Alabama Supreme Court Rules Unborn Baby is a Person

Free Republic

via Christian Headlines

The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that a wrongful death lawsuit brought by a woman who claims her doctor caused her to have a miscarriage by administering an abortion-inducing drug can proceed.

Kimberly Stinnett’s usual doctor was reportedly out the day of her appointment. Karla Kennedy, the doctor who was filling in that day, believed that Stinnett had an ectopic pregnancy since she had had one previously.

Thus, Kennedy decided to administer methotrexate, a drug that, as the court noted, is “intended to cause the end of the pregnancy.”

However, when Stinnett’s usual doctor, William Huggins, examined her pregnancy via ultrasound, he found that Stinnett did not have an ectopic pregnancy after all, but instead had a normal intrauterine pregnancy. He said that Stinnett’s pregnancy was now doomed to fail, however, quite possibly from the methotrexate.

A few weeks later, as predicted, Stinnett suffered a miscarriage. She then took her case against Kennedy to court, alleging that the doctor had unnecessarily ended a viable pregnancy.

The initial court dismissed the case, but when Stinnett appealed her case to the Alabama Supreme Court, it was ruled that her case stands and must be heard in the lower court.

The court’s decision to allow Stinnett’s case to proceed has significant implications for the pro-life movement since they based their decision on the belief that Kennedy had possibly contributed to a homicide–meaning that Stinnett’s unborn baby was a person and not simply a fetus.

“The use of the viability standard established in Roe [Roe v. Wade] is incoherent as it relates to wrongful-death law because, among other reasons, life begins at the moment of conception. The fact that life begins at conception is beyond refutation,” wrote Judge Thomas Parker.

“Members of the judicial branch of Alabama should do all within their power to dutifully ensure that the laws of Alabama are applied equally to protect the most vulnerable members of our society, both born and unborn,” Parker added.

Obama Eligibility Case Finally Ruled on by Alabama Supreme Court: “No Opinion”

Freedom Outpost

A lot of hopes have been riding on the Alabama Supreme Court and specifically Judge Roy Moore for some time. For many months people have been anxiously awaiting for Alabama to rule and in the end The Cotton State “ruled not to rule.”

How does a court rule that they have no opinion? These are our courts. We go to them when we cannot resolve situations without them. Then they tell us that they cannot rule on this and pass the buck back to the Secretary of State and legislators? This is unreal and it shows how corrupt and gutless the entire system is.

Continue reading

Exclusive: Alabama Supreme Court Ruling Could Come “Next Week”

Sharon Rondeau | Post & Email (Mar. 15, 2014) —

A decision in the case of McInnish v. Chapman, which claims that former Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman failed to vet presidential candidates for the 2012 election, may be announced “this week,” a reliable source told The Post & Email on Saturday after a face-to-face conversation with Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore.

The Alabama Supreme Court decision in a case challenging Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility could be announced on Friday, according to a reliable source who spoke with Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore on Saturday

The case was filed by Atty. Larry Klayman on behalf of plaintiffs Hugh McInnish and Virgil Goode initially in October 2012, “asking the court to order that Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman verify president Barack Obama‘s eligibility – and all of the candidates — to be placed on or remain on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot.”  After a denial in Montgomery Circuit Court, Klayman filed an appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court last March.
Chapman resigned her post as Alabama Secretary of State on July 31 of last year despite having “garnered more votes than any other Constitutional Officer in state history and was elected as President of the National Association of Secretaries of State.”

Continue reading

Friend of the Court in Alabama Eligibility Case Claims Obama Became an Indonesian Citizen

ARE THESE THE ANSWERS WE HAVE ALL BEEN WAITING FOR?
By Sharon Rondeau | The Post & Email

(Aug. 8, 2013) — An Amicus Curiae brief filed by Atty. Albert W.L. Moore, Jr. in an eligibility case now before the Alabama Supreme Court contends that the man known as “Barack Hussein Obama II” became an Indonesian citizen during his youth, traveled on an Indonesian passport, and rejected U.S. citizenship “by refraining from registration with the Selective Service System.”

The Alabama Supreme Court is part of the Unified Judicial System of Alabama, which consolidates the appellate courts, the state law library, and the Administrative Office of the Courts

Further, the brief claims that Obama’s biological parents are not those he has publicly identified, Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama II.
Moore states that “Obama” has used the alias “Barry Soetoro,” which has been confirmed by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse‘s investigation of Obama’s long-form birth certificate posted on the White House website.  The image, as well as documents mailed to FOIA requesters purported to be Obama’s Selective Service registration form, have been declared “computer-generated forgeries” by the investigators.

Continue reading

Document Expert Could Topple The Obama Administration

Western Journalism

There have been many lawsuits challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President—most based on the fact that Obama is not a natural born citizen, his father being a Kenyan. Other lawsuits challenge the validity of Obama’s PDF long-form birth certificate, riddled with strange anomalies like multiple layers and eight different fonts.

The lawsuits have all crashed and burned in flames for two reasons: 1. The court hearing the lawsuits have treated the cases as a joke instead of a valid question of Constitutional requirements. And 2. The plaintiffs haven’t had Reed Hayes on their side.

 

Continue reading

Obama Eligibility Appealed In Judge Roy Moore’s Court

Freedom Outpost

While many believe the “birthers” are “right wing extremists,” there is much  evidence that demonstrates that Barack Hussein Obama is not only ineligible for  office, but that he is knowingly a usurper to the highest office in the land.   The Obama eligibility case is likely to be heard in a court room by a judge who  questions Obama’s eligibility.  Judge Roy Moore was elected chief Justice of the  Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to  remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.   Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and now the head of Freedom  Watch, is appealing to Moore’s court after the Montgomery Circuit Court  dismissed the Obama eligibility case.

Continue reading