President Obama: Accessory to the Crimes Committed By Illegal Aliens?

Family Security Matters

by MICHAEL CUTLER

 

On April 19, 2016, the House Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security conducted a hearing on the topic, “The Real Victims of a Reckless and Lawless Immigration Policy: Families and Survivors Speak Out on the Real Cost of This Administration’s Policies.”

I urge you to watch the entire video of that important hearing. And then I recommend that you provide information about that hearing to as many folks as possible.

The witnesses at this hearing were: Sheriff Charles Jenkins of Frederick County, Maryland; Michelle Root, the mother of Sarah Root; Laura Wilkerson,  the mother of Joshua Wilkerson; and Bishop Minerva Carcaño of the United Methodist Church.

The timing of the hearing could not have been better because the day before, on Monday, April 18th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the administration’s implementation of the DAPA program (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents). A CNN news report, “Supreme Court divided on Obama’s immigration actions,” focused on this program, which is a follow-on to the DACA program (Deferred Action, Childhood Arrival), which largely paralleled the failed DREAM Act.

Continue reading

Government Launches Assault on 90 Conservative, Libertarian Groups

 

Independent Sentinel

The Democrat attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands is now targeting 90 conservative and free market groups in a phony and corrupt racketeering scheme meant to silence all opposition to the climate change movement. They have subpoenaed all their records and communications on climate change, even confidential donor information.

The lawsuit is based on the twisted assumption that denial of climate change constitutes fraud and anyone perpetrating it is liable for prosecution under the law.

It’s to silence opponents, allowing radicals, neo-Fascists and revolutionaries to act freely on this issue.

Continue reading

John Kerry Betrayed America to Follow International Law

https://i0.wp.com/static1.businessinsider.com/image/535ea70869bedd84679c9161/john-kerry-is-getting-slammed-for-using-the-a-word-with-israel.jpg

businessinsider.com

 

 

Independent Sentinel

John Kerry officially signed the UN Climate Change Plan last week and he will not submit it to the Senate despite the fact that it is a treaty. He has every intention of implementing it, however.

John Kerry is not abiding by the Constitution, he’s abiding by the will of the UN.

It is dangerous and it threatens American workers and employers as Rep. Babin wrote in a press release. The representative from Texas said that the president will not submit it to Congress as required under the Constitution.

Bureaucrats, globalists, the UN dictators club have hailed the news.

Americans will face higher energy costs, smaller paychecks, and fewer high-paying jobs. It will do nothing for the planet and that is an easily provable point.

For this reason, Rep. Babin wrote that he has “cosponsored a resolution instructing the President to follow the U.S. Constitution and submit the agreement to the Senate as a treaty for its advice and consent. As the representative of an area that is a leading energy producer and user, I will continue helping lead the charge in Congress to block funding for this radical United Nations plan.”

We have to pass a bill to require the president follow the Constitution and there is no outrage?

Why isn’t every congressmen signed on to this?

Missing 13th Amendment To The United States Constitution

Socialism is not the Answer

If this is true………..it answers a lot of questions. Let’s face it, it is the reason your Reps don’t really care what you think. What they do is illegal, corrupt and punishable by death if We the People got our hands on them, but hey, that’s just my opinion.

1 Dragon

 

1800politics.com

1800politics.com

Free Republic

Reprinted from the Oregon Observer for April 1997 with permission [Note: See Becraft on the Missing 13th. Forest ] ________________________________________ In 1983 David Dodge and Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records in a Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. They uncovered probably the most explosive evidence ever uncovered in our history. They uncovered the United States Constitution printed in 1825, which was to prohibit lawyers from serving in Government.

Extensive research since then has uncovered the following:

1.) The unlawful removal of a ratified 13th Amendment from the US Constitution.

2.) The Amendment had been printed in at least 18 separate publications by 11 different states and territories from 1819 to 1868.

3.) The Amendment was secretly removed from documents by a group of lawyers and bankers. In its place was entered the slave Amendment, which was the 14th amendment, which was changed to the 13th Amendment. All of this occurred during the turmoil of the civil war.

4.) Since the Amendment was not lawfully repealed, it is still the law of the land.

5.) Colorado printed the correct 13th Amendment in 1668. [This probably should read 1868.]

The following is why the Amendment was written and what the meaning is: (Keep in mind we had just fought the Revolutionary War.) The “title of nobility” and words such as “nobility,” “honour,” “emperor,” “king,” “esquire” and “prince” normally would lead you, today, to dismiss this Amendment.

Just Read More

Continue reading

EPA Will Soon Seize Control of America’s Power Grid

Independent Sentinel

The current administration and the future Democrat administrations have promised to seize complete control of the energy industry to destroy fossil fuels. The Democrats have the EPA writing legislation to make it happen.

Barack Obama promised coal companies that if they wanted to build a coal-fired plant, they could but he’d bankrupt them.

He followed through by pushing Peabody Energy Corp. Arch Coal, Alpha Natural Resources, Patriot Coal and Walter Energy into Chapter 11.

He has his Democrat States Attorneys General investigating Peabody for not believing in his extreme climate change mantra. They plan to prosecute Exxon Mobil and a Libertarian think tank, American Enterprise Institute, for not abiding by their dictum. They say they will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law. These companies are not only banned from having free speech, they are being compelled to speak as the government requires. Read the story at The Washington Post.

Robert Murray, CEO and owner of Murray Energy Corporation, said it was a war on fossil fuels which it is of course.

Continue reading

Team Obama’s War On NASCAR

Secure Freedom Minute fsm logo

SECURE FREEDOM MINUTE

According to President Obama, the greatest threat we face is climate change. So his administration has gone to war on, wait for it, NASCAR.

That’s right. The Environmental Protection Agency under the direction of its regulate-everything-in-sight administrator, Gina McCarthy, has reportedly decided that – in the interest of cutting gases that supposedly contribute to planetary warming – the conversion of street cars into race cars will have to be restricted.

It’s not clear whether making it harder to upgrade regular cars into racing machines will make an iota of difference in world surface temperatures. Even the UN acknowledges that far more dramatic regulations won’t have appreciable impact. What is a pretty safe bet, though, is that the EPA’s ruling will inflame the nation’s millions of NASCAR fans – and give them a reason to vote this fall.

nascar-sprint_ AUTO RACING

Global Warming Deniers Beware

https://libertyendanger.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/global-warming-hoax2.jpg?w=555&h=337

Image via muskegonpundit.blogspot.com

 

Independent Sentinel

The government plans to shut down global warming doubters and compel speech that aligns with the leftist ideology on the subject. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative Libertarian think tank prominent for its skeptical viewpoint in climate-policy debates is under assault and the government hopes to shut them down.

The government is, as CEI puts it, criminalizing people for policy differences through RICO-style investigations.

No matter what your opinion is of climate change, the question here is whether the government can use force to compel speech or silence dissent.

Continue reading