SECURE FREEDOM MINUTE
The United Nations yesterday unanimously elected a new leader. He’s a prominent socialist with a record of mismanagement and doing the bidding of Islamists.
Antonio Gutterres thus is a perfect misfit for the institution corrupt leftists and totalitarians use to advance a transnational agenda that, in practice, furthers Islamic supremacism – among other dangerous ideologies.
Claudia Rosett is the investigative reporter who has done more than anyone to document the UN’s systemic dysfunction and various misdeeds. She noted recently at PJ Media that for six years Gutterres ran the Socialist International and for ten years the UN’s refugee programs.
In these capacities, he long promoted under the guise of “democratic socialism” Bernie Sanders-style anti-Americanism and worked with those trying to import more jihadists into the United States.
Expect more of the same, and worse, from Secretary General Antonio Gutterres.
As noted earlier, the United Nations, being run by Muslims and moonbats, has declared that bacon, ham, sausage, et cetera are as bad for your health as cigarettes. By a remarkable coincidence, most of these newly dangerous foods are pork products, forbidden under Islam. The Islamophile liberal establishment media has predictably gone to town with the story. In just 1 day, Progressives Today collected nine MSM videos hyping the hysterical report.
Living under liberalism will soon mean living without bacon. Maybe we will finally start to see serious resistance.
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.
This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
What is a global police force doing in our cities?
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com …
If U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has his way the United Nations will be able to say if Americans are allowed to have their Second Amendment rights. He has just signed an anti-gun treaty with the United Nations that the U.S. Senate has already said it is against.
The treaty Kerry signed without authorization from the Senate would create an un-Constitutional registry of all US gun buyers and would lead to the UN controlling American’s gun rights. Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday signed a controversial U.N. riling U.S. lawmakers who vow the Senate will not ratify the agreement.
(Excerpt) Read more at gopthedailydose.com …
Rep. Michael Rogers (R-AL) has put forth legislation to repeal the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and has several supporters in favor of the bill.
Currently Representatives Thomas Massie (R-KY), Jeff Duncan (R-TN) Westmoreland (R-GA), and Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) has co-sponsored the bill.
According to the bill, it would:
We long for the relief of the 2016 presidential election being over without really seeing that Barack Obama’s presidency is the true life horror of a never-ending presidency.
Obama will likely be even more dangerous out of office than he was in office.
There is no doubt that joyful, resounding cheers will follow the celebrated retirement of the most anti-American president ever elected when he departs from the White House in can’t-come-too-soon January 2017.
Cheers guaranteed to soon become fears in contemplation of this chilling thought:
Obama will be taking every secret ever stored at the White House with him when he goes. Over nine years as a top insider, he knows America’s every vulnerability—including those he created himself—even when and where it’s best for the enemy to strike. When it comes to data control, Obama is the Edward Snowden of the Information toss.