Clock Runs Out On Perjury Charges For James Clapper, Ensuring He Won’t Be Punished For Lying to Congress

https://www.technocracy.news/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/James-Clapper-DNI.jpg

Image via technocracy

 

Free Republic

It almost seems like half a lifetime ago, but only a half-decade has passed since James Clapper lied to Ron Wyden about the NSA’s domestic collections. Wyden pointedly asked Clapper during an intelligence committee hearing whether or not the NSA was collecting “any type of data at all” on American citizens. Clapper gave two answers, both untrue: “No, sir” and “Not wittingly.”

A couple of months later, the first Snowden leak — detailing massive amounts of call data being captured in the Section 215 dragnet — undid Clapper’s careful, under-oath lies. Since then, nothing has happened. The DOJ refused to investigate Clapper for lying to his oversight. Clapper exited office a few years later, becoming a go-to national security expert for a variety of news programs. He has since offered a variety of excuses for lying, but none of them are particularly good.

As of March 12, the clock has run on perjury charges. James Clapper has violated federal law and gotten away with it.

(Excerpt) Read more at sensenbrenner.house.gov

Grassley: Early Drafts of Comey’s Exoneration Statement Acknowledged Hillary Clinton Violated Federal Law

Family Security Matters

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray late Monday afternoon demanding to know why early versions of former FBI Director James Comey’s statement exonerating Hillary Clinton strongly indicated she had violated federal law by hosting and sharing top secret information on a personal email server. In Comey’s final statement, which he delivered in July 2016, that language was changed.

“Although Director Comey’s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced,” Grassley said.

From the letter, which details how the statement changed:

On November 3, 2017, the FBI provided documents in response to the Committee’s August 30, 2017, letter requesting records relating to then-Director Comey’s statement exonerating Secretary Clinton from criminal wrongdoing.  Among those documents, the FBI provided what appears to be a May 2, 2016, draft of the exoneration statement, two months before Director Comey’s July 5, 2016 press conference.  In that draft, the original language is shown to have included the following sentence:

There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton, and others, used the private email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified material.[1]

That same draft also included the following sentence:

Similarly, the sheer volume of information that was properly classified as Secret at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding the “up classified” emails) supports an inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information.[2] 


Finish reading – click here

Liberal Law Professor: Bergdahl Prisoner Swap Violated Federal Law

The Right Scoop:

 

Democrat Law Professor Jonathan Turley agrees that Obama did break federal law in the Bergdahl transfer and said it adds to a long list of Obama breaking federal law.

Not only that, but he also points out that Obama used a signing statement to make this happen, something he argued against as he was campaigning for president back in 2008.

Source: