Sick joke: Anti-Obama filmmaker indicted for election fraud

American Thinker

Dinesh D’Souza, a best selling author and creator of the documentary “2016: Obama’s America” has been indicted for election fraud and causing false statement to be made to the FBI.

 The indictment alleges that D’Souza reimbursed some people for giving campaign contributions to a Senate candidate from New York. The amount that was allegedly donated was $20,000.

  Continue reading

Why the GOP Will Not Challenge Vote Fraud… Can This Be?

Knowledge Creats Power

GOP legally BARRED from fighting vote fraud

photo: Gulag Bound

30 years later, consent decree violation claims still threaten

Continue reading

Live Database Pull Linking Harrison Bounel to Obama’s Bogus Social Security Number

ObamaRelease YourRecords

Al Hendershot: A database pull using the Obama alias Harrison J Bounel linking it to Barack H Obama’s bogus social security number and linking the Obama alias to Michelle Obama as well. A direct search using “Bounel” in the state if IL was used in capturing this vital information that has never been exposed until now.
This alias is associated with his bogus CT social security number that he has been using since the 1970’s. The alias is also associated with Michelle L Obama which lists her as Bounel’s spouse as of 2011. Barack H Obama has committed a felony in the state of NH; furthermore, he has committed the same fraud in every state prior to the 2008 election and in the up-coming 2012 election.

Exactly what Constitution is the Federal Government using?

T-Room

Since the 2008 Presidential primary, millions of citizens have questioned the duly elected President’s eligibility. Hundreds of thousands of American’s have turned to the United States Constitution for answers. Dozens upon dozens of lawsuits have been filed challenging Obama’s eligibility, and with every new day more challenges are filed. Others have turned to their state’s Attorney General to investigate election fraud To date, six state Attorney’s General have received these Memorandum of Complaints. They simply request the state Attorney General, the People’s Attorney, to investigate whether the Democrat Corporation placed an ineligible candidate on the “D” line of state ballots. Remember, we the citizen’s paid for that election ballot.

Patriotic American’s, representing 48 states, held the Third Continental Congress at Pleasant Run in St. Charles, Illinois, from November 11 — 22, 2009. These American Patriots paid their own expenses, took time off from work, left their families and worked night and day to develop Articles of Freedom for you, your family, your friends, your co-workers. Read them. They did a fabulous job representing “We the People”.

Then their is citizen Bob Campbell who heads up The American Grand Jury. He and his fellow Patriots have made great strides informing American Citizens of their rights granted to them under the Constitution. He’s assisted numerous citizens in holding American Grand Juries across the country, and then files the Presentments to the respective court. Patriot groups are growing by leaps and bounds. Check out Resistnet, IrateNationFreeRepublic to name a few. The American Patriotic movement is flourishing all over the blogosphere, but if you are one of those American’s who rely on Mainstream news mediums, well, sadly you wouldn’t know about, let alone understand, who we are and why we’re fighting so hard for you.

A deafening silence, a silence so loud, so powerful from the Fourth Estate has resulted in a monstrous clash between the American Patriot and the American Sheeple. The controlled mainstream media outlets dare not touch the subject of Obama’s eligibility. Rather, if they cover it at all, they frame the subject in terms of ridicule using inflammatory rhetoric and casting all who question as crazy, nut jobs, conspiracy theorists, birthers and so on. From Glenn Beck to Keith Olbermann to The New York Times new About.com (h/t CitizenWells.wordpress.com), Washington Post to the LA Times, all American patriots hear is how stupid we are or out of touch we are.

Are we? Could they be trying to tell us something we don’t want to hear?

As an American Patriot, when you’re in the trenches reading, writing, debating, learning and challenging these Mainstream rascals it’s a difficult to see the rope dangling above your head to escape to a different place. A place to breathe in some fresh air, feel the warmth of the sun bathe upon your skin, and to see and hear the noises of everyday life surrounding you. You realize how mentally fatigued you are, how heavy your heart is and you remember how life used to be, that is, before the 2008 Presidential Primary.  You sit on a grassy knoll, you lay down and you rest. Thoughts start swirling around in your mind when suddenly you remember that rope. Why did this appear? Why did I grab onto it and climb my way out? You ponder this thought for awhile, and the next thing you know you find yourself at a bend in the road that just might point you toward that ray of hope so many of us are desperate find.

Could such a road lead you and me to the truth? Well, here’s a radical thought. Could it be that the Federal Governement is not governed by the U.S. Constitution but rather the Corporation? Could it be possible that a former Congress threw the U.S. Constitution away? Could we actually be being ruled by the U.S. Corporation all the while believing we were being governed by the Constitution? Is this why Congress only placates “We the People” so as to remain in power? Is this why “We the People” don’t trust Congress? Could this answer the question so many have asked “why is Congress so out of touch with the People?” You tell me.

