Tag Archives: Presidential Eligibility

More States Jumping on the Birther Bandwagon

The Right Side of Life

Based on a recent update to News.TheRightSideOfLife.com, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Indiana have joined Arizona in producing eligibility bills regarding the presidency (and, in some, the vice presidency). In fact, Indiana’s SB82 is all about “standing,” the ability for a certain class of citizens to rightfully petition the Judiciary with respect to a candidate.

There’s also a bit from David Weigel’s excellent posting on this story where he spoke with a reporter from NewsMax.com who has had various eligibility stories “spiked” on account of the controversy (I know — what controversy, right? You’re either eligible or not and you can either show it fully or not).

And for those following what’s going on in the great State of Arizona, apparently tea party leaders aren’t currently endorsing either former Rep. J.D. Hayworth or Sen. John McCain.


Sky News’ Dissembler and Propagandist

The Obama File

The Obot, Greg Milam

As you folks know, I have spent the last two years researching the life and times of the ObamaMessiah, and today I just learned something new.  Barack Obama’s birth certificate was destroyed in a fire.

In an article, entitled, “Obama ‘Birther’ Row Rears Its Head Again,” Greg Milam, identified as a “U. S correspondent” for Sky News, the British version of Fox News, has just introduced a whole new reason for Obama not presenting his birth certificate to confirm his eligibility — it was burned in a fire! — poor Barack — everything seems to happen to him.

Milam correctly claims, “The White House has consistently dismissed the issue (of Obama’s eligibility).”

Of course they did.  After all, what can they say?  You couldn’t get a driver’s license with the three pieces of documentation that Obama has released to establish his eligibility: his autobiography, a Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth,” and two old newspaper clippings.

Then, Milan claims that, “Authorities in Hawaii have provided an electronic record of Obama’s birth….”

This statement is completely false.  No Hawaiian authority, at any time, has ever claimed that Hawaii provided, any one of the THREE evolving copies of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth (COLB), that, over time, were posted on the Internet by Obama’s co-conspirators at the left-wing Annenberg FactCheck.com.  I challenge anyone to produce a statement from any Hawaiian official confirming Milan’s assertion.  It never happened.

But this statement takes the cake! “…because the paper copy was destroyed in a fire which wiped out much of the state’s archives.”

Whoaaa Nelly!  Where in the world did Milam get that one?  Google — Hawaii archive fire — yourself.  See!  Never happened — but I guess if Milan wrote that Obama’s dog ate it, no one would believe it.

Let’s take a look at Obama’s bona fides:

1. A supposed “autobiography,” that Obama acknowledges is full of pseudonyms, composite characters, approximated dialogue, and events out of chronological order — and outright lies.  The life presented in the book is a myth.  Most of what you think you know about Obama comes from this piece of fiction — and most of what you think you know just ain’t so.

2. The “birth announcements” from two Hawaiian newspapers prove nothing.  They could be real as can be, or forgeries.  It doesn’t matter.  There isn’t a court in the country that would accept two old newspaper clippings as evidence of anything.  Those two old newspaper clippings are hearsay.

3. And the bogus COLB is the biggest joke of all.  Only the conspirators know where the three COLBs came from.  They didn’t come from Hawaii.  Beyond that, as discrepancies in the document were identified, the document evolved, like everything else about Obama’s life narrative.

In this image rich file, a genealogist associated with a leading genealogy website, documents the evolution of the FactCheck.org images:

Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ — No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery.  Debunked by Ron Polirak, Sandra Ramsey Lines, and the author of this document, among others.

Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL.

Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.

So, how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?

And Milam continues to dissemble, writing, “Democrats in Arizona have dismissed the bill…” — Well, now, there’s a surprise!  Democrats may dismiss the bill, but the bill is currently working its way through the Arizona Senate with twelve co-sponsors.  the Arizona House Committee on Government, chaired by Rep. Judy Burges (R-Skull Valley), voted to pass her introduced bill, HB2441, by a vote of 6-1 — similar bills are working their way through the legislative process in 20 states.

