Family Security Matters
by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD
What would happen if Americans learned that Barack Obama is not just an individual with a history of radical, anti-American associations, but an illegal President and an unindicted felon?
What would happen if Americans learned that the US government, including all members of Congress, and leading figures in American media knew it and deliberately hid the truth from us?
If such a scenario were true, the political system and the media, as we now know it, would collapse, most politicians and journalists would lose their jobs and many would go to jail.
Who in government and the media have the greatest incentive to remain silent and run out the clock on Barack Obama?
Why does no one attending the thirtieth reunion of Barack Obama’s graduating class at Columbia University remember meeting him? That’s the intriguing question raised by Wayne Allyn Root in a piece published at the Blaze:
We shared the same exact major- Political Science. We were both Pre Law. It was a small class- about 700 students. The Political Science department was even smaller and closer-knit (maybe 150 students). I thought I knew, or met at least once, (or certainly saw in classes) every fellow Poly Sci classmate in my four years at Columbia.
But not Obama. No one ever met him. Even worse, no one even remembers seeing that unique memorable face. Think about this for a minute. Our classmate is President of the United States. Shouldn’t someone remember him? Or at least claim to remember him? (snip)
With 3 different problems jumping up at the same time it seems that President Obama is sounding more like Alfred E. Newman of Mad Magazine fame! “What? Me Worry?” How can a President not know a thing about what is going on in his administration? Is Obama really that out of touch with his people, or is he just way too tied up in campaigning to worry about the United States or those below him? Perhaps he is either incompetent or he’s outright lying.
The White House dumps e-mails that show just who had asked for changes in talking points, all done while 4 men had their very lives in the balance. Yet it was much more important to ask about talking points while men were being killed. Obama throws everyone else under the bus, while he keeps on saying that he had no knowledge in anything dealing with Benghazi. People in Obama’s administration are now being shoved out to the press so that it seems they are the ones that did what he says he had no knowledge of. Even with President Obama’s statements at a briefing on Thursday May 16, 2012, Obama clearly made it understood that he had no knowledge of what happened. Maybe we should change that concept to the most famous statements from one Sergeant Schulz, of the Television show Hogan’s Heroes, where Schulz would make the famous statement, “I know nothing!”
It seems that all of the e-mails sent back and forth to the White House from around 3 PM until much later were just concerning what was to be given as “talking points,” without any discussion as to what was going on at the Benghazi Embassy or what type of attack they were under or if anyone was hurt. Nope, it was all about the “talking points.” It seems that maybe Obama is throwing that out there with his release of some 94 e-mails to maybe try and alter the discussion as to why he seemingly just went to sleep while others were discussing the “talking points,” not to mention that Americans were being killed and their bodies being dragged through the streets of Benghazi. Now is that just some weird reason to ask questions that have yet to be answered? Questions like, just what did Obama do after he got the one call in the evening of September 11, 2012, a date when the entire diplomatic core should have been on double high alert or of a much higher level of security. Instead, our President seemingly went to bed while brave men died defending themselves in Benghazi.
Now let us take a brief look at an article or part of it that shows just what has happened and how much this single scandal has affected the Obama administration and how it may well have an effect upon the 2014 elections. We need only look at this article written by Tad Cronn.
I don’t normally display lawn signs or bumper stickers during political campaigns; I usually keep my voting preferences to myself. (That’s the point of secret ballots, right?) But the November 2012 elections got me charged up to the point where I felt the urge to do something public, and since my friends already knew how I felt, I didn’t think I would be divulging any secrets by doing so.
But I didn’t like the bumper stickers offered by the campaigns, or any of the clever ones being sold over the internet, because I was really against certain candidates rather than for the opposition. So I designed and ordered my own, shown below in Figure OB:
Figure OB. “Obama Built This Forgery” bumper sticker.
by: Louise Hodges
I have no use for Barack Obama. I don’t need a President with a history of drug abuse who puts the dreams of his father above the interests of the United States. Obama’s presidency is like a giant sinkhole, swallowing up everything we ever valued as Americans.
It’s almost an insult to our intelligence, to ask us to believe that Obama is a US citizen. He has a schizophrenic timeline of unexplained foreign travel, a list of aliases, and uncomfortable friendships with communists and hostile governments.
We can drop this debate over his birth certificate because we have something even more valuable. We have his mother’s passport files.
by Dan Crosby
of the Daily Pen
NEW YORK, NY – It requires a truly reprobate mind that causes one to refuse the preeminent definition of natural-born citizenship as it was divinely understood by the framers. They declared the Constitutional eligibility mandate in the critical time which required it…and forever more, because, by moral convention, it was simply normal and common to them.
Willful ignorance and shame consumes the ideologue unwilling to accept that those, existing centuries before them, more favored by God, declared natural-born eligibility from a righteous perspective rooted in an eyewitness understanding of the need to disqualify tyranny born of foul parentage, primarily, not just geographic origin.