Anti-Americanism: The Official Policy of the NFL

New Zeal

By: Thomas Wigand

 

For months now we’ve endured the spectacle of NFL players taking a knee (or hiding in the locker room) during the national anthem. Receiving blowback, some tried to claim that they weren’t intending to insult our country, but to raise consciousness about the plight of Blacks in the United States of America. BULLONEY.

It’s called the national anthem for a reason – it is symbolic of, and is representative of, the totality of our country and, by that very nature and the ceremonial reverence attendant to it, is intended to honor our country. The players’ actions were intended to, did, and continue to dishonor our country (most egregiously at the hands of those who did so on foreign soil). In particular, they’re (proverbially) not just kneeling on, but pissing on the graves of those who have fallen in defending our great nation (more on this later).

Disrespecting our national anthem on foreign soil – the despicable Jacksonville Jaguars.

They’ve thought that they were making a statement promoting “social justice” (or whatever). The reality is that those players are unwitting pawns that have paraded onto the field of Progressive Stadium, merely another team playing in the League of Useful Idiots – we’ll refer to their “team” as the Knee-Takers. They now play alongside more-established teams like the Antifa’s; the BLM’s (Black Lives Matter); the Pusseful Idiots (Women’s Marchers adorned in their “pussyhat” helmets); the Social Justice Warriors and the Occupiers. Those teams compete for the virtue-signaling Social Justice Bowl, hoping to win the Social Justice Trophy and each get Social Justice rings. They know, they just know, that “social justice” is the ultimate goal that will bring near utopia to “our global community.” And while that may be their heartfelt goal, it is not the ultimate goal. But they play on in their self-satisfied obliviousness.

 

Meanwhile, some of the coaches – and all of those who actually control the League of Useful Idiots, watching from skyboxes above – are content in the knowledge that, unbeknownst to the players, the action on the field is actually a sideshow, albeit one that is helping the controllers to garner a much bigger prize. Space here does not permit an explanation of how useful idiots who believe that they are fighting exploitation are actually being exploited themselves, but this writer has discussed that in more detail here and, more applicably to the NFL players, here.

In this drama of NFL anti-Americanism, there are three primary factions: the players (and their union); the NFL / owners; and the fans. We will deal with them in that order.

Continue reading

Global Warming: Fake News from the Start

Townhall.com

By Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris

President Donald Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change because it is a bad deal for America. He could have made the decision simply because the science is false, but most of the public have been brainwashed into believing it is correct and wouldn’t understand the reason. 

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and indeed the leaders of many western democracies, though thankfully not the U.S., support the Agreement and are completely unaware of the gross deficiencies in the science. If they did, they wouldn’t be forcing a carbon dioxide (CO2) tax, on their citizens. 

Trudeau and other leaders show how little they know, or how little they assume the public know, by calling it a ‘carbon tax.’ But CO2 is a gas, while carbon is a solid. By calling the gas carbon, Trudeau and others encourage people to think of it as something ‘dirty’, like graphite or soot, which really are carbon. Calling CO2 by its proper name would help the public remember that it is actually an invisible, odorless gas essential to plant photosynthesis. 

Continue reading

Time to End Mueller’s Wild Reign of Malfeasance?

Family Security Matters

Since before President Trump’s election, what appears to be a very large cabal at the US Federal Bureau of Investigation has been active in the planning and implementation of its coup d’état against Donald J. Trump should he win the US presidency.  Said policy would, ostensibly, be activated–when and just in case Mr. Trump was elected–by what Deputy Assistant Directors of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok (one of the Mueller-hired biased-against-Trump investigators who also referred to Trump voters being smelly Walmart shoppers and many more vile ‘observations’ in emails sent to Strzok’s lover Lisa Page).  Mr. Trump was elected.  The investigation of Trump’s incoming team began.

Based upon a highly-sexualized, inflammatory, disturbing and now debunked “dossier” created and provided by former M.I. 6 British Agent Christopher Steele and commissioned and paid for by Hillary Rodham Clinton and her team-was used in an attempted takedown of then President-elect Trump.  Note:  According to Forbes, the plot was launched within 24 hours after Trump’s election. Virtually all of Mueller’s team-against-Trump is comprised of Hillary Clinton Democrat donors and/or those who have rabidly supported her.  One notable is Justin Cooper who actually admitted to destroying evidence that would likely have been gained against Hillary Clinton by-on at least two occasions-destroying her cell phones and “breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer!”  Another of the Mueller nightmare team-Aaron Zebley-was the attorney who represented Cooper.  Yet, another Mueller investigator–Jeannie Rhee-has strong ties to the (supposedly) dismantled ‘Clinton Foundation’ and personally represented Ben Rhodes.  Bre Payton of The Federalist writes:  “Rhee also served as the personal attorney for Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama who infamously bragged about lying to reporters to dupe lawmakers and the public into supporting the Iran Deal.”  Rhee also represented The Clinton Foundation.  On top of these, the Mueller team is comprised of other Hillary donors with Rhee, alone, having given over $16,000 to Democrats and the legally allowed limits to both of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaigns.

Then we have the pièce de résistance member of the Mueller malevolent team and the man who, almost, single-handedly destroyed Enron, Arthur Andersen Consulting and Merrill Lynch.  Andrew Weisman has a long and sordid career of lying, not producing exculpatory information to defense attorneys and the courts and being overturned by higher courts…including SCOTUS.  Weisman was instrumental in sending Enron executives to prison; a decision that was later partially overturned but not before this man had destroyed thousands of lives.  He accomplished the same with Arthur Anderson-successfully bringing the worldwide consulting firm to its end…and over 20.000 people out of jobs.

Continue reading

Comey Memo Edits Warrant Indictments

Flopping Aces

by Daniel John Sobieski

 

Now we know that not only did Hillary Clinton show intent in her handling of classified materials routed through her private server, but that former FBI Director James Comey and his team showed intent in letting her get away with it to the detriment of American national security.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, in a Thursday letter to current FBI Director Christopher Wray, reveals how edits to Comey’s exoneration memo went beyond changing “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” but edited out content that shows the FBI knew Hillary was intentionally in violation of the Espionage Act but that, since the decision to exonerate her had already been made, they had to submit to the annals of history a lie they agreed upon:

Newly released documents obtained by Fox News reveal that then-FBI Director James Comey’s draft statement on the Hillary Clinton email probe was edited numerous times before his public announcement, in ways that seemed to water down the bureau’s findings considerably.Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, sent a letter to the FBI on Thursday that shows the multiple edits to Comey’s highly scrutinized statement.

In an early draft, Comey said it was “reasonably likely” that “hostile actors” gained access to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email account. That was changed later to say the scenario was merely “possible.”

Another edit showed language was changed to describe the actions of Clinton and her colleagues as “extremely careless” as opposed to “grossly negligent.” This is a key legal distinction.

Johnson, writing about his concerns in a letter Thursday to FBI Director Christopher Wray, said the original “could be read as a finding of criminality in Secretary Clinton’s handling of classified material.”

“This effort, seen in light of the personal animus toward then-candidate Trump by senior FBI agents leading the Clinton investigation and their apparent desire to create an ‘insurance policy’ against Mr. Trump’s election, raise profound questions about the FBI’s role and possible interference in the 2016 presidential election and the role of the same agents in Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation by President Trump,” Johnson said.

Indeed this does raise profound questions. Coupled with the text messages of lead investigator, FBI Agent Peter Strzok,who has become known as the Zelig of the FBI who mysteriously appeared at every controversial moment, expressing clear intent to prevent the election of Donald Trump, we have before us a criminal conspiracy in which the most powerful law enforcement agency on this planet conspired with one political party to defeat the candidate of the other:

The letter reveals specific edits made by senior FBI agents when Deputy Director Andrew McCabe exchanged drafts of Comey’s statement with senior FBI officials, including Peter Strzok, Strzok’s direct supervisor, E.W. “Bill” Priestap, Jonathan Moffa, and an unnamed employee from the Office of General Counsel (identified by Newsweek as DOJ Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson) – in what was a coordinated conspiracy among top FBI brass to decriminalize Clinton’s conduct by changing legal terms and phrases, omitting key information, and minimizing the role of the Intelligence Community in the email investigation. Doing so virtually assured that then-candidate Hillary Clinton would not be prosecuted.

Imagine what was at stake here. If the FBI had just followed the evidence where it led and drew the obvious conclusions, Hillary Clinton would have been indicted, the Democratic Party would have been irreparably shattered, with Donald Trump winning in a popular vote as well as electoral vote landslide. This, in the view of a corrupted and politicized FBI had to be prevented at all costs and the Comey memo had to be sanitized before its release:

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net