‘She guards it pretty closely’
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the State Department provided a previously hidden email which shows that top State Department officials used and were aware of Hillary Clinton’s email account.
On December 24, 2010, Daniel Baer, an Obama State Department deputy assistant secretary of state, writes to Michael Posner, a then-assistant secretary of state about Clinton’s private email address:
Baer: “Be careful, you just gave the secretary’s personal email address to a bunch of folks …”
Posner answers: “Should I say don’t forward? Did not notice”
Baer responds: “Yeah-I just know that she guards it pretty closely”
Mr. Posner had forwarded Clinton’s email address, which was contained in an email sent to State Department senior leadership, about WikiLeaks.
It appears the State Department produced this email in 2016 in redacted form, blacking out Clinton’s personal email address and the discussion about Clinton’s wanting to keep her email address closely guarded.
Judicial Watch sought the email after a former top Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) State Department official testified to Judicial Watch about reviewing it between late 2013 and early 2014.
The testimony and the email production comes in discovery granted to Judicial Watch on the Clinton email issue in a FOIA lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Clinton also faces potential questioning under oath in this lawsuit.
Despite a recent court order requiring production of the email, the DOJ and State Departments only produced it 10 days ago after Judicial Watch threatened to seek a court order to compel its production.
“Judicial Watch just caught the State Department and DOJ red-handed in another email cover-up – they all knew about the Clinton email account but covered up the smoking-gun email showing this guilty knowledge for years,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
The scope of court-ordered discovery that produces this email find includes: whether Secretary Clinton used private email in an effort to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); whether the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 and 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.
During a recent hearing, Judge Lamberth specifically raised concerns about a Clinton email cache, firstname.lastname@example.org, discussed in a letter to Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) and wants Judicial Watch to “shake this tree” on this issue.
Judge Lamberth also criticized the State Department’s handling and production of Clinton’s emails in this case stating, “There is no FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence.”
The court rejected DOJ and State efforts to derail further Judicial Watch discovery. Judge Lamberth called their arguments “preposterous” and cited a prior Judicial Watch FOIA case in which he ordered U.S. Marshals to seize records from a Clinton administration official.
Judge Lamberth detailed how the State Department “spent three months from November 2014 trying to make this case disappear,” and that after discovering the State Department’s actions and omissions, “Now we know more, but we have even more questions than answers. So I won’t hold it against Judicial Watch for expanding their initial discovery request now.”
Judge Lamberth stated his goal was to restore the public’s faith in their government, which may have been damaged because of the Clinton email investigation.
The court granted Judicial Watch seven additional depositions, three interrogatories and four document requests related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. Hillary Clinton and her former top aide and current lawyer Cheryl Mills were given 30 days to oppose being deposed by Judicial Watch.
On December 6, 2018, Judge Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”
This Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of the Clinton email system in 2015.
Judicial Watch’s discovery over the last several months found many more details about the scope of the Clinton email scandal and cover-up:
- John Hackett, former Director of Information Programs and Services (IPS) testified under oath that he had raised concerns that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s staff may have “culled out 30,000” of the secretary’s “personal” emails without following strict National Archives standards. He also revealed that he believed there was interference with the formal FOIA review process related to the classification of Clinton’s Benghazi-related emails.
- Heather Samuelson, Clinton’s White House liaison at the State Department, and later Clinton’s personal lawyer, admitted under oath that she was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in June 2016.
- Justin Cooper, former aide to President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation employee who registered the domain name of the unsecure clintonemail.com server that Clinton used while serving as Secretary of State, testified he worked with Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, to create the non-government email system.
- In the interrogatory responses of E.W. (Bill) Priestap, assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, he stated that the agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President.
- Jacob “Jake” Sullivan, Clinton’s senior advisor and deputy chief of staff when she was secretary of state, testified that both he and Clinton used her unsecure non-government email system to conduct official State Department business.
- Eric Boswell, former assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, testified that Clinton was warned twice against using unsecure BlackBerry’s and personal emails to transmit classified material.
“Since corrupt people unite among themselves to constitute a force, then honest people must do the same.” —Tolstoy
The Democratic Party’s obsession with booting President Trump from office has gone from the ridiculous to the absurd.
