Socialism Can Never Work, Ever

This was sent to me in my e-mail and after reading it, I thought, this is about as simple as it gets. So even some Libs out there might be able to understand it.   1Dragon

As the late Adrian Rogers said, “you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

This Professor is a Genius!

An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had
never failed a single student before, but had once failed an entire class.


That class had insisted that Obama’s socialism worked and that no
one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.

The professor then said, “OK,  we will have an experiment in this class on Obama’s plan”.

All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the
same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A.

After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.
The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.

As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less
and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.  

The second test average was a D!

No one was happy.

When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.

The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted
in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.  

All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would
also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great
but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
Socialism can Never, Ever Work!

Could not be any simpler than that

Outing Obama’s Internet Brownshirts


The Post & E-Mail

by John Charlton

Hitler’s Brown Shirts, was a group of violent political operatives, under the leadership of Sodomites and Sadomasochists, who made it a point to terrorize his political opponents.

(Jan. 26, 2010) — Recent reports have brought national attention to the fact that Obama has implemented Cass Sunstein’s strategy of cognitive dissonance, in the creation of Internet teams which harass citizens with invective on Internet blogs, forums, chat rooms, and websites.  Several sites have been attacked by this corp of Brown Shirts, others hacked, others harassed.

The Post & Email has substantial internal evidence that there are individuals who post the same identical comments over and over in favor of Obama and attacking his critics.  Since these individuals are most likely members of Obama’s Brown Shirt corps, under direct or indirect control of Cass Sunstein, we believe it a duty of patriotism to make it a policy of listing the little information we have about them, so that other sites can examine their own computer logs and collect information on these individuals, in a mutual effort to protect free speech.

List of Brown Shirt Members:

Preston, claims to use as his email, and posts from the ip number 192.30.115.XXX, which ip number is associated with Palomar Community College District, San Marcos, California: he posts repeated comments berating Neil Sankey (Private Investigator working with Orly Taitz).

Myron, claims to use (redacted) as his email, and posts from ip number 198.22.21.XXX, which ip number is associated with Memorial Hermann Healthcare System, Houston, Texas:  Myron posts comments in perfect “cognitive dissonance” form, to disagree with any point he believes is most vulnerable and to attempt to get a reaction.

Amalgam, claims to use (redacted) as his email, and posts from ip number 66.214.93.XXX, which ip number is a Charter Communications Customer, out of Malibu, California: he is rather famous for 1) appearing to be a resident of the same locale as the editors of, and 2) posting recurrent nasty remarks about anything he/she can think of. His/her nick makes one thing of a Union employee; but he has used other nicks which indicate familiarity with the OT and Hebrew language.

Not true, is not so easy to identify, since he changes his nick and his email address,, also changes to suit his message, but he prefers a “not true” kind of tone; he posts from the ip number  12.204.118.XXX, which is out of Parsippaney, New Jersey, and which is associated with Gannet Co. (the news agency?).

smrstrauss (snrstrauss), is a rather notorious Obot, who uses (redacted) as his email address, and and posts from ip number  96.237.177.XXX, which hails from Arlington, Massachusetts. You’ll find him more frequently at The Right Side of Life.

da verg, is another infamous Obot, who claims to use (redacted) as his email address, and posts from 75.11.185.XXX, which hails from San Diego, California: notorious for his twisted logic, personal attacks, he seems unable to resist attacking a certain women lawyer who sue Obama.

The Everett-WA Stalker, is perhaps the most violent and perverse of all Obots: he resides in the vicinity of Spokane, Washington, uses a variety of nicks and email addresses and ips numbers: at The Post & Email he has expressed hope and delight that all conservatives are sent to gulags and exterminated, that all Birthers are shot, and that Orly be violently raped. The Post & Email has filed 3 criminal complaints against him with the Spokane Police Department, which seems yet to have done nothing to stop him.  He seems to be a time bomb waiting to explode in another shooting spree. Recently he has switched his IP number to state parks outside of Seattle.

Mary Adams, is one of the original “I hate Orly” obots, who claims to use as her email, and posts from ip number, which hails from  Sacramento, California, though she is known to use different ips: she prefers nasty comments, insults and mindless statements. If she is from Sacramento, then she is probably a state worker, who gets a cushy enough job to afford high speed cable access from home.

Seriously, is an obot who claims to use (redacted) as his email, and posts from ip number 206.208.224.XXX, which is associated with the Cap Gemini system, in the N. suburbs of Houston. He loves the word “stupid” and “get over it” and emphasizes that Obama is “our” president, which obviously means he considers himself part of Obama’s regime.

bob, is a pervert from San Francisco, who claims to use as his email and who posts from ip number 75.36.159.XXX in the city of San Francisco: he is obsessed with the vocabulary of perverse acts against women.

