The mainstream media continues to insist that there is “no evidence” of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election.
They are lying.
Here are many examples of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election that, as far as I’m aware, have not been debunked.
Russell James Ramsland, Jr. audited 22 Dominion voting machines that were used in Antrim County, Michigan.
This is his conclusion from his report on his audit:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud…
Hillary Clinton isn’t in jail. She isn’t under investigation or review. In fact, no charges were ever brought against her. These statements probably represent the most holistic failure of justice in the history of America. This woman has proven herself a criminal time and again, and there is still a strong segment of the population that praises her.
While we’ve known the real reason she remains free, we’ve been left scratching our heads about how she actually got away with it. Well, some new evidence helps shed a little light on that situation.
WikiLeaks is at it again. And, as per usual, their leaks seem only to spell bad news for the DNC and the left. In the newest batch, we find that the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton was even worse than we thought. Isn’t that something! The corrupt, obviously biased miscarriage of justice that was the Hillary Clinton investigation was actually worse than what you know up to this point. That is no small statement.
Here’s what we learned. When the probe began, the FBI confiscated Hillary’s email server. This is the infamous server that was kept in her home, and it was the device that housed, sent and received virtually every email of her career as Secretary of State. Considering that, it was a pretty crucial piece of evidence.
It was in storage for just shy of two months before investigators were ready to comb through it and see what there was to find. This in itself is not entirely unusual. Investigators face red tape all the time, and that’s exactly why the FBI uses a chain of custody to keep track of things that have to sit in storage for a while.
This is where we get to the problem. When investigators took the server out of storage, they found that it had no chain of custody. What does that really mean? For two months, the FBI was unaware of the server’s existence. Now, this does not prove that anyone tampered with the server before it was investigated, but it does prove that anyone could have messed with it and the FBI would be unaware.
For perspective, if the same thing happened with a drug sample or a murder weapon, people would be fired. Then, they would be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. Losing a chain of custody is a big deal, and in this case, it’s a catastrophe. If nothing else, it shows exactly how tens of thousands of emails were able to disappear right under the nose of the FBI.
And, above all else, this case was too high profile for such a problem to be an honest mistake. The chain of custody was missing for a reason, and it is another strong piece of evidence that shows complete corruption within the FBI and the Clinton investigation.
If this were the only problem with the Clinton investigation, it would make the entire thing suspect. Unfortunately, it’s actually a minor piece of the puzzle. There are greater injustices by far. For starters, Hillary never had to testify under oath. That’s pretty irregular, but it pales in comparison to the FBI preparing their statement before even hearing what she had to say. That alone demonstrates that they weren’t looking for evidence of wrongdoing.
Instead, they were looking for ways to create the appearance of an investigation while really aiming to protect her from prosecution. And, we’re still in the minor injustices.
What really boggles the mind is that Hillary’s staff was literally caught on video destroying evidence. They smashed phones and other devices with hammers, and this was done after those devices were subpoenaed. If you did that, you’d be in jail immediately. It is an open and shut case of obstruction of justice, and no one even pushed for prosecution. It’s kind of like when Bill lied under oath on national television and everyone just let it go. Except this is more extreme. Do you want to know the worst part? This still isn’t the pinnacle of this debacle.
What really caps the whole thing is that enough emails were found to show that Hillary knowingly mishandled classified information. There were emails, found on her insecure server, with unmistakable classification headings. They were shared with individuals who did not have sufficient clearance, and there is strong evidence that these actions directly endangered American lives. We have absolute, unquestionable proof that she was completely guilty of the charges in the probe, and no prosecution moved forward.
One would think that at least a single lawyer out there would want to be the one to publicly bring down Hillary Clinton. Instead, she walks free after we saw beyond any shadow of a doubt that she acted criminally. On multiple counts.
Why Isn’t She in Jail?
There is only one word to describe what happened: corruption. We’ve seen proof of this too. Leaked emails and memos show that everyone involved in the investigation assumed she would be the next President and didn’t want to cross her. Besides that, Obama inundated the FBI with yes men who would do his bidding.
The complicit mainstream media might be the most disgusting part of the whole deal. Hollywood recently released a movie praising the media’s involvement in bringing down Nixon. Something no one had the journalistic integrity, or even the blind ambition, to do to Hillary.
Instead, they all worked together to shield her just so she could be the first female president. For roughly half the country, scoring a win against sexism is more important than honesty, rule of law or the safety of men and women serving our country in dangerous capacities.
It is disgusting. Inexcusable. Draining the swamp almost feels like a hopeless endeavor at this point. What would it take to actually bring Hillary to justice? Could she murder someone on live TV and still walk free? Sadly, that doesn’t seem far-fetched.
Following election night, the investigative team at The Epoch Times went to work to uncover the controversy behind the election. Senior investigative reporter Joshua Phillip traveled across the country to swing states to interview whistleblowers, big data experts, and election experts. This film documents what he uncovered. Check out the full film below: