Why nearly all state gun control laws being passed today will soon be null and void

(NaturalNews) Gun control zealots currently  think they are winning. Connecticut has just passed a wildly  unconstitutional new gun control law, and it was preceded by New York’s  similarly-outrageous assault on private gun ownership liberties. Colorado,  Maryland and California are all either working on gun control bills or have  already passed various measures that are blatantly illegal in  America.
What gun grabbers do not yet realize is that there are three  powerful reasons why their gun control laws will soon be null and  void.

Reason #1) Many laws will be struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court

The  U.S. Supreme Court already has a track record of striking down the several key  gun control laws that have been put in place by cities or states.
For  example, in District of Columbia  v Heller, the Supreme Court struck down a D.C. law that criminalized the  possession of guns in the home for the purpose of self defense.
In McDonald v. City  of Chicago, the Supreme Court further confirmed that the Second Amendment  right to “keep and bear arms” is guaranteed to individuals under the Due  Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In other words, any law that  denies a citizen the right to keep and bear arms is simultaneously a denial of  their Fourteenth Amendment rights… and is therefore unconstitutional and  illegal in America.
These two landmark decisions, if correctly  interpreted by the Supreme Court when  challenges rise from recent gun restrictions in New York, Connecticut and  elsewhere, will cause those laws to also be struck down as  unconstitutional.

Reason #2) A Supreme Court decision would expose the illegitimacy of the  court and reveal the outright criminality of the federal government

If,  somehow, the U.S. Supreme Court finds these new state gun restrictions laws to  be “constitutional,” such a decision would be equivalent to a declaration that  the court has openly abandoned its only real duty, which is to halt  overreaching laws that violate the individual rights and freedoms guaranteed by  the Constitution and  its Bill of Rights.
At this point, there would be widespread realization  that the judiciary is an occupying enemy force acting in violation of  their sworn oaths of office. If such a scenario unfolds, I theoretically  predict, but do not condone, the likelihood that disgruntled individuals,  having been stripped of their freedoms by a clearly illegal and unconstitutional  judiciary, would take it upon themselves to assassinate U.S. Supreme Court  justices who violated the Constitution as well as key high-level members of  the federal government. Again, I’m not condoning this nor advocating it, because  I do not believe violence is the appropriate path to a long-term solution in all  this. However, I cannot deny the possibility of a decentralized, spontaneous  armed response to the “long train of abuses” that liberty-loving Americans  continue to suffer under today.
Any decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to  nullify the Second Amendment would be seen by millions of Americans as nothing  less than an outright declaration of war… and may spark an armed revolt  against the tyranny. This may be precisely why DHS has purchased over 2 billion  rounds of ammunition, many of which are hollow point rounds intended solely to  cause maximum tissue damage against human targets on the streets of  America.

Reason #3) A civil war may be underway before any of this makes it to the  courts

At some point, the law-abiding citizens of America, when repeatedly  oppressed, provoked and denied justice under law, will reluctantly decide that  “following the law” is irrelevant. They will take up arms and begin to  physically fight for the liberties that are being incrementally stolen from them  by tyrants at both the state and federal level.
Globalists appear to be  attempting to trigger precisely this reaction. The gambit is to see if a small  reactionary group of “terrorists” (i.e. anyone with a gun  who fights against oppression) can be cajoled into committing acts of violence  that would justify the declaration of Martial Law and a nationwide gun  confiscation domestic military action. If such an act of resistance cannot  be provoked, it can always be engineered and pulled off by the FBI which is  already well-practiced  at staging terrorists attacks in the USA, then recruiting hapless stooges to  frame as “terrorist masterminds” to be arrested.
This is where the  “stuff” really hits the fan, because we’ll see all-out war between various  factions of gun grabbers vs. gun defenders. Big-city police will attempt to  shoot and murder sheriffs. Patriot groups within the U.S. military will mutiny  and take over entire units to protect and defend the Constitution. A military  coup might target top administration officials in Washington D.C. Regional wars  might break out between urban (gun  control) and rural (gun rights) communities. And the big kicker? Obama might call in the United Nations to aid in “halting the terrorists,” setting  off an international war against America and the Constitution. (This may be  Obama’s ultimate end game.)

During war, you are not bound by laws

During all of this, gun laws  are irrelevant. If things degrade to a point where otherwise law-abiding  citizens feel no choice but to pick up a rifle and start killing tyrants, then  they are way past the point of politely following laws written on  paper.
Furthermore, once the state declares you a “terrorist” —  which the federal government has seemingly already  done with veterans and gun owners — there is really no point in attempting  to abide by any laws whatsoever because the government already claims to  right to murder  you without due process thanks to the  NDAA and Obama’s “kill lists” of Americans to assassinate.
DHS  specifically defines “terrorists” in America as: (SOURCE)
–  Americans who believe their “way of life” is under attack – Americans who are  “fiercely nationalistic” – People who consider themselves “anti-global” –  Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority” – Americans  who are “reverent of individual liberty” – People who “believe in conspiracy  theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal  liberty.”
Thus, at least half the U.S. population has already been deemed  “terrorists.” According to the White House, this means they have no right to due  process.
In a scenario when resistance fighters realize they will not be  offered anything resembling due process, they will only fight harder and  become even more aggressive in their tactics and stance. After all, if you are  cornered but offered a fair trial that you can genuinely trust to be fair, you  might simply surrender and avoid the risk of death. But if you are cornered by a  regime that has already announced it’s going to call you an “enemy combatant”  and claims to right to secretly kill you without any due process whatsoever, there is no additional risk in fighting to the death. You are dead  anyway, logically speaking.
Even more, there is no moral hesitation  against people in such a position resorting to tactics that would otherwise be  scorned such as targeting family members of specific enemy targets. Even,  imaginably, mass public suicide bombings would be an inevitable behavior of  people who exist under extreme oppression with seemingly no recourse. This is  the logic behind the mass bombings in Israel, of course. Whether right or wrong,  the suicide bombers feel they have no recourse and have already been placed on  government murder lists anyway.
By signing the NDAA and creating kill  lists of Americans to murder with drones, Obama has actually radicalized  whatever resistance might someday rise up in America if government  oppression worsens. He has put laws and executive orders in  place that have essentially pre-announced to gun owners and veterans, “You will  not be given a fair trial. You will be named an enemy combatant and murdered by  your own government.” This action by Obama is extremely irresponsible, arrogant  and dangerous. It is precisely the kind of stance that could provoke a violent  response that’s wildly multiplied far beyond what might have otherwise been  attempted.
“If you make peaceful revolution impossible you make violent  revolution inevitable.” – John F. Kennedy
Keep in mind that in the recent  Rand Paul filibuster in the U.S. Senate which sought answers to whether the  President believed he had the power to kill Americans on U.S. soil using  military drones, the official answer that was eventually received still claimed  Americans who were “actively engaged” in anti-government activities could be  killed without due process.
“Actively engaged” could mean anything,  including blogging on the web or taking photographs of government buildings.  Thus, the White House already claims the power to kill practically any American  at any time, without due process or even producing a single shred of evidence  against the person.

War is the absence of civility

War is, philosophically, the complete  absence of civil law. Although the UN has tried to set “rules of war,” the U.S.  government routinely and habitually violates those rules in numerous ways…  torture, for example, as well as the use of weapons of mass destruction  (depleted uranium).
A breakout of war means all attempts at civility  have failed and one or both parties believes they are left with no other  option but attempted violence to achieve their goals.
That’s how America  was born, by the way: by the desperate actions of a determined minority of  colonists deciding they had endured enough suffering and oppression. They made a  joint decision to flat out start killing (British) tyrants, realizing this was  their last remaining option for achieving liberty.
Due to this  application of strategic violence for a noble cause, the British empire was  eventually forced to withdraw because it could not physically commit a  sufficient level of violence to achieve lasting control over the colonies.  Importantly, even though the British won most of the military battles, they  still lost the war for numerous tactical and sociological reasons. This is  important because it indicates that military might does not equal military  victory when people are defending their lives, their liberties and their  core beliefs. (Just ask the Afghans.)

Delusional members of the radical left think they can suppress freedom by  writing words on paper

The reason all this really matters is because the  radical left is wildly delusional on all this, believing that if certain gun  control words and phrases can be written on paper and ratified by members of  government, then those words become a reality and all the privately-held guns,  ammo and freedoms simply vanish from existence.
This is precisely the  same sort of delusional thinking offered up by the left’s advocacy of signs that  say things like “gun free zone,” ridiculously believing that words on a sign  will magically alter reality.
They think the same thing about words on  paper held at the state capitol. But history has shown that words are  fleeting, but liberty lives forever. While gun control zealots may  temporarily succeed in creating artificial constructs of their favorite words  (i.e. “laws”), all that’s really happening in the physical world is that gun  owners are burying their guns and ammo while mentally preparing to retrieve  them when necessary to defend the United States of America against all enemies,  foreign and domestic.

Gun prohibition will fail just like marijuana prohibition

Guns do not  disappear simply because they are banned. They go underground. Everyone  on the left should easily understand this point because most of them smoke  illegal pot from time to time, and they know how easy it is to purchase  marijuana even though the substance is criminalized according to federal law.  Once guns are added to the list of banned objects, they will only become even  easier to acquire through off-the-books networks of distributors and  resellers, none of whom will pay taxes or report any purchases through  government “background checks” systems.
The best way to drive guns  into the hands of criminals is to criminalize guns. Gun grabbers on the left  are almost mentally retarded when it comes to anticipating the real-world  impacts of their laws. Their intention is to eliminate guns, but intentions do  not drive reality: economics does. Economics is the study of human decision  making and behavior, by the way, not the study of money.
Driving guns  into the underground economy will effectively construct a huge infrastructure of  underground gun production, distribution and delivery, allowing anyone who can  buy pot right now to be able to buy guns in the near future. Gun shops that  presently follow federal laws for background checks will be put out of business  and replaced by underground gun smugglers who follow no laws  whatsoever.
In response, the federal government will multiply the budget  of the ATF and declare a “war on guns” that will be roughly as successful as  today’s miserable “war on drugs” — a police state fiasco that has done nothing  more than fill the prisons with innocent victims while justifying the  outrageous growth of police state agencies like the DEA.
Leftists who  advocate gun control are really advocating a massive expansion of the police  state while invoking the organic, spontaneous economics of underground  trade. The state cannot stop people from getting what they really want. The  failed war on drugs proves that. It’s far smarter for the state to decriminalize  the trade, regulate it and tax it — and that’s where gun sales are right now, before any new gun control laws are put in place.
Learn more:  http://www.naturalnews.com/039795_gun_control_Supreme_Court_Constitution.html#ixzz2PczzJaeH

One thought on “Why nearly all state gun control laws being passed today will soon be null and void

  1. O’bama doesn’t care. This is all just “wag-the-dog” just as the “discussion” about marriage also more wag-the-dog. It’s ALL to kill time while o’bama gets his ducks in a row to get his real AGENDA going, which is likely to get an excuse to declare Martial Law and then be “saved” by the UN with their fascist New World Order.
    That’s another reason why congress is sitting on their hands.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s