Hillary Clinton 2016? More Alinsky-Style ‘Hope & Change’?

Freedom Outpost


Who is Hillary Rodham Clinton?  We have to ask because this woman is now set  to run for the highest office in the land.  Of course, there are many things to  remind the American people about concerning Hillary Clinton, including her most  notorious scandal concerning what she did or did not do when it came to the  operations in Benghazi.  We also have to explore just what was being done in  Benghazi that the federal government thinks must be hidden from the people of  the United States, especially the families of the 4 men killed.

Benghazi is serious and is more recent history.  However, let us take a trip  down memory lane with Hillary Rodham Clinton, especially since she seems to  wish  to run for President in 2016. 


We have to question Hillary Rodham Clinton  about  her past since it seems that she came from a background that is foggy and  questionable, to say the least.  We have to go back as far as we can before all  the sources dry up or get removed, similar  to her 1969  College Senior Thesis which was a 92 page report on none other than a man  named “Saul Alinsky.”  Clinton had several meetings with him prior to writing  her thesis.  Her thesis was so strong on Alinsky that she was offered a job  when  she graduated from Wellesley College in 1969 with a “Saul  Alinsky” foundation called, “Industrial Areas Foundation” (IAF).  Hillary  Rodham was not yet married to William Clinton, so she decided to go on to Yale  Law School instead, and there she continued her allegiance to the “Alinsky”   style of teachings.

According  to a March 2007 Washington Post report: “As first lady, Clinton  occasionally lent her name to projects endorsed by the [IAF]…. She raised money  and attended two events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF  affiliate.”

Later on after the escapades of her husband in the office of President with  Monica Lewinsky, Hillary became a senator for New York.  Her actions in the  senate, along with her statements, followed the Marxist Saul Alinsky ideology  perfectly, since Hillary stated that she would, in essence, “take from the  rich.”

During her  years in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton consistently voted against proposed  income-tax cuts — most notably the Economic Growth and Tax Relief  Reconciliation  Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation  Act of 2003 —  depicting them as fiscally irresponsible measures that were  designed to help  only the wealthy. At a fundraiser in 2004, she told a crowd of financial donors: “Many of you are well  enough off that … the tax cuts may have helped you … We’re saying that for  America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not  give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the  common  good.”
Have we, as a nation, been lowered to this level of  ignorance that  we actually believe that those who have the will and work ethic  to get up and  work long, hard days to make millions from their ideas just to  have to give it  up because people like Hillary Clinton and others want them to?  Our nation was  never thought of in this way.  Only in the past few decades has  the influence of  socialists, communists, and Marxists been seen as they have  been elected to  Congress.  For the most part, they have been elected under the  guise of being  Democrats and have even become emboldened enough to call  themselves  “Progressives,” which is a term closely associated with all 3 of the  aforementioned groups.

Recently, people have seen the discussion about the Bill,  Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation and how it continues to  operate in the red and be extravagant  in spending.  We should question this, because if Hillary, or any member of  her family, cannot run this foundation, how in the world will she run our  country? When the Clintons began the foundation, they employed Robert Congel’s  assistance with their foundation, which is nearly in failure!

In 2004, New York developer Robert Congel donated $100,000 to the then called “William J. Clinton Foundation”.  It has since been  changed to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Soon thereafter,  Senator Clinton reportedly helped Congel access millions of dollars in federal  assistance for his mall project.

As with all the Democrats and especially with the “progressives,” (better  known as the Socialists, Communists, and Marxists) they continually make the  statement that if you are against any of the ideas floated out by the  Democrats,  you are either a Homophobic, Racist, or some other general hate  group.  This is  clearly shown by what Hillary Clinton stated about herself and  others within the  “Elite” group that know just how to “help’ the poor people,  in the following  brief paragraph which, by the way, shows just how the  Democrats prey upon those  who are under the wrong idea that they wish to help  them!

Depicting herself and fellow leftists as the champions of the downtrodden, Mrs. Clinton  has often characterized Republicans and conservatives as being inclined toward  racism and discrimination. At a Martin Luther King Day celebration in January  2006, for example, she told a black audience at Harlem’s Canaan Baptist Church:   “When you look at the way the (Republican-controlled) House of Representatives  has been run, it has been run like a plantation. And you know what I’m talking  about. It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a  chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard.” She went on  to  condemn Republicans’ “constant exploitation of race.” Al Sharpton later  praised  her comments.

Of course,  we all should know that Al Sharpton, along with one Barack Obama  and Jeremiah Right organized Louis Farrakhan’s October 16, 1995 Million Man  March. Al Sharpton of course has come out mainly to stir things up between the  races in what many call Race baiting by him so with a direct link to Hillary  Clinton, it seems that maybe she is willing to do the same thing that Al  Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the rest of the others wish to do, and that is to  divide the races rather than bring them together.

As with other Democrats, Hillary was re-elected back to the Senate again in  2006, even though she could not keep any of her promises. During her 2000  campaign, she had pledged to bring 200,000 new jobs to New York State. By late  2006, however, New York had lost 112,000 jobs and its jobless rate had risen by 0.7  percent. Clinton won the 2006 election by a wide margin over Republican  opponent  John Spencer.