Bovril, is another classic obot, who claims to use as his email, and posts from ip number, which hails out of Hoboken, New Jersey. He practices Cass Sunsteins cognitive infiltration tactics. He might be the same guy as “Not true.”

The Newton Center Obot, uses a variety of nicks and emails addresses, and hails from Newton Center, MA. He known to use irony and satire, since he has no facts to back up his disagreeing statement.

Since our outing of Obots in a previous report, we have not seen the Brown Shirts who hail from the northern suburb of Montreal, or the NE suburb of Orlando Florida; nor the one from Westchester Country, New York.

You see light makes cockroaches scatter.  Search the logs of your blog/website, and you might find a lot of visits from the Brown Shirts above.  By posting your own lists you can protect free speech by shaming the political operatives of the Obama regime


Sex sting in Poconos nets former chief U.N. weapons inspector

Pocono Record Writer
January 14, 2010

A former chief United Nations weapons inspector is accused of contacting what he thought was a 15-year-old girl in an Internet chat room, engaging in a sexual conversation and showing himself masturbating on a Web camera.

Scott Ritter of Delmar, N.Y., who served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and who was an outspoken critic of the second Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq, is accused of contacting what turned out to be a Barrett Township police officer posing undercover as a teen girl.

Complete Story:

Firms announce big oil find beneath shallow Gulf

Houston Chronicle

Jan. 13, 2010

McMoRan Exploration Co. today announced what it said could be one of the largest oil and natural gas discoveries in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico in decades.

The discovery was made at the Davy Jones ultra-deep prospect located on South Marsh Island Block 230 in about 20 feet of water and 10 miles off the Louisiana coast, the New Orleans company and Energy XXI, one of its Houston partners in the project, said in statements this morning.

The well was drilled to 28,263 feet and found a 135-foot column of hydrocarbon-filled sands in the Wilcox section of the Eocene and Paleocene geologic trends.

That puts the estimated the size of the discovery close to 2 trillion cubic feet of resources, rivaling some oil and gas discoveries in the deep water Gulf.

If development drilling confirms what early testing has shown, “this is going to be a huge reserve,” McMoRan’s co-chairman, James R. Moffett, said in a conference call this morning.

What’s more, Energy XXI Chairman and CEO John Schiller said the discovery “verifies the ultra-deep potential of the Gulf of Mexico shelf and opens this horizon as a major exploration frontier.”

Investors responded by driving up the stock prices of McMoran and Energy XXI by more than 25 percent in morning trading.

“Success at Davy Jones could be a transformative event for (the companies),” said Jefferies Research, in a note to investors, noting the prospect could boost McMoRan’s year-end proved reserve base by 150 percent and Energy XXI’s by 60 percent.

McMoRan is the lead operator of Davy Jones, with 32.7 percent working interest. Houston’s Plains Exploration & Production Co. has a 27.7 percent stake, Energy XXI has a 15.8 percent interest, Japan’s Nippon Oil Exploration USA Limited holds 12 percent, while W.A. “Tex” Moncrief, Jr. has an 8.8 percent interest.


Guess how ‘the One’ will be honored next

By Drew Zahn, WorldNetDaily

Hawaii planning a monument for Obama’s birth… where will they decide he was born?

Hawaii’s state legislators are lining up a string of new holidays, parks and memorials to honor Barack Obama, the first American president to claim the state as his home – though commemorating his birthplace may prove difficult.

Senate President Coleen Hanabusa wants Aug. 4 to be a state holiday commemorating Obama’s birthday, reports the Honolulu Advertiser; and State Rep. Della Au Belatti is pressing for Obama’s inauguration day, Jan. 20, to be memorialized in Hawaii as Barack Obama II Ohana Day.

And though Hanabusa and Belatti are Obama’s fellow Democrats, even Republican state Rep. Gene Ward is hoping to add to the honors list.

“We’re all Americans first and then we’re Republicans and then we’re Democrats,” Ward told the Advertiser.

Ward is proposing Hawaii establish a President Barack Obama Birthplace State Park.

Only, the president has yet to reveal exactly where his birthplace is.

Read More

Obama Admits Failures, Goes Snorkeling

Dec. 30, 2009

The Obama File

The Chicago Tribune reports that yesterday, after a vacationing Barack Obama conceded that both human and systemic failures of U.S. Intelligence had failed to bar a Nigerian man posing a reported security risk from boarding that Detroit-bound jetliner — a near ”catastrophic” breakdown in security — Obama left the reporters talking about his words in Hawaii — and went snorkeling.

