Why Blame Obama?

American Thinker

Let  me count the ways.

Before  inauguration.  Senator Obama voted for the budgets he would later  blame on Bush, and for the TARP bailout.  After just two months of TARP,  the Bush administration said it was done — crisis averted.

Barack Obama: The great jobs killer

As former President Ronald Reagan might have said, “Obama, there you go again.”

The current occupant of the White House claims to know how to create jobs. He claims jobs have been created. But so far the score is Great Obama Depression 2.2 million lost jobs, Obama 0 — a blowout.

Obama is as hopeless, helpless, clueless and bankrupt of good ideas as the manager of the Chicago Cubs in late September. This “community organizer” knows as much about private-sector jobs as Pamela Anderson knows about nuclear physics.

Barack Obama: A Bill of Indictment

CFP

Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! All those with business before the court of public opinion will draw near. A bill of indictment has been issued for Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America. It is a call for justice from the people of the United States who allege that he is engaged in the destruction of their nation.

For the court’s consideration, it is alleged:

Obama’s Agenda: Overwhelm the System

Fox Nation

Rahm Emanuel cynically said, “You never want a crisis to go to waste.” It is now becoming clear that the crisis he was referring to is Barack Obama’s presidency.

Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he’s doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos — thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.

Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of ’83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the clues below. Taken individually they’re alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival … and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government. Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.

Dems Shift Blame to American People

Red County

Ever notice how Pres. Obama and the liberals in Congress go to great lengths to place the onus of their own reckless spending on to the American people, or the prior administration?  It’s as if these shameless politicians are declaring that the people made them go on a spending spree.

Although spending was quite high during the George Bush years, two wars were being fought, and the spending was nowhere near  the astronomical borrowing and deficit spending currently underway with the Dems.  Democrats often claim that the American people want them to lead, and have a burning desire for change.  Really?

Since when did the American people request bailouts for Chrysler, GM, and several major financial institutions?  When did they cry out for a stimulus plan (ARRA), a bloated budget, or the raising of the debt ceiling?  Where are all these Americans who demanded that our federal government take over health care?  Did the people plead with the Feds to escalate deficit spending, and the national debt?

I bet we’d be hard pressed to find many Americans who endorse spending trillions of non-existent dollars on highly dubious Ponzi schemes.  Yet the Dems continue the same old mantra that they are only doing what the people want.  If that is the case, then why do the Dems exhort businesses and individuals to live within their means, while the current administration in D.C. does the opposite?  Indeed, if the Dems are acting in the interests of Americans, why has the gargantuan spending done little to spur the economy?

Crisscrossing America, Obama is selling Obamacare as a real bargain, as he trots out folks who have suffered due to a lack of insurance.  He knows full well that anyone who wants to be insured could be if interstate commerce laws allowed folks to shop for health insurance around the country, as they can with other types of insurance.  Moreover, medical care could be more affordable if there were fewer regulations on health care delivery by doctors and hospitals.  Granted, doctors and hospitals could police themselves better by curtailing unnecessary procedures and tests.

Whenever the Dems assert that they are working for the American people, be very wary indeed.  What they really mean is that they are laboring to enhance their own control and power over the American people, in order to perpetuate a state of  government dependency.  People don’t make the government spend, because in most cases the Dems ignore the will of most Americans.  Indeed, most folks want the government to get off their backs, and stick to the liberty enhancing core principles that the founders enshrined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Source:

Chrysler bankruptcy lawyers raise eligibility question

---

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Lawyers defending the government-orchestrated deal by which Chrysler was purchased by Fiat and hundreds of dealers were thrown out of the network have raised President Barack Obama’s eligibility for office as a possible issue in the dispute.

In a footnote in their latest court filing, attorneys representing the old car company at the firm of Jones Day have cited a “scheme” purportedly on the part of the lawyers for the former Chrysler dealers – the plaintiffs in the case.

“Although the debtors have no independent knowledge of these matters, the debtors have taken note of certain public statements connecting the motion to a crusade involving the movants’ counsel to challenge Barack Obama’s legitimacy as president of the United States,” the court filing states. “For example, one report has stated: Birthers are launching yet another scheme … [that] involves a legal maneuver known as ‘quo warranto,’ a prerogative writ requiring the person to whom it is directed to show what authority he has for exercising some right or power (or ‘franchise’) he claims to hold.”

Attorney Stephen Pidgeon, who along with Leo Donofrio is representing more than 70 former Chrysler dealerships put out of business by the machinations involved in granting massive quantities of taxpayer funds

to Chrysler, which then was taken over by Fiat, said it’s a good sign for the case.

“This is very encouraging because they are attempting to distract the court from the law, a tactic they would not employ if they truly thought the law was on their side. … This case is getting very interesting,” he said.

Complete Story: