Rudy’s right. Obama loves something, but it’s not this country

Flopping Aces
And I will prove it to you.A couple of days ago Rudy Giuliani violated the 11th Commandment:

Thou Shalt Not Ridicule a Black President

Giuliani dared to rip into Barack Obama:

WASHINGTON — Rudy Giuliani has delivered a political shot-in-the-gut to President Obama, charging the president doesn’t “love America.”

“I do not believe, and I know this is a horrible thing to say, but I do not believe that the president loves America,” Giuliani told about 60 conservative business leaders gathered Wednesday night at the 21 Club to hear Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

According to the former mayor, Obama doesn’t love Giuliani either.

“He doesn’t love you. And he doesn’t love me. He wasn’t brought up the way you were brought up and I was brought up, through love of this country,” he continued, as Walker, who has entered the top tier of Republican presidential candidates, sat nearby.

The comments are a departure from standard political rhetoric, where blasting someone’s ideas is considered fair game, but questioning an opponent’s love of country is usually a no-no. Politico reported the expansive comments.

The fact is, Obama doesn’t love this country and Rudy said what at least half the country is thinking. Let’s crank up the Wayback Machine and revisit the moments when Barack Obama opened the door to his soul.

Continue reading

Alinsky Does Amnesty

Family Security Matters



President Obama is an Alinskyite.​

That assertion is not an epithet – well, not primarily. True, I would not describe someone I admired as an “Alinskyite.” Saul Alinsky was a loathsome figure – a radical statist who whose toxic brew of thoroughgoing deceit and brass-knuckles extortion (“direct action”) has become a part of mainstream politics. But in tying the president to the seminal community organizer whose theories and tactics so influenced him, my purpose is more to decode than to insult him.

Of course, calling Obama an “Alinskyite” draws cataracts of condemnation from the Democrat-media complex – for the same reason that Muslim Brotherhood shrieks of “Islamophobe!” inevitably follow any reasoned, scripturally based discussion of Islamic supremacism. People who advance their agendas in dishonesty and stealth can’t afford to have critics shine a light on them. The best diversion is to smear the critic as racist and phobic – or as Alinsky, a master of the game, put it, “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Well, this week Alinsky did amnesty, so let’s not be diverted.

Continue reading

Hillary Clinton, Saul Alinsky correspondence revealed

Washington Free Beacon


Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveal new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development.

Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing.

Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

Continue reading

Hillary: The Real Alinsky Disciple – Improvements Made to the Original Design


Freedom Outpost

There are things throughout history that one can point to and say, “That changed everything.” Things like electricity, indoor plumbing and gunpowder.

Some we can point to as simply upgrades or improvements to the original design. Things like fuel injection, the self-contained rifle cartridge or Hot Shots Part Deux.

Both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton did the same with Saul Alinsky‘s teaching of community agitating.

Interestingly, as an aside, what is today called, by most everyone, community organizing, Alinsky called agitating. However, as the left often does, somewhere along the line, agitator was deemed too negative – too radical, so it magically became organizer. Who could be against organization?


To be more precise, Alinsky preached that an agitator’s job isn’t to organize, but to enter and already organized community, agitate to disorganize it and re-organize the community to better achieve the agitators goal.

I heard many commentators mention Alinsky and his 1971 book “Rules for Radicals” when describing the pitiful “Occupy Wall Street” spectacle from a couple years ago.

However, Alinsky would not have approved of the amalgamation of dirty hippies and ne’er-do-wells. He taught that true “revolutionaries” should not “flaunt their radicalism.” They should “cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within.”

Is any of this sounding familiar?

Many think Hillary is somehow, like her husband, more moderate than Barack, but it was she who was a direct disciple of Alinsky.

So impressed was Alinsky with Hillary, that he offered her a job. She turned him down to go on to attend Yale Law School – but that wasn’t the only reason. Apparently, she had become convinced that, although she agreed with the Alinsky philosophy, she found his methods of local agitating to be not “large” enough.

I know Obama feels the same way. Many Alinsky disciples evidently feel the same way – that his local agitating and disorganizing philosophy can and should be played out on a grander, national scale.

Again, does this sound familiar?

How many times over the past five years – certainly since his reelection, have we heard that Obama wants to remake America? Look around and see how many government departments and agencies appear to be “dis-organized.”

Now, in his second term, I’m certain he feels no need to hold back. All there is left to do is decide what more he wants to dis-organize in order to re-organize or re-make.

Evidently, he has chosen immigration and an open border, and he and his cohorts are bringing all their button-down, clean cut radicalism to bear regarding it.

If things continue unabated, the only question that will remain is what America will look like after Obama’s reorganization and which hand-picked radical he will choose as his successor to carry on Alinsky’s vision.


Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘America’ warns Hillary Clinton will ‘finish off’ the country

Washington Examiner

In his highly anticipated new book and movie “America,” conservative author Dinesh D’Souza is warning that Hillary Clinton won’t be a clone of her moderate husband, but will instead take the baton from President Obama to continue radicalizing the country and “undo the nation’s founding ideals.”

“America — Imagine a World Without Her,” published by Regnery and set for release Monday, charges that as students of radical organizer Saul Alinsky, Obama and Clinton could have enough time to “unmake and then remake America” into a nation the founding fathers wouldn’t recognize.

Continue reading

Obama Syndicate Assaulting Americans from Every Angle

Barack Obama Power Analysis TeachingIn order to effectively–and with as much certainty as is possible–decimate and destroy a country, its Middle Class must be thoroughly eradicated. The infamous Soviet-style Communist Saul Alinsky–mentor to Hillary Clinton who wrote her Senior thesis on him “There is Only the Fight…” at Wellesley College–wrote extensively about it in his book Rules for Radicals. Barack Hussein Obama is also an admirer of Alinsky and his work and actually taught ’the Alinsky Method’ to students during his days as a radical community organizer.

In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky wrote that it would be very difficult to destroy the Middle Class in the USA because it was too well educated. So the, already, largely leftists government (“public”) school system set to the task of dumbing-down its students. They did an admirable job, to which Osama’s “elections” attest.

Continue reading

Hillary Clinton 2016? More Alinsky-Style ‘Hope & Change’?

Freedom Outpost


Who is Hillary Rodham Clinton?  We have to ask because this woman is now set  to run for the highest office in the land.  Of course, there are many things to  remind the American people about concerning Hillary Clinton, including her most  notorious scandal concerning what she did or did not do when it came to the  operations in Benghazi.  We also have to explore just what was being done in  Benghazi that the federal government thinks must be hidden from the people of  the United States, especially the families of the 4 men killed.

Benghazi is serious and is more recent history.  However, let us take a trip  down memory lane with Hillary Rodham Clinton, especially since she seems to  wish  to run for President in 2016. 

Continue reading