The day before, after making his first televised comments on the matter– it was a “systemic failure” —  it wasn’t Obama’s fault — he headed for the golf course — an outing interrupted by the child of a close, vacationing friend from Chicago suffering a surfboard accident.

Obama dropped his golf game an immediately and returned to the vacation house — it took him three days to respond to the Crotch-Bombers jihad.

Says something about where this guy’s priorities are.

The Telegraph’s (UK) US Editor says Obama gets an “F” for the events that led to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab boarding a Detroit-bound plane in Amsterdam with a PETN bomb sewn into his underpants.   He said yesterday that a “systemic failure has occurred.”  Well, he’s in charge of that system. Obama, instead of defending the system, sided with critics who complained that it did not work and positioned himself as a reformer who will fix it.

Obama’s going to fix the system?  Ha!  That’s a laugher!

Obama!  The guy that’s bowing to Muslim kings;  closing Gitmo;  freeing terrorists and sending them to Yemen; giving other terrorists rights and lawyers;  stonewalling terror investigations;  claiming these are all “isolated incidents” — he’s gonna fix the system! — sure, right after he goes snorkeling.

Obama is a British Citizen!

Dec. 24, 2009

The Post & E-Mail


A Legal Analysis of Obama’s Citizenship status by Jane Menta

The Union Jack has been the flag of the United Kingdom for more than 2 centuries.

(Dec. 23, 2009) — According to the official British Consular Registry Stipulations, the British Nationality Act of 1948 and of 1981, Kenya Constitution, and the Kenya Independence Act of 1963 Barack Hussein Obama was born a British subject, and is a British Citizen to this day.

To ascertain this more exactly, I wrote to Claire McIntosh, who works in Nationality and Consular Registration Section, of the British Foreign & Commonwealth Office.

In her letter to me, of Dec. 11, 2009, she explained the laws applicable to Barack Hussein Obama’s birth:

IF Barack Obama, Sr was born in Kenya Colony: President Obama born in Hawaii on August 4th, 1963, under The British Nationality Act of 1948, became  a Section 5(1) Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by virtue of his birth (born after 1 January 1949 outside UK and Colonies to a CUKC father). This entitlement is by descent and cannot be passed on;

On the provision of the Kenyan Independence Act 1963, which came into affect on 12 December 1963 President Obama became a Kenyan Citizen on that day as he was:

“…a) a person who

i) was a CUKC or British Protected Person immediately before independence; and

ii) was born in the former colony or protectorate; and

iii) had a parent born in the former colony or protectorate.

b) a person born outside Kenya who was a CUKC or a British protected person and whose father possessed (or would but for his death have possessed) the three qualifications listed in the bullet points above…””

Let’s take a journey down the Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., British Citizenship Timeline:


Obama bows to his Queen, Elizabeth II.

Let’s apply the The British Consular Registry’s criteria for classification as a British subject under the British Nationality Act of 1948 Section 5(1) of the United Kingdom and Colonies for one who would be qualified as a “British Citizen By Descent:”

Q. 1.  Was Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. born in Kenya Colony?

A. —Yes, Barrack Hussein Obama Sr. was born in Kenya Colony of the British Empire.

Q. 2.  Was Barack Obama, Jr. born after 1 January, 1949?

A. —Yes, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. says that he was born 4 August, 1961.

Ergo:  Barack Hussein Obama was a “British Citizen by descent” on Aug. 4, 1961.

“Dear George (Washington), Strangest thing! We have a British Citizen as putative President!”

George Washington Fighting the British

We know you fought a bloody war for American Independence against the British, and, but, well, umm….”


The Kenya Constitution (87) states that a person born of a father who becomes a Kenyan Citizen shall also become a Citizen of Kenya, and The Kenya Constitution (97) prohibits dual citizenship for adults but not so for children.

Q. 3.  Did Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., become a Citizen of Kenya?

A. — Yes, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. became a Citizen of Kenya, as  did his son Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., on 12 December, 1963.

Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. also was a Senior Economist for the Kenyan Government.



The Kenya Independence Act of 1963 Section 3(2) defines persons who retain citizenship of United Kingdom and Colonies although becoming citizens of Kenya if their parent was born in Kenya Colony:

Q. 4.  Was Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. born in Kenya Colony?

A. — Yes, Barack Obama Sr. born in Kenya Colony of the British Empire. Further, Hussein Onyango Obama, Barack Obama, Jr.’s grandfather, was born in Kenya British Protectorate in 1895 and was a British Protected Person under British Nationality and Status Act 1914 by virtue of his birth in a Protectorate at his birth.


If Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama at age five or younger, Obama would automatically have become an Indonesian citizen per Indonesia’s laws in the 1960’s, which stipulated any child aged five or younger adopted by an Indonesian father is immediately granted Indonesian citizenship upon completion of the adoption process.

Q. 5.  Was Obama, Jr. adopted by Lolo Soetoro at or before the age of 5?  Was the adoption recognized by Indonesia?

A. — Unknown.  If yes to both questions, he would have become an Indonesian citizen only while in Indonesia because Indonesian law then did not recognize dual citizenship, but U.S. law would still recognize Obama as an American citizen (but not a natural born citizen).  If no to either question, then Obama, Jr.’s citizenship while living in Indonesia would have been whatever it had been prior.  An Indonesian public school did recognize “Barry” as an Indonesian Citizen.


To give up British Citizenship, a person must be age 18 and of sound mind and must fill out a declaration on form RN.

Q. 6.  Did Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., after the age of 18 and of sound mind fill out a declaration to revoke his British Citizenship?

A. — There is no record or statement to the effect that Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. ever revoked his British Citizenship at any time at or after the age of 18.  Therefore in law, we must presume he has not.


To keep Kenyan Citizenship from expiring after the age of 21, a person must swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya and revoke all other citizenships (Kenya does not recognize dual citizenship for adults), between the ages of 21-23.

Q. 7.  Did Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya between the ages of 21 to 23?

A.  — Unknown.  Obama states on and that he never swore an oath of allegiance to Kenya.  However, Obama did visit Kenya in 1982 at the age of 21, after his father died. During such a visit he could have sworn such an oath.


Hussein Obama, Jr. became a “British Overseas Citizen” under the British Nationality Act of 1981.

Q. 8.  Was Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., prior to 1983, a British Citizen by Descent?

A.  — Yes, Barack Obama, Jr. was a British Citizen by Descent and thus became a British Overseas Citizen in 1983.

Obviously, a “Natural Born” U.S. Citizen Means Born In-Country to Two US Citizen Parents !

According to Article II of the Constitution, only a “Natural Born Citizen” of the US is eligible for the presidency.  Since a Natural Born Citizen, being born in-country to two US citizen parents, obviously cannot possibly have any other allegiances or citizenship ties to any other country than the USA by birthplace or by blood, this is why the term requires no statutory definition or laws.   For indeed, a Natural Born Citizen, is naturally a born Citizen, not artificially constructed through statute.  Article II specifically precludes statutory born Citizens as being eligible for the presidency.  The reason for this is that in every case, a statutory born Citizen has some other ties to another nation whether by birthplace or by blood.  In the case of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., in no variation of birthplace, statutory US citizenship by birth, adoption, or oath of citizenship circumstance can he ever be a Natural Born Citizen, nor can he ever be considered lawfully eligible for the presidency of these United States.










9.  Dreams from My Father, p. 376, Dreams from My Father, pp. 425-426












Congrats, Democrats. You own Obamacare

The Washington Examiner
December 22, 2009

It took hundreds of millions of dollars in bribe money to win over Sens. Mary Landrieu, of Louisiana, Ben Nelson, of Nebraska, and Bernie Sanders, of Vermont, (plus even more millions for a senator whose identity cannot be determined thanks to the obtuse language of the bill). By hook or by crook, Obamacare’s Senate backers got their magic 60 votes. Now Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, of Nevada, his 57 Democratic colleagues; and both Senate independents own Obamacare. Their votes moved Obamacare past its biggest legislative hurdle yet in a tally taken in the dead of a very cold Sunday night on a massive bill none of them actually read in its entirety.

These 60 senators have joined in what surely ranks among the most breathtakingly arrogant spasms of anti-democratic hubris in American legislative history. By every credible measure of public opinion, opposition to Obamacare has grown for months as people learned more about it. Fully 61 percent of those responding to CNN’s most recent survey turned thumbs down on Obamacare. And still these 60 senators opted to thumb their noses at the majority.

