What does a democrat state AG do when a sting catches only democrats?

Flopping Aces

Deep six it, of course.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, a democrat, has shut down a sting operation in which only democrats were snared:

A sting operation designed to nab dishonest politicians in the act of accepting bribes was abruptly shut down by Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane. The only politicians caught were Democrats; Kane is a Democrat.

The sting was set in morion in 2010 by Kane’s predecessor in office and current governor, Republican Tom Corbett, and politicians from both major political parties were tested, according to Philly.com.

Why would she do that, you ask?

Buried Secrets of Bill and Hillary Clinton

Treason Exposed! Obama Used Benghazi Attack to Cover Up Arms

The corporate media has yet to point out that the Obama administration attempted to cover-up the real reason for the murder of ambassador Stevens — U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and the State Department initially pointing to a lame anti-Muslim video — and has consistently downplayed the incident and characterized it as a non-event not requiring congressional investigation and the impeachment of President Obama.

Covert War Between the Pentagon and CIA

A number of people came forward following the attack have built an indisputable case that the CIA was shipping arms from U.S.-controlled facilities located at the U.S. mission in Benghazi to its mercenaries in Syria and the murder of ambassador Stevens was carried out by an al-Qaeda affiliated group as part of a turf war between the CIA and elements in the Pentagon.
“The real issue is very simple, you have to think of two elements of the government fighting each other that are covert,” Pieczenik said. “The government is never unified, it never has been unified. For over thirty or forty years there has been a conflict between the military and the CIA and the FBI… The CIA has been run for the last fifty years by civilians who are out of control.”

Muslims Sue Empire State Building

Moonbattery

In the days following 9/11, I walked past the Empire State Building each day on the way to work. Having watched the World Trade Center collapse, each time a saw King Kong’s former perch I felt enormously relieved that it was still there, but terrified that it wouldn’t be for long. Years passed and to my surprise, Muslims never brought it down. It became a symbol of the New York — and the America — that still survived despite the rise of Islam.

Before long the dhimmis in charge started lighting up the Empire State Building with green lights to celebrate Islamic holidays. Now we read this:

A Muslim family from Long Island slapped the owners of the Empire State Building Tuesday with a scathing $5 million lawsuit that claims they were booted from the building’s observation deck for praying.

Fahad and Amina Tirmizi of Farmingville said their civil rights were violated when they were “assaulted, battered and forcibly removed” from the famed observatory last July.

Assaulted. Battered. Sure they were.

The observation deck on the Empire State Building offers a great view of where the World Trade Center used to rise into the sky. The Tirmizi soft jihadists chose that place to go into their Islamic prayer routine while dressed in traditional Muslim attire.

The psychological effect on tourists was predictable and no doubt intended.

Since they were not flung toward the nearest empty spot on the pavement below, I would say the Tirmizis were treated better than they deserved.

Screeches the termite serving as their lawyer:

“To most, the Empire State Building is one of the great landmarks of this city, but for my client and his family, it is a building of ignorance and injustice.”

If blacks can collect over $100 million for being too dumb to pass the FDNY entrance exam, Muslims should have no problem collecting $5 million for not being allowed to intimidate tourists at the Empire State Building.

At last I understand why Muslims never hijacked another plane to take the building out. Now they let moonbattery do their work. It destroys their infidel enemies at a deeper level.

White flags are now green.

Pikes, Pickets, and Scams

American Thinker

Every now and then seeing the overwhelming stupidity of so many, I daydream about running a major scam, cleaning up and retiring in style to the Cayman Islands or Tahiti. But reviewing the records of politicians, media, and universities, I realize I am just not up to the competition. Instead, I’m resigned to simply opening up a series of pike and picket stands at all the entrances to the Capital City.

This week’s manifest fraud should fuel our fury.

The False Myth of the 80% Conservative

CFP

The danger is this:  In the USA’s upcoming 2014 elections, Republican elites assume that everyone all now agrees that conservatives ‘must’ support non-conservative candidates to win more elections.  The GOP is operating on the belief that everyone is on board, simply because insiders have officially decreed it to be so.

However, the grassroots in the USA remains unconvinced.  Worse, the Republican establishment has no plan for truly healing the actual wounds.  Elites want to avoid change more fervently than they do want to win elections.  Elites violated trust by advancing liberal policies in the U.S. Congress, but they won’t apologize or reform.  The GOP will do anything to win elections – except change.

Obama Eligibility Case Finally Ruled on by Alabama Supreme Court: “No Opinion”

Freedom Outpost

A lot of hopes have been riding on the Alabama Supreme Court and specifically Judge Roy Moore for some time. For many months people have been anxiously awaiting for Alabama to rule and in the end The Cotton State “ruled not to rule.”

