Journalist Asks Hillary Clinton “What Happened” to Her Emails and Seth Rich

Cernovich

Hillary Clinton was signing copies of her new book “What Happened” in New York City today when journalist Laura Loomer stopped by to ask some serious questions.

“Hi, it’s so great to see you. Thanks for having me,” said Loomer. “So the American people would really like to know what happened to your 33,000 emails?”

“Hahahah,” Clinton responded, cackling like a witch.

“What happened in Benghazi?” asked Loomer.

“Go read the book,” answered Clinton.

“What happened to the millions of dollars that was supposed to go to the people in Haiti?” Loomer asked, referring to the millions of dollars in earthquake relief donations the Clintons were reportedly in charge of. “What happened to Seth Rich? What happened to your health Hillary?”

“You know what, I’m so sorry you believe things that are untrue,” Hillary replied. “Read the book.”

After getting only a cold reception from Clinton, Loomer then spotted embattled aide Huma Abedin in the bookstore.

https://i0.wp.com/theolivebranchreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Hillary-scandals-lying-corruption-presidential-2-600x350.jpg

Image via theolivebranchreport.com

 

“Huma its so great to see you. When are you going to divorce your husband for texting underage girls?” Loomer asked, referring to Anthony Weiner’s infamous criminal affair.

Loomer was detained by Secret Service for 20 minutes after asking these questions, but not because the Secret Service took issue with the questions’s content. Rather, the Secret Service was primarily concerned with someone trying to grab a strand of Hillary’s hair in response to Martin Shkreli’s satirical $5,000 “bounty.”

The Secret Service also wanted to look at Loomer’s phone, but she declined and the agents did not press the issue.

Dear Celebrities: NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU THINK!!!

Oath Keepers

In the following video, Candace Owens, of Red Pill Black, expresses her feelings on celebrities using their celebrity to advocate political and social opinions. It is not that they don’t have the right to speak out, as every American has Freedom of Speech. No, it is the plain and simple fact that NOBODY CARES!

Do I care what George Clooney, Madonna, Alec Baldwin, or a host of other brainless celebrities have to say about subjects other than their profession? No. Why should I? They offer only parroted versions of the Elite’s propaganda. Why should I waste my time listening to them?

When movie stars choose to speak out and insult me for being a thinking human being, they merely encourage me to boycott their movies. When sports figures do the same, I don’t bother with their sport. They apparently don’t get it that it is we, the “deplorables” that make possible their rich lifestyle, by buying the tickets to their events, or by watching them on the TV. ESPN is learning the hard way that we in “flyover country” don’t appreciate being insulted and paying for that privilege.

It is time for celebrities of all stripes to shut up and stick to what they do best, be it acting, playing their sport, or whatever they do, because we are tired of their crap.

LOL: Hillary Says She Believes in Evidence and The Rule of Law

https://i2.wp.com/usbacklash.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/hillary-liar-630x354-600x337.jpg

Image via usbacklash.org

 

Townhall

by Katie Pavlich

Hillary Clinton’s new book What Happened, a recap of the 2016 presidential campaign, is out this week. Naturally a whine filled, woa is me promotional tour from the failed candidate is well underway. Matt has been documenting the ongoing situation.

During an interview with USA Today’s Susan Page, Clinton insisted the Russians fully colluded with the Trump campaign to beat her and laughably argued she believes in the “rule of law” and “evidence.”

“I happen to believe in the rule of law and believe in evidence, so I’m not going to go off and make all kinds of outrageous claims. But if you look at what we’ve learned since (the election), it’s pretty troubling,” Clinton said.

Oh boy, where do we start with this?

The woman who deliberately and illegally set up a personal, unsecured email server in her home to host, store and transmit top secret classified information believes in the rule of law? The woman who used BleachBit, not a cloth, to wipe her servers of evidence and 40,000 emails believes in…evidence?

https://i1.wp.com/truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/hillary-clinton-liar.png

Image via truthfeed.com

 

The woman who was given a free pass by FBI Director James Comey, who decided he would exonerate Clinton of any prosecution referral months before agents were done with their criminal investigation into her mishandling of classified information, believes in the rule of law?

