How come Congress can’t call a spade a spade here and simply state that the REASON Obama, Hillary, Rice, etc., falsely promoted the video as the reason for the attack on Benghazi is to lessen the negative impact of the Benghazi attack on Obama’s 2012 re-election bid?
The Benghazi attack occurred just 8 weeks before the 2012 U.S. presidential election. With Team Obama’s narrative that “GM is alive and Al Qaeda is dead”, isn’t it CLEAR that the reason they lied and failed to label the attack as a “terrorist attack” is because they felt this would harm Obama’s chances of winning the 2012 election?
Has Obama EVER said “terrorist attack”, anyway? I don’t believe he has. He prefers to say “act of terror” because this term does NOT denote any type of individual, Muslim or otherwise whereas “terrorist attack” DOES. Obama will NEVER use a term which negatively portrays Muslims in any way.
As I noted in the introduction to my book, The Obama Timeline: From his Birth in 1961 Through his First 100 Days in Office, a jury at a murder trial will often find the accumulated circumstantial evidence so overwhelming that a guilty verdict is obvious—even though there may be no witness to the crime. “The jurors in the Scott Peterson trial believed the collection of evidence more than they believed Scott Peterson. Among other things, the jury thought that being arrested with $15,000 in cash, recently-dyed hair, a newly-grown goatee, four cell phones, camping equipment, a map to a new girlfriend’s house, a gun, and his brother’s driver’s license certainly did not paint a picture of a grieving husband who had nothing to do with his pregnant wife’s disappearance and murder.”
It was predicted here repeatedly that if Obama won, it would be by voter fraud. No psychic ability was required; given the state of the economy and Obama’s abysmal job performance, there is no other way he could win. His only significant political experience before taking office was with ACORN, an outfit best known for engaging in voter fraud. In order to make sure Obama’s base engaged in it broadly, Eric Holder used his jihad against voter ID requirements to broadcast loudly well in advance that voter fraud would be easy and risk free.
Does anyone believe that when Barack Obama loses on November 6, he will go quietly?
This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it. The nation should be preparing for how he might react when it happens — there is nothing more dangerous than a cornered god.
Obama’s policies, pals, performance and the people who surround him tell the tale of who he is and where he is taking America.
We can feel the disastrous results and although some people chalk it up to Obama’s inexperience, incompetence or say that he is just in over his head, if people knew the truth about Obama, they would see that he and his comrades are deliberately doing exactly what they intended to do.
So let’s look at some of the real facts about Obama that the media will never tell you. (Part 2 will address his background, pals and those who surround him).
UPDATED: The only questions left now are:(1) Is the DNC and Team Obama lying to us again… and just took the official designation supporting Jumah off their site?(2) Are the Jumah events now moving forward in Charlotte on their own and without sanction, now that Team Obama decided it was a liability for President Obama’s reelection?(3) Or will the Jumah event move forward as planned at the DNC Convention (with unofficial sanction) but not be televised or discussed by the liberal bias media. See: Jumah prayer event prior to the 2012 DNC goes off without a hitch or disruptionNo one has been able to get a definite response from either the DNC, Team Obama or the White House about the status of this event since they removed it from the DNC Convention Website as an officially sanctioned event… But it was then noticed that it had not been removed from MuslimBureau.com and is now being reported as having started and taking place as planned.