Robert Mueller’s $40M “investigation” into Trump’s supposed Russian collusion was in the end a cover-up operation that came up with nothing with which to charge Trump, let alone impeach him. Rep. Jerry Nadler’s committee opened an inquiry to see if the president had committed any impeachable crimes, which was ultimately a fishing expedition.
Then the oleaginous Rep. Adam Schiff came up with a new plan of attack. Over the span of a few weeks, he crafted a complaint behind the scenes with a partisan CIA spy and leaker who has an obvious axe to grind. They called this spy a “whistleblower,” then changed the rules that previously required a whistleblower to have firsthand knowledge about the nature of his complaint before releasing his statement of charges to Congress. This person, “not a direct witness,” had no such knowledge of President Trump’s phone calls, and his complaint is mostly hearsay and rumor. Once the rules were surreptitiously changed, the complaint was released with the Left’s usual media-propelled fanfare and a new impeachment inquiry was announced with glee, the kind of glee Pelosi called “sadness.”
As usual, Democrats truly believe that all of us out here in flyover country and on both coasts are unable to grasp the truth of their silly subterfuge.
This scheme too went awry. Schiff claimed that Trump had demanded that the president of Ukraine “dig up dirt” on Joe Biden and held up aid money to ensure a quid pro quo. To Schiff’s shock, Trump released a transcript of the call which contained nothing like what Schiff alleged. There was no national security breach. It certainly contained nothing impeachable. Why Schiff went ahead and read his ill conceived, idiotic version of the conversation imagined in “mob talk” is a mystery. Schiff has destroyed any credibility he may still have had. He should resign in disgrace. What he did was monstrous.
So why have the Democrats become so hysterical and careless in their efforts to see Trump impeached that they are making serious mistakes like the tempest about a phone call that Schiff just badly mismanaged?
Because they know that A.G. Barr’s and John Durham’s investigations into their roles and the roles of many Democrats in the Russian collusion hoax are going to be devastating.
I.G. Horowitz’s report on FISA abuse too will reveal just how extensive and how criminal the plot to destroy Trump was from 2015 to the present. When in 1998, then-president Bill Clinton bombed that aspirin factory in Sudan after the bombings of our embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, many believed he did so to create a distraction from the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The film Wag the Dog had been released just two months earlier, and Clinton was desperate to change the news cycle.
It is beginning to be obvious that the Democrat frenzy now is a wholly misguided attempt to distract us from what is soon going to be made public. Perhaps they hope to get Trump out of office before the truth of the DNC/Clinton global conspiracy to derail him leading up to the 2016 election and after is available. They hope all the noise they are making will drown out the truth of the vast corruption on their side. It won’t. Now they hope to dirty up Attorney General William Barr, investigator John Durham, secretary of state Mike Pompeo, and even Vice President Mike Pence in order to invalidate the results of their investigations, but that won’t work, either. Unlike the Democrats in Congress, Barr and Durham appear to be serious, honest men who have not only read the Constitution, but know it well. House speaker Nancy Pelosi constantly references the Constitution but seems to have no grasp of its text. Pompeo is unimpeachable and Pence has probably never uttered a curse word, let alone done anything illegal or unconstitutional. These Democrats are truly grasping at straws.
Pelosi and Schiff held a press conference on Wednesday at which they each pretended to care about the country, about the reduction of the cost of prescription drugs, and USMCA (the revised trade treaty with Mexico and Canada), both of which the Democrats have blocked, just as they have blocked any immigration reform. The Democrats have cooperated on no issue since Trump was elected except spending. Parsing Pelosi’s rambling opening statement could be a comic book; the woman, her sanctimony aside, is mentally scattered. Both Schiff and Pelosi appeared as bug-eyed deer in the light of a train coming down the track. Pelosi rambled and dissembled. The performance, and that is what it was, was a mess. They do not care about what their hate campaign is doing to the country, not one bit. They both blatantly lied, repeatedly, about Trump’s conversation with Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky. It is very clear from the transcript that when Trump asked for his help on the origins of the Russia collusion hoax and mentioned Biden, he was talking about the 2016 election, not 2020. Joe Biden is very likely not on Trump’s radar as a 2020 threat to his re-election.
