The Global warming hoax is shaping up to be the greatest science scandal ever.
The Telegraph reported:
When future generations look back on the global-warming scare of the past 30 years, nothing will shock them more than the extent to which the official temperature records – on which the entire panic ultimately rested – were systematically “adjusted” to show the Earth as having warmed much more than the actual data justified.
Two weeks ago, under the headline “How we are being tricked by flawed data on global warming”, I wrote about Paul Homewood, who, on his Notalotofpeopleknowthat blog, had checked the published temperature graphs for three weather stations in Paraguay against the temperatures that had originally been recorded. In each instance, the actual trend of 60 years of data had been dramatically reversed, so that a cooling trend was changed to one that showed a marked warming.
This was only the latest of many examples of a practice long recognised by expert observers around the world – one that raises an ever larger question mark over the entire official surface-temperature record.
Following my last article, Homewood checked a swathe of other South American weather stations around the original three. In each case he found the same suspicious one-way “adjustments”. First these were made by the US government’s Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). They were then amplified by two of the main official surface records, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (Giss) and the National Climate Data Center (NCDC), which use the warming trends to estimate temperatures across the vast regions of the Earth where no measurements are taken. Yet these are the very records on which scientists and politicians rely for their belief in “global warming”.
Homewood has now turned his attention to the weather stations across much of the Arctic, between Canada (51 degrees W) and the heart of Siberia (87 degrees E). Again, in nearly every case, the same one-way adjustments have been made, to show warming up to 1 degree C or more higher than was indicated by the data that was actually recorded. This has surprised no one more than Traust Jonsson, who was long in charge of climate research for the Iceland met office (and with whom Homewood has been in touch). Jonsson was amazed to see how the new version completely “disappears” Iceland’s “sea ice years” around 1970, when a period of extreme cooling almost devastated his country’s economy.
Read the rest here.
More… A UN Climate official admitted this week: We’re Intentionally Transforming The Economic Development Of The World.
Reblogged this on Grumpa Joe's Place and commented:
Global warming is a fairy tale designed to separate a man from his money? Suckers.
Reblogged this on hocuspocus13 and commented:
jinxx ♠ xoxo
The motive: $22 billion per year.
To be clear . . . that’s $22 billion of taxpayers’ money . . . the amount that our government pays to stop the “global warming” epidemic.
That comes out to $41,856 every minute.
Or, to put it in perspective, that is twice as much as what our government spends on securing our borders.
Then, imagine this top U.S. intelligence agent turning to you, and asking for you to join him on a mission to out those involved in the “global warming” lie.
It’s all about control.
Reblogged this on Consciousness Shift.
Show me the data for all these stations for all their years and let me figure out who is lying (besides al gore because it’s PROVEN that warming doesn’t follow higher CO2 but the OPPOSITE)
Perhaps it is a hoax, perhaps it isn’t?
How do we explain the speed at which the polar ice caps are melting compared to previous decades?
HOWEVER, one cannot deny that governments (not just yours) are funnelling billions (and who knows how much globally combined) to special interest groups, sweetheart deals, and insider contracts. Opportunistic malarkey.
Dragon, I would go so far as to say that BOTH sides are manipulating the data. I would be interested in seeing the raw numbers posted publicly since we the tax payers (globally) are paying out for emission controls, etc.
Great article sir.
It’s all about control.