How do you say ‘Second Amendment’ in French?

American Thinker

Paris and another mass murder in a gun-free zone.  Another incident where well-armed criminals shot at people who could only scream and watch their colleagues gunned down without mercy.

love-my-guns

Wonder if anyone in that Paris building wished he or she had a gun to shoot back.  I’m not saying that a couple of concealed weapons would have stopped well-armed terrorists, but it could have bought a little time before the police got there.

I know that many Europeans call this “a cowboy crossfire.”  Tell that to the families of the dead – all dead because guys with guns shot innocent unarmed people working in their office.

Like other countries, France has very restrictive gun laws, as David Crodea reported:

Continue reading

What’s the Difference Between a Gunman and a Terrorist?

American Thinker

Compare the following reports – the first from the Toronto Sun describing the recent terrorist attack in Ottawa and the second from the Jerusalem Post detailing the  recent terrorist attack in Jerusalem:

Continue reading

Republicans Overturn Obama Decision To Deny Honors And Benefits To The Victims Of Fort Hood Terrorist Attack

Terrorist Attack

Weasel Zippers

Finally, for the long suffering families.

Has Benghazi hero Glen Doherty’s family not received his benefits and insurance for the same absurd reason?

Via IJR:

Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee will overturn one consequence of Obama’s unwillingness to recognize the terrorism of the Fort Hood attack: victims will be eligible for the Purple Heart, allowing survivors to receive better and prompter health care from the VA. More than that, every victim will get the recognition and honor due to them.

From KCEN-TV:
“I applaud the Members of the committee for their leadership in approving this important piece of legislation for Fort Hood and the surrounding community,” said Sen. Cornyn. “The 2009 Fort Hood victims should be eligible for all the honors and benefits available to U.S. troops who fall victim to an international terrorist attack, especially Purple Heart medals, and this would make that a reality.”

“Nearly five years have passed since the horrible tragedy at Fort Hood took the lives of 13 innocent Americans,” said Congressman Williams. “It is beyond comprehension why the current Administration has labeled this gruesome terrorist attack “workplace violence,” leaving the victims and their families without the benefits, treatment and honor they earned and deserve. This provision in the NDAA would restore the full range of deserved benefits for the victims. Though justice cannot bring back those we lost, justice can be served for the killed and injured troops whose brave actions prevented further bloodshed.

This comes at the same time that the administration is defending itself against charges that decisions were made in the Benghazi attack were animated by the same impulse – to protect Obama instead of protecting Americans.

 

 

Judicial Watch: Benghazi Documents Point to White House on Misleading Talking Points

 

Image

Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that on April 18, 2014, it obtained 41 new Benghazi-related State Department documents. They include a newly declassified email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a campaign to “reinforce” President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”  Other documents show that State Department officials initially described the incident as an “attack” and a possible kidnap attempt.

The documents were released Friday as result of a June 21, 2013, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the Department of State (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00951)) to gain access to documents about the controversial talking points used by then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice for a series of appearances on television Sunday news programs on September 16, 2012.  Judicial Watch had been seeking these documents since October 18, 2012.

Continue reading

Obama and His Media Loyalists Still Spinning Benghazi

Family Security Matters

The media and Obama administration  are at it again, trying to defend their earlier actions on Benghazi. For weeks  following the September 11, 2012 attacks, President Obama and his colleagues  blamed them on a spontaneous demonstration inspired by protests in Cairo, a  position that has been repeatedly found to be patently untrue.

But Obama would prefer that the  American public ignore this and his other “phony” scandals. In fact, he told  Bill O’Reilly in a recent pre-Super Bowl  interview that scandals like the IRS  controversy are the result of irresponsible reporting by Fox News. “These kinds  of things keep on surfacing in part because you and your TV station will promote  them,” he told O’Reilly.

In an effort to convince us that  Benghazi is not a scandal, Obama, arguing with O’Reilly, once again attempted to  defend his completely indefensible narrative that in fact he said from day one  that it was a terrorist attack (or in his words, “an act of terror”), and that  the decision to claim the attack was the result of a spontaneous demonstration,  sparked by an anti-Islam video, was made with the best information  available. 

Continue reading

Congressman: CIA Employee Who Refused to Sign Non-Disclosure on Benghazi Suspended

BY: Follow @Kredo0

 

A CIA employee who refused to sign a non-disclosure agreement barring him from discussing the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, has been suspended as a result and forced to hire legal counsel, according to a top House lawmaker.

Rep. Frank Wolf (R., Va.) revealed at an event on Monday that his office was anonymously informed about the CIA employee, who is purportedly facing an internal backlash after refusing to sign a legal document barring him from publicly or privately discussing events surrounding the Benghazi attack.

Continue reading

Obama Muzzles Fort Hood Survivors

Moonbattery

Benghazi survivors aren’t the only ones getting muzzled by the Obama Regime:

Autumn Manning, wife of Fort Hood survivor Army Staff Sgt. Shawn Manning, is claiming that the U.S. Department of Defense is “slapping victims with gag orders” and telling family members not to talk to the press following testimony in the trial of Maj. Nidal Hasan.

This prevents survivors from talking about “denial of benefits,” which is still happening after the Obama administration decided to classify the shooting as “workplace violence.” Because of the designation, Fort Hood survivors have been denied combat-related benefits.

Manning later clarified that the DOD’s gag order only applied to witnesses, though she also claims family members were told not to talk to the press.

It will be hard for the Islamophile in Chief to spin this horrific terror attack as run of the mill workplace violence if low-information voters get wind of the self-described “soldier of Allah” Nidal Hasan spouting rhetoric like this in the courtroom:

“The evidence will clearly show that I am the shooter, and the dead bodies will show that war is an ugly thing. … We, the mujahedeen, are imperfect Muslims trying to establish a perfect religion in the land of the supreme God.”

By now maggots should have long since nibbled the last gristle from Hasan’s bones in the cold darkness of his grave. The only trials at this point should be for conspiring with the enemy on the part of any officials playing along with Obama’s absurd “workplace violence” gambit.

obama_fort-hood
Turning a terror attack into a national disgrace.