The Struggle of Memory Against Forgetting-Obama lies and high-tech harassment.

Frontpagemagazine

President Donald Trump has charged that the previous president tapped his phones during the 2016 election campaign. With Democrats and the old-line establishment media in a fury, the people would do well to recall the 44th president’s high-tech harassment of journalists and his legacy of lies.

“If you like your health plan, you can keep it,” he told the nation. As countless Americans verified, they could not keep the health plan they liked, nor the doctor they liked, and they would not save thousands of dollars a year. In California, the president’s Affordable Care Act was responsible for “widespread consumer misery,” a revival of President Jimmy Carter’s misery index.

The president lied because he knew the ACA was groundwork for his designated successor Hillary Clinton to impose the “public option,” or “single payer,” in reality government monopoly health care. But last November the people turned down the designated successor, and that put the former president and his establishment media allies in a foul mood.

The 44th president, whose mentor was the Stalinist Frank Marshall Davis, deployed the powerful IRS against political opponents, blocking their attempt to secure tax-exempt status. The president claimed “not even a smidgeon of corruption” was involved in the IRS scandal. For the most part, the old-line establishment media accepted the lie, and the president always knew he could get away with anything.

Predictions.What Will Obama Call The San Bernardino Shooting?,Workplace Accident?

Free Republic

Needless to say, President Obama is backed into a corner. So what is he going to say now after a few weeks of begging us to take in Syrian Refugees? And how will Obama describe the shooting? Workplace Violence? Local Shooting? An unexpected shooting? Will he bring up that some of the police there were acting stupidly? Or maybe he will claim that he will not make any accusations until all the facts are in, right?

“Chattanooga Five” Memorial Event Ignored by National Media

Accuracy in Media

An estimated 100,000 people showed up at a memorial event last week in Chattanooga, Tennessee to honor and remember the four Marines and one Navy Sailor who were assassinated at the hands of a Muslim jihadist in July. The national news media chose to ignore this massive outpouring of gratitude and remembrance for these fallen American heroes.  However, while the local media provided ample coverage, they took exception to remarks by Admiral James “Ace” Lyons (ret), who was invited to be one of the principal speakers.

So what were Admiral Lyons’ offensive words that so upset the local officials who organized the event, and the local media who reported on it? Specifically, Admiral Lyons laid the blame for the assassination on the “evil of radical Islam.”

Among other things, he said, “This tragedy never had to happen. They weren’t cut down on a battlefield. This was not workplace violence,” a clear reference to the Obama administration’s characterization of the attack by Major Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 and wounded 32 at Ft. Hood in Texas back in 2009.

Lyons stated “Make no mistake, it is clear our Constitution and way of life are under attack.” He also argued that it was President Obama’s policies that have contributed to the social unrest and the atmosphere of hate.

Alinsky Does Amnesty

Family Security Matters

by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

 

President Obama is an Alinskyite.​

That assertion is not an epithet – well, not primarily. True, I would not describe someone I admired as an “Alinskyite.” Saul Alinsky was a loathsome figure – a radical statist who whose toxic brew of thoroughgoing deceit and brass-knuckles extortion (“direct action”) has become a part of mainstream politics. But in tying the president to the seminal community organizer whose theories and tactics so influenced him, my purpose is more to decode than to insult him.

Of course, calling Obama an “Alinskyite” draws cataracts of condemnation from the Democrat-media complex – for the same reason that Muslim Brotherhood shrieks of “Islamophobe!” inevitably follow any reasoned, scripturally based discussion of Islamic supremacism. People who advance their agendas in dishonesty and stealth can’t afford to have critics shine a light on them. The best diversion is to smear the critic as racist and phobic – or as Alinsky, a master of the game, put it, “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Well, this week Alinsky did amnesty, so let’s not be diverted.

Obama would have called the 9-11 attacks “workplace violence”

Flopping Aces

What does it take before we’re allowed to call domestic Islamic terrorism what it is?

When James Foley was beheaded by a Muslim somewhere in the “Levant” the Obama administration called it a “terrorist attack against our country.” They called it a “barbaric act.”

When a woman is beheaded by a Muslim in Oklahoma the Obama administration calls it “workplace violence.” It seems that the alleged killer, a convert to Islam, was merely carrying out the dictates of the Quran.