Milam quotes a democratic operative as saying, “”The truth is that he was born in the United States and has provided that proof time and time again.” — Watch out! — a democratic beginning a statement with the words, “The truth is…”  You know a lie is coming.  Not that Obama was born in Hawaii.  I give that statement a 97% of being truthful, but the statement, “[Obama] has provided…proof time and time again — no he hasn’t.  There is no PROOF.  No one has provided PROOF.  As a matter of fact, Obama has illegally disbursed almost $2 million dollars from campaign funds to avoid providing proof of eligibility.  Now that he has the power of the Oval Office, he has civil service attorneys illegally representing him in lawsuits demanding he do so.

Milam gets in a shot at Birthers, writing, “The ‘birthers’ are perhaps the most bizarre of the protest movements against the president.” — well the only thing bizarre about that statement is that Milan believes that it is perfectly appropriate for Barack Obama to tell half of America to go screw themselves.  That’s bizarre!  WE the People have a need to know, and a right to know who the hell Barack Obama is — and we don’t — and Obama intends to keep it that way.

The icing on Milan’s cake is an opinion from the addled-brained Jimmy Carter, that anybody who questions Obama is a racist.  Sighhhhhhhhhhhh!

This is what stands for journalism in 2010.

Greg Milam, whose previous claim to fame was being attacked by a cockerel, on air, is either dumb as a brick, or a committed Obama propagandist — probably both.

Udpate:  NoBarck08 says it seems kind of strange that they find a letter from Lincoln in the archives, if it had a fire.

The Honolulu Star-Bulletin reported that that Daniel W. Stowell, director of the Papers of Abraham Lincoln at the Presidential Library and Museum in Springfield, Ill., and Luella Kurkjian, branch manager of the Hawaii State Archives, displayed documents signed by Lincoln during a news conference yesterday at the Hawaii State Archives Building.


This Is Completely Uncharted Territory

The Obama File

Bob Unruh says an attorney whose legal brief in a case challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility revealed a Supreme Court can remove an ineligible chief executive now has released an analysis confirming that if Obama isn’t eligible, he could be charged under a number of felony statutes.

And that’s just on the federal level; any state charges would be in addition, as would charges against individuals who may have helped him in the commission of any of the acts, according to Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation (USJF).

Kreep has been involved in several of the cases that have raised challenges to Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office, including two in California.  One is on appeal in the state court system and names California Secretary of State Debra Bowen as defendant.  The other, in the federal court system, is on appeal before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Both make claims on behalf of individuals and political candidates in California over Obama’s presence on the 2008 election ballot.

North Dakota Gov. Thomas Moodie, removed from office when the state Supreme Court found him ineligible

Kreep’s legal research revealed two precedents he believes would be applicable in the Obama case.  In one, state officials arbitrarily removed a candidate from an election ballot because it was not proven the candidate was qualified for office.  In another, the North Dakota Supreme Court removed the sitting governor from office when it was documented he was not eligible under the state’s requirements.

Now Kreep has released an analysis of the federal laws he believes could be applied should Obama ultimately be shown to be ineligible.

“If he is not eligible, he could be charged not only under with these crimes, but potentially with crimes in a number of states where he falsely represented that he was qualified to run, as well as people who helped him.”

Further, there could be any number of challenges to virtually anything he did as president: his nominations, his executive orders and his signing of legislation.

“This is completely uncharted territory.  It could all be challenged as invalid.  There has to be a sitting president for [actions] to be valid.  If he’s not qualified, if he’s not the president, it isn’t valid.”


Saudi controlled FOX moves against Gubernatorial candidates who question Obama’s Eligibility


The Post & E-Mail

by John Charlton

© 2009/2010

(Feb. 15, 2010) — In a move which openly and shamelessly manifests FOX’s anti-American agenda, the former conservative news agency has launched a propaganda campaign against U.S. Citizens who, having announced their candidacy for State Governor, in their home states, also question the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of U.S. President.

In an unsigned report published at their website, on Friday, Feb. 12, 2010, Fox News takes aim at Georgia Gubernatorial Candidate, Nathan Deal, and Texas Gubernatorial Candidate Debra Medina.

