Democrats’ New Devious Plan Can Be Explained in Two Words: Socialist Rathole


Independent Sentinel

Democrats have a new plan to transform the US by supporting the BlackLivesMatter revolutionaries. Their plan and their goal can be summed up in two words: Socialist Rathole. Instead of uniting us, Barack Obama deliberately divides us and his Democrats on the far-left are all in.

Our administration under Obama has fostered ridiculous behavior, emphasizing PC. It’s a divisive tactic used by Alinsky, a person about whom Obama knows a great deal.

The Democrats are joining in with this far-left administration to win at all costs. Politico has a story up today about major donors who are considering funding this insane leftist group BlackLivesMatter.

They will discuss it at the Democracy Alliance major liberal donor club, which runs from Tuesday evening through Saturday morning and is expected to draw rich Democratic leftists, including Tom Steyer and Paul Egerman.

They’re going to buy themselves a revolution because that is what BlackLivesMatter represents. Politico referred to these violent subversive rioters as “scrappier”  and “diverse.”

The Democracy Alliance was created in 2005 by a handful of major donors, including billionaire leftists George Soros and Taco Bell heir Rob McKay to build a permanent infrastructure to advance liberal ideas and causes.

Soros is funding BlackLivesMatter now.

Color of Change and other leftist-led groups are pushing for the funding.

This “movement” is meant to be an insurrection and a revolution to finally bring about our fundamental transformation into a socialist hellhole.

These students who follow the left are misguided and driven by their own prejudices.

As Governor Christie said today, Obama has let “an air of lawlessness settle in the country”.

Rep. Gohmert: Alarmed by Military Exercise Targeting Red States as “Hostile”

Family Security Matters

Earlier this month, Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement on the ‘Jade Helm 15′ exercises the federal government plans to stage in Texas and other states:

Over the past few weeks, my office has been inundated with calls referring to the Jade Helm 15 military exercise scheduled to take place between July 15 and September 15, 2015. This military practice has some concerned that the U.S. Army is preparing for modern-day martial law.

Certainly, I can understand these concerns. When leaders within the current administration believe that major threats to the country include those who support the Constitution, are military veterans, or even ‘cling to guns or religion,’ patriotic Americans have reason to be concerned. We have seen people working in this administration use their government positions to persecute people with conservative beliefs in God, country, and notions such as honor and self-reliance. Because of the contempt and antipathy for the true patriots or even Christian saints persecuted for their Christian beliefs, it is no surprise that those who have experienced or noticed such persecution are legitimately suspicious.

Having served in the U.S. Army, I can understand why military officials have a goal to see if groups of Special Forces can move around a civilian population without being noticed and can handle various threat scenarios. In military science classes or in my years on active duty, I have participated in or observed military exercises; however, we never named an existing city or state as a “hostile.” We would use fictitious names before we would do such a thing.

Once I observed the map depicting ‘hostile,’ ‘permissive,’ and ‘uncertain’ states and locations, I was rather appalled that the hostile areas amazingly have a Republican majority, ‘cling to their guns and religion,’ and believe in the sanctity of the United States Constitution. When the federal government begins, even in practice, games or exercises, to consider any U.S. city or state in ‘hostile’ control and trying to retake it, the message becomes extremely calloused and suspicious.

Such labeling tends to make people who have grown leery of federal government overreach become suspicious of whether their big brother government anticipates certain states may start another civil war or be overtaken by foreign radical Islamist elements which have been reported to be just across our border. Such labeling by a government that is normally not allowed to use military force against its own citizens is an affront to the residents of that particular state considered as ‘hostile,’ as if the government is trying to provoke a fight with them.

The map of the exercise needs to change, the names on the map need to change, and the tone of the exercise needs to be completely revamped so the federal government is not intentionally practicing war against its own states.”

Another strange Obama admininstration arms purchase

American Thinker

On July 29, 2013, the Department of the Army in a Combined Synopsis/Solicitation, Solicitation Number W15QKN13T8513, asked the General Services Administration to procure “592,825 (approx) AK Rifle Magazines: 7.62x39mm Caliber, New Production, Steel, 30 Round Capacity”.  That many magazines would require 17.8 million rounds just fill each magazine once. What nation or even what moderate Syrian rebel group needs that kind of firepower?  That request is far beyond what is needed by any nation that issues AK’s to its soldiers except Russia and China. Of course, the US armed forces do not use AK rifles as standard issue.


 US armed forces stationed in Jordan are currently supplying Syrian rebels with small arms, like the AK.  However, could this Administration be planning to supply over half a million AK magazines to the moderate rebels, most of which will probably end up in the hands of the al-Qaeda or even the Assad regime? No. Realistically only 50,000 magazines would end up being delivered to “our” rebels in an entire year.

 From Reuters we read:

  Continue reading