Confirmed: Progressive Gun Control Policy to Blame for Second Fort Hood Massacre

Gateway Pundit

In 2009 Islamist killer Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army major and psychiatrist, fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others at Fort Hood Texas.
Fort Hood was a gun-free zone.

Hasan reportedly screamed, “Allahu Akbar!” as he committed his mass murder.

(Examiner)

Barack Obama termed this Islamic terrorist attack – workplace violence.
Complete lunacy.

After the first mass killing nothing changed. Fort Hood is still a gun-free zone. President Bill Clinton’s gun-free policies are still in place.

Last week there was another mass shooting at Fort Hood.
Soldiers were told to take cover and hide like cowards as a crazed gunman shot at least 14 Americans on base.
The shooter, Ivan Lopez, then shot himself in the head when he was confronted by a female security guard with a gun.

Tribute: First Lieutenant Patrick Cook (left) posted his open letter onto Facebook on Monday night in which he praised Sergeant First Class Daniel Ferguson (right) and was deeply critical of authorities who insist on keeping military bases weapons-free zones. (Daily Mail)

On Monday First Lt. Patrick Cook, who was saved by a fellow soldier last week, penned a powerful letter after the shooting.
The Daily Mail reported:

In a powerful, open-letter a soldier whose life was saved by a brave colleague during the Fort Hood shooting has described the desperate attempts of his fellow brothers-in-arms to resuscitate him after he had been fatally wounded.

In the letter posted to Facebook, First Lieutenant Patrick Cook hails the ultimate sacrifice of Sgt. First Class Daniel Ferguson as he barricaded closed a door that wouldn’t lock – crucially keeping shooter Spc. Ivan Lopez outside.

In one horrific passage, Cook recalls how one week on he can still ‘taste the blood’ of Ferguson in his mouth only to then rage and demand the ‘God-given-right’ for soldiers to be armed on base to prevent another massacre happening again.

Here is First Lt. Patrick Cook’s Facebook post:

My letter to Congress, read today at Texas Senate committee on Constitutional Carry. It is now public record.

To my friends, fellow Texans, brothers in arms, members of the committee, and everyone within the sound of my voice, greetings.

My name is First Lieutenant Patrick Cook of the 49th Transportation Battalion, Fort Hood, Texas, and this past Wednesday I found myself trapped in an enclosed room with fourteen of my fellow Soldiers, one of whom was barricading the door against a madman with a .45 pistol when he was fatally shot. Through what I can only describe as a miracle, he somehow found enough strength to continue pushing against that door until the shooter gave up and went elsewhere, at which time he collapsed. Nearly a week later, I can still taste his blood in my mouth from when I and my comrades breathed into his lungs for 20 long minutes while we waited for a response from the authorities. This Soldier’s name was Sergeant First Class Daniel Ferguson, and his sacrifice loaned me the rest of my life to tell this story.

But I write to you today not to memorialize this brave Soldier, nor to tell a war story about how we made the best of a losing situation, but to express the part of that story that some in high positions of power clearly do not want told: I knew this was going to happen. I had been saying for five years that Fort Hood was a tinderbox of another massacre waiting to happen. It had to happen, because our betters failed to learn the obvious lesson of five years ago. Worse yet, I know it will happen again. More will die, more will be wounded, more families will be torn apart, needlessly. It happened again, and will happen again, because Fort Hood is a gun free zone.

When the first shots rang out, my hand reached to my belt for something that wasn’t there. Something that could have put a stop to the bloodshed, could have made it merely an “ugly incident” instead of the horrific massacre that I will surely remember as the darkest twenty minutes of my life. Stripped of my God-given Right to arm myself, the only defensive posture I had left was to lie prostrate on the ground, and wait to die. As the shooter kicked at the door, I remember telling myself, “oh well, this is it.” It is beneath human dignity to experience the utter helplessness I felt that day. I cannot abide the thought that anyone should ever feel that again.

Read the rest here.

Let’s hope politicians have the courage to do the right thing and end gun-free zones on military bases.

Fast track Hasan to his 72 virgins and be done with it

The Patriot Factor

By: Diane Sori

 

      

Justice of sorts comes four years later yet justice has NOT been  fully served for the Purple Hearts that should rightly be given to the  victims and survivors of the Fort Hood Massacre are still being denied  them, because Barack HUSSEIN Obama continues to say that the carnage of  that day is NOTHING but ‘workplace violence’.
And so after numerous trial delays, finally yesterday, fourteen  months after the  first scheduled trial start date, the self-proclaimed ‘soldier of  allah’…Army Major Nidal Hasan…has been found guilty by a 13-member  panel of  high-ranking officers who voted unanimously to convict him on all 45  charges levied against him…13 counts of premeditated murder and 32  counts of attempted  pre-meditated murder…for the November 5, 2009 shooting spree…slaughter  is more like it…at the Fort Hood (Texas) military base. And with this  ‘guilty on all charges’ verdict, Hasan might now very well be the first  person the US military puts to death in more than 50 years, for as the  trial now enters the penalty phase, prosecutors are likely to ask  that this barbarian be put to death by lethal injection.

Attorney for Ft Hood Jihad Victims: Obama & Army “Twisted Rules” to Avoid Admitting Nidal Hasan is a Jihadist

Freedom Outpost

Major Nidal Hasan, the confessed Ft. Hood shooter that killed 13 Americans  and injured nearly 3 dozen others has been on trial.  Why the trial still  goes on after his confession is beyond me.  However, one thing is clear and  that is Barack Obama doesn’t want Nidal Hasan’s actions to be labeled as jihad  or terrorism.  He’s called it “workplace violence,” which is an insult to  anyone’s intelligence and a slap in the face of the victims and their families.   However, the attorney for the victims says that both Barack Obama and the Army  is engage in twisting the rules in order to avoid calling Nidal Hasan a  jihadist.

JihadWatch reports:  

Obama Muzzles Fort Hood Survivors

Moonbattery

Benghazi survivors aren’t the only ones getting muzzled by the Obama Regime:

Autumn Manning, wife of Fort Hood survivor Army Staff Sgt. Shawn Manning, is claiming that the U.S. Department of Defense is “slapping victims with gag orders” and telling family members not to talk to the press following testimony in the trial of Maj. Nidal Hasan.

This prevents survivors from talking about “denial of benefits,” which is still happening after the Obama administration decided to classify the shooting as “workplace violence.” Because of the designation, Fort Hood survivors have been denied combat-related benefits.

Manning later clarified that the DOD’s gag order only applied to witnesses, though she also claims family members were told not to talk to the press.

It will be hard for the Islamophile in Chief to spin this horrific terror attack as run of the mill workplace violence if low-information voters get wind of the self-described “soldier of Allah” Nidal Hasan spouting rhetoric like this in the courtroom:

“The evidence will clearly show that I am the shooter, and the dead bodies will show that war is an ugly thing. … We, the mujahedeen, are imperfect Muslims trying to establish a perfect religion in the land of the supreme God.”

By now maggots should have long since nibbled the last gristle from Hasan’s bones in the cold darkness of his grave. The only trials at this point should be for conspiring with the enemy on the part of any officials playing along with Obama’s absurd “workplace violence” gambit.

Turning a terror attack into a national disgrace.

It’s an Obama World… Fort Hood Islamist Killer Nidal Hasan Paid $278,000 Since Slaughter

Gateway Pundit 

Nidal Hasan has been charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder.

Islamist killer Nidal Hasan has been paid $278,000 since he murdered 13 Americans in a terrorist attack in 2009. NBC DFW reported:

The Department of Defense confirms to NBC 5 Investigates that accused Fort Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan has now been paid more than $278,000 since the Nov. 5, 2009 shooting that left 13 dead 32 injured. The Army said under the Military Code of Justice, Hasan’s salary cannot be suspended unless he is proven guilty.

If Hasan had been a civilian defense department employee, NBC 5 Investigates has learned, the Army could have suspended his pay after just seven days.

Personnel rules for most civilian government workers allow for “indefinite suspensions” in cases “when the agency has reasonable cause to believe that the employee has committed a crime for which a sentence of imprisonment may be imposed.”

Meanwhile, more than three years later soldiers wounded in the mass shooting are fighting to receive the same pay and medical benefits given to those wounded in combat.