The Hillary-Alinsky-Lucifer Connection

The American Spectator

The devil is in her details.

In his speech at the Republican convention last week, Ben Carson made a statement that raised some eyebrows. “Now, one of the things that I have learned about Hillary Clinton is that one of her heroes, her mentors, was Saul Alinsky,” said Carson. “And her senior thesis was about Saul Alinsky. This was someone she greatly admired….”

So far so good. Nothing most political junkies haven’t heard before.

“And let me tell you something about Saul Alinsky,” continued Carson. “He wrote a book called Rules for Radicals. It acknowledges Lucifer, the original radical who gained his own kingdom. Now think about that.”

That certainly got a lot of people thinking.

“This is our nation where our founding document, the Declaration of Independence, talks about certain inalienable rights that come from our Creator, a nation where our Pledge of Allegiance says we are ‘One nation under God,’” added Carson. “This is a nation where every coin in our pockets and every bill in our wallet says, ‘In God We Trust.’ So are we willing to elect someone as president who has as their role model somebody who acknowledges Lucifer? Think about that.”

In response, the liberal media predictably went bonkers.

“Ben Carson rails against Hillary Clinton, Lucifer,” howled the headline in USA Today.

“Ben Carson Ties Hillary Clinton to Lucifer as GOP Swaps Campaign for Witch Trial,” scowled the Daily Beast.

“She’s one-degree of separation from a devil-lover!” wailed the Daily Mail.

I must say that I shouldn’t be too critical of the liberal media’s apoplectic reaction, because I was likewise incredulous the first time I heard this claim.

It was 2007, and I was finishing a book on the faith of Hillary Clinton. One morning I heard a local radio talk-show host make an amazing claim: that Alinsky’s 1971 classic Rules for Radicals began with a dedication to Satan. Oh, I can’t believe that, I said. I was angry at the host. This kind of hyperbole gives conservative talk-radio a bad name!

And yet, it couldn’t be hard to check. I had better do so as author of a biography of Hillary Clinton in which I had a section on Hillary and Saul Alinsky. As part of the promotion for the book, I would likely appear on this same talk-show, and the host surely would ask me about the Lucifer acknowledgment.

I quickly emailed one of the staffers at our library at Grove City College. Did we have a copy of Rules for Radicals on our shelves? We sure did. Please pull it, I said. I’ll be right there.

I opened the book and couldn’t believe my eyes. Alinsky offered this acknowledgment:

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.

Yes, there it was. Saul Alinsky commenced his magnum opus — the one for which he is hailed by the left, a book not only read by Hillary Clinton but used as a text by Barack Obama as a teacher of community organizing — with an acknowledgement of the Devil.

 

continued reading.…..

Hillary Clinton, Saul Alinsky correspondence revealed

Washington Free Beacon

NOTE: READ THE HILLARY CLINTON-SAUL ALINSKY LETTERS HERE.

Previously unpublished correspondence between Hillary Clinton and the late left-wing organizer Saul Alinsky reveal new details about her relationship with the controversial Chicago activist and shed light on her early ideological development.

Clinton met with Alinsky several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis about his theory of community organizing.

Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969, two letters obtained by the Washington Free Beacon show.

Obama Syndicate Assaulting Americans from Every Angle

 Gulag Bound

Sher Zieve

In order to effectively–and with as much certainty as is possible–decimate and destroy a country, its Middle Class must be thoroughly eradicated. The infamous Soviet-style Communist Saul Alinsky–mentor to Hillary Clinton who wrote her Senior thesis on him “There is Only the Fight…” at Wellesley College–wrote extensively about it in his book Rules for Radicals. Barack Hussein Obama is also an admirer of Alinsky and his work and actually taught ’the Alinsky Method’ to students during his days as a radical community organizer.

In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky wrote that it would be very difficult to destroy the Middle Class in the USA because it was too well educated. So the, already, largely leftists government (“public”) school system set to the task of dumbing-down its students. They did an admirable job, to which Osama’s “elections” attest.

Allen West On The Unemployment Rate Miraculously Dropping 1 Month Before Election: “Representative Of Saul Alinsky Tactics”…

Via Rep. Allen West:

We all want the suffering of the American people from this rampant scourge of unemployment to end. However, today’s jobs report is confusing to say the least. Previous months numbers have been revised and yet the workforce participation rate remains at a 30 year low. The unemployment rate drops to 7.8 percent, that is where it was in January 2009 when the President took office.  But the U6 computation of unemployed, underemployed, and discouraged Americans remains the same at 14.7 percent.

