Oops: Turns out the Iran deal breaks the law


Free Republic


It’s usually the first warning to someone who’s about to enter into a complicated legal agreement: Be sure to read the fine print.

Looks like President Obama and the team that negotiated the disastrous nuclear deal with Iran didn’t do that. Or, worse still, they did — but hoped no one else would. Too late for that.

Fox News’ James Rosen reports some senior US officials involved in the negotiations have concluded that a key element of the deal conflicts with federal law and can’t be implemented.

Unless Congress changes the law, that is. But since majorities in both houses opposed the deal, why would they help it now?

Especially since it involves sanctions relief — freeing up tens of billions to Tehran for use in supporting its terrorist allies.

At issue is a provision allowing foreign subsidiaries of US firms to do business with Iran.

Oops: The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act, signed into law by Obama in 2012, specifies that this can only happen if Iran is removed from the State Department’s list of terror sponsors and the president certifies that Iran has permanently ceased the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.

Iran has said loudly it won’t stop boosting terror, and the deal doesn’t even pretend to permanently stop it from building nukes.

If the deal were a treaty ratified by Congress, it would be near-impossible to challenge in court. But it’s not a treaty — and this fine-print problem is an open invitation to legal challenge.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com

Mark Levin: Time to Start Using the ‘I-Word’


PJ Media via Mark Levin Show

On his radio show yesterday, Mark ‘The Great One’ Levin said that Republicans “have to grow a set” and go after the imperial president, also known as President Barack Obama. He said this in response to a question from a listener who wondered whether it was time for Republicans to throw around the ‘I-word’: impeachment.

Continue reading

Are you ready for the era of the dictator President?

hillary dictator 

Flopping Aces

Barack Obama has trampled the Constitution both literally and figuratively. He is the closest thing to a dictator of the United States we’ve seen in a very long time. President McStompyfeet has a hissy fit every time Congress doesn’t obey him exactly as he demands and he then sets off on an uncharted course, bending every conceivable law to its limit to satiate his wants.

Congress isn’t jumping to act immediately following the Oregon shooting of nine white people by a black man and so it’s Executive Action for our Chavez/Maduro wannabe.

In response to the latest mass shooting during his presidency, President Obama is seriously considering circumventing Congress with his executive authority and imposing new background-check requirements for buyers who purchase weapons from high-volume gun dealers.

Under the proposed rule change, dealers who exceed a certain number of sales each year would be required to obtain a license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and perform background checks on potential buyers.

As the president heads to Roseburg, Ore., on Friday to comfort the survivors and families of those killed in last week’s mass shooting at Umpqua Community College, the political calculus around his most vexing domestic policy issue is shifting once again.

Barack Chavez has only until January 2017 to inflict more of his version of social justice on this country and he’s got a lot of work in front of him.


Now Hitlary Hillary Clinton wants in on the action. Clinton already thinks herself better than anyone and truly believes rules are not for her. Fortunately, people are beginning to see it.

The response from the focus group was so negative Morning Joe had to cut parts of it out so the liberals on the show would not have tantrums.

Continue reading

Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism’ In U.S.




Free Republic

via Breitbart.com

On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.

This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.

The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?

After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

What is a global police force doing in our cities?

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com

Obama’s Planned Surrender of the Internet Might Have Hit a Snag


Independent Sentinel

There are a number of assaults on the Internet underway by liberals and globalists. One involves Obama’s “internationalizing” of the Internet but some in Congress think it might be unconstitutional.

In the end, it’s all about control, centralization and globalization under the U.N.

Continue reading