In its title, “Gubernatorial Candidates Echo Theories of Birthers, 9/11Truthers” the report echoes the terminology and strategy adopted by Eric Erickson of Redstate.com; lump a legitimate constitutional, pro-American issue, with an illegitimate anti-American issue, so as to confuse viewers and suborn their loyalty to the nation.

Medina, does not support the notion that the U.S. Government plotted 9-11, but she is open to consideration of the possibility.  Nathan Deal simply wrote a letter to Obama, asking for reliable information about his birth story.

In that report, FOX openly lied about an important fact in the history of the eligibility question:

In Georgia, Deal, who sent his letter in December, says he is not questioning Obama’s legitimacy, but he believes the president would like a chance to put the issue to rest — even though the Hawaiian government confirmed during the 2008 campaign that a copy of Obama’s birth certificate, which his campaign posted on his Web site, was authentic.

No such claim was ever made.  In fact, Janice S. Okubo was merely quoted by the St. Petersburg Times saying that the electronic image appeared to be like of an actual Hawaiian Certification.  She later made it quite clear that she never saw Obama’s original form, and that electronic images are not issued by her department.  It is obvious as Communication Director, that she is also not qualified to authenticate electronic images.

But FOX showed its true colors, when in the same report, it immediately gave credence to the Democratic agenda, by citing an opponent of Nathan Deal:

In a gubernatorial debate this month, Deal was criticized by one of his GOP opponents for pressing the president to release his birth certificate

“The ability to work with the president … is hindered when you have people who are running for governor that are calling for childish things like the president to show his birth certificate,” said Georgia state lawmaker Austin Scott. “I promise you I’ll always be a gentleman when working with the federal government.”

By this statement, FOX has made it absolutely clear to America, that they will not tolerate anyone who will not work with Obama and be respectful to him.

This move by FOX comes less than a month after a member of the Saudi Royalty, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of the King of Saudi Arabia, announced his desire to forge closer ties with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, the parent of FOX.

Tarek El-tablawy, AP Business Writer, in a report published by Yahoo News, on Sunday, Jan 17, 2010, wrote:

Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a nephew of the Saudi king and who was listed last year by Forbes as the world’s 22nd richest person, met with News Corp.’s chief executive Rupert Murdoch on Jan. 14 in a meeting that “touched upon future potential alliances with News Corp.,” according to a statement released by his Kingdom Holding Co. late Saturday.

Media reports have indicated that News Corp, parent to Fox News and Dow Jones & Co., among others, may be thinking of buying a stake in Alwaleed’s Rotana Media Group, which includes a number of satellite channels that air in the Middle East.

Neither company has commented publicly on the possible deal, but the talks offer an indication yet that such an agreement may yet be in the offing.

Kingdom Holding’s statement said Alwaleed is already the second largest stakeholder in News Corp., with 5.7 percent of the shares of the media company. The stake is held through Kingdom Holding, in which Alwaleed holds a 95 percent stake.

The investment company has a diverse portfolio, ranging from hotels to shares in Apple, eBay and Citigroup.

According to Discover The Networks, Khalid Al-Mansour, a wealthy Muslim Businessman, is the one who reportedly helped Barack Hussein Obama II, transfer from Columbia University to Harvard in the 80’s, remaining an important supporter of the mulatto candidate, who openly claims as his own Arab/Muslim roots in Kenya.

Al-Mansour is a Afro-American, from San Francisco, who converted to Islam, made friends with Prince Alwaleed and was eventually hired by the latter to promote fundamentalist Islam in America.

Thus, it can be rightly said, that a foreign power is the power behind the policy decisions both at FOX News and in the Obama Campaign.

American patriots need to start asking themselves what other so-called “conservative” sources of information have been bought out by the same forces, which want to keep Obama in power, for the sake of Islam.

© 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.


A Chronology of Forgery & Deceit


The Post & E-Mail

by John Charlton

(Jan. 27, 2010) — Most know that there are doubts about Obama’s Birth Certificate or eligibility to be president of the United States, but few are aware how his supporters passed off an obvious forgery of a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth and used cleverly crafted quotes of apparent authorities to establish its authenticity, for the purpose of committing election fraud upon the entire nation.

