CIA Leak: “Incontrovertible Evidence” That 9/11 Was State Sponsored

 Freedom Outpost

If you have ever questioned the official narrative for the September 11th  attacks then you have, without a doubt, been dubbed a conspiracy nut by the establishment media and those who hang  on their every word.

Like the Warren Commission report on the JFK assassination, the 9/11 Report  assembled by a Congressional investigation is unraveling and being revealed for  what it really is – nothing more than a cover story.

This is no longer a conspiracy theory… it’s conspiracy fact.

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no  state sponsors.

But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’  investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign  support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

It was kept secret and remains so today.

  

President Bush

inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just  blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section.  The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where  an estimated 7,200 words once stood

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are  “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the  attacks.

Some information already has leaked from the classified section, which is  based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to Saudi Arabia, a  presumed ally.

The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly  found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials — not just  wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers  employed by the kingdom — helped the hijackers both financially and  logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the  Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making  9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but  an act of war.

The New York Post investigation reveals that Saudi agents,  officials and operatives in Virginia, Florida, California and D.C. provided  direct support by way funding or intelligence to those involved in bringing down  the towers.

Karl Denninger at the Market Ticker succinctly argues that this was, in fact, an  act of war:

It’s obvious given what happened, the logistical and funding  requirements and where the hijackers came from along with inexplicable  actions immediately following the attacks – unless our government explicitly let  certain people flee.

Yet we went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan while  helping the Saudis — the very people who attacked us.

And Obama, to this day, kisses the Saudi  King.

Over three thousands Americans are dead – yet President Obama bows to  Saudi King Abdullah, whose government had direct ties to 9/11  hijackers:

It makes a very convincing case that the Saudi Government was involved in an  act of war against the United States.  Not simply terrorism —  remember, the Pentagon, a military target, was one of the  locations hit.  The other intended target for the plane that went down in PA was  the Capitol.

You awake yet America?

You damn well should be.

It’s about damn time that the mainstream media started talking about this  — you’re only a decade late, *******s.  And no, people like myself who have  been saying this all along are not nuts.  

We’re right.

In addition to this startling, yet unsurprising, revelation is even more  evidence that those within the Saudi government knew what was coming. Somebody  made a ton of money shorting airline stocks by positioning themselves for stock  prices to crash in the aftermath of 9/11 and according to Infowars, that may well have been the Chief of  Saudi Intelligence and other government officials. Moreover, after all flights  within the continental United States were grounded there was one – just one –  airplane that was allowed to fly over U.S. soil to, you guessed it, Saudi  Arabia. On board that plane were – and this has been confirmed by an official Freedom of Information request – the members of  Osama Bin Laden’s extended family.

And these are but a few of the hundreds  of inconsistencies surrounding the September 11th, 2001 attacks.

As it turns out, the “conspiracy theorists” are the ones who accurately  detailed the series of events and those involved in the attacks. The “official  story” itself, it seems, is the “conspiracy theory.”

They’ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars on securing the United States  and preventing another act of terror on U.S. soil. They’ve turned their massive surveillance infrastructure inwards on the American  people under the pretext of preserving our safety. They’ve identified hundreds  of thousands of Americans and included them on watch lists that restrict their travel or  flag them as potential threats to national security.

Yet the real threat, the one that has been validated by scores of reports and  investigations, is being redacted and ignored by our government.

We know that there is more to 9/11 than the official story.

It doesn’t just involve the Saudis. America’s air defense, for example, were  seemingly disarmed minutes before the attack occurred. Moreover,  intelligence agents from Israel were reportedly spotted in New York on the day of, arrested by NYPD, and  then released under suspicious circumstances.

All of this is highly suspect, especially that a mainstream news source like  the New York Post would start releasing these details to the general  public. As with 9/11, most people couldn’t make sense of it or why. A decade on  we have a better perspective because we’ve seen the implementation of  initiatives all across America as a result of what happened that day.

Call it a conspiracy, call it whatever you like, but look around.

If they lied – yes, lied – about the assassination of a President of the  United States, or about Benghazi, or Fast and Furious, or the benefits of new  health care laws, then what else are they hiding from us?

How much do you trust your government?

How much do you trust the official narrative peddled by the  establishment?

How much do you trust that the powers that be have our best interests at  heart?

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/cia-leak-incontrovertible-evidence-911-state-sponsored/#YWI0t8tMxwHfZGy6.99

4 thoughts on “CIA Leak: “Incontrovertible Evidence” That 9/11 Was State Sponsored

  1. The Bin Laden Family had ask for help when George Bush was in office (Daddy Bush).
    Russia was invading to get their oil. They didn’t have the $$ to harvest the oil.
    So? The Bush Family pushed the Russians back and helped them to harvest the oil.
    They went into the oil business with the Bin Laden Family (and NO, Osama Bin Laden
    did NOT cause 9/11.) After that, they became friends.
    But! We had to be other there to help them harvest the oil vs. drilling here in the U.S.
    What better way to be there than to allow 9/11?

