A study by political scientist Jesse Richman from Old Dominion University in Virginia (https://www.odu.edu/directory/people/…) found that 6.4 percent of the 20 million non-citizens who reside in the United States voted in November’s presidential election.
He then extrapolated these results into support for each presidential candidate, estimating that Clinton would have received 81 percent support from non citizens, therefore receiving an extra 834,000 votes.
The number of 834,000 is significant enough to have tipped some of the closest races in Clinton’s favor, including New Hampshire, Nevada, and Maine, all of which Clinton won by margins of under 3 percent.
It would also have reduced Clinton’s margin of victory in the popular vote, which she won by 2.8 million by dominating cosmopolitan centers such as New York and California.
In the run up to the election, a number of Democratic-run cities were found to be pushing plans to increase the voting rights of non-citizens in order to further strengthen Democratic incumbents.
The Democratic Party has long been in favor of increasing voting rights for non-citizens, as well as felons, in the knowledge that these groups are more likely to vote Democrat rather than Republican.
In the attached article from Brietbart, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton weighs in on the burgeoning debate over whether illegal aliens voted in the 2016 presidential election…
And he makes it abundantly clear that those who think they didn’t need to think again:
Are we supposed to be so naive as to think that tens of millions of people are here, present in the United States, and none of them are illegally voting? In states where you don’t have voter ID, in states where most voter registration, you’re not required to certify citizenship, other than signing and saying you’re a citizen?
It happens repeatedly where you have these voter registrations signed by aliens because they shouldn’t be voting, so they’re registered to vote – and the irony is, once they’re registered to vote, voter ID ain’t gonna protect you, because they have the ID necessary to vote, once they’re registered. So you have many non-citizens voting in elections, and they vote in large numbers in a way to sway elections.
Fitton knows whereof he speaks.… Both because Judicial Watch has taken the lead in exposing and fighting voter fraud for decades … And because when it comes to protecting election integrity, he wrote the book – or, at least, a compelling chapter.
It’s in his recent bestseller, Clean House, and you can read it here.
As the fight over voter fraud continues to heat up, please feel free to call Jill Farrell (202-664-5188 / email@example.com) for an interview with Tom Fitton — or with the director of Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project, Robert Popper.
Reports are pouring in from across the country that thousands of legal permanent residents from around the world have been inspired by Trump’s rhetoric to become citizens just so they can vote against him. They are also inspired by some sketchy leftist organizations fueled by communist and socialist agendas.
The leftists are working on a turnout of nearly nine million immigrant residents who are allegedly eligible for citizenship.
We are constantly being told there are 12 million illegal immigrants here but the left has come up with 9 million residents in addition, many of whom were given Obama amnesty.
The immigrants, legal and illegal, think that closing the borders, cutting off welfare to foreigners, deporting people here illegally is punishing the innocent because of the ‘few’ terrorists and drug cartels who come through. After all, they will say, they are coming here out of necessity.
George Soros unveiled an unprecedented $15 million campaign to push the effort to get as many people as possible registered by the October deadline. They expect them to tip the scales in Nevada, Colorado and Florida which would be game over for Republicans.
The groups funded by Soros and other wealthy leftists are telling the people that Trump is a racist, they are entitled to come here illegally, and welfare is their due. This is their civil right they are told.
Family Security Matters
LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD
There is a potential winning coalition in America, one including Democrats and Republicans, men and women, and all racial and ethnic groups, who believe in one simple proposition – honest, representative government.
We do not have either.
What we do have is a political-media system representing the interests of an oligarchy, a form of government in which all power is vested in a dominant class. It is composed of financiers and their political and media whores, who finance their avarice by using the tax revenues squeezed from hard-working Americans as a personal hedge fund.
The present American political system is a “totalitarian democracy“, one in which “lawfully” elected representatives rule a nation state whose citizens, although granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of government, nor whose views are ever seriously considered except when they parallel the interests of the oligarchy.
Here’s an example of hilarious and good-natured ribbing, targeting liberals and President Obama.
Liberals get outraged whenever you criticize them, their actions, or their policies. They also frequently resort to a disgusting tactics to try to get their way.
This person’s bumper sticker is a great example of using the First Amendment to fight back against a bad government. Such political speech is the right of every American. This driver just did it in an unusually creative and funny way. Kudos to the owner of the car and bumper sticker.
The bumper sticker says, “Obama sucks, and so do liberal cowards who steal my stickers.”
There is no indication of how to get one for yourself, although they might be available somewhere online.
Hat Tip to Legal Insurrection for the source of the photo.
How extensive is voter-fraud, especially among non-citizens? Just bring up the question, or suggest we need to have voter-ID at the polls like every other advanced democracy, and the answer will be instantly supplied: You’re a racist. But as Dan McLaughlin points out over at The Federalist, Democrats seem to win a suspiciously high number of close elections, well beyond what a random statistical trial would suggest.
There’s a bombshell academic study out on this issue right now that the media is mostly ignoring (the only exception being the Washington Post’s very fine wonky MonkeyCage blog), in part because it appears in an obscure academic journal, Electoral Studies, that is behind an expensive subscription paywall, and in part because any reporter who does a story about it will be called a racist. Since I’m an academic these days, I’ve got access to the article, “Do Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. Elections?”, by Jesse T. Richman and Gulshan A. Chattha of Old Dominion University and David C. Earnest of George Mason University.
The conclusion of the abstract alone ought to set off alarm bells: