Islam Enters Congress

American Thinker

The two newly elected Muslim darlings of the Democratic Party have more ego than intellect and more hatred for Israel than love for America.

On January 3, 2019, new members of Congress arrived at their Longworth House offices radiating a contagious excitement.  Scores of political fans from Muslim districts in Michigan and Minnesota greeted each other in Arabic, smiling as if Uncle Sam were Santa Claus bringing gifts to greet the first female Palestinian and the first Somali members of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Minn.) wore the Palestinian flag on election night and a Palestinian thobe to the House offices, clearly stating where her alliances lie.  Then she announced her alarming position: a one-state solution creating a binational state of “Palestine.”  According to the Anti-Defamation League, “a ‘one-state solution,’ is nothing less than an indirect attempt to bring about an end to the State of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people.”

 

Support for the single state; the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement; and a delegation to Judea and Samaria for freshman members of Congress demonstrates Tlaib’s anti-Israel and anti-Jewish bigotry.  “I want us to see that segregation [of Palestinians] … has really harmed us from being able to achieve real peace[.] … I don’t think AIPAC provides a real, fair lens into this issue.”  Did she forget that she was elected to represent her district in Michigan?

Tlaib said she will “absolutely vote against military aid to Israel,” but she went too far when stating she would “stand up to bullies like President Donald Trump and impeach the m‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑.”  While the speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, and other Democratic leaders did condemn Tlaib’s inappropriate language, none of them countered her declaration that Israel has no right to exist.

Continue reading

Weekly Update: Benghazi and Clinton Emails Are Back

Judicial Watch Moves to Question Top Obama-Clinton Officials About Benghazi and Clinton Emails
The Border Crisis is Also a Public Health Crisis
Big Apple Corruption: the Mayor, the Rat, & the NYPD

 

Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch Moves to Question Top Obama-Clinton Officials About Benghazi and Clinton Emails

The Departments of State and Justice will not investigate themselves we now know, and of course we can’t expect any more efforts in the House of Representatives to get to the bottom of Hillary Clinton’s fraudulent behavior in high office.

But Judicial Watch and some courts won’t be intimidated from asking tough questions.

We have submitted a court-ordered discovery plan for the depositions of several top former government officials involved in the Clinton email scandal, including Obama administration senior officials Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap.

In it we say that we intend “to update the Court regarding the depositions of Hillary Clinton and Cheryl Mills at the conclusion of the 16-week discovery period, unless the Court believes such notice is not necessary.”

The plan for discovery is the latest development in the July 2014 FOIA lawsuit we filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to our May 13, 2014 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). We were seeking:

Continue reading