    Money connections between Bush Republicans and Osama bin Laden go way back and the political and economic connections have remained unbroken for 20 years. And what appears to be a “new” alliance with Pakistan is merely a new manifestation of a decades-long partnership in the heroin trade.

    Conveniently ignored in all of the press coverage since the tragic events of Sept. 11 is the fact that on May 17 Secretary of State Colin Powell announced a gift of $43 million to the Taliban as a purported reward for its eradication of Afghanistan’s opium crop this February. That, in effect, made the U.S. the Taliban’s largest financial benefactor according to syndicated columnist Robert Scheer writing in The Los Angeles times on May 22. But — as we described in FTW’s March 2001 issue — the Taliban’s destruction of that crop was apparently the single most important act of economic warfare against U.S. economic interests that the Taliban had ever committed. So why the gift?

    Critics of the Gulf War well recall how, just prior to Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait, President Bush (Sr.) dispatched Ambassador April Glaspie to visit Saddam with a letter and a “wink and a nod” telling the Iraqi leader that it was OK to invade his smaller neighbor. The May gift from Uncle Sam could well have been sending the same kind of message, along with necessary funds to complete the attacks. Drugs and terrorism go hand in hand.

    Until February, Afghanistan had been the world’s largest producer of opium/heroin, claiming close to 70% of the world’s total production. That opium, consumed largely in Western Europe and smuggled through the Balkans, was a direct source of cash deposits in Western financial institutions and markets.

    I specifically commented on this at an economic crisis conference in Moscow, Russia on March 7. In my formal statement to the Russian conference I said,

    “Just before coming to this conference I read in the Associated Press, Agence France Press and other reliable sources that the Taliban has recently eradicated most of its 3000 ton opium crop in Afghanistan. If true, I view this as a form of economic warfare against Russia [and the U.S.] because it would drive opium production more into Southeast Asia and Colombia. However, I now suspect that this will result in a shift of opium production to the Caucasus under the Kurds which will see an increase in smuggling through Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. I should note that both Vice President Richard Cheney and the designated Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage are members of the US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce. Such a move would have the effect of drastically shortening smuggling routes and costs into Western Europe and of bypassing unstable areas of the Balkans.
    I have received additional reports that Uzbekistan is now awash in the opium poppy and, as in the US with the CIA, that Russian military and intelligence agencies facilitate the trade as a means of protecting access to hard currency. The point here is not that the US it totally evil or the only country doing these things. But the US is far and away the most advanced nation when it comes to the use of such methods to achieve superiority. As [Russian economist Michael]Khazin has noted, the US and Britain and Germany started the conflict in Kosovo in 1999 to stave off a collapse of western markets following the Asian collapse of 1997-8. Now Colombia is a last-ditch effort to protect the US markets and European opposition is jeopardizing that plan.”

    The Taliban’s actions this year severed the ruling military junta in Pakistan from its primary source of foreign revenues and made bin Laden and the Taliban completely expendable in the eyes of the Pakistani government. It also cut off billions of dollars in revenues that had been previously laundered through western banks and Russian financial institutions connected to them.

    Now as US military action will replace the Taliban government and fresh crops will be planted in Afghanistan, the slack in cash flow will assuredly be replaced by dramatically increased opium production in Colombia; the revenues from that effort being needed to maintain the revenue streams into Wall Street. Prior to the WTC attacks, credible sources, including the U.S. government, the IMF, Le Monde and the U.S. Senate placed the amount of drug cash flowing into Wall Street and U.S. banks at around $250-$300 billion a year.

    In that context, the real history of Osama bin Laden, as America’s useful terrorist-du-jour reveals a long and continuous history, interwoven with the drug trade and the Bush family, of supporting conflicts that have benefited U.S. military and economic interests.
    bin Laden
    There are direct historical links between Osama bin Laden’s business interests and those of the Bush family. On September 15 I received the following message fromFTW subscriber, Professor John Metzger of Michigan State University:

    “We should revisit the history of BCCI, a bank used by the legendary Palestinian terrorist known as Abu Nidal. BCCI was closely tied to American and Pakistan intelligence. Its clients included the Afghan rebels, and the brother of Osama bin Laden, Salem. Salem bin Laden named Houston investment broker James R. Bath as his business representative in Texas, right after George W. BushÕs father became CIA director in 1976. By 1977, Bath invested $50,000 into juniorÕs first business, Arbusto Energy, while Osama bin Laden would soon become a CIA asset. George W. BushÕs FBI director Robert Mueller was part of the Justice DepartmentÕs questionable investigation of BCCI. (On BCCI, the bin Ladens, and the Bushes, see the books, The Outlaw Bank, A Full Service Bank, and Fortunate Son).” Further details of the business and financial relationships between the Bush and bin Laden family are found in Peter Brewton’s 1992 bookThe Mafia, CIA and George Bush. BCCI, incidentally, was founded by a Pakistani.