The only proper response to Clinton’s pious claim is laughter, preferably out loud.

During the 2016 campaign, the number one word voters associated Clinton with was “liar.” This is just another example that they were accurate in their description.

Your Beliefs Are No Longer Allowed

https://i1.wp.com/recruitingdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2016/03/Screen-Shot-2016-03-21-at-1.59.55-PM.png

Image via recruitingdaily.com

 

American Thinker

By Taylor Lewis

 

American progressives have fnally gone all the way to a totalitarian vision, demanding control over not just your behavior, but your thoughts and beliefs. This as the price of simply living without being attacked.

And hats off to Erick Erickson for naming it first. The former RedState honcho and Never-Trumper called it right, and no, I’m not talking about his near-demonic hatred of President Trump.

Last year, Erickson released a book with a title he popularized: You Will Be Made to Care: The War on Faith, Family, and Your Freedom to Believe. The book is a summation of an argument Erickson has long made. As the sexual left makes progress on its biggest projects — same-sex marriage, transgenderism acceptance, pronoun wordplay — they are increasingly unwilling to brook resistance.

Do you believe in traditional marriage but don’t care that gays marry? Think it’s OK teenagers take hormonal injections to swap genders but it’s not right for your kids? Don’t really give a hoot about someone who identifies as “xe”?

Well, too bad, sucker. The new dispensation doesn’t care for your waffling. Going forward, your private beliefs must align with your public stance. No exceptions made or allowed.

Everything I Needed to Know About Islam I Learned on 9/11

Front Page Magazine

by Daniel Greenfield

 

“In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate,” a terrorist declares on the Flight 93 cockpit recording. That’s followed by the sounds of the terrorists assaulting a passenger.

“Please don’t hurt me,” he pleads. “Oh God.”

As the passengers rush the cabin, a Muslim terrorist proclaims, “In the name of Allah.”

As New York firefighters struggle up the South Tower with 100 pounds of equipment on their backs trying to save lives until the very last moment, the Flight 93 passengers push toward the cockpit. The Islamic hijackers call out, “Allahu Akbar.” The Islamic supremacist term originated with Mohammed’s massacre of the Jews of Khaybar and means that Allah is greater than the gods of non-Muslims.

Mohammed Atta had advised his fellow terrorists that when the fighting begins, “Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.” He quoted the Koran’s command that Muslim holy warriors terrorize non-believers by beheading them and urged them to follow Mohammed’s approach, “Take prisoners and kill them.”

The 9/11 ringleader quoted the Koran again. “No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood.”

Continue reading

Federal Judge Rules To Withhold Important Information In Benghazi Case

https://socialismisnottheanswer.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/1a5e3-benghaziattack20121.jpg

Image via soldierexecutionerprolifer2008.blogspot.c

 

The Daily Caller

by Kerry Picket

 

Days before the fifth-year anniversary of the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya that killed U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens, a federal judge ruled that jurors at the trial of Libyan radical Islamist Ahmed Abu Khattala, charged with organizing the September 11, 2012 assault, cannot be told information that may prove he threatened to murder one of Stevens’s successor, Politico reported.

Khattala’s trial is expected to happen later this month in Washington, D.C. U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper prevented prosecutors from showing evidence to jurors that proves Khattala communicated to an ally about murdering the other U.S. ambassador in retaliation for the U.S.’s capture of another Libyan Islamist in 2012, Abu Anas Al-Libi.

Other American casualties of the Benghazi attack include diplomat Sean Smith and CIA security contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

Politico notes that although court filings do not name who the second ambassador is, it is likely U.S. Ambassador Deborah Jones, who succeeded Stevens and was confirmed to the Libya post in May 2013.  until July 2014, when the embassy was eventually shut down.

Judge Cooper also prohibited prosecutors from showing evidence that Khattala ordered associates to assassinate an American teacher in Libya.

Khattala faces life in prison if convicted, however, Attorney General Loretta Lynch declared in 2016 that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty against Khattala.

“Since these acts appear to have occurred well after the attack and after the charged conspiracy ended they do little to illuminate the formation and contours of the conspiracy,” Cooper wrote in his order.