In 1801, the Sixth Congress, 2nd Session, Chapter 15, An Act Concerning the District of Columbia (a) also known as The Act of 1801, was passed accepting land ceded by the state of Maryland and the Commonwealth of Virginia to permanently form the seat of the government for the United States. Yet, in 1871, the Forty-First Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, passed “The Act of 1871 forming a corporation [in the District of Columbia] called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin.“  Do yourself the favor and read both Acts and then read the highlighted link telling us the Act of 1871 appears to have changed everything our Founding Fathers fought for.

Am I wrong? I don’t know, you tell me?

The seating of the government of the United States in 1801 gave rights to the citizens of the District of Columbia but The Act of 1871 began the process of eroding said rights. Geez, Washington DC’s license plates read “Taxation without Representation.”

Continued Reading:

White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races

Tips to Dancing Czars

The American Spectator: Additional sources below.

“Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.” – 18 USC Sec. 211 — Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office

“In the face of a White House denial, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak stuck to his story yesterday that the Obama administration offered him a “high-ranking” government post if he would not run against U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania’s Democratic primary.”
Philadelphia Inquirer
February 19, 2010

“D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff”
Denver Post
September 27, 2009

A bombshell has just exploded in the 2010 elections.

For the second time in five months, the Obama White House is being accused — by Democrats — of offering high ranking government jobs in return for political favors. What no one is reporting is that this is a violation of federal law that can lead to prison time, a fine or both, according to Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code.

The jobs in question? Secretary of the Navy and a position within the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The favor requested in return? Withdrawal from Senate challenges to two sitting United States Senators, both Democrats supported by President Obama. The Senators are Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Michael Bennet in Colorado.

On Friday, Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak, the Democrat challenging Specter for re-nomination, launched the controversy by accusing the Obama White House of offering him a federal job in exchange for his agreeing to abandon his race against Specter.

In August of 2009, the Denver Post reported last September, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Jim Messina “offered specific suggestions” for a job in the Obama Administration to Colorado Democrat Andrew Romanoff, a former state House Speaker, if Romanoff would agree to abandon a nomination challenge to U.S. Senator Michael Bennet. Bennet was appointed to the seat upon the resignation of then-Senator Ken Salazar after Salazar was appointed by Obama to serve as Secretary of the Interior. According to the Post, the specific job mentioned was in the U.S. Agency for International Development. The Post cited “several sources who described the communication to The Denver Post.” Complete Story:

“Citizen vs. Natural Born Citizen” – with Obama’s Exact Citizenship Status It’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” – Washington Times National

The Betrayal

A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers Published:

sheethttp://www.scribd.com/doc/26563415/Citizen-v-natural-born-Citizen-It-s-Don-t-Ask-Don-t-Tell-20100208-Issue-Wash-Times-Natl-Wkly-pg-15

Many people do not know there is a difference between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen.” Being a “Citizen” of any type, whether an Article II natural born Citizen, 14th Amendment born Citizen, 14th Amendment naturalized Citizen, or statutory born Citizen under a Congressional Act, means you are a member of the society and entitled to all its rights and privileges. But under our Constitution to serve in the singular most powerful office in our government, that is to be the President and Commander-in-Chief of our military under our Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, of our Constitution you need to be a “natural born Citizen.” Being a “natural born Citizen” cannot be conveyed by any laws of man and can only be conveyed by the facts of nature at the time of your birth and circumstances of your birth, i.e., being born in the country to two citizens of the country.

(Legal Treatise “The Law of Nations – Principles of Natural Law” Section 212 by E. Vattel 1758, SCOTUS Decision Venus 1814, SCOTUS Decision Minor v Happersett 1874). This new advertorial is designed to help educate the public pictorially about the fact that Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the USA and thus is ineligible under our Constitution to the office he sits in. Obama is a Usurper who was allowed to be put there by millions in foreign money, a corruptly lead Congress, and an enabling main stream media. This is a constitutional crisis and a national security concern that must be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court or our Republic, Constitution, and Liberties are in great danger.

Obama is hiding the truth from the People with an enabling media and is refusing to answer questions on his Article II constitutional eligibility to be President and Commander in Chief of the military. In fact he said last week people should not even question him about it. With him his exact citizenship status policy is, “don’t ask, don’t tell” and hope it goes away. Well it is not going away. This is a constitutionally based legal eligibility question. Obama’s election fraud and cover up will be revealed. The truth and the Constitution will win the day in the end and We the People will constitutionally remove the Usurper from his illegally obtained office.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ … help the cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org/

Source:

What the Dems Know: Universal Voter Registration

American Thinker

By James Simpson

Many are puzzled that Democrats persist in ramming unpopular and destructive legislation down our collective throats with no apparent concern for their plummeting poll numbers. A widespread belief is that the Democrats are committing political suicide and will be swept from one or both houses of Congress with unprecedented electoral losses next November. But since Democrat politicians rarely do things that will not ultimately benefit themselves, this column asked two weeks ago, “What do they know that we don’t?”