I agree with former GE CEO Jack Welch, Chicago style politics is at work here. Somehow by manipulation of data we are all of a sudden below 8 percent unemployment, a month from the Presidential election. This is Orwellian to say the least and representative of Saul Alinsky tactics from the book “Rules for Radicals”- a must read for all who want to know how the left strategize . Trust the Obama administration? Sure, and the spontaneous reaction to a video caused the death of our Ambassador……and pigs fly.

Please read from CNBC today:

Job growth remained tame in September, with the economy creating just 114,000 net new positions though the unemployment rate fell to 7.8 percent, the first time it has been below 8 percent in 44 months.

The Bureal of Labor Statistics’ nonfarm paryolls report presented a slew of contradictory data points, with the total employment level soaring despite the low net number

Source:

Obama versus Jesus: Black Christians Must Decide

American Thinker

By Lloyd Marcus

A  poll claims that Romney will receive zero  percent of the black vote.  Well, if the poll proves correct, it means  that a vast majority of black voters are ignorant of the truth…or else they’re  racist.

Black  Christians who vote for Obama knowing his crimes against Christianity and  biblical principles have chosen to worship the idol of racial loyalty over their  discipleship to Jesus Christ.  Pure and simple.

“Thou  shalt have no other gods before me.” -Exodus 20:3

Don’t Let Alinsky Win

The American Spectator

Conservatives itching for an all-or-nothing showdown with Barack Obama risk playing right into his hands. A crisis is exactly what he wants. To understand this, it is necessary, once again, to understand that most of his playbook comes from radical organizer Saul Alinsky, and that his playbook also assuredly draws on the work of professors he encountered at Columbia University, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.

“The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength,” wrote Alinsky in Rules for Radicals. “The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step….”

Hitler’s and Obama’s health enabling acts

Canada Free Press

President Hitler signed a shockingly similar bill with similar tactics used to get it signed….threats,  harassment,  false promises,  intimidation, invented crises.  Gee….did Obama take lessons from Hitler?  He certainly proudly taught ACORN workers from Saul Alinsky’s book,  Rules for Radicals, so why not go back to the original power crazed,  crowd manipulator and evil visionary?  On that fateful day, March 23rd Hitler signed into law the National Law for Removing the Distress of the People bill.  It was also called Hitler’s Enabling Act.

I talked with Steve Eichler of faxdc.com this week on air about these two dates and the horrifying similarities of the two events in history.  Steve and I probed whether we were indeed reliving history.  We both studied the events of 1933 and 2010 and said a big fat yes!

It is horrifying how similar both acts are.

First of all, understand Hitler was a brilliant, charismatic speaker who said things in style, lied through his teeth and manipulated whatever he had to, to get a vote and power.  His big dagger in the heart of the German people and constitution was to somehow get the vote by Parliament to pass his Enabling Act,  which, due to contrived crises and manipulated need would give him total power,  full power without the need of any more votes or Parliament.

Obama also seduced 60% of the nation, congress and most the media into not asking real questions and just believing his countless lies.

What did Hitler do?  He first manufactured the need and crises.

Hitler promised Health care for everyone, jobs for 100% of the German people and protection from what he called the beginning of a widespread uprising.  This was the mythological uprising he and his Nazi party created by burning down the German government building,  causing huge panic and rage in the people.  Hitler at the time blamed the horrific burning on the communists,  thus he needed a vote for his Enabling Act to stop this out of control terror in Germany.

Napalitono, Homeland Security and Obama have called conservative Americans domestic terrorists,  even returning Vets.  We saw the other leaked report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) that listed Rev. Chuck Baldwin and Ron Paul and their followers of even being potential domestic terrorists.

In 1933 it was Jews and Communists.  In 2010, not only does this growing enemy list seem anti Semitic and anti Israel, but Obama has new enemies to add.  These include Christians,  gun owners,  pro lifers,  Vets,  Tea Party people,  Republicans. Talk radio hosts and conservatives in general.

Doug Hagmann of North East Intelligence Network homelandsecurityus.com confirmed these growing controls by our Government even more with a recent conversation he had with an intelligence source, who talked of Homeland Security actively investigating incidents and threats of violence made to at least ten Democrats.  Of course you would want and expect them to investigate if there were real threats, but Doug said more lists were being made with their focus and suspicions on tea-party organizations and pro-life groups.

How did the Nazis get the votes for Hitler for the Enabling Act?

Intimidation

The Nazis chanted loudly around the opera house Parliament was voting in,  “Full powers – or else!  We want the bill or fire and murder!!”  They also lined the halls and aisles, glaring and intimidating Parliament members to vote Hitler’s way….or else

Complete Story: