Voice of Europe
Mosques are popping up all over Britain, especially in its capital city of London. Sharia courts are in full function in London, handing out actual decisions to London’s ever growing Muslim population.
“London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together,” Islamic preacher Maulana Syed Raza Rizvi told local media
Churches still outnumber mosques in Britain, but there are many mosques that are becoming overcrowded. Five years ago the Daily Mail published photos of churches and mosques in London. The difference was astonishing.
The St Mary’s Church had only 12 people attending mass. While nearby at the Brune Street Estate mosque there were over 100 Muslims, full to capacity.
Since 2001, 500 London churches of all denominations have been turned into private homes. While this was going on, mosques have been popping up all over London. From 2012 to 2014 the number of Brits who identified as Muslim has grown by over one million.
Regular churchgoers are declining at a rate that within a generation, their numbers will be three times lower than that of Muslims who go regularly to a mosque on Friday.
In Britain it’s estimated that by 2020, Muslims going to a mosque regularly will outnumber Christians going to church.
There are now officially 100 Sharia courts in London. The allowance of these justice systems in parallel with British courts has Brits very worried. It’s now fully legal for Sharia courts to operate in Britain thanks to British Arbitration Act and the system of Alternative Dispute Resolution.
SECURE FREEDOM MINUTE
Voters in London just made a Muslim their mayor. Some describe the election of the Labor candidate, Sadiq Khan, over the Conservative’s Zac Goldsmith, to be a milestone in the evolution of Great Britain’s increasingly multicultural society. And, indeed, it is.
Interestingly, Milestones is the title of a book by one of the most influential leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sayyid Qutb. It describes how Islamic supremacists must pursue a phased approach to dominating unbelieving infidels. That goal is advanced by electoral majorities arising from migration of the faithful to non-Muslim lands.
Goldsmith unsuccessfully warned of Khan’s ties to such Islamists. His loss brought denunciations from his own party for undermining its efforts to “build bridges” to Muslims. But Qutb declared such “bridges” could only be built for the purpose of bringing infidels to Islam.
The Islamic State (ISIS) militants claimed on Twitter that they had the ‘dirty bomb’ and had ‘terror’ plans for London, confirming fears raised by the United Nations(UN) back in July.
Several ISIS affiliate accounts made the claim in the last few days that the militant group had the capacity to make the ‘ Bomb’ using 40kg of Uranium that the group ‘stole’ from the Mosul University some four months ago.
photo via Free Republic
The details of the ‘dirty bomb’ emerged recently after the ISIS fighters boasted on Twitter of the chaos they could wreck in London. A “dirty bomb” is a type of radiological dispersal device (RDD) that combines conventional explosives, such as dynamite, with radioactive material.
A Mirror report claimed that British ISIS fanatics were seen boasting of the possible destruction in the UK.
An ISIS fanatic, identified as Hamayun Tariq of Dudley, West Midlands, revealed on social media that the group had the bomb ready, made using nuclear material….
(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.co.in …
Family Security Matters
Readers of Aaron Klein’s latest piecing together of the Benghazi-Syria arms puzzle will take special notice of the role that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears to have played in pushing the policy to arm the jihad front fighting Assad.
It was the New York Times in February that highlighted Clinton’s “activist” plan to “vet the [Syrian] rebel groups and train fighters, who would be supplied with weapons.” In essence, this was just Libya Redux. In Libya, of course, any supposed figleaf “vetting” process failed to stop the US and NATO from both arming and militarily enabling the victory of jihad forces over the anti-jihad Qaddafi — a red-line-crossing I think of as Uncle Sam joining the jihad. “Our” jihadis in Libya were actually led by senior members of “al Qaeda” in Europe and the Med, with close, demonstrable links to the perpetrators of the catastrophic jihad attacks on London, Madrid, Tunisia and Casablanca — as John Rosenthal lays out in his shocking, dot-connecting new book The Jihadist Plot: The Untold Story of Al-Qaeda and the Libyan Rebellion.
Hillary’s Syria plan, according to the paper, was rebuffed by the Obama White House. Last week, however, Klein points out, the Times reported that a secret plan that sounds like Clinton’s has been implemented by the CIA to arm “rebels” in Syria in fits, starts and escalation since early 2012. The US plan involves Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Croatia and probably other unsavories.