified information with intent to harm the United States. Being not guilty (and, indeed, not even accused) of Offense B does not absolve a person of guilt on Offense A, which she has committed.

It is a common tactic of defense lawyers in criminal trials to set up a straw-man for the jury: a crime the defendant has not committed. The idea is that by knocking down a crime the prosecution does not allege and cannot prove, the defense may confuse the jury into believing the defendant is not guilty of the crime charged. Judges generally do not allow such sleight-of-hand because innocence on an uncharged crime is irrelevant to the consideration of the crimes that actually have been charged.

It seems to me that this is what the FBI has done today. It has told the public that because Mrs. Clinton did not have intent to harm the United States we should not prosecute her on a felony that does not require proof of intent to harm the United States. Meanwhile, although there may have been profound harm to national security caused by her grossly negligent mishandling of classified information, we’ve decided she shouldn’t be prosecuted for grossly negligent mishandling of classified information.

I think highly of Jim Comey personally and professionally, but this makes no sense to me.

Finally, I was especially unpersuaded by Director Comey’s claim that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case based on the evidence uncovered by the FBI. To my mind, a reasonable prosecutor would ask: Why did Congress criminalize the mishandling of classified information through gross negligence? The answer, obviously, is to prevent harm to national security. So then the reasonable prosecutor asks: Was the statute clearly violated, and if yes, is it likely that Mrs. Clinton’s conduct caused harm to national security? If those two questions are answered in the affirmative, I believe many, if not most, reasonable prosecutors would feel obliged to bring the case.

A version of this piece also appeared on National Review  Online.

Benghazi shows that if we are ever attacked while obama is President, we are absolutely screwed

Flopping Aces
 

Today terrorists attacked Attacked airport in Istanbul, Turkey, at last count leaving 28 dead and at least 60 injured:

— At least 28 people have been killed and 60 others wounded in the attack on Istanbul Ataturk Airport in Turkey, Istanbul Gov. Vasip Sahin told Turkey’s state-run news agency TRT. It is unclear if the total includes the bombers. Another report, from semi-official news agency Anadolu, said six of the wounded are in critical condition. A total of 49 ambulances were sent to the site.
— Turkey’s Justice Minister Bekir Bozdag earlier said at least 10 people were killed and 20 others injured. The suicide bombers were also killed. Bozdag said one attacker “first opened fire with a Kalashnikov then detonated himself” at the airport entrance.
— In total three bombs exploded, the governor told TRT.
–One of them was located just outside a terminal on the pavement, while the other was at the security gate at the entrance to the airport, Bozdag told CNN.
— Authorities said no bombs exploded within airport buildings, according to the minister.
— A video posted to Twitter shows a view from a camera inside an airport terminal. A few dozen people are walking around when a bright flash and fireball erupt in the background.
— A Turkish official told CNN that police fired shots at suspects near the international terminal in an effort to neutralize them.
— Videos posted on social media show travelers sitting on the airport floor. A man shouts, “Get down! Get down!” Someone cries as a gunshot rings out.

As I write, the estimated death toll is now 50.

Continue reading

Red Democrats: Meet The Communists And Socialists On The Dems Platform Drafting Committee

New Zeal

By: Trevor Loudon

Several communists and radical anti-American socialists now serve on the influential Democratic Party Platform Drafting Committee.

Democrats_Communist_Donkey_01_220px

None of them covertly infiltrated their way onto this important body. All were appointed at the request of Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton or at the discretion of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Many of those appointed have been involved with Democratic Socialists of America, which despite its name is a communist group based on the theories of Italian Communist party theoretician Antonio Gramsci – an advocate of revolution through infiltration. Others come from more traditionally communist groups.

gromp-1

These appointments prove that whether Bernie, or Hillary (or Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren) prove victorious in the primary, Marxists will set the policy direction for the Democratic Party. No matter who wins, the fix is in for socialism.

Continue reading