democrats have been fast and loose with accusations of treason of late. On the one hand, they threw the accusation at Tom Cotton for reminding everyone that the Senate gets offer advice and consent to any binding treaties the President engages in. Soon after they agreed to support in principle what Cotton stipulated.
Hey, says James Lewis over at American Thinker, as long as treason is in the air…
What’s more, by bringing that ticklish word “treason” into the public debate, the left is opening up a can of worms. We can now ask some crucial questions that have been taboo until now.
•Does Hillary Clinton’s personal aide Huma Abedin, a lifelong Muslim Brotherhood acolyte, represent a clear and present danger in time of war?
•Did Hillary Clinton knowingly allow Abedin access to top secret State Department documents via Hillary’s private email accounts?”
And, to echo Prince Turki al-Faisal this week,
•Is Obama now opening the door to nuclear proliferation to rogues and terrorists, by letting Iran have nuclear weapons, thereby betraying this country, our allies and the entire world?
Those questions must now be asked. They should be asked as a matter of national survival.
What Does Obama Think The Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles Are For?
Referencing Iran and the United States with regard to the interim nuclear deal, Barack Obama said that “both sides have kept their commitments” even though Iran has not. Judge Jeanine called him out for it Saturday night on her Fox News show.
“Signing any agreement or deal with Iran would be a disaster. It would be a problem for me and it would be a problem for you,” Pirro said.
Barack Obama said it is the “best opportunity in decades to pursue a different future between our two countries” in a video clip Pirro played. She commented saying, Iran is one of the countries Obama is referring to and it would appear that the other is the United States, as currently it is “his to destroy.”
“I don’t want to have a different experience with Iran. In fact, I don’t want to have any experience with Iran as long as the Ayatollah Khamenei is running the joint,” Pirro said. “I personally am not on a suicide mission. I’m looking to hang around as long as I can.”
Pierre played another Obama clip in which he says, “Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons and President Rouhani has said that Iran would never develop a nuclear weapon.” [That’s good enough for me, what say you? Actually, no one can find this alleged Fatwa.]
Judge Jeanine Pirro said with no holds barred, “Are you kidding?” After she elaborated, she played a clip of Obama boasting of how the deal will benefit Iran and its people – it’s about jobs!!!
It’s the same gibberish Marie Harf tried to sell recently about getting jobs for terrorists as a solution to terrorism. When dictator Morsi was elected president of Egypt, the administration talked about starting a U.S. taxpayer-funded program to secure jobs for Egyptians. Now that Egypt has a leader who wants to fight terrorism, Obama won’t give them the time of day.
Pirro reminded Obama that it is Americans he is supposed to look after – the people he’s constantly undermining and apologizing for – he is supposed to find jobs for Americans, not terrorists.
Pirro thinks Obama is looking for a nuclear-armed Iran and for retaliation against Israel since Obama lost in his effort to unseat Benjamin Netanyahu.
Obama is either the smartest radical Islamist sympathizer in modern history or he is a patsy and a fool. Take your pick.