How does a court rule that they have no opinion? These are our courts. We go to them when we cannot resolve situations without them. Then they tell us that they cannot rule on this and pass the buck back to the Secretary of State and legislators? This is unreal and it shows how corrupt and gutless the entire system is.

Oakland Pays $4.5 Million to Violent #Occupy Thug Who Was Injured By Fellow Violent #Occupy Thugs

Gateway Pundit

Occupy Oakland goons rioting in 2011.

The City of Oakland agreed to pay violent #Occupy thug Scott Olsen, the founder of “I Hate the Marines.com” website, for injuries he suffered at an #Occupy riot in Oakland in 2011. The Guardian reported:

The City of Oakland has agreed to pay $4.5m to Scott Olsen, a marine corps veteran who was critically injured by city police during Occupy demonstrations, his attorneys announced on Friday.

Olsen, 26, sued the Oakland police department after being hit in the head by a police projectile during a chaotic October 2011 protest. He was admitted to a hospital in critical condition and suffered a fractured skull, broken neck vertebrae and brain swelling.

The city settled the suit rather than take the case to trial.

But as reported in 2011—

The cops were innocent.

Memorial for Marine-hater Scott Olsen at Occupy Oakland. (Reuters)

Confirmed: Leftist hero, Jew-basher and founder of “I Hate the Marines.com” website Scott Olsen was not injured at the Oakland riots by local deputies. Olsen was hit by a projectile thrown by the protesters.

The Occupy Oakland protesters already admitted that they started throwing rocks and bottles at police before the police took action.

Today the the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department announced that it was not their deputies who injured Scott Olsen. Spokeswoman Eileen Hirst said 35 of the 37 Sheriff’s Department personnel on site for the raid were not carrying projectiles, and the two who were equipped with them did not fire. Sorry libs. The San Francisco Examiner reported:

Former Marine Scott Olsen suffered a skull fracture in the shutdown of the camp after it turned violent the night of Oct. 25 in downtown Oakland. More than 15 local public safety agencies were called in to assist the Oakland Police Department, including the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department.

Occupy activists and supporters claim to have identified at least three San Francisco deputies in video shot before and during the raid…

…Protesters identified the three deputies based on preraid video that showed them from a closer and less chaotic standpoint — near enough to make their nametags visible.

The head of the union that represents sheriff’s deputies said activists circulated one deputy’s home address online. The union has requested it be removed.

The Sheriff’s Department said an internal investigation unit is reviewing the incident, but it’s unlikely the identified deputies caused Olsen’s injury. Spokeswoman Eileen Hirst said 35 of the 37 Sheriff’s Department personnel on site for the raid were not carrying projectiles, and the two who were equipped with them did not fire.

Hirst also said the department has a policy against deputies using weapons for which they are not trained, or borrowing weapons from other law enforcement during a raid situation.

The Mercury News has more.

The only nonlethal weapons San Francisco sheriff deputies brought to Oakland were two Anti-Riot Weapon Enfield rifles that fire 37 mm nonlethal rounds, similar to a roll of quarters. However, no deputies shot those weapons Tuesday night, Hirst said. Asked if someone from another department could have fired a deputy’s weapon, Hirst said, “No, we can’t use equipment we’re not trained in.”

Islamic Law Is Adopted By British Legal Chiefs

Photo via Free Republic

 

Weasel Zippers

The Brits have been assimilated

Via The Telegraph

Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills.

Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether.

The documents, which would be recognised by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.

Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia principles, which recognise only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes.

Nicholas Fluck, president of The Law Society, said the guidance would promote “good practice” in applying Islamic principles in the British legal system.

Obama Judge: Mexican Border Fence May Have “Disparate Impact” on Minorities

If this Judge is anything like Obama, the alternative title to this story should be, Border Fence is Racist. Now that sounds like an Obama supporter. Anything negative about Obama or any of his ideas is racist. I wonder if it will still be racist when a group of terrorist cross our Southern Border and  start blowing things up? Hey, somebody has to ask.          1 Dragon

Judicial Watch

A Homeland Security initiative to put fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border could discriminate against minorities, according to an Obama-appointed federal judge who’s ruled that the congressionally-approved project may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”

This of course means that protecting the porous—and increasingly violent—southern border is politically incorrect. At least that’s what the public college professor at the center of the case is working to prove and this month she got help from a sympathetic federal judge. Denise Gilman, a clinical professor at the taxpayer-funded University of Texas-Austin, is researching the “human rights impact” of erecting a barrier to protect the U.S. from terrorists, illegal immigrants, drug traffickers and other serious threats.