Just how bad is Obamacare? Here are some of the proposal’s most important flaws, as described by one of the proposal’s most passionate critics:

  • It forces you to pay up to 8 percent of your income to private insurance corporations — whether you want to or not.
  • If you refuse to buy the insurance, you’ll have to pay penalties of up to 2 percent of your annual income to the Internal Revenue Service.
  • After being forced to pay thousands in premiums for junk insurance, you can still be on the hook for up to $11,900 a year in out-of-pocket medical expenses.
  • Many of the taxes to pay for the bill start now, but most Americans won’t see any benefits — like an end to discrimination against those with pre-existing conditions — until 2014 when the program begins.
  • It allows insurance companies to charge older people 300 percent more than other customers.
  • The cost of medical care will continue to rise, and insurance premiums for a family of four will rise an average of $1,000 a year — meaning in 10 years, you family’s insurance premium will be $10,000 more annually than it is right now.

Care to guess the name of the Obamacare critic who pointed out these and many more flaws in the bill? Try Jane Hamsher of the very liberal blog, Fire Dog Lake, who called Obamacare “a con job.” Clearly, opposition to Obamacare has grown to span the political spectrum. Yet these 60 senators couldn’t care less. May the day come soon when all of them have to explain their disdain for their constituents

Obama Health Care Reform and the Constitution

Tips to J.C.

Suite 101

David J. Shestokas

Washington assumes that Congress has the authority to directly regulate the doctor patient relationship. Is there validity to that assumption?

Often Congress passes legislation without including statements in the law of the constitutional authority it has acted under. When this happens the courts must sort out the authority under which a given law was passed. The oath of office taken by each Representative and Senator requires that each support and defend the Constitution bearing true faith to the document. Consideration of this oath would include an obligation to consider the constitutionality of laws being passed. This obligation applies to President Obama’s pending health care reform.

Congressional Oath of Office to Support and Defend the Constitution

Article VI of the Constitution requires all federal officials to take an oath of office. Since 1884, the Congressional Oath of Office taken by all Senators and Congressman has been:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

This oath by its own terms requires members of Congress to act in accordance with the Constitution in the conduct of their offices. When there is a statement of constitutional purpose in legislation the courts are given significant direction in interpreting the law and its validity.

Social Security Considered by Court After Program Was Entrenched

By the time litigation regarding Social Security reached the Supreme Court there had been collected $150,000,000 in payroll taxes, a huge bureaucracy was in place and some claimants were all ready getting benefits. The Court was faced with a fait accompli and came up with a convoluted opinion in Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937) to uphold a law which would have been a nightmare to dismantle.

// <![CDATA[//

Ads by Google

What’s Wrong with America
We’re Facing 3 Major Problems That Could Lead to Disaster. A Must Read
Pocket $44,000+ in HITECH
Sign up for our free EMR and keep all your stimulus incentives.

// <![CDATA[//

This historical situation applies to the current health care debate as Congress attempts to impose its will on one-seventh of the American economy. There are significant constitutional considerations involved in the debates regarding health care. Current proposals do not include statements of constitutional authority.

Doctor Patient Relationship Subject to Constitutional Right to Privacy

The Supreme Court has been very protective of the doctor/patient relationship and finding that the federal government has little if any business being involved in that process.

In the 1925 case of Linder v. United States, a doctor proscribed morphine for a patient allegedly in violation of federal law. The doctor was prosecuted and found guilty in overturning his conviction the Court said: “Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government.

More recently the right to privacy in medical decisions found in the 9th and 10th Amendments has become important to the Court and was the principal factor in Roe v. Wade. In 2003, in rejecting an appeal of Conant v. Walters, the Court refused to change a lower court decision that allowed doctors to be involved with their patients regarding medical marijuana. In 2005 the Court upheld Oregon’s assisted suicide law in Gonzales v. Oregon.

Individual Mandates

A principle element of President Obama’s health care reform proposals includes something called individual mandates. These mandates would essentially require someone to obtain health insurance or face financial penalties. Government would be involved in some of the most private decisions individual Americans make.

Consider the Constitution Before Passing Laws

The congressional oath of office requires support of and true faith to the Constitution. Fulfillment of that oath includes passing constitutional legislation. Inclusion of a statement of constitutional purpose and authority gives the courts significant direction in future rulings
Read more at Suite101: Obama Health Care Reform and the Constitution: Can Congress Regulate Health Care Choices? |

Senate and Obama ignore the Constitution to Socialize Healthcare

The Betrayal

Copyright © 2009 Impeach Obama Campaign

Dr. (Mengele) ObamaIn an outrageous example of the abuse of near dictatorial power, the leader of the United States Senate, Harry Reid, forced a vote on nationalized health care. With total disregard for the will of the people and turning a blind eye to the United States Constitution, Reid sought passage for this bill by corrupting the legislative system.

“This process is not legislation. This process is corruption,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Oklahoma, referring to the last-minute blitz of dirty deal making that enabled Obama to lock in the 60 votes needed to pass the bill.

[