Whistleblower Exclusive: Benghazi Cover-up Is The Proxy Battle With The War With Iran


Freedom Outpost

The immediate concern for the Obama-Clinton regime after the attack in  Benghazi was to cover up the connection with Iran and Syria to Ansar al Sharia  and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) according to my Benghazi  whistleblower source. The attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans,  including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, was not a terrorist attack; it was a  nation-state attack, an escalation of war, and an opening of a new front in the  tit for tat conflict with Iran and by extension their proxy partner Russia that  is now being fought in Syria.

For anyone who thinks Americans will be told that Benghazi was a nation-state  attack by  ex-CIA chief David Petraeus in the near future they are in for a  disappointment. He is part of the problem and has been for years. He sold his  soul for shiny medals and financial perks and circuses long ago—and as his  record shows, he will roll over again and again. Recall how Petraeus fell into  lock-step rank-and-file with President Obama and Hillary Clinton when he joined  them in falsely misleading America before the 2012 elections by blaming an “out-of-control  demonstration prompted by a Youtube video” for the Benghazi attack to the  House Intelligence Committee three days after the attack. He’s as dirty as they  are.

In addition, tell me please, how can a man who sends troops to war, on  multiple deployments, with duffle bags full of medications, under suicidal,  unwinnable polices like catch  and release and COIN, while watching the military suicide numbers soar (22  a day or one every 65 minutes) have a conscience or any sense of right and  wrong? To be fair that question includes the morally bankrupt Congress,  particularly the long serving members who have allowed these policies that are  destroying America’s military to continue unabated for years through the Bush  and Obama administrations. As I previously reported, Petraeus is getting off  easy for simply  apologizing about sex. Take the scales off your eyes, and stop idolizing  this gravely flawed, evil man with blood on his hands—the “celebrated General,” as some media types call him. By their fruits you shall know them.  Indeed, we know David Petraeus and his fruits are rotten to the core—unless  Petraeus finds his soul, a conscience, and makes a deal in exchange for criminal  leniency, he will keep toeing the line.

Moreover, freshman Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tx) is correct. You  can’t trust the Republicans either. As I reported, the Republican Committee  in their Benghazi  Interim report already rolled over when they shockingly confirmed the  administration’s dishonest story that no one was denied help during the Benghazi  attack. As their report states: “No U.S. government element refused or denied  requests for emergency assistance during the crisis (page 15),” which as previously  reported was a lie and here’s why. The Republicans have yet to explain why  they were wrong when they backed up the Obama-Clinton regime’s latest falsehood,  and thus far have refused to answer my queries. Everyone makes mistakes but at  least have the decency to admit it and explain what happened.

Therefore it is up to us, you and I, and all the brave whistleblowers and  journalists, who at great risk must reveal the truth of Benghazi. “What  difference does it make?” declared Hillary Clinton during the Foreign Relations  Committee hearings—a big one because the truth of Benghazi affects not only  America’s future but the entire world.

Here we go.

Let’s break it down. Remember the pictures of the three suspects that the FBI  released in relation to the Benghazi attack on May 1? One of my sources with  direct information on Benghazi informed me that of those three terrorists, the  one on the right is a Yemeni national who was part of the jihadist group Ansar  al Sharia. Ansar Al Sharia, according to Saudi intelligence, is backed, funded  and directed by Iran. They are enemies  of the Saudis and are trained by Iran’s Quods forces.

Photo Credit FBI

Photo Credit FBI

Normally, if the FBI is trying to track down bad guys who are possibly  involved in something like a terrorist attack that killed Americans, the FBI  offers some sort of reward for any information that will lead to their arrest.  Notice how that did not happen with the men in Benghazi? Where’s the incentive  for anyone to cooperate? As my source explained, “The game was given away when  they gave that picture out. They did the same thing with the Boston Marathon  bombers—played dumb, even though we now know they knew who these guys were all  along. They are doing the same thing with the Benghazi guys. Saudi intelligence  and Western intelligence agencies are very aware of who they are.”

It was these Iranian-backed men in the FBI photos, Ansar al Sharia, who went  to Benghazi to build up a militia and radicalized some locals. As my source  explained, “when you have an Iranian funded group sent into Benghazi to  radicalize the locals that means you are in a proxy battle with the war in  Iran.” Why? That’s a two part answer.

First do you think Iran was happy when seven  Iranian Red Crescent workers were kidnapped by gunmen in Benghazi on July  31, 2012? Recall how these Red Crescent workers (equivalent to the Red Cross)  were still held captive during the Benghazi attack, were released less than a  month after, and flown out of the Benghazi Benina International Airport. These  weren’t your typical aid workers handing out food and supplies. According to my  source; they were taken off the streets because they were probing the gunrunning  operation into Syria when someone picked them up.

Next it’s been well documented that the Saudis have been heavily involved in  everything in Benghazi and Libya in general, the Muslim  Brotherhood in the region, as well as supplying  arms to the rebels in Syria to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad—with  US assistance despite the line drawn by Russia.

Who else was in Benghazi? A faction of AQIM  Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb backed by Syria. Syria, like Iran was in  Benghazi. What was going on in Syria? There was gunrunning  and arms smuggling from Libya through Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan into Syria  as well as bringing in fighters to engage in a war with Syrian President  Assad—the backdoor to Iran.

Meanwhile shortly after the Benghazi attacks reports of secret  meetings with Obama’s chief advisor, Valerie Jarrett, with representatives  of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Qatar regarding Iran’s nuclear  weapons program that had been going on before the Benghazi attack began to  widely surface. The Obama administration wanted to announce a breakthrough  agreement in Iran’s nuclear standoff— a diplomatic victory to ensure his  reelection. While the Obama administration denied these reports, my source  confirmed they are true. “The Iranians played them.”

Because the attack in Benghazi was a nation-state attack, with the 2012  elections coming up the Obama-Clinton regime did not want American voters to  know that thanks to their under-handed policies of gunrunning into Syria to  overthrow Assad with the Saudis that America was in a proxy war with Iran, and  by extension their proxy partner Russia. Do you think American voters would have  re-elected President Obama had they known that America is about to be pulled  into another major conflict?

Nine months later, the administration still doesn’t want the public to know  the truth about Benghazi which is why, as the Associated  Press reported last week, despite the Federal Bureau of  Investigations (FBI) identifying five men who might be responsible for the  attack no arrests have been made. “The men remain at large while the FBI gathers  evidence”—the same FBI that the Obama-Clinton regime denied  access to Benghazi for almost a month after the attack— the perfect way to  thwart evidence collection and skew official conclusions as previously reported  and documented here.

This is also why President Obama, last week during his speech at Ft. McNair’s  National Defense University in Washington, called the attack in Benghazi a “localized” threat. Obviously he doesn’t want you to see the bigger picture that is  literally unfolding in the Middle East before your eyes as you read this that  his administration is responsible for, the so-called Arab Spring.

What is happening is America is the final stages of the run up to the next  major military conflict coming up in the Middle East. But unlike Iraq and  Afghanistan or the smaller operations in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, Syria won’t  implode it will explode and spread throughout the region in an epic bloody,  deadly Sunni-Shiite conflict. Christians, people of all faiths, non-believers  will be persecuted if not outright slaughtered. Think Islamic Caliphate time.

The security and existence of Israel will also be in jeopardy. As Israel  Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz recently warned; Israel must prepare for a three-front war, presumably having to defend  themselves from Syria, Lebanon, and Iran. Already sectarian  violence is flaring up in Lebanon and Syria. On top of Iran’s nuclear  program, Israel will have to defend herself from Syria’s massive weapons arsenal  that includes “advanced anti-aircraft missiles, anti-ship missiles and surface- to-air missiles. Syria also has large stockpiles of chemical and biological  weapons, advanced artillery as well as the other components of a large  conventional military force,” reports  Caroline Glick. In addition Israel could also become the target of the  weapons that went missing from Libya and Col. Muammar Gaddafi’s vast weapons  arsenal that the Obama-Clinton  funded rebels looted from Gaddafi’s warehouses and includes the most  advanced Russian surface-to air missiles, SA-24s that are easily launched from a  person’s shoulder or a truck bed that can take down low-flying military and  commercial aircraft.

I repeat massive bloodbath ahead, genocide and ethnic cleansing  draws near if Obama’s underhanded policies are not stopped. As Time  Magazine reported from Libya this magnified nightmare awaits the  troops:

“Stockpiles of old Soviet artillery shells and land mines gave Iraqis  enough car bombs, roadside bombs and suicide vests to run an eight-year  insurgency that has killed thousands of Americans and many tens of thousands of  Iraqis. “If you just take one of these, you have a car bomb,” [Tom  Bouckaert of Human Right’s Watch during an interview in Libya] says,  pointing to a box containing 130-mm antitank shells. There are hundreds more  stacked in the same room.

A nearby sandy lot holds thousands more antipersonnel and antitank mines,  with trip-wire triggers to rig booby traps already available nearby. Hundreds of  such stockpiles have been located across Libya. Human Rights Watch found some 60 weapons warehouses in the eastern city of Ajdabiyah alone,  all of them looted. “The storage facilities we found in Iraq were  minuscule compared to what we’re finding here,” says Bouckaert  (emphasis mine).”

One can’t help but ask what did the Obama-Clinton regime think would happen  when they funded al  Qaeda rebels to topple Gaddafi? Either they are dangerously stupid or this  is what they wanted to happen considering they have been gearing up for the next  stop Syria for well over a year now. As previously  reported, the State Department will not provide an inventory or location of  the weapons recovered in Libya as part of the MANPAD weapons recovery program  that Hillary Clinton funded using $40 million tax dollars.

Are you awake yet? Is it becoming clear now? I repeat. According to my  source, Benghazi was a nation-state attack—not simply a terrorist attack. There  has been a U.S. proxy war with Iran since Benghazi. It is heating up by the day.

