As you know, Donald Trump issued a temporary suspension of immigration and travel for the seven countries that obama compiled and was voted into law by democrats. Although it is clearly spelled out as temporary suspension and it is clearly not a religious ban (the 400 million Muslims in Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan are excluded for some reason) democrats persist spreading fake news.
Donald Trump’s Muslim Ban Makes Us All Less American
screams Rolling Stone
Trump’s Reckless Muslim Ban Makes Americans Less Safe
whines the Center for American
Donald Trump’s long-awaited Muslim ban became a reality on Friday
the stupidest man in Congress blathered.
Trump’s travel/immigration really doesn’t bother many, outside of liberals, CAIR and ISIS supporters. Shireen Qudosi argues that many Muslims tend to support the suspension:
Being swept aside in the tide of policy or directly attacked by extremists themselves is a widespread worry that many other Muslims have (but don’t often publicly admit). Many American Muslims realize they’re on a fast-track to their own deportation process if the country doesn’t start taking radical Islam seriously.
Take Fatima, for example, a North American-Muslim woman, who welcomes a crackdown on domestic terrorism.
In a message exchange with me, Fatima confides, “Between extreme vetting and increased surveillance of mosques and monitoring the funding of mosques and organizations like CAIR, [these efforts] will help curb extremists and extremist ideas.”
And she poignantly adds, “This administration should be able to fight Islamic extremism without vilifying all Muslims.”
David Ignatius stated that the Middle East cares not as much about the suspension as it does Iran’s hegemony:
Washington Post columnist David Ignatius told the MSNBC “Morning Joe” crew Monday that Donald Trump’s anti-Iranian outlook “resonates much more” with Middle Eastern countries than questions his proposed Muslim travel ban might raise.
“The crucial thing for the Saudis, for King Salman, is being tough with Iran,” Ignatius said of Trump’s weekend conversation with the Saudi King. “And the Saudis see the Syria war as an Iranian proxy war to take over a Sunni country.”
“They see in Donald Trump somebody who is prepared to stand up to Iran and is prepared to do safe zones,” he added. “Which Hillary Clinton talked about but President Obama never wanted to do.”
Clearly, the issue us being whipped into a frenzy based on a false premise for the sake of partisan politics. And that’s the thing.
It’s not Trump making us less safe. democrats are making us less safe by lying about Trump’s actions and in so doing they are handing the ammunition to ISIS, who lap up the words of democrats and put them to use.
“When U.S. President Donald Trump says ‘We don’t want them here’ and bans the Muslim immigrants from Muslim countries, there is one thing that comes to our mind,” said another posting, beneath a banner of al-Awlaki and his quote.
But that’s not what the EO said or did. Instead of acknowledging what really was done, democrats have willingly sided with ISIS. ISIS eats up the claim of a “Muslim ban” and democrats keep feeding them. They don’t like Trump. I get that, but empowering ISIS because you don’t like Trump? That’s evil.
democrats and their lies – that’s what’s making us less safe.
Exit question: Ever notice- based on democrats’ claims- how hair-trigger easy it is to radicalize Muslims? If it is truly that easy, why does the left so badly want them here?