Pelosi and Schiff know the phone call is a faux scandal but they continue to lie about it and to fundraise on their lies. Both of them are patently disingenuous. Albert Einstein wrote that “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Schiff, Pelosi and all those Democrats who claim Trump should be impeached simply because they don’t like him, have done and are doing terrible damage to the nation. They are harming our allies and rewarding our enemies – on purpose! Because they still cannot accept the results of the 2016 election, they have increasingly become enemies of America. Now is the time for all those well-mannered, quiet, serene and cowardly Republicans in Congress who care about this country’s continued existence as founded to unite and fight back as fiercely as the Democrats fight to destroy it. Words spoken on cable TV are not enough. Appoint a special counsel to investigate Biden’s corruption, Schiff’s lies and malfeasance, and Pelosi’s despicable undergirding of all the unscrupulousness. This means you! Senators Mitch McConnell, Charles Grassley, Mike Lee, John Thune, Roy Blunt, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and the rest of your colleagues who have been sitting on their hands for far too long. We are counting on you to protect and defend the best president we’ve had since Reagan.
It turns out, as Rush Limbaugh noted in a recent broadcast, that the “whistleblower” is a CIA person detailed to the White House. Likely a holdover from Obama, he is John Brennan’s man.
When Obama left office, he left in place a mechanism designed to lead to Trump’s impeachment: The revelations of the intel community about Russian collusion with the incoming president.
Now that those are debunked by the very prosecutor hired to prove them, this same crowd, these same folks, have shifted their emphasis to the Ukraine scandal.
The allegation is that Trump used his official power to induce Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden’s son. But the fact — caught on tape — is that Biden used his power as VP to get Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who was after his son!
Trump does not deserve impeachment for bringing Biden to justice. Biden deserves our condemnation for trying to impede it.
The impeachment drama, begun suddenly by the whistleblower complaint, probably will play out this way:
House Democrats, driven by their blood thirsty base, will vote to impeach. All but their dedicated partisans will see them as over-reaching and ignoring the agenda they were elected to legislate. Party discipline will assure a unanimous Democratic vote to impeach but few if any Republicans will join them. Impeachment will be seen as a partisan ploy rather than the outcome of a real investigation.
Senate Republicans will stand firm and united behind Trump and against impeachment. With the GOP base solid and enraged by impeachment, any who waiver will be harshly disciplined by the threat of primary fights. Only Mitt Romney might break ranks. The House Democratic impeachment trial managers will fall far short of the two-thirds needed to oust Trump. The drama will consume the remainder of 2019 and last well into the primary season of 2020.
Voters will see the Democrats as taking the election out of their hands and trying to remove Trump even as his first term nears its end. Impeachment will hurt the Democrats in 2020 just as it injured the Republicans when they tried to throw out Clinton in 1998.
In the meantime, all the focus on Biden’s son’s role in Ukraine and China will further weaken and eventually destroy Joe Biden’s presidential chances. With Biden out of the way, the Party’s left wing will be triumphant and will nominate Elizabeth Warren.
With the Democrats hurt by impeachment, the economy purring along, and the radical Warren leading them, Trump will likely win re-election, perhaps massively.
Democrats are being forced into a strategic dead end by the exuberant media and their frothing base. But it will not end well for them.
By Sher Zieve
There can no longer be any doubt about the motives of the debauched Democrat Party. With help from the (still-Brennan’s) CIA and the other “intelligence” agencies, they are implementing their DEFCON 1 plan of ‘whatever we need to do, whatever lies we have to tell and whatever and whomever we need to destroy is now acceptable…even if we have to bring down the country. If we can’t regain our full power over it all…it needs to be destroyed, anyway’.
I’ve warned about this for years. And, bringing down the USA—from within—is now in play. Here are a few things that have been and are now happening, separately but simultaneously, by the criminalesque Socialist Democrat Deep State Party to regain its power via increased corruption, lies and force.
Socialist Democrat of America Party (SDAP): “Anything Goes in Order to get rid of Trump!”
Socialist Democrat of America Party (SDAP): “Anything Goes in Order to get rid of Trump!”
There are no longer any moral or ethical boundaries that cannot be crossed by the Socialist Democrats—no matter how heinous and vicious—as long as they’re designed to “get Trump.” The SDAP perps can lie incessantly (think Dem Rep Adam Schiff who had the audacity to rewrite and, then, “respeak” what President Trump had said to President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, in regards to the now made-infamous-by-the-Socialist-Dems perfectly delightful and legal phone call; a call that was leaked to the public by a John Brennan operative…not a true “whistleblower.”
And, the, now, fully-compromised US “intelligence” community surreptitiously and illegally changed the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) of 2012 just a month or so prior to their associate SDAP members beginning their impeachment proceedings. The WPA was drafted and passed by Congress and can only (legally) be amended by Congress. But, the CIA (again and apparently still run by Brennan and not Gina Haspel) did it anyway. The change made was that whistleblowers did not have to adhere to firsthand knowledge of any alleged crime, but could rely on hearsay. This sort of thing would not be allowed in any legitimate court of law. Hearsay is simply not allowed. But, even though the leaker—“whistleblower” a misnomer—is not a legally legitimate source and even though the WPA was illegally changed by the CIA…it is still being allowed to go forward. WHAT??!?
And, what of that call made by President Trump to President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky? In 2014—under Obama’s regime—Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 was passed. It was later amended by Congress to include—amongst other items—“(a) Senate approved amended version of H.R. 4152 by voice vote. The Senate-passed version of H.R. 4152 requires the U.S. government to assist Ukraine to recover assets stolen by the previous regime through corruption; authorizes $50 million in U.S. aid in FY2015 to help Ukraine carry out political and economic reforms…” In other words, US presidents are required to discuss political reforms with Ukraine in order to investigate and weed out corruption.
Impeachment of President Trump?
Therefore, President Trump was not only justified, he was and still is, required to ferret out corruption in Ukraine; corruption—in this case—that led to former Obama V.P. Joe Biden. And, there is also the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 to be considered. It strongly appears that the last administration was even more corrupt than originally thought. So, now, today’s sickly crop of demented Socialist Democrats are working with the CIA and the leftist media to effect a scorched earth policy of one illegal Deep-State Democrat act after another.
Note: The US Justice System has become so perverted that openly illegal acts are now being allowed…but, only if you’re a card-carrying Luciferian Leftist.
Impeach him…for what? It’s being widely touted, these days, that a president of the United States can be impeached for anything the other political side wants. That is simply not true. In order to have a LEGAL impeachment (legalities are things that Democrats believe should be “flexible” or not apply to them at all), high crimes and misdemeanors must have been committed. As no crime whatsoever has been committed by President Trump, he cannot legally be impeached.
Observation: The now-firmly Socialist Democrats have become as rabid as any group of creatures ever witnessed in my lifetime. They flout the laws, read things into the Congressional record that President Trump never said and accuse him of what they have actually done…but, President Trump has not. Democrat Rep. Al Green said that Trump will win the 2020 election unless the Dems impeach him. So, San Fran Nan with her old bag o’ tricks has indicated she’ll do it now.
The State of our Union
This is the State of our Union, folks….and it’s not pretty. This is truly the worst it has ever been. In 2020, election fraud from the Dems will likely be rampant along with the Democrat enforcement groups Antifa and the CIA. We are under assault as never before. There are even anti-Trump RINOs (think Mitt Romney) who are working with the Dems to get rid of our president. Please remember, President Donald J. Trump is working for our country, our people, to right what has been wrong with it for decades and place it back on its intended course. The Democrats and RINOs in Congress are working for themselves. We must win…
“Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness”—Exodus 23: 1
“The wicked lie in wait for the righteous, intent on putting them to death; but the Lord will not leave them in the power of the wicked or let them be condemned when brought to trial”—Psalm 37:32-34
Originally published May 15, 2015, this article should be put forth if representatives had the guts to do what is right and deal with criminal and the usurper, Obama. Doug Vogt recently did a short interview with Honest American News involving the contents of his recently unsealed affidavit. Among other bombshells Doug dropped in the interview was his opinion that Nancy Pelosi will hang for her role in “worst crime in American History.”
Mr. Vogt explains that current Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz, who was Chair of the State Democratic Party in 2008, refused to certify Barack Obama as eligible to be president of the United States. Vogt’s claim is that Schatz knew there was no long form “certificate of live birth” (COLB). Nancy Pelosi made the certification and thus by Vogt’s logic is guilty of treason.
Vogt also talked about the controversy that surrounds him following the unsealing of his affidavit, which was admitted to court. Vogt pointed fingers at many who he believes worked on the forgery, which has “riled a few feathers” in the birther community.
Perhaps the biggest bombshell of all is that Vogt believes he can prove that the assigned number on the certificate could not possibly have been issued to Barack Obama. He has studied the sequencing and has determined that this COLB could not have been issued at that time. This is a critical piece of evidence because it does not involve a scientific examination of layering technology and forgery techniques that could be open to opinion. If the number is proven wrong then that is hard to debate.
Below is an audio clip. The part about Pelosi starts around the 12:45 mark.
Shortly after the 6:00 mark, Vogt mentioned that Hawaii Governor Abercrombie was caught admitting that there is no birth certificate. That audio can be heard below.
Last year we reported on another affidavit from a former Hawaii official, Tim Adams, who stated the same in his sworn testimony.
h/t Birther Report
Kenyans Admit Obama was Born in Kenya…
We were right! In May we reported …
General Flynn was given an ultimatum by the corrupt Mueller team – choose either your son or your country! This grotesque abuse of power and the legal system by the Mueller gang should never have happened and should not go unpunished!
General Flynn worked for the Obama Administration but at some point was fired by Obama for apparently disagreeing with his policies and actions and speaking out against his failed policies in Iraq and Syria. Soon after, then candidate Trump ran for office and General Flynn supported the future President and introduced the candidate at rallies and then was offered a position on the Trump team.
Obama was upset with Flynn for supporting Trump and it appears that he had some sort of vendetta with Flynn for his comments on the growing threat of ISIS.
It’s also suspected that after Flynn parted ways with President Obama he was set up at a dinner with Russians where he was seated next to Russian President Putin in December 2015.
Additional information on the framing of General Flynn was reported from a woman who said she was used as a Russian against the General –
Svetlana Lokhova, the Russian historian at the center of Michael Flynn investigation for ‘alleged contacts with Russians’, told Fox News in an exclusive interview with Catherine Herridge, that she is not a Russian spy and that she thought “there’s a high chance that is was coordinated, and believe it needs to be properly investigated.”
In 2017, American various media outlets framed her as a Russian operative and linked her to Michael Flynn. The allegations involved her contact with Flynn three years prior at a 2014 dinner at the University of Cambridge, England, when Flynn was Defense Intelligence Agency director.
General Flynn’s actions had nothing to do with collusion with Russia. He was set up and spied on!
In October 2016, shortly before the election, based on a bogus and fake dossier financed by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, Obama’s gang of corrupt Intel Heads filed for and eventually obtained a warrant to spy on fellow Americans. The warrants were fraudulent due to their source and made up content.
Obama spied on the Trump team as well as President Trump’s leadership team, including General Michael Flynn for some time. (When and for how long is still unknown. Many suspect this is why Flynn was targeted by the Mueller gang – because Flynn was spied on illegally by the Obama Deep State for some time before the 2016 election most likely based on the phony reports that Flynn was working with Russians. By indicting General Flynn the Deep State could say – see he was a Russian sympathizer and therefore their illegal spying was justified.)
General Flynn was participating in Trump rallies throughout the US and he also became an advisor for the campaign. At this same time the Obama administration was in full force beginning their efforts to frame candidate Trump as a compatriot with Russia to steal the election. One way they did this was to set up Flynn with the Russians.
After Trump eventually won the election, the Deep State that represented and supported Obama was in a panic. They feared that if Flynn looked into efforts to spy on the Trump campaign, they would be found guilty of their many illegal actions in spying on the incoming President, the opposition party and many others.
