They all lied about how Ambassador Christopher Stevens Died in Benghazi

Tea Party Tribune

As new information is finally starting to leak out about what really happened in Benghazi on that fateful night of September 11, 2012, NOTHING is more telling than this one single photograph…for this photograph proves that Ambassador Christopher Stevens did NOT die of smoke inhalation in the embassy compound as was claimed by the Obama administration, but was taken alive, raped, sodomized, and God only knows what else…and Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Hillary Clinton, and all those in their vile orbit knew this from day one and all bold-faced lied.

They all willfully, deliberately, and with malice LIED to Ambassador Stevens’ family and to ‘We the People’. And while we all know that some claim that Stevens was the middle-man in Obama’s gun and weapons running operation to the Syrian rebels, or that he was actually kidnapped to trade for the Blind Sheik and mistakenly killed, I believe that what I will tell you about this picture coupled with Obama’s cover-up and LIES, gives credence to my belief (one that I’ve had since day one) that Ambassador Stevens found out Obama was running guns and weapons under the table to the al-Qaeda supported Syrian rebels, and was silenced before he could expose what Obama was doing.

Before I get to the photograph we must let the lead-up facts speak for themselves.

First, we all know there was NO spontaneous mob protest outside the consulate as Obama claimed for the first two weeks after the attack. Mob violence that got out of control because of an anti-islamic YouTube video he said, but a video that few had actually seen, that is until he went on Pakistani TV bloviating and apologizing for it after the fact. And with both former CIA Director David H. Petreaus and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both knowing beyond a shadow of a doubt that NO video was involved, they both bold-faced lied to Congress when first questioned, claiming that it was the video and the video alone that caused the attack. But I hate to tell them …NO I’m happy to tell them…lying under oath is a felony…an arrestable offense.

The AWOL Commander-in-Chief

Family Security Matters

You couldn’t help but feel for Robert Lovell. The retired brigadier general is haunted by the failure of AFRICOM, the U.S. military’s Africa Command, to respond when Americans were under siege in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. His congressional testimony this week was somber – no faux “What difference, at this point, does it make?” indignation, no “Dude, this was two years ago” juvenilia for him.

Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the State Department’s Sean Smith were killed in the early stage of the jihadist attack. By then, the actions that would surely have saved their lives – e.g., an adult recognition that Benghazi was no place for an American diplomatic facility, or at least the responsible provision of adequate security – had already been callously forsaken. It seems unlikely AFRICOM could have gotten there in time for them on that fateful night, though that does not come close to excusing the failure to try.

Former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty are a different story. They fought valiantly for many hours after our military learned, very early on, that the battle was raging. Unlike AFRICOM, the SEALs did not stand pat. They ran to the sound of the guns. After saving over 30 of their countrymen, they paid with their lives. The armed forces, General Lovell recalled, knew that terrorists were attacking them. Yet no one came to their aid.

Lovell bears the burden of their abandonment with a heavy heart. His moving testimony made that clear. Still, his version of events is deeply unsatisfying. Why did AFRICOM fail to respond? “Basically,” he stammered, “there was a lot of looking to the State Department.” Unfortunately, we’re told Secretary Hillary Clinton and her minions were unclear “in terms of what they would like to have.” Come again? “They didn’t come forward with stronger requests for action.”

Obama’s ‘Impeachable Offense’ Over New Benghazi Revelations

Western Journalism

We now know the CIA Annex in Benghazi was the hub for illegally shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels. That the CIA Annex contained three huge warehouses containing thousands of surface-to-air missiles, taking part in a proxy war to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.

We now know, as revealed in Congressional testimony by Gregory Hicks, the State Department’s deputy chief of mission in Libya, after the Benghazi consulate was attacked—after ambassador Christopher Stevens begged for help—a stand down order was given. That AFRICOM, the huge military presence overseeing the entire African continent, including Libya, gave a direct order for special forces not to be deployed; and this order had to have come from the President (or someone acting in the President’s place.)

The question is, why was the stand down order given? And why the cover story of a protest over an anti-Muslim YouTube video? What exactly was so shocking in Benghazi that had the Obama administration scrambling to create a huge coverup? Were Barack Obama and his rogue CIA agency simply caught with their hands in the cookie jar fighting a war they had no authorization for?

Shockingly, this is only half the story.

Something much more serious has been revealed by Joe DiGenova, former chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee and now the attorney representing Benghazi whistleblower Gregory Hicks. According to information supplied to DiGenova from high-level officials in the Special Operations and Intelligence community, the reason for the huge coverup was because during the attack on the consulate and later the CIA Annex, 400 surface-to-air missiles were stolen. According to DiGenova, these are shoulder-fired heat-sinking missiles capable of shooting down a commercial airliner. Who stole these missiles? Al-Qaeda. The same Al-Qaeda that flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers and Pentagon on 9/11.

Four hundred missiles capable of shooting down an American airliner in the hands of our enemies, and Barack Hussein Obama didn’t bother to tell the American people about it?
Some are saying this is an “impeachable offense.”

When al-Qaeda shoots down an American airliner (and no doubt they will, eventually), it will be blood on Barack Obama’s hands. Blood added to the blood already on his hands for abandoning Americans under attack in Benghazi.

If this doesn’t get Obama impeached, nothing

General Carter Ham to testify for the first time about Benghazi

Free Republic

Below is from my FNC colleague Justin Fishel:

Subject: Fox First: General Carter Ham to testify on Benghazi for first time next week

Fox News has learned that the House Armed Services Committee will hold a classified briefing next Weds June 26 at 9:00 on Benghazi.

Briefers will include:

Gen. Carter Ham (ret.) He was head of AFRICOM during Benghazi attack.

LTC Gibson

RADM Brian Losey – Special Operations Command Africa

This is being coordinated by the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee of the HASC. It will be closed door but will be the first time Ham has been questioned by Congress about his oversight of military assets that were available and why they weren’t sent to Benghazi last Sept 11/12. Ham was in the Pentagon at the time and oversaw the military response.

LTC Gibson is the Army Lieutenant Colonel who Greg Hicks said was told to stand down with his 3 other Special Forces when they wanted to go to Benghazi on the morning of Sept 12. We have not heard from him or Admiral Loissy, who was the head of Special Ops in Africa. He was in Europe coordinating from his base in Germany. He can speak to where the Special operations teams or CIF (Commander’s in extremis force) was based and when it was told to deploy and why it wasn’t sent to Libya.

Again this will be closed door.

(Excerpt) Read more at gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com …

Rumors of General Ham Being Relieved Could be True

Family Security Matters

Rumors have been swirling about General Carter Ham, commander of Africa  Command located in Stuttgart,  Germany, ever since Secretary of Defense Leon  Panetta announced that President Obama has nominated General David Rodriguez to  replace him. Those rumors have been adamantly denied by the Pentagon.