It seems that Hillary Clinton is not afraid to gather support from the very  people that wish to “change” the way our nation has been operated since 1776!  In  Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary did the following:  




“In January 2007, two months after her re-election to a six-year term in  the Senate, Mrs. Clinton announced that she planned to run for U.S. President in  2008.
On the campaign trail, candidate Clinton said that to restore “fiscal responsibility to government,” she would like to  return “high-income tax rates to the 1990s levels.”  
In April 2007  Mrs. Clinton spoke at an event held by Al  Sharpton‘s National  Action Network, where she stated that her own presidential bid was possible  only because of the dedicated work of longtime civil-rights leaders who had  fought on behalf of those traditionally excluded from power positions in  American life. She specifically cited Jesse  Jackson and Children’s  Defense Fund founder Marian  Wright Edelman (both of whom were on the dais that day). “I have enjoyed a  long and positive relationship with Reverend Al Sharpton and National Action  Network,” said Mrs. Clinton, “and I don’t ever remember saying ‘no’ to them and I intend to  remain their partner in civil rights as I clean the dirt from under the carpet  in the Oval Office when I am elected President.”
That same month, Senator Clinton appointed Raul  Yzaguirre, who served as President and CEO of the National  Council of La Raza from 1974 to 2004, to co-chair her 2008 presidential  campaign and to direct her outreach efforts to Hispanic voters.
Another  notable co-chair of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign was Los Angeles Mayor Antonio  Villaraigosa, supporter of the radical Chicano student organization MEChA.”

br/> However, Hillary Clinton also has ties to what some have seen as  the worst person in the United States, George  Soros!  Many will ask just who  this is, and all you have to do is click  on the link and you will find out, but  be aware, this man is the money bags for  most if not all of the anti-United  States groups one could ever think of.

According to Discover the Networks:

“Mrs. Clinton has close ties to  the billionaire financier George  Soros and his so-called “Shadow Democratic Party,” or Shadow  Party. This term refers to a nationwide network of unions, non-profit  activist groups, and think tanks that actively campaign for the Democrats and  leftist causes. The Shadow Party was conceived  and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Harold  McEwan Ickes – all identified with the Democratic  Party left.
A New York hedge fund manager with a personal fortune  estimated at about $7.2 billion (aside from the billions of dollars in investor  assets controlled by his management company), Soros is one of the world’s  wealthiest and most powerful individuals. Since 1979, his foundation  network – whose flagship is the Open  Society Institute (OSI) — has given billions of dollars in grants to a  multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of  Soros. The major agendas of those organizations can be summarized as follows:  

  • promoting the election of  leftist political candidates throughout the United States
  • promoting open borders, mass  immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws  
  • promoting a  dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating  taxes
  • promoting social welfare  benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
  • financing the recruitment and  training of future activist leaders of the political Left
  • promoting socialized medicine  in the United States
  • promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism
  • promoting racial and ethnic  preferences in academia and the business world alike

Hillary Clinton shares each of  the foregoing Soros agendas.
At a 2004 “Take Back America”   conference in Washington, DC, Mrs. Clinton introduced Soros with these words:  

“Now, among the many people who  have stood up and said, ‘I cannot sit by and let this happen to the country I  love,’ is George Soros, and I have known George Soros for a long time now, and  I  first came across his work in the former Soviet Union, in Eastern Europe,  when I  was privileged to travel there, both on my own and with my husband on  behalf of  our country. … [W]e need people like George Soros, who is fearless,  and willing  to step up when it counts.”[18]“

[18] Cited in David Horowitz and Richard Poe, The Shadow Party, p.  53.”

Here, one sees for the first time the words “Shadow Party.”  We can state,  without a doubt that many will come up with all sorts of wild ideas, but if you  follow the link, it will show you a part of the United States that is extremely  scary, to say the least!

Hillary Clinton made a statement early on about the ideas of Saul Alinsky, of  whom she actually sat down and discussed his ideas with on several occasions.  However, the most “radical’ words that she stated in 2003 have to be considered  when we think of her running for President since this shows that her ideas are  so closely aligned to Saul Alinsky, that it.

“I agreed with some of Alinsky’s ideas,” she explained in “Living  History,” her 2003 biography, “particularly the value of empowering people  to help themselves. But we had a fundamental disagreement. He believed you  could  change the system only from the outside. I didn’t.  Later he offered me  the  chance to work with him when I graduated from college, and he was  disappointed  that I decided instead to go to law school.  Alinsky said I  would be  wasting my time, but my decision was an expression of my belief that  the  system could be changed from within.”

Hillary Clinton shows without a doubt that she figures that the “change” that  is needed to move the United States towards the goals of this Saul Alinsky  character could better be done from “within.”  Now that alone should cause some  exceptionally strong concern if she thought that way just 8 short years ago,  what would make her think any different now?  The concern should not be that  there needs to be change, but what kind of change.  In the two terms of Barack  Hussein Obama, we have seen what the Alinsky kind of change is, and it isn’t  pretty.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/hillary-clinton-2016-alinsky-style-hope-change/#ixzz2d4HeX697 Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/hillary-clinton-2016-alinsky-style-hope-change/#YjvMHJp40I6lEcu2.99

4 thoughts on “Hillary Clinton 2016? More Alinsky-Style ‘Hope & Change’?

  1. pigs are about to fly!

  2. That commie bitch is sorry as bad as a fresh bag of dog shit!
    Have we forgotten the murders of the Whitewatergate and her involvement with her sorry ass piece of shit husband! Why else do you think she stayed with him after monica and blow jobs are not sex ordeal! Hell she and he both are coconspirators in that fracus!
    That is where she gets her calousness from and hence her screaming at Congress “What difference

    does it make at this point”! All these animal commie progressives demoncraps deserve nothing more or less than what they desire to do to us and that is kill all who oppose or disagree with them! TYRAMTS ONE AND

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s