    Economics Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the University of Ottawa has just completed a detailed history of bin Laden’s career detailing his secret funding and logistical support to terrorist organizations beginning from his early CIA-supported roots in the 1980s as a “freedom fighter” through to the present day. Chossudovsky’s compelling and well documented article, ​​Who Is Osama Bin Laden? dated Sept 12, 2001 can be found on the Internet at: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html.

    Bin Laden’s role has not just been as a practitioner of terrorist acts but as a trainer and supplier of terrorist organizations around the world. Included in bin Laden’s coterie are terrorist groups linked to the Balkans, Albania, the KLA (a U.S. ally), and rebel groups leading the insurrection against Russia in Chechnya.

    As FTW described in 1998, and as confirmed by Chossudovsky, the key to understanding U.S. support of bin Laden is to grasp that he has always been controlled by a cutout, the Pakistani government and its intelligence service the ISI. In this manner there has been virtually no direct contact between bin Laden and the CIA. This has served the dual purpose of maintaining his apparent “purity” with his followers and providing plausible deniability for the CIA. The whole underlying pretext for this relationship evaporated with the Taliban’s destruction of the opium crop in February.

    Chossudovsky writes:
    “The history of the drug trade in Central Asia is intimately related to the CIA’s covert operations. Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war, opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional markets. There was no local production of heroin. In this regard [Professor] Alfred McCoy’s study confirms that within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, ‘the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world’s top heroin producer, supplying 60 per sent of the U.S. demandÉ

    “With the disintegration of the Soviet Union, a new surge in opium production has unfolded. (According to UN estimates, the production of opium in Afghanistan in 1998-99 — coinciding with the build up of armed insurgencies in the former Soviet republics — reached a record high of 4600 metric tons. Powerful business syndicates in the former Soviet Union allied with organized crime are competing for the strategic control over the heroin routes.

    “The ISI’s extensive intelligence military-network was not dismantled in the wake of the Cold War. The CIA continued to support the Islamic “jihad” out of PakistanÉ”
    “É The Golden Crescent drug trade was also being used to finance and equip the Bosnian Muslim Army (starting in the early 1990s) and the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). In the last few months there is evidence that Mujhideen mercenaries are fighting in the ranks of the KLA-NLA terrorists in their assaults into MacedoniaÉ
    “É With regard to Chechnya, the main rebel leaders Shamil Basayev and Al Khattab were trained and indoctrinated in CIA sponsored camps in Afghanistan and PakistanÉ In this regard, the involvement of Pakistan’s ISI and its radical Islamic proxies are actually calling the shots in this war.

    “Russia’s main pipeline route transits through Chechnya and Dagestan. Despite Washington’s perfunctory condemnation of Islamic terrorism, the indirect beneficiaries of the Chechen war are the Anglo-American oil conglomerates which are vying for control over oil resources and pipeline corridors out of the Caspian Sea basin.”

    ​​The oil and drug connections were the subject of FTW’s story, The Bush-Cheney drug Empire in October, 2000. That story is online a ​​thttp://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/bush-cheney-drugs.html. Both Bush and Cheney are oil men.

    George Bush, Sr. was Vice President and, by virtue of executive Order 12333, in charge of all U.S. intelligence and narcotics operations from 1981 through 1989. As President from 1989 through 1993, he continued and expanded his control in these areas. Thus, it was Bush (the elder) who directly nourished and nurtured bin Laden’s evolution.

    Dramatic Confirmation From Indian Government
    The web site of the Indian Embassy in Washington contains dramatic confirmation for these positions. On September 4, 2000, B. Raman, Director of India’s Institute for Topical Studies wrote an open letter to the U.S. Congress entitledPakistan’s Noriega’s. That eight-page article exposed the depth of Pakistani government involvement in the drug trade. It may be viewed at:
    http://www.indianembassy.org/int_media/
    saag_september_04_2000.html.
    The letter said, in part:
    “For more than a decade, the people of India have been living in a state of half-war and half-peace due to the depredations of a large number of terrorists, outrageously called jehadists, who have been trained, armed and funded and infiltrated into the State of Jammu & Kashmir and other parts of India by Pakistan in order to make the people of India and its security forces bleed in the name of religion.

