THE DAILY PEN NEW YORK, NY – While preparing the second part of our investigative report on the statistical examination of the contents of the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, there are a few things we need to be reminded of about this contemptible, overemphasized record.

Lt. Colonel, Dr. Terry Lakin, willingly sacrificed his unblemished 20-year military career and served prison time by rightfully refusing deployment orders when Obama refused to provide it.
Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of multiple investigative best sellers and nemesis to John Kerry’s mendacious attempt at the 2004 U.S. presidency, published yet another best seller because Obama refused to provide it. A State of Georgia administrative law court convened a hearing over it. Arizona law enforcment and investigative personnel are preparing to issue a formal report over it. Before all this, Hillary Clinton “PUMA” supporters started the “birther” movement during the 2008 Primary campaign when Obama refused to provide it

. Former Philadelphia Deputy District Attorney and life-long registered Democrat, Philip Berg filed a lawsuit in August of 2008 because Obama refused to provide it.

“…Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children…in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen…”

Senate Resolution 511 affirming John McCain’s presidential eligibility was debated and unanimously passed based on a definition of natural-born parentage which his opponent did not possess, after Congressional senators refused to demand it.
Congressional representatives tried eight times to change the Constitution by removing the Natural-born citizenship clause of Article II between 2004 and 2008 when they couldn’t find it.
Former senior Hawaii elections clerk, Tim Adams, in charge of verifying voter eligibility, with access to national and international identity verification databases, as well as hospital records, was told to stop asking about it because it, apparently, didn’t exist.
Seven different reporters from four newspapers in Hawaii, and a national radio host, could not find it, yet that same media repelled inquiries for years claiming that Hawaii’s health department could not provide it.
Former director of the Hawaiian Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, said she had seen it, but her boss, Hawaii governor and self proclaimed “friend” of Obama, Neil Abercrombie, as manager of that same municipality, could not find it.
Obama says that he possessed it as a teenager in the 1970s, but current Lt. governor of Hawaii, Brian Schatz, serving as the Democrat Party of Hawaii Chairman in 2008, across the street from the Hawaiian Department of Health, refused to certify Obama’s nomination as “constitutionally eligible” when he could not find it.
The Hawaiian district attorney was forced to refer a customized copy of an Official Certification of Nomination to the DNC party headquarters, headed by Nancy Pelosi, for permission to “legally” put Obama’s name on the ballot in his own state, because he couldn’t find it.
Former Hawaii election’s commission chairman, Kevin Cronin, resigned after a dispute with Schatz over eligibility documentation procedures and deadlines related to Obama’s appearance on the Hawaiian ballot in October, 2008, when he couldn’t find it.
34-year-old Schatz was suddenly elevated to his current status as the youngest Lt. Governor in Hawaii’s history without ever having served in government. Schatz’s won the election without public appearance or publicly campaigning, having filed an application for his candidacy just days before the ballot inclusion deadline, against the protests of nearly ten other long-standing democrats who suspected Schatz’ sudden ascendance to power was because he remained silent about not being able to find it.
The Hawaii Election Commission called a special session with Schatz and the attorney general along with Obama, who made an emergency trip to Hawaii to visit his sick grandmother, on October 24th, 2008, the deadline for being included on the Hawaii ballot, to discuss Obama’s eligibility, when they couldn’t find it.
Donald Trump conducted an investigation as a prospective presidential candidate, (until his television contract was renewed), but he couldn’t find it.
Then suddenly, in April, 2011, right before the release of Corsi’s book, and Lakin from prison, and Trump’s television deal, and Fukino from her position, and the 2012 presidential campaigns, an image of it suddenly appears.
Pristine and jewel-laden for the world to behold, the most conveniently absent document in American history is suffered forthwith on the most corruptible, anonymously accessible “crime scene” in human history, the internet.
When the absurdity of the image began to pressure the Obama administration to answer for its belated appearance, bizarre format and lack of authenticity, rather than uphold the “transparency touchstone” of his fraudulent presidency, he allegedly orders the end of Osama Bin Laden in a Pakistani raid and secretly disposes of the body without public confirmation or evidence while telling the world what a wonderful president he thinks he is.
Meanwhile, we learn the Pakistani government conveniently acquired top secret military technology from “wreckage” we left after the raid as compensation for that government’s cooperation in upholding Obama’s mendacious tale that Bin Laden was, in fact, alive before he released his birth certificate, and then conveniently dead after.
When the founding fathers composed the Constitution, they had no idea what a birth certificate was. They were guided by the timelessness of natural law, the laws of nature, to determine the matter of course. By these laws, America became the greatest nation in human history.
The only so-called vital records in the late 1700s were “Bills of Mortality” which listed the names of dead people and were posted by undertakers at the outer limits of villages ravaged by various epidemics such as plague and typhoid fever. The only method for recording births came from parishioners who informally documented infant christenings in the church.
The language used by the founders to write the U.S. Constitution was based in the culture of the era, just as ours is today in how we speak, write and construct our laws. Therefore, drawing nomenclature from precedence, they were forced to convey concepts of their understanding of advanced citizenry by citing natural law and highly regarded principles which were embraced by the greatest majority of the people.
WHERE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL SOVEREIGNTY COMES FROM Much of the evidence mounting against Obama demonstrates how ridiculous this entire affair has become. That some birth certificate from a little island in the Pacific is more qualified to determine the eligibility of president over the constitution and its historical founding principles. The use of the term “Natural-born citizen” in clarifying the eligibility requirements for a U.S. presidential candidate in Article II of the Constitution was a well earned right following the blood-ransom paid to win the Revolutionary War. It was also a highly incendiary term, intentionally taken from a document written in the language of Great Britain’s other enemy at the time, French. It was a term, expressed in the “Law of Nations” meant to convey a distinct message to the British monarchy and its society after the war. We are sovereign in our right to govern ourselves without your plural allegiances, royal cross-breeding and incestuous demography.
In Chapter 19, Section 212 of the “Law of Nations” it is stated:
“…Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children…in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
This is a powerful, sardonic conviction of Obama’s eligibility to be President. Today, however, a certain strain of American society is perishing under the loss of its vintage identity. The most ironic and contemptible message from Obama’s deception is that it’s apparently acceptable now to be illegitimately conceived to a British father and still qualify for the U.S. presidency as a “Natural-born citizen” without so much as a question about its constitutionality from vetting authorities, media or election officials.
Today, you can apparently be born under foreign paternity on a remote, multicultural, migratory island hub way out in the Pacific ocean, move to Indonesia with your foreign, non-citizen step-father, attend school under the name and religious identity of that patriarch, then suddenly reappear back on the island four years later under suspicious circumstances without any evidence of repatriation, and none of these circumstances prompts anyone in our government or media to ever so much as question your claim to Natural-born eligibility.
Barack Hussein Obama is the reason our fathers wrote, with divine awareness of posterity, Article II of the Constitution.
Our government’s failure to uphold the preeminence and sanctity of the U.S. Constitution with understanding of how our founders would have regarded Barack Obama today is the single greatest offense committed upon the American people in the entire 250 years of our history. Forebodingly, the weight and damage of the crisis has yet to remit its stored wrath against the menacing perpetrators and passive abettors alike.



  1. Reblogged this on Boudica BPI Weblog and commented:
    A lot of unanswered questions about this Obama character!

  2. Still waiting for this jerk to get vetted.

  3. Reblogged this on Cmblake6's Weblog and commented:
    Excellent argument, all of the points in this ones I have used myself, or have linked others saying.

  4. All of us are! I rather see him vented than vetted! Now that funny I don’t care who you are!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s