The notion that it is a forgery continues to be squashed by the Main Stream Media. Consider the transcript from Chris Matthews, Hardball, program from last night, during his interview of J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ), who is challenging John McCain for the U.S. Senate seat in Arizona (note that Matthews is attempting to belittle McCain’s opponent):

Matthews asked Hayworth: “Are you as far right as the birthers?” Are you one of those who believes that the president should have to prove that he’s a citizen of the United States, and not an illegal immigrant? Are you that far right?”

“Well, gosh, we all had to bring our birth certificate’s to show we were who we said we were, and we were the age we said we were, to play football in youth sports,” Hayworth responded matter of factly. “Shouldn’t we know exactly that anyone who wants to run for public office is a natural born citizen of the United States, and is who they say they are?”

Matthews referred back to some of Hayworth’s past statements. “I’m reading your letter that says the president should go back and get his birth certificate from the governor of Hawaii,” said Matthews, who then added: “I’m just asking, do you stand by this letter?”

“Yeah, sure,” Hayworth responded.

“Should the governor of Hawaii produce evidence that the president is one of us, an American?” Matthews asked. “Do you think that’s a worthy pastime for the governor of Hawaii right now?”

“No, I — look. I’m just saying the president should come forward with the information, that’s all,” said Hayworth. “Why should we depend on the governor of Hawaii?” (Source & Video)

That Matthews should ridicule such a common-sense request, is absurd on its face; but his approach is pure Alinksy-esque tactics.

However, what the Main Stream Media don’t want you to remember or recognize is that the highly flaunted electronic image of the COLB which the Obama campaign puts forth to defend his claims to be eligible for office, was recognized as a forgery from the beginning.

This is the little known chronology of forgery and deceit, which this article will highlight for the sake of National Security.

Complete Story:

Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?

Australia.to News
Tuesday, 12 January 2010 22:21

Written by Zach Jones

E-mail Print PDF

Barack ObamaDid Hope for Rising GOP Stars like Bobby Jindal Play a Role in the Obama’s Presidential Eligibility Scandal?

When questions about Obama’s eligibility to serve as President arose, I immediately recognized that this could be the biggest political scandal in U.S. history, bigger even than Watergate. The allegations, if true, would have created widespread political turmoil and would have had to involve people, high up people, ignoring and/or covering up facts. How could a young Senator from Illinois have gotten so far, so quickly, in national politics without some in both the Democratic & Republican Parties taking notice, researching, discovering details of his past and recognizing that there was a BIG potential problem? Especially, given that every other person in Washington is a lawyer, people knew, the media had to have known, known both of the problem and its ramifications. After all, it’s the political big league in Washington.

Having a legal background, I decided to do my own research to satisfy my curiosity and it became abundantly clear that legitimate questions existed and continue to exist. Questions regarding interpretation of Article II, Section I of the Constitution, questions of original intent, British/Kenyan law, acquisition of citizenship, questions about Obama’s birthplace, his adoption, his educational scholarships, his parent’s foreign allegiance/citizenship, his prior inadvertent admissions, questions about his passport(s), etc., exist with sufficient basis in law and/or fact to warrant serious investigation and judicial review. So, like many others at the time, I sat back and waited for the media firestorm to begin. And I waited, and waited, and waited. Not a peep from the media, Hillary, McCain or Republicans. Why?

With an issue this big involving the first competitive African-American running for the Presidency of the United States, his intentional withholding of records and the possibility that he fails to meet the Constitutional requirements for the Office, I just knew that every stone would be quickly overturned to get to the bottom of it. Even though it’s common knowledge that the American media is pretty much left of center when it comes to politics and everything else – ‘the story’, this story was SO big that I was sure they would not be able to ignore it. It wasn’t like other political stories the media ignored such as John Edwards’ love child or Larry Sinclair’s allegations of drug use and sex with Obama. This story went to bedrock, the requirements of who can be President and who can serve as Commander In Chief of our military. To my surprise, next to nothing came from the mainstream media.

Complete Story: