Who is Hillary Rodham Clinton? We have to ask because this woman is now set to run for the highest office in the land. Of course, there are many things to remind the American people about concerning Hillary Clinton, including her most notorious scandal concerning what she did or did not do when it came to the operations in Benghazi. We also have to explore just what was being done in Benghazi that the federal government thinks must be hidden from the people of the United States, especially the families of the 4 men killed.
Benghazi is serious and is more recent history. However, let us take a trip down memory lane with Hillary Rodham Clinton, especially since she seems to wish to run for President in 2016.
We have to question Hillary Rodham Clinton about her past since it seems that she came from a background that is foggy and questionable, to say the least. We have to go back as far as we can before all the sources dry up or get removed, similar to her 1969 College Senior Thesis which was a 92 page report on none other than a man named “Saul Alinsky.” Clinton had several meetings with him prior to writing her thesis. Her thesis was so strong on Alinsky that she was offered a job when she graduated from Wellesley College in 1969 with a “Saul Alinsky” foundation called, “Industrial Areas Foundation” (IAF). Hillary Rodham was not yet married to William Clinton, so she decided to go on to Yale Law School instead, and there she continued her allegiance to the “Alinsky” style of teachings.
According to a March 2007 Washington Post report: “As first lady, Clinton occasionally lent her name to projects endorsed by the [IAF]…. She raised money and attended two events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF affiliate.”
Later on after the escapades of her husband in the office of President with Monica Lewinsky, Hillary became a senator for New York. Her actions in the senate, along with her statements, followed the Marxist Saul Alinsky ideology perfectly, since Hillary stated that she would, in essence, “take from the rich.”
During her years in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton consistently voted against proposed income-tax cuts — most notably the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 — depicting them as fiscally irresponsible measures that were designed to help only the wealthy. At a fundraiser in 2004, she told a crowd of financial donors: “Many of you are well enough off that … the tax cuts may have helped you … We’re saying that for America to get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
Have we, as a nation, been lowered to this level of ignorance that we actually believe that those who have the will and work ethic to get up and work long, hard days to make millions from their ideas just to have to give it up because people like Hillary Clinton and others want them to? Our nation was never thought of in this way. Only in the past few decades has the influence of socialists, communists, and Marxists been seen as they have been elected to Congress. For the most part, they have been elected under the guise of being Democrats and have even become emboldened enough to call themselves “Progressives,” which is a term closely associated with all 3 of the aforementioned groups.
Recently, people have seen the discussion about the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation and how it continues to operate in the red and be extravagant in spending. We should question this, because if Hillary, or any member of her family, cannot run this foundation, how in the world will she run our country? When the Clintons began the foundation, they employed Robert Congel’s assistance with their foundation, which is nearly in failure!
In 2004, New York developer Robert Congel donated $100,000 to the then called “William J. Clinton Foundation”. It has since been changed to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Soon thereafter, Senator Clinton reportedly helped Congel access millions of dollars in federal assistance for his mall project.
As with all the Democrats and especially with the “progressives,” (better known as the Socialists, Communists, and Marxists) they continually make the statement that if you are against any of the ideas floated out by the Democrats, you are either a Homophobic, Racist, or some other general hate group. This is clearly shown by what Hillary Clinton stated about herself and others within the “Elite” group that know just how to “help’ the poor people, in the following brief paragraph which, by the way, shows just how the Democrats prey upon those who are under the wrong idea that they wish to help them!
Depicting herself and fellow leftists as the champions of the downtrodden, Mrs. Clinton has often characterized Republicans and conservatives as being inclined toward racism and discrimination. At a Martin Luther King Day celebration in January 2006, for example, she told a black audience at Harlem’s Canaan Baptist Church: “When you look at the way the (Republican-controlled) House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation. And you know what I’m talking about. It has been run in a way so that nobody with a contrary view has had a chance to present legislation, to make an argument, to be heard.” She went on to condemn Republicans’ “constant exploitation of race.” Al Sharpton later praised her comments.
Of course, we all should know that Al Sharpton, along with one Barack Obama and Jeremiah Right organized Louis Farrakhan’s October 16, 1995 Million Man March. Al Sharpton of course has come out mainly to stir things up between the races in what many call Race baiting by him so with a direct link to Hillary Clinton, it seems that maybe she is willing to do the same thing that Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the rest of the others wish to do, and that is to divide the races rather than bring them together.
As with other Democrats, Hillary was re-elected back to the Senate again in 2006, even though she could not keep any of her promises. During her 2000 campaign, she had pledged to bring 200,000 new jobs to New York State. By late 2006, however, New York had lost 112,000 jobs and its jobless rate had risen by 0.7 percent. Clinton won the 2006 election by a wide margin over Republican opponent John Spencer.
It seems that Hillary Clinton is not afraid to gather support from the very people that wish to “change” the way our nation has been operated since 1776! In Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary did the following:
“In January 2007, two months after her re-election to a six-year term in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton announced that she planned to run for U.S. President in 2008.
On the campaign trail, candidate Clinton said that to restore “fiscal responsibility to government,” she would like to return “high-income tax rates to the 1990s levels.”
In April 2007 Mrs. Clinton spoke at an event held by Al Sharpton‘s National Action Network, where she stated that her own presidential bid was possible only because of the dedicated work of longtime civil-rights leaders who had fought on behalf of those traditionally excluded from power positions in American life. She specifically cited Jesse Jackson and Children’s Defense Fund founder Marian Wright Edelman (both of whom were on the dais that day). “I have enjoyed a long and positive relationship with Reverend Al Sharpton and National Action Network,” said Mrs. Clinton, “and I don’t ever remember saying ‘no’ to them and I intend to remain their partner in civil rights as I clean the dirt from under the carpet in the Oval Office when I am elected President.”
That same month, Senator Clinton appointed Raul Yzaguirre, who served as President and CEO of the National Council of La Raza from 1974 to 2004, to co-chair her 2008 presidential campaign and to direct her outreach efforts to Hispanic voters.
Another notable co-chair of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign was Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, supporter of the radical Chicano student organization MEChA.”<
br/> However, Hillary Clinton also has ties to what some have seen as the worst person in the United States, George Soros! Many will ask just who this is, and all you have to do is click on the link and you will find out, but be aware, this man is the money bags for most if not all of the anti-United States groups one could ever think of.
According to Discover the Networks:
“Mrs. Clinton has close ties to the billionaire financier George Soros and his so-called “Shadow Democratic Party,” or Shadow Party. This term refers to a nationwide network of unions, non-profit activist groups, and think tanks that actively campaign for the Democrats and leftist causes. The Shadow Party was conceived and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Harold McEwan Ickes – all identified with the Democratic Party left.
A New York hedge fund manager with a personal fortune estimated at about $7.2 billion (aside from the billions of dollars in investor assets controlled by his management company), Soros is one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful individuals. Since 1979, his foundation network – whose flagship is the Open Society Institute (OSI) — has given billions of dollars in grants to a multitude of organizations whose objectives are consistent with those of Soros. The major agendas of those organizations can be summarized as follows:
- promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
- promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
- promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
- promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
- financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
- promoting socialized medicine in the United States
- promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism
- promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike
Hillary Clinton shares each of the foregoing Soros agendas.
At a 2004 “Take Back America” conference in Washington, DC, Mrs. Clinton introduced Soros with these words:
“Now, among the many people who have stood up and said, ‘I cannot sit by and let this happen to the country I love,’ is George Soros, and I have known George Soros for a long time now, and I first came across his work in the former Soviet Union, in Eastern Europe, when I was privileged to travel there, both on my own and with my husband on behalf of our country. … [W]e need people like George Soros, who is fearless, and willing to step up when it counts.”“
 Cited in David Horowitz and Richard Poe, The Shadow Party, p. 53.”
Here, one sees for the first time the words “Shadow Party.” We can state, without a doubt that many will come up with all sorts of wild ideas, but if you follow the link, it will show you a part of the United States that is extremely scary, to say the least!
Hillary Clinton made a statement early on about the ideas of Saul Alinsky, of whom she actually sat down and discussed his ideas with on several occasions. However, the most “radical’ words that she stated in 2003 have to be considered when we think of her running for President since this shows that her ideas are so closely aligned to Saul Alinsky, that it.
“I agreed with some of Alinsky’s ideas,” she explained in “Living History,” her 2003 biography, “particularly the value of empowering people to help themselves. But we had a fundamental disagreement. He believed you could change the system only from the outside. I didn’t. Later he offered me the chance to work with him when I graduated from college, and he was disappointed that I decided instead to go to law school. Alinsky said I would be wasting my time, but my decision was an expression of my belief that the system could be changed from within.”
Hillary Clinton shows without a doubt that she figures that the “change” that is needed to move the United States towards the goals of this Saul Alinsky character could better be done from “within.” Now that alone should cause some exceptionally strong concern if she thought that way just 8 short years ago, what would make her think any different now? The concern should not be that there needs to be change, but what kind of change. In the two terms of Barack Hussein Obama, we have seen what the Alinsky kind of change is, and it isn’t pretty.
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/hillary-clinton-2016-alinsky-style-hope-change/#ixzz2d4HeX697 Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/hillary-clinton-2016-alinsky-style-hope-change/#YjvMHJp40I6lEcu2.99