We may have found out. It’s called universal voter registration. The Wall Street Journal‘s John Fund described the Democrat plan recently at a David Horowitz Freedom Center forum. Watch the video here.
Fund describes the proposal as follows:
In January, Chuck Schumer and Barney Frank will propose universal voter registration. What is universal voter registration? It means all of the state laws on elections will be overridden by a federal mandate. The feds will tell the states: ‘take everyone on every list of welfare that you have, take everyone on every list of unemployed you have, take everyone on every list of property owners, take everyone on every list of driver’s license holders and register them to vote regardless of whether they want to be …’
Fund anticipates that Congress will attempt to ram this legislation through, as with the health care bill. What a surprise! Fund covers the vote issue at greater length in his book, How the Obama Administration Threatens to Undermine Our Elections.
Leftist groups are already arguing that universal voter registration will solve all the problems with our voting system. But the left created most of these problems. The radical leftist Nation Magazine, for example, absolutely loves the idea of universal voter registration. This is the same magazine, however, that advanced Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven’s Manufactured Crisis strategy. The Cloward/Piven strategy was designed to undermine government institutions by overwhelming them with impossible demands for services. Cloward and Piven focused on welfare, housing, and voting as the main targets of this strategy, and the radical group ACORN was specifically created for the purpose of executing it.
The Nation article enthusiastically lists Cloward/Piven-inspired organizations like Project Vote, the ACORN group where President Obama cut his teeth. It also discusses the left’s efforts to push enforcement of the Motor Voter law and explains how universal voter registration could assist in these efforts. Cloward and Piven were the ones who crafted Motor Voter legislation in the early 1980s and pushed for its enactment until 1993, when President Clinton signed it into law. Cloward and Piven considered Motor Voter to be their crowning, lifetime achievement. The picture below, from White House photo archives, shows Cloward (light gray suit) and Piven (green coat and navy dress) standing directly behind Clinton at the Motor Voter signing ceremony.
The left has predictably launched vicious smear attacks against John Fund for bringing universal voter registration to our attention. A Google search of the issue brings up any number of nasty ad hominem attacks. Most notable is Media Matters, the leftist group whose sole purpose seems to be to smear Republicans and defend the left’s indefensible policies. They put up this gem: “Right-Wing Ass Weasel John Fund Doesn’t Like Universal Voter Registration because of ACORN.”
The problems with universal voter registration are numerous and obvious. Many states’ lists include vast numbers of illegals, including some states which allow illegals to obtain drivers licenses; because many homeowners have more than one home, there will be duplicates; because so many people are on so many separate federal and state government agency lists, there will be duplicates; and because so many lists exist with little or no cross-checking capability, all of these duplicates are likely to go uncorrected. Add to this the fact that Dems hope to extend voting rights to felons, and the whole thing begins to look like a nationwide Democrat voter registration drive facilitated by taxpayers.
Universal voter registration will create massive vulnerabilities to systemic voter fraud nationwide, and if Democrats have proven anything in recent years, it is that they can win elections that way. The George-Soros-funded Secretary of State project (SOS) was designed to take advantage of such vulnerabilities and may have been developed in anticipation of the universal voter registration plan. Al Franken’s stolen election in Minnesota was a trial run for the SOS project. Longtime ACORN friend Mark Ritchie was elected Minnesota Secretary of State in 2006 with Soros’s SOS and ACORN money, and what followed in Norm Coleman’s Senate runoff election was a frightening demonstration of just how far Democrats will go to win. Franken won the runoff, and the Democrats got their filibuster-proof sixty-vote Senate majority.
The Motor Voter law was correctly identified as a facilitator of vote fraud. One of the few legal issues Barack Obama actually participated in as a lawyer was a 1995 suit against the State of Illinois, which he brought on behalf of ACORN. Then-Republican Governor Jim Edgars saw the newly passed Motor Voter act as creating the potential for massive vote fraud and refused to implement it. With the assistance of the Clinton Justice Department, Obama’s legal team won that suit. Obama himself actually participated very little, a strategy that seems to have served him well in life. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, after identifying himself in court proceedings, Obama sat back and let “the heavy-hitters at the Justice Department make the arguments.”
It is not surprising that the Democrats are now choosing to push this new initiative, for universal voter registration will be Motor Voter on turbochargers. And who better to sign it into law than the president from ACORN?