They all lied about how Ambassador Christopher Stevens Died in Benghazi

Tea Party Tribune

As new information is finally starting to leak out about what really happened in Benghazi on that fateful night of September 11, 2012, NOTHING is more telling than this one single photograph…for this photograph proves that Ambassador Christopher Stevens did NOT die of smoke inhalation in the embassy compound as was claimed by the Obama administration, but was taken alive, raped, sodomized, and God only knows what else…and Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Hillary Clinton, and all those in their vile orbit knew this from day one and all bold-faced lied.

They all willfully, deliberately, and with malice LIED to Ambassador Stevens’ family and to ‘We the People’. And while we all know that some claim that Stevens was the middle-man in Obama’s gun and weapons running operation to the Syrian rebels, or that he was actually kidnapped to trade for the Blind Sheik and mistakenly killed, I believe that what I will tell you about this picture coupled with Obama’s cover-up and LIES, gives credence to my belief (one that I’ve had since day one) that Ambassador Stevens found out Obama was running guns and weapons under the table to the al-Qaeda supported Syrian rebels, and was silenced before he could expose what Obama was doing.


Before I get to the photograph we must let the lead-up facts speak for themselves.

First, we all know there was NO spontaneous mob protest outside the consulate as Obama claimed for the first two weeks after the attack. Mob violence that got out of control because of an anti-islamic YouTube video he said, but a video that few had actually seen, that is until he went on Pakistani TV bloviating and apologizing for it after the fact. And with both former CIA Director David H. Petreaus and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that NO video was involved, they both bold-faced lied to Congress when first questioned, claiming that it was the video and the video alone that caused the attack. But I hate to tell them …NO I’m happy to tell them…lying under oath is a felony…an arrestable offense.

Continue reading

Obama and His Media Loyalists Still Spinning Benghazi

Family Security Matters

The media and Obama administration  are at it again, trying to defend their earlier actions on Benghazi. For weeks  following the September 11, 2012 attacks, President Obama and his colleagues  blamed them on a spontaneous demonstration inspired by protests in Cairo, a  position that has been repeatedly found to be patently untrue.

But Obama would prefer that the  American public ignore this and his other “phony” scandals. In fact, he told  Bill O’Reilly in a recent pre-Super Bowl  interview that scandals like the IRS  controversy are the result of irresponsible reporting by Fox News. “These kinds  of things keep on surfacing in part because you and your TV station will promote  them,” he told O’Reilly.

In an effort to convince us that  Benghazi is not a scandal, Obama, arguing with O’Reilly, once again attempted to  defend his completely indefensible narrative that in fact he said from day one  that it was a terrorist attack (or in his words, “an act of terror”), and that  the decision to claim the attack was the result of a spontaneous demonstration,  sparked by an anti-Islam video, was made with the best information  available. 

Continue reading

Rumors of General Ham Being Relieved Could be True

Family Security Matters

Rumors have been swirling about General Carter Ham, commander of Africa  Command located in Stuttgart,  Germany, ever since Secretary of Defense Leon  Panetta announced that President Obama has nominated General David Rodriguez to  replace him. Those rumors have been adamantly denied by the Pentagon.

Continue reading

Did General Disobey Obama’s Orders to Stand Down to Muslim Terrorists?


The indescribably shameful ascension to power of Barack Hussein Obama has confronted some military personnel with an agonizing choice: do they serve their country, or do they serve the sick joke in the White House? From a careerist’s point of view, General Carter Ham appears to have chosen incorrectly, according to this piece of RUMINT relayed by the Washington Times:

Continue reading