Anyone who reads DoJ researcher John Lott’s paper and still denies voter fraud is a fool

NOQ Report

by JD Rucker

Americans have been conned. We are still being conned. This is, in fact, the biggest con-job perpetrated against the masses since WMDs were used as the predicate for permanent Middle East wars. The only reason that con-job was technically bigger is because it fooled more people. This one only seems to be fooling about half of the country. But its effects may end up being even bigger as a corrupt, controlled puppet of the Chinese Communist Party is poised to become the leader of the free world.

Image via WHSV.com

An academic analysis and report written by a Department of Justice researcher may be the clearest indication that massive voter fraud took place. It’s not that it presents additional evidence, but instead dives into the numbers in a way that makes it crystal clear voter fraud was the only viable explanation for surges in votes that were isolated to key counties in swing states. What makes his analysis different from others is that it quantifies the likely voter fraud scope in a way that makes clear it was sufficient to change the results of the election. According to the abstract of his 25-page report:

---

This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election. It first compares Fulton county’s precincts that are adjacent to similar precincts in neighboring counties that had no allegations of fraud to isolate the impact of Fulton county’s vote-counting process (including potential fraud). In measuring the difference in President Trump’s vote share of the absentee ballots for these adjacent precincts, we account for the difference in his vote share of the in-person voting and the difference in registered voters’ demographics. The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.

Second, vote fraud can increase voter turnout rate. Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. However, the increase might not be as large as the fraud if votes for opposing candidates are either lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.

---

The data Lott analyzes and subsequently explains is inexplicable without the presence of massive voter fraud. But it’s bigger than that. The coordination between states becomes apparent when we realize the same process that were used in one county were also applied to others. There are differences in the way the cheaters went about their normal business of cheating before and on election night, but the post-election night injections of ballots were uniform. In other words, they cheated stealthily at first but when it was clear they had still lost, they went with the clumsier, more easily noticeable wholesale fraud attempts.

---

Unfortunately, all of the so-called “arbiters of truth” have declined to cover any of this, just as they’ve covered up the entire process from the start. Mainstream media and Big Tech in particular are complicit in this cover-up to the point that they often do not even try to debunk reports like Lott’s. They simply announce that the election is over and there’s nothing more to be said about it. But the details of Lott’s report are not only worth reading, but definitely worth spreading to the masses. If mainstream media won’t cover it, we will. If Big Tech will try to suppress it, we’ll continue to share anyway.

John Lott is a world-renowned economist and statistician. His work has always been impeccable and this particular research is top notch. There is no feasible way for the left to counter it, which is why they’re focused on keeping it away from as many eyeballs as possible. As we continue to hope and pray for the MOAB to arrive, this isn’t it. But it’s further affirmation of the righteousness of our pursuits. The truth is clearly on our side even if they liars are more powerful and numerous.

Is it a bombshell? Technically, no. It’s a methodical, comprehensive analysis that logically reveals what tens of millions of Americans already knew: The election was stolen through massive, coordinated voter fraud. This is 100% certain.

Watch: Dr. Robert Epstein, Joe Biden Supporter, Shows Evidence “The System Was Rigged Against One Candidate”

The Federalist Papers

By Marmee Rooke

Tucker Carlson came under scrutiny recently after he seemed to attack attorney Sidney Powell for ignoring his call for Ms. Powell to be on his show after Powell made rounds on other nighttime news show alleging she has enough information to overturn the election. Sidney Powell claims she has enough information that the voting systems that the counties in question used could be (and were) manipulated in favor of one candidate.

Tucker claimed that if she had the evidence, she could come on his show and prove it to the world. He said he would give her the full hour, but he insinuated that she could be a fraud since she denied his request.

Maybe in an attempt to save face, or maybe it was a way of making up for his mistake, regardless Tucker Carlson continues to fight to uncover proof of the Republican’s claim of a stolen 2020 election.

In 2019, Tucker Carlson had Dr. Robert Epstein, “one of the world’s foremost experts on the effects of big tech on politics,” on his show to explain how an internet search can change the results of an election.

Dr. Epstein, back in 2019 said, “Google and similar companies like Facebook are completely unregulated in the United States, so they can do whatever they please.” We have seen glimmers of how these companies act when they “are completely unregulated.” The bias is always in favor of one party, and that party isn’t ours.

http://newsweek.com

Dr. Epstein continued saying, “If they all work together in 2020 to support the same presidential candidate, they can shift upwards of 15 million votes with no one knowing that they have been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail.”

Damn, if that doesn’t sound familiar?

Dr. Epstein, a Democrat who clarifies that he does not support President Trump, says that he assembled a team to monitor the effect that these large tech companies could have on the 2020 election.

Dr. Epstein claims he has gathered enough information so far to prove that these large tech companies were responsible for “shifting” 6 million votes and counting.

He says the proof includes a search engine algorithm that delivered unbalanced search results by giving conservatives a harsh liberal slant on search results. He says this coupled with the data showing for “a period of days, when the ‘vote’ reminder on Google’s homepage, was being sent only to liberals – not one of [his] conservative field agents received a vote reminder during those days.”

