Rep. Thomas Massie: Missile Strikes Against Syria are “An Act of War” & Only Congress Can Declare War, Not Obama

Freedom Outpost

The war drums are pounding and President Barack Obama is each day closer to taking  military action against the Syrian government.  There are major questions  about why the U.S. would become involved in Syria, and whether or not the claim  that the Assad regime used chemical weapons on citizens living in a Damascus  suburb are based in fact.  Administration officials say that military  action against Syria would be done “not to create a regime change,” but some  members of Congress aren’t buying it.

“If it’s not an effort to exact regime change then what is it?” asks  Republican Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie.  “Is it just retaliation?  Is  it bullying? Is it showing everybody in the world that we have missiles, and  we  can fire them into your country because we don’t like what we see?”

Congressman Massie talked exclusively with about the push by  the Obama Administration to draw the U.S. into war with Syria.

“When you deliver missiles into somebody’s country that is an act of war,”  Massie said.  “We can argue about whether having economic sanctions are an  act of war, but clearly when you deliver missiles, if somebody delivered  missiles into the central United States or anywhere on American territory that  would be an act of war.”

Massie went on to talk about the claims made by Secretary of State John Kerry  that there is “no doubt” that the President Bashar al Assad ordered the use of  chemical weapons a week ago.  Massie says the evidence is not clear at  all. 

“We don’t have proof of who used the weapons, or who used the gas,” he added.    “And it is also not clear to me how you improve the situation where  chemical weapons were used by delivering kinetic weapons. If we send in  airstrikes or missiles from ships, it is not clear to me how killing more  people  is going to improve the situation.”

So, who has the authority to hold the administration accountable?  The  Congress of the United States.  It is Congress, and Congress alone that  has  the authority to authorize an act of war against another nation.  Back  in  June, Rep. Massie authored a bill titled the “War Power Protection Act of  2013.”   At the time, he had 8 co-sponsors, but that number has now risen  to 13.   Rep. Massie says it is time for Congress to quit abdicating its  responsibility on this matter and instead enforce its Constitutional authority  to authorize or deny military involvement in Syria.

“There will be civilian causalities in any conflict,” Massie stated.    “If we get involved we are going to cause civilian causalities, and I  think that is wrong when our interests are not clear.  It is morally  wrong.   And this is a country (Syria), by the way, that has not expressed  aggression toward the United States at this point.  And as you pointed  out,  we are not in a situation where there is an imminent threat to our  wellbeing.” 


The Congressman was referring to the 1973  War Powers Act which allows for the President to act without Congressional  approval for 30 days.  Where that act has been misrepresented by lawmakers  and media, is that the Act only allows the President to do so if the United  States is under threat of imminent attack.  Congressman Massie’s bill, in  addition to preventing the President from entering a war without Congressional  approval, also blocks the U.S. from providing aid to the rebels in Syria.

“The bill itself deals with military or para-military purposes,” Massie said.    “Obviously if we wanted to provide humanitarian aid, my bill would not  prevent it.”

As to the question of whether or not a strike against Syria could lead to an  impeachment of the President, Massie says that is doubtful.

“People have asked me, ‘would you bring impeachment proceedings against the  President?'” Massie continued.  “The harsh fact of the matter is that there  aren’t enough votes in the Senate to affect an impeachment of the President.    It requires a 2/3rds vote of the Senate, and before you get the process  started, it requires a majority of the members on the judiciary committee.”  

“People should encourage their Congressman to support my bill, its HR  2507,” the Kentucky congressman added.  “It’s called the ‘War Powers  Protection Act.’  We only have 13 brave souls in Congress who are  co-sponsoring this bill, and it basically says that the President cannot  intervene in Syria until he comes to Congress, it’s that simple.”

Of course, the role of Congress is not to sit back and do nothing while  missiles are fired at another nation and then attempt to punish the President  afterward.  The job of Congress is to stand up before military action is  taken. Rep. Massie warns the American people as well to watch out for language  being used, even by House leadership when they say that the President must  first  “consult” with Congress.

“Our leadership in the House of Representatives says that the President  should consult with Congress,” he concluded.  “Our leadership is not  asking  them to come and get permission, and I think that the Administration  needs to  come and get permission.  They can’t just come and talk to three  or four  members on the Foreign Affairs Committee or the Military Committee or  just the  leadership.  They need to ask the entire body in the House of  Representatives and in the Senate for authorization or for a declaration of war  before he can proceed.”

Read more:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s