Are We Going To Live By Secret NSA Rules Or As A Constitutional Republic?


Freedom Outpost

To hear the NSA tell it, their interception of phone calls and emails of 300  million people was done to protect the security of the United States; what they  did will prevent future 911′s and keep our utilities from being sabotaged.   In fact, NSA claims, this blanket surveillance frustrated a dozen terrorist  attacks.  But no details on that are available.  It’s secret.   National security.

The people of the United States have a choice: they can live by the rules  made up (secretly) by the NSA, or they can live in a Constitutional republic.

The Catch-22 is that if you choose the NSA rules, you are told you are safe,  but you can’t know how that works. National security.  You can’t even know  what it has accomplished.  Again, national security.

If you choose to live in a Constitutional republic, you need to know how  things work and why things are done.  The secrets are few and far between  and are secret only for short periods of time.  Transparency, not secrecy  is the rule.

The world of the NSA is the world of Dr Strangelove and James Bond.   There is always a villain out there with a powerful laser that will be used to  enslave the world.  We need to be protected from this villain by secret  facilities costing billions of dollars which we are never allowed to know about  or monitor.

When we stumble across information about the secret NSA programs and  questions are asked, as in the recent congressional hearings, the head of the  NSA lies and says that the phone and email messages of millions of U.S. citizens  were not monitored.

What is frightening is that Clapper, who denies  he lied, probably believes he needed to lie to protect the security of the  United States.

According to James Bamford, “The  Secret War,” Wired, 6/12/13, General Keith Alexander runs the NSA’s cyberwar  facilities:

“We jokingly referred to him as Emperor Alexander—with good cause, because  whatever Keith wants, Keith gets,” says one former senior CIA official who  agreed to speak on condition of anonymity. “We would sit back literally in awe  of what he was able to get from Congress, from the White House, and at the  expense of everybody else.”

He is able to get whatever he wants, including 4.7 billion dollars currently  pending, because he has convinced everyone that we are at risk from the internet  and we need his secret operation to save us:

“Alexander runs . . . an empire he has built over the past eight years by  insisting that the US’s inherent vulnerability to digital attacks requires him  to amass more and more authority over the data zipping around the globe. In his  telling, the threat is so mind-bogglingly huge that the nation has little option  but to eventually put the entire civilian Internet under his protection,  requiring tweets and emails to pass through his filters, and putting the kill  switch under the government’s forefinger. “What we see is an increasing level of  activity on the networks,” he said at a recent security conference in Canada. “I  am concerned that this is going to break a threshold where the private sector  can no longer handle it and the government is going to have to step in.”

The government will step in?  It seems that has already happened.

So here’s what we have: a secret operation that monitors every US citizen in  secret ways that will never be revealed costing at least 4.7 billion dollars  every year.  If questioned about the existence of this program, those in  control will lie.

Here’s what we need: a transparent operation that tells the world what we are  monitoring and what we are doing generally without going into the details of how  it is done. Further, this program needs to be subject to actual – not fake – oversight.  The American people might decide that they do not want every  email monitored and they might, for example, instruct NSA to monitor only those  emails belonging to people suspected of terrorist ties.

Much is made of the need for secrecy.  Implied is that the continued  existence of the nation depends on this secrecy.

How much secrecy can there be if 4.5 million people have top security  clearance?  In all probability, one or two of those 4.5 million people have  already sold out to our enemies and, unlike Snowden, have leaked valuable  information, not vague generalities and, again unlike Snowden, they do it for  money.

During the cold war, it is almost certain that the Soviet Union knew our  nuclear capability and we knew theirs. No disasters happened.  We need a  strong defense but we don’t need secrecy of the sort that is being insisted  on.  For raising this debate, if nothing else, for lifting this veil,  Snowden is a national hero.  We don’t need and, in fact, we cannot survive  the secrecy that has been promulgated.

Another thing we don’t need is emperors.  But if you were Alexander or  Clapper you wouldn’t be arguing for transparency.  Empires thrive  on secrecy and the claim that such secrecy is needed for our continued  existence.  Actually, it’s needed for their continued existence.

What has happened here is that the form of government we thought we  had has been taken from us by people we never heard of, operating in  secret.

Read more:

2 thoughts on “Are We Going To Live By Secret NSA Rules Or As A Constitutional Republic?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s