It wasn’t until after the fourth day of monitoring, and Dr. Epstein making his findings public did Google stop. He said it was the same night that they noticed the algorithm stopped completely.

He said Google wasn’t the only culprit, using manipulations to help their preferred candidate, and that his company was monitoring other companies like Youtube, Facebook, Bing, and Yahoo. With all of the data he has quantified, he believes this was enough to “shift” the election results.

Dr. Epstein says that these large tech companies don’t stop at American elections and use their influence for different political spectrums depending on the company’s need. For example, he claims that Google helped the Chinese government spy on its citizens.

Dr. Epstein says what he feared would happen did happen. He says that whistleblowers from Google, along with undercover video/audio and internal documents, have come out for over a year sounding the alarm that Google wanted President Trump out of the oval office. He claims these videos prove that Google employees would stop at nothing to ensure he didn’t win the Presidency.

Dr. Epstein claims that large tech companies buy academics’ silence off with large research grants.

As Tucker Carlson says, “The 2020 presidential election was not fair. No honest person would claim that it was fair. On many levels, the system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another.”

Lou Dobbs Discusses Voter Fraud Report 834,000 ILLEGALS Voted For HILLARY CLINTON

A study by political scientist Jesse Richman from Old Dominion University in Virginia (https://www.odu.edu/directory/people/…) found that 6.4 percent of the 20 million non-citizens who reside in the United States voted in November’s presidential election.

He then extrapolated these results into support for each presidential candidate, estimating that Clinton would have received 81 percent support from non citizens, therefore receiving an extra 834,000 votes.

The number of 834,000 is significant enough to have tipped some of the closest races in Clinton’s favor, including New Hampshire, Nevada, and Maine, all of which Clinton won by margins of under 3 percent.

It would also have reduced Clinton’s margin of victory in the popular vote, which she won by 2.8 million by dominating cosmopolitan centers such as New York and California.

In the run up to the election, a number of Democratic-run cities were found to be pushing plans to increase the voting rights of non-citizens in order to further strengthen Democratic incumbents.

The Democratic Party has long been in favor of increasing voting rights for non-citizens, as well as felons, in the knowledge that these groups are more likely to vote Democrat rather than Republican.

http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clin…

Judicial Watch: Fitton Weighs in on Illegal Alien Voting

Judicial Watch

Dear Editor/Broadcaster,

In the attached article from Brietbart, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton weighs in on the burgeoning debate over whether illegal aliens voted in the 2016 presidential election…

And he makes it abundantly clear that those who think they didn’t need to think again:

Are we supposed to be so naive as to think that tens of millions of people are here, present in the United States, and none of them are illegally voting? In states where you don’t have voter ID, in states where most voter registration, you’re not required to certify citizenship, other than signing and saying you’re a citizen?

It happens repeatedly where you have these voter registrations signed by aliens because they shouldn’t be voting, so they’re registered to vote – and the irony is, once they’re registered to vote, voter ID ain’t gonna protect you, because they have the ID necessary to vote, once they’re registered. So you have many non-citizens voting in elections, and they vote in large numbers in a way to sway elections.

Fitton knows whereof he speaks.… Both because Judicial Watch has taken the lead in exposing and fighting voter fraud for decades … And because when it comes to protecting election integrity, he wrote the book – or, at least, a compelling chapter.

It’s in his recent bestseller, Clean House, and you can read it here.

As the fight over voter fraud continues to heat up, please feel free to call Jill Farrell (202-664-5188 / jfarrell@judicialwatch.org) for an interview with Tom Fitton — or with the director of Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project, Robert Popper.

Sincerely,

Carter Clews

Communists, Socialists Plot to Get 9 Million Leftist Immigrants Voting by October

Independent Sentinel

Reports are pouring in from across the country that thousands of legal permanent residents from around the world have been inspired by Trump’s rhetoric to become citizens just so they can vote against him. They are also inspired by some sketchy leftist organizations fueled by communist and socialist agendas.

The leftists are working on a turnout of nearly nine million immigrant residents who are allegedly eligible for citizenship.

We are constantly being told there are 12 million illegal immigrants here but the left has come up with 9 million residents in addition, many of whom were given Obama amnesty.

The immigrants, legal and illegal, think that closing the borders, cutting off welfare to foreigners, deporting people here illegally is punishing the innocent because of the ‘few’ terrorists and drug cartels who come through.  After all, they will say, they are coming here out of necessity.

George Soros unveiled an unprecedented $15 million campaign to push the effort to get as many people as possible registered by the October deadline. They expect them to tip the scales in Nevada, Colorado and Florida which would be game over for Republicans.

The groups funded by Soros and other wealthy leftists are telling the people that Trump is a racist, they are entitled to come here illegally, and welfare is their due. This is their civil right they are told.

2016 election – It’s the corruption, stupid

Family Security Matters

LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD

 

There is a potential winning coalition in America, one including Democrats and Republicans, men and women, and all racial and ethnic groups, who believe in one simple proposition – honest, representative government.

We do not have either.

What we do have is a political-media system representing the interests of an oligarchy, a form of government in which all power is vested in a dominant class.  It is composed of financiers and their political and media whores, who finance their avarice by using the tax revenues squeezed from hard-working Americans as a personal hedge fund.

The present American political system is a “totalitarian democracy“, one in which “lawfully” elected representatives rule a nation state whose citizens, although granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of government, nor whose views are ever seriously considered except when they parallel the interests of the oligarchy.

This Conservative’s Anti-Obama Bumper Sticker Is Hilarious… Now It’s Going Viral

Conservative Tribune

Here’s an example of hilarious and good-natured ribbing, targeting liberals and President Obama.

Liberals get outraged whenever you criticize them, their actions, or their policies. They also frequently resort to a disgusting tactics to try to get their way.

This person’s bumper sticker is a great example of using the First Amendment to fight back against a bad government. Such political speech is the right of every American. This driver just did it in an unusually creative and funny way. Kudos to the owner of the car and bumper sticker.

The bumper sticker says, “Obama sucks, and so do liberal cowards who steal my stickers.”

There is no indication of how to get one for yourself, although they might be available somewhere online.

Hat Tip to Legal Insurrection for the source of the photo.

How Many Elections Will Democrats Steal Next Week?

Powerline

How extensive is voter-fraud, especially among non-citizens? Just bring up the question, or suggest we need to have voter-ID at the polls like every other advanced democracy, and the answer will be instantly supplied: You’re a racist. But as Dan McLaughlin points out over at The Federalist, Democrats seem to win a suspiciously high number of close elections, well beyond what a random statistical trial would suggest.

There’s a bombshell academic study out on this issue right now that the media is mostly ignoring (the only exception being the Washington Post’s very fine wonky MonkeyCage blog), in part because it appears in an obscure academic journal, Electoral Studies, that is behind an expensive subscription paywall, and in part because any reporter who does a story about it will be called a racist. Since I’m an academic these days, I’ve got access to the article, “Do Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. Elections?”, by Jesse T. Richman and Gulshan A. Chattha of Old Dominion University and David C. Earnest of George Mason University.

The conclusion of the abstract alone ought to set off alarm bells:

Votes from ‘non-citizens’ could decide the election

American Thinker

A massive study published in the journal of Electoral Studies suggests that hundreds of thousands of “non-citizens” have cast votes in recent elections illegally. In fact, the data suggests that these illegal votes have been the difference in several contests.

Photo via alipac.us

Dick Morris: Dems Attempting to ‘Fix Presidential Elections’

Newsmax

Democrats are bypassing the Constitution as they try to replace the Electoral College with the popular vote as the means by which Americans elect presidents, says Dick Morris.

Supporters of the initiative says it levels the playing field by giving all voters the same amount of power, as opposed to grossly empowering voters in swing states, who enjoy the most attention of presidential candidates during the height of election season.

Morris says it’s a bold-faced attempt to neuter the GOP.

“If this thing passes, Republicans will never again win a presidential race and that’s why all the Democrats are lining up behind it,” Morris told John Bachman and J.D. Hayworth on “America’s Forum” on Newsmax TV.

The legislatures of 10 states and the District of Colombia have passed laws to pledge all of their electoral college representatives to select the winner of the national popular vote, and the measure has already passed one house in 10 other states. It takes 270 Electoral College votes to control the presidential selection. If the 10 states that have adopted the initiative in one house pass it into law, 242 electoral votes would be delegated to the winner of the national popular vote.

Morris, who penned a column on the topic for Newsmax earlier this week, said that Democrats are subverting the Constitutional amendment process with their state-to-state tactics. Constitutional amendments must be ratified in 38 states.

Morris said that if presidents are decided by popular vote, urban areas in traditionally Democratic states would gain new power while the doors to voter fraud would be kicked open.

“First of all, it would [spur] the urban Democratic machines in places like Chicago and D.C. and New York that don’t work too hard at getting out the vote because the states are blue anyway, but now if the popular vote matters, they’ll work like demons in getting out the vote including committing voter fraud,” he said.

“Secondly, right now, if things come down to one state like Florida in the Electoral College, you could look at voter fraud in Florida and probably stop it from ruining the election, but if the fraud could be committed in any precinct in the 50 states and it counts in the popular vote, it’s too large a problem ever to be able to either track or to solve.”

Morris was adamant that this empowerment of urban areas through the popular vote would unfairly benefit Democrats.

“So there’s a reason that of the 20 states that have either adopted this or one House has adopted it, 18 of them are blue states… it’s because this is a conspiracy by the Democratic party to fix presidential elections for the indefinite future,” he said.

Related Stories:

• NY Gov. Cuomo Signs Law to Rig Electoral College

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/democrats-electoral-college-elections-president/2014/04/17/id/566240#ixzz2zEIpLzi4
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!