Look, events are confirming my source’s accuracy. Iranian  soldiers and Hezbollah are fighting for Assad in Syria—even the State  department had to recently, finally admit this.

Ding! Ding! Russian  soldiers and the Syrian Army are fighting the Syrian rebels.

Cannibalism alert! A Syrian rebel, Al  Hamad, a Sunni, with a sectarian hatred of Alawite Muslims (that would  include Shiites and all other “infidels”), cuts out the heart and lung of a  Syrian soldier and eats it.

Now do you understand why Russian President  Vladimir Putin recently kept Secretary of State John Kerry waiting for three  hours? You know the world is upside down when Putin rightfully distrusts the  truth-challenged Kerry who already betrayed his own country and the troops  during Vietnam. Moreover, Putin has been warning for over a year the “catastrophic” consequences that would befall if the West  and Arab nations persist with their military intervention in Syria which will lead to war with Iran. Obviously, Putin does not want the Muslim  Brotherhood on his doorstep either. Would you? (Incidentally, the FBI denied my  Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on  John Kerry prior to his Secretary of State confirmation. As previously  reported, Kerry participated in the Benghazi  cover-up as well.)

Still not awake or retreating into denial? Think about this. Could the  Saudis, without the U.S./NATO intervention, have overthrown Assad by arming the  Syrian rebels alone to install the Muslim Brotherhood and expand their reach?  No, if the Saudi’s could have accomplished that, Assad would have been gone  months if not over a year ago. The Saudis need U.S./NATO intervention. Do not be  deceived. As  reported here, the same applied for Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and Col. Muammar  Gaddafi in Libya—two leaders who had banned the Muslim Brotherhood in their  countries. Are you awake yet?

Remember when the Benghazi nation-state attack that killed four Americans  happened, America was in the final weeks of the 2012 presidential election  cycle. A proxy war with Iran could not be known to the public. It was  unacceptable for Americans to know that at any time troops could be sent into  Syria which will explode into Iran. This is the reason why the Obama-Clinton  regime pulled out this obscure Youtube video as the chief culprit to  blame for the attack in Benghazi— a YouTube video that doesn’t appear  anywhere in their infamous “Talking points” that were repeatedly edited to  deceive Americans. The Youtube video was intended to distract the  public’s attention to what is really going on in the Middle East. It worked.  Indeed. Under a heavy fog of deception Obama was reelected.

Hillary Clinton and the cover-up

If you don’t address the Iranian and Syrian connection to the nation-state  attack in Benghazi, you can’t get to the Clintons. Hillary’s starring role is  definitely in the Benghazi cover-up because nine months later it still has not  been “officially” confirmed whether Ambassador Christopher Stevens was wearing  his State Department hat or his CIA hat at the time when he was murdered. What  is undeniable is Hillary was one of the first top administration officials to  publicly falsely blame the Youtube video. She, with President Obama,  appeared in a paid advertisement costing $70,000 to disavow the Youtube  video that aired in Pakistan. She lied  to Tyrone Woods’ father face about the death of his son. Her State  Department self-investigation, the Advisory Review Board (ARB), blamed  Ambassador Christopher Stevens and a lack of funding for the Benghazi attack  to conceal the truth. Hillary’s friends, Admiral Mike Mullen and Tom Pickering,  who headed the ARB, as reported in the  fix was in, didn’t bother to interview the Turkish Counsel General who  Ambassador Stevens last saw before he was killed—neither have the Republicans  thus far. Pickering finally admitted on NBC’s  Meet the Press what I and others, like Doug  Hagmann, have been reporting for months that the ARB was a rigged travesty.  As Pickering put it, “The Accountability Review Board was there to look  at the question of security. We did not examine talking points after  the fact. It was not in our remit (emphasis mine).” Indeed. A  lot was not in Pickering’s remit.

The next time someone, be it in the media, President Obama, Secretary of  State John Kerry or members of Congress, like  the insufferable Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.S.), say  the U.S. needs to overthrow Syrian President Assad for humanitarian purposes,  ask them what they think will happen next. Are they really so stupid to actually  believe that freedom, democracy, unicorns, peace and lollipops will take over  Syria after Assad is removed or will another vacuum be created for the Muslim  Brotherhood to fill? A vacuum that will be filled by massive bloodshed,  ethnic cleansing, genocide that could set the entire region on fire with  American and NATO troops being dragged in to serve the interests of someone else  who are using America’s military might to create the United States of Islam. You  already can see it happening in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.

Wake up America. Wake up the useful idiots now. The Obama administration has  picked a fight with Iran and Russia in Syria which could trigger World War III.  It intensified with the Obama-Clinton regime’s gunrunning out of Libya into  Syria. As the WSJ reported, Hillary’s State Department provided the “diplomatic  cover” in Benghazi. Do not be deceived. Benghazi was a nation-state attack.

By their fruits you shall know them.

You have been warned.

Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/whistleblower-exclusive-benghazi-cover-up-is-the-proxy-battle-with-the-war-with-iran/#ixzz2Ulaks78G

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s