When President-elect Trump met with President Obama for the first time, Obama even recommended that the future President not select Flynn to be on the Trump administration team. It’s suspected that Obama didn’t want Flynn on Trump’s team because Obama feared Flynn would uncover the illegal spying that the Obama team carried out during the 2016 campaign and before.
So the same FBI investigator who led the Hillary Clinton email investigation:
– The same individual who led the Hillary interview and neglected to take notes, put her under oath or record the meeting
– The same individual who assisted in drafting the memo months before the Hillary was interviewed that was presented by corrupt FBI Director Comey to explain why the FBI was not pressing charges against Hillary
– The same individual who lead the Russia – Trump investigation
– The same individual who neglected to do anything when presented with information that China was hacking Hillary’s emails real-time
– The same individual who personally reviewed over 300,000 Hillary emails found on perp Anthony Weiner’s computer a week before the 2016 election
– The same individual that said all of Weiner’s emails were reviewed in less than a week and no criminally related information was found
– This individual, Peter Strzok, went to the White House a couple days after President Trump’s inauguration and entrapped General Flynn, President Trump’s National Security Advisor, in discussions related to Russia.
Corrupt Strzok asked Flynn questions related to a call Flynn made to a Russian official before the inauguration – totally legal. The rumor is that the FBI Agent with Strzok, Joe Pientka, said Flynn never lied. Strzok and Pientka asked Flynn questions, did not tell him he was under investigation, did not read him his rights, did not allow him to have an attorney and then lied about what was said. The location of the FBI’s original Form 302 recording this discussion is unknown.
After this meeting a few days later, then acting AG Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, went over to the White House and stated that General Flynn had lied to the FBI. Eventually General Flynn resigned from his position at the White House on February 13, 2017.
A few months passed and then the corrupt Mueller investigation started. Mueller’s first target was General Flynn. Mueller had nothing on Flynn so he and his goons went after Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn, Jr. Micheal Jr had a brand new baby and was grilled by the Mueller team. Eventually, they used the General’s family against him. It’s believed that the General could plea guilty to a bogus charge of lying to the FBI or he could watch Mueller’s goons put his son in prison for some bogus crime.
“Make a decision, either your country or your son?”
Mueller’s goons put the General in the worst position possible. He chose his son. The goons then placed the General under a gag order while the media persecuted him for months for a false crime, unrelated to Russia collusion. They paraded him as a criminal.
The judge overseeing the case who took Flynn’s plea was a friend of corrupt cop Strzok and was also a FISA Court judge. He was recused from the sentencing but to this day we don’t know why. They never told Flynn that he was being spied on for months before the election.
The Mueller team and the Deep State and the Democrats didn’t stop with the General, they went after others including the President’s eldest son, Don Jr.
There are so many questions yet unanswered. One question is why did Obama’s Deep State not tell the President that General Flynn was under investigation during his campaign? Who made this decision? This would have been the proper thing to do. Were they afraid that illegitimate spying by the Obama team would be uncovered?
General Flynn is a patriot. He never should have been put in this situation. He was illegally set up and lied to. He was forced to choose between his family or his country. General Flynn chose his family. What would you have done?
Please donate to the Michael T. Flynn Legal Defense Fund. This ordeal has cost him and his family millions.
**** Update October 3, 2017
According to a report at the Epoch Times yesterday:
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s lawyer, Sidney Powell, wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr in early June outlining her belief that the government targeted Flynn for “concocted and political purposes” in order to “take out” President Donald Trump.
She informed Barr that she intended to demand production of a large volume of evidence and suggested “a just resolution” to the Flynn case “if the evidence shows what we believe to be true.” She also made several requests, including for Barr to replace the prosecution team on the case and to determine “when, how, and on what basis the first investigation of General Flynn began.”
In the piece was a link to Sidney Powell’s letter to Barr. One important piece related to the Mueller gang’s actions with General Flynn’s son:
The Mueller goons did go after the General’s son! What the hell kind of crooks are running the DOJ and FBI that landed in the Mueller gang? They should be arrested, indicted and disbarred!
This is the tag line the Dems invented for Nixon – “would you buy a used car from this man?”
It’s even more fitting for crazy-eyes lyin-lips Schiff