    “More people belonging to different religions — Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and others — have been killed in India by these mercenary-terrorists sponsored by the State of Pakistan than by any other terrorist groups anywhere else in the worldÉ”

    “ÉMany other States have suffered and have been suffering due to the depredations of terrorists, made in and exported from Pakistan and the Taliban-controlled Afghanistan — [these include] Algeria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Central Asian Republics, the Chechnya and Dagestan areas of Russia, the Xinjiang province of China, Bangladesh, the Arakan area of Burma and the southern Philippines…”

    “After his [1993] removal, [as official head of Pakistani intelligence, trusted advisor to Pakistani leader Gen. Pervez Musharraf] Lt. Gen. Nasir traveled to Somalia, Chechnya, Dagestan, the Central Asian Republics, ÉChina, and the Southern Philippines as a preacherÉ and helped Islamic organizations, including the group which killed U.S. troopsÉ in Somalia.”

    “ÉIt was he, who, during his tenure as the DG [Director General] of the ISIÉ has entered into an agreement with the LTTE of Sri Lanka [which secured] LTTE’s assistance in smuggling Afghanistan produced heroin in its ships to West Europe, the USA and CanadaÉ”

    “ÉAnother reason for the ISI’s helping the LTTE, despite its anti-Muslim policies, was to use it for smuggling heroin to West Europe, the U.S. and Canada. During Zia-ul-Haq’s regime in the 1980s, heroin had become a major source of extra revenue not only for the State of Pakistan, especially the ISI and Pakistan’s nuclear and missile establishment, but also to many senior officers of the Pakistan Army, including [Musharraf et al]É”

    “The way Mr. Sharif before October 1999 and Gen. Musharraf since then have been using the heroin money to prevent the Pakistani economy from collapsing has not received due attention in the U.S. …”
    “If one goes purely by economic indicators, Pakistan’s must be in as bad a shape as that of Russia, or even worse, since Russia has been in receipt of Western and IMF assistanceÉ”

    “Where does the money come from? From the smuggling of heroin to West Europe, the U.S. and Canada. The U.S. Government might have stopped economic assistanceÉ from the taxpayers’ money. But why should the Noriegas of Pakistan be worried when they get billions of dollars from the heroin sale in the U.S.?É ”

    Vice President Dick Cheney’s recent comment that the CIA needs to get in bed with “unsavory characters” is a joke. That’s a bed that the CIA has never left. And it’s a marriage vow that President Bush has just reaffirmed for all the world to see.

  2. An Afghan man tried to warn us, I believe within 72 hrs of 9/11. He was murdered after doing so. Please read all of this:
    ​Massoud’s Letter To The People Of America
    ​With all due respect and my best wishes for the government and people of the United States,

    ​​Ahmad Shah Massoud.

    http://www.afghan-web.com/documents/let-masood.html
    ——————————–
    Tag words: 9/11 warnings, Bush, Afghan Hero assassinated

    ​​Date: 1998

    ​​A Message to the People of the United States of America
    I send this message to you today on behalf of the freedom and peace-loving people of Afghanistan, the Mujahedeen freedom fighters who resisted and defeated Soviet communism, the men and women who are still resisting oppression and foreign hegemony and, in the name of more than one and a half million Afghan martyrs who sacrificed their lives to uphold some of the same values and ideals shared by most Americans and Afghans alike. This is a crucial and unique moment in the history of Afghanistan and the world, a time when Afghanistan has crossed yet another threshold and is entering a new stage of struggle and resistance for its survival as a free nation and independent state.

  3. I fouind this while I was looking for something else. Wait until you read this!
    ​By John Byrne
    Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:04 EDT

    Elena Kagan, President Barack Obama’s latest nominee to the Supreme Court, helped protect the Saudi royal family from lawsuits that sought to hold al Qaeda financiers responsible in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
    The suits were filed by thousands of family members and others affected by the Sept. 11 attacks. In court papers, they provided evidence that members
    of the Saudi royal family had channeled millions to al Qaeda prior to the bombings, often in contravention of direct guidance from the United States.

    But Kagan, acting as President Obama’s Solicitor General, argued that the case should not be heard even if evidence proved that the Saudis helped
    underwrite al Qaeda, because it would interfere with US foreign policy with the oil-rich nation. She posited “that theprinces are immune from

    petitioners’ claims†because of “the potentially significant foreign relations consequences of subjecting another sovereign state to suit.

    â€Â

    Continue Reading:
    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/05/11/kagan-helped-shield-saudis-911-lawsuits/

    • May I suggest the book Why America Slept. I read the book in 2 1/2 days and it opened my eyes to a lot of things.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s