Most of the talk about the recently released Reggie Love interview centers on Love’s admission that he and President Obama played cards — Sp***s to be precise — during the Osama bin Laden raid. But Love, Obama’s “body man” for several years, revealed more than the White House wanted him to about Obama’s notorious birth certificate.
At a forum hosted last month hosted by the Artists & Athletes Alliance in Los Angeles, Love jovially recalled the moment when Obama “finally found” his birth certificate.
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch, announced today that it has obtained documents from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) revealing that on February 12, 2013, HUD Assistant Secretary for Office of Housing Counseling Sarah Gerecke may have violated federal law by requesting that $201,222.07 be transferred from the account of the defunct Affordable Housing Centers of America (AHCOA), an ACORN spin-off, to HUD intermediary Mission for Peace “to specifically pay for the activities of former AHCOA affiliates.”
The government’s treating citizens as potential terrorists threats have been on display for the past couple months with a series of revelations about the NSA, IRS and DOJ. In March 2009, a leaked secret report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) profiled third-party supporters, homeschoolers, people who know the U.S. Constitution and people who have related bumper stickers on their cars, fly the flag or even invest in gold as potential domestic terrorists.
In April 2009, a Department of Homeland Security published Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment, a report which expressed many of the same sentiments and targeted the same people. It wasn’t too long afterward that the flag@whitehouse.gov scandal emerged, in which the White House asked people to report their friends, acquaintances, colleagues and neighbors who disagreed with Obamacare.
Represenative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) spoke at a town hall meeting on Wednesday evening dropped a bombshell about former Secretary Hillary Clinton. According to Kinzinger, Clinton shouted him down for suggesting that the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2012 in Benghazi, Libya were the result of Islamic terrorists.
“Two days after this attack we were in a briefing with Hillary Clinton and she screamed at a member of Congress who’d dare suggest that this was a terrorist attack,” Kinzinger said.
Kinzinger then added, “Now we find out that while it was happening they knew it was a terrorist attack.”
In the video, Kinzinger doesn’t point to any source for his claims. However, we do know from various people that many in the administration did know that the attacks in Benghazi were jihadist terrorist attacks.
Former CIA Director, General David Petraeus told Congress that Benghazi was a terrorist attack “almost instantly.” The CIA, apparently knew it as well. The White House knew it was a terrorist attack within two hours, according to emails from the State Department. AFRICOM General Carter Ham said he knew it was a terror attack.
So why the cover-up? Why the manipulating of talking points? Why was the anti-Islam video and its creator used as the scapegoat? The truth is sometimes hard to swallow, but I think Dean Garrison laid out one of the best scenarios of what really took place in Benghazi.
The question now remains, will the Senate call Hillary Clinton back to answer these charges as Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) said, or will they choose to ignore these facts and exclaim as Clinton did, “What difference does it make?”
The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents.
Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by law and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. e-mails and telephone calls.
The documents, provided earlier this summer to The Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, include a level of detail and analysis that is not routinely shared with Congress or the special court that oversees surveillance. In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
In one instance, the NSA decided that it need not report the unintended surveillance of Americans. A notable example in 2008 was the interception of a “large number” of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a “quality assurance” review that was not distributed to the NSA’s oversight staff.
In another case, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which has authority over some NSA operations, did not learn about a new collection method until it had been in operation for many months. The court ruled it unconstitutional.
The Obama administration has provided almost no public information about the NSA’s compliance record. In June, after promising to explain the NSA’s record in “as transparent a way as we possibly can,” Deputy Attorney General James Cole described extensive safeguards and oversight that keep the agency in check. “Every now and then, there may be a mistake,” Cole said in congressional testimony.
The NSA audit obtained by The Post, dated May 2012, counted 2,776 incidents in the preceding 12 months of unauthorized collection, storage, access to or distribution of legally protected communications. Most were unintended. Many involved failures of due diligence or violations of standard operating procedure. The most serious incidents included a violation of a court order and unauthorized use of data about more than 3,000 Americans and green-card holders.
Never in the history of the USA has it been in so much trouble as it finds itself today. There is neither point nor gain in attempting to soft-soap anyone about this. Its demise now seems imminent, as no one is doing anything to stop the now proven-to-be criminal and would-be POTUS illegally occupying what was once–but is no more–our White House. The end of America as the world’s “shining city on a hill” is in its final stage of demolition. No one cares to stop its murder. So, the United States of America will die.
The Obama syndicate, in partnership with the N.W.O., is working hard to keep us on edge–every hour of every day–so that we will be distracted and not see the desolation he is creating in front of us. Dictator-in-Chief Obama, however, remains apart from these issues and–instead–recently had an “all boys” weekend of golfing and who knows what else to celebrate his birthday at Camp David and also begins another round of vacations away from Washington D.C. As with all other dictators before him, this is Obama’s nature…to play hard with other people’s money and lives while he works to destroy those same people. The destruction of the USA is not simply the end of a country. It is, instead, the end of a civilization.
We now know the CIA Annex in Benghazi was the hub for illegally shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels. That the CIA Annex contained three huge warehouses containing thousands of surface-to-air missiles, taking part in a proxy war to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.
We now know, as revealed in Congressional testimony by Gregory Hicks, the State Department’s deputy chief of mission in Libya, after the Benghazi consulate was attacked—after ambassador Christopher Stevens begged for help—a stand down order was given. That AFRICOM, the huge military presence overseeing the entire African continent, including Libya, gave a direct order for special forces not to be deployed; and this order had to have come from the President (or someone acting in the President’s place.)
The question is, why was the stand down order given? And why the cover story of a protest over an anti-Muslim YouTube video? What exactly was so shocking in Benghazi that had the Obama administration scrambling to create a huge coverup? Were Barack Obama and his rogue CIA agency simply caught with their hands in the cookie jar fighting a war they had no authorization for?
Shockingly, this is only half the story.
Something much more serious has been revealed by Joe DiGenova, former chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee and now the attorney representing Benghazi whistleblower Gregory Hicks. According to information supplied to DiGenova from high-level officials in the Special Operations and Intelligence community, the reason for the huge coverup was because during the attack on the consulate and later the CIA Annex, 400 surface-to-air missiles were stolen. According to DiGenova, these are shoulder-fired heat-sinking missiles capable of shooting down a commercial airliner. Who stole these missiles? Al-Qaeda. The same Al-Qaeda that flew airplanes into the World Trade Center towers and Pentagon on 9/11.
Four hundred missiles capable of shooting down an American airliner in the hands of our enemies, and Barack Hussein Obama didn’t bother to tell the American people about it?
Some are saying this is an “impeachable offense.”
When al-Qaeda shoots down an American airliner (and no doubt they will, eventually), it will be blood on Barack Obama’s hands. Blood added to the blood already on his hands for abandoning Americans under attack in Benghazi.
Socialism is not the Answer 