Another Coincidence… How Many Can There Be?


Before the 2012 election we re-posted: Can It All ‘Really’ Be Coincidence?  But I think this is a good time to re-post, update and re-read this piece… with a few enhancements, while we still have the opportunity to fight back… (although before the final certification of the election might have been better) for the coincidences just keep coming and before his second inauguration, Obama and team are moving full speed ahead in implementing their goals… continued spending, demonizing their opponents using the Cloward and Piven method and  Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, gun control, and ruling by executive orders, just for a starter.  (Much of which was outlined in the President’s final press conference of his first term) Please take some time to read this, especially if you missed it the first time around, or at least scan the links and related articles below as well.  Ask Marion~

Can It All ‘Really’ Be Coincidence?

by Don Fredrick – the moral liberal

As I noted in the introduction to my book, The Obama Timeline: From his Birth in 1961 Through his First 100 Days in Office, a jury at a murder trial will often find the accumulated circumstantial evidence so overwhelming that a guilty verdict is obvious—even though there may be no witness to the crime. “The jurors in the Scott Peterson trial believed the collection of evidence more than they believed Scott Peterson. Among other things, the jury thought that being arrested with $15,000 in cash, recently-dyed hair, a newly-grown goatee, four cell phones, camping equipment, a map to a new girlfriend’s house, a gun, and his brother’s driver’s license certainly did not paint a picture of a grieving husband who had nothing to do with his pregnant wife’s disappearance and murder.”

Continue reading


via e-mail from Keith

You can’t get any more accurate than this!

This straight forward country thinking..
by Jeff Foxworthy                      
Which side of the fence?

If you ever wondered which side  of the fence you sit on, this is a great test

If a Republican doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If  a Democrat doesn’t like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat  meat.
If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat  products banned for everyone.

If a Republican is  homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a Republican doesn’t like a talk                       show host, he switches channels.
Democrats demand that  those they don’t like be shut down.

If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.                      
A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and  religion silenced.
If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a Republican reads  this, he’ll forward it so his friends can have a good  laugh.
A Democrat will delete it because he’s “offended”.

Obama Now King of the Gun Grabbers

Family Security Matters

In his usual theatrical style, on Wednesday on live television, President  Barack Obama revealed his plans to implement his administration’s agenda for a  new gun control policy that includes assault weapons bans, more thorough  background checks of gun buyers, limited ammunition magazines, and government  access to mental health records of potential gun buyers.

“In just one afternoon, the man who is suspected of okaying the smuggling of  guns into the hands of the Mexican drug cartels — known as Fast and Furious —  has ‘outed’ himself as the king of the gun grabbers. He’s also implementing the  strategy of his former chief of staff, Rahm Emanual, by not allowing ‘a good  crisis to go to waste,'” said police detective Jose Santos.


Obama’s proposal are allegedly the result of a rushed review process  spearheaded by Vice President Joe Biden, that addressed law enforcement,  dangerous firearms and ammunition, school and campus security, and keeping  firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

Surrounded by children and their parents who support Obama’s gun-control  agenda, the president recommended requiring criminal background checks for all  gun sales; a tougher and more far-reaching assault weapons ban; limiting ammo  magazines to 10-rounds; eliminating armor-piercing bullets, also known as  cop-killer bullets; hiring more police officers; and instituting a federal gun  trafficking statute.

The cost of the package, senior officials estimated, would be roughly $500  million, some of which could come from already budgeted funds.

“Ironically, the price tag for Obama’s gun crime agenda is the same amount  lost in the Solyndra scandal by the Obama administration,” said Mike Baker, a  political strategist.

“I intend to use whatever weight this office holds to make them a reality,”  said the president. “If there’s even one life that can be saved, then we’ve got  an obligation to try.”

The National Rifle Association, anticipating Obama’s overreach and disregard  for the U.S. Constitution, released a television advertisement accusing the  president of hypocrisy. In the commercial, viewers are reminded that Obama’s  daughters are protected by a detail of armed bodyguards when they attend school,  but Obama denies that same right to American parents and children by his  opposition to arming individuals who work in government schools.

“It is unfortunate that this administration continues to insist on pushing  failed solutions to our nation’s most pressing problems,” the NRA said after  meeting with Biden last week. “We will not allow law-abiding gun owners to be  blamed for the acts of criminals and madmen.”

As part of its policy recommendations, the White House called on Congress to  act on an old administration proposal to spend $4 billion to keep 15,000 cops on  the streets. In addition, the president is proposing a new initiative that would  incentivize police departments to hire more school resource officers and  encourage schools to hire more mental health professionals. The president’s plan  also calls on Congress to allocate resources to help schools, other educational  institutions and houses of worship develop emergency management plans.

The White House proposals, even officials there admit, are not a cure-all for  mass shootings. Among the suggested recommendations on the gun-policy front,  only the ban on high-capacity magazines could have had a tangible impact on the  shooting in Newtown, and it’s unclear what, exactly, the effect would have  been.

Moreover, the administration claims it is pointedly not going after those  weapons and ammunition clips that are currently and lawfully owned. The proposal  would instead affect the future production and sale of military-style weapons or  high-capacity magazines.

“We are not going to go after existing stock of weapons or magazines,” said a  senior administration official. “We are going to limit it to the manufacturing  of assault weapons and clips going forward.”

The White House nevertheless insists that its package of proposals has teeth.  It would provide law enforcement with the mechanisms needed to go after the  illegal transfer of weapons and help prevent those weapons from falling into the  wrong hands. It would also stem the use of military-style weapons — the White  House says its proposal would improve on the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban, which was  riddled with loopholes — and give schools and communities resources to address  violence when it occurs.

“Gun-grabbing media, political and business interests are bad news.

They use murderous acts of a few to generate opposition to the rights of the  many. They mislead public opinion against the civil right to keep and bear  arms,” stated John Snyder, an advisory board member of the National Association  of Chiefs of Police.

Read more: Family Security Matters Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

Columnist Devvy Kidd Slams Gutless Cowards In Congress Over Obama’s Forged Identity Records

By Devvy Kidd @

The impostor president went on TV earlier today to repeat over and over that he respects your right to hunt and own a gun to hunt and he respects that right, blah, blah, blah.
EVERY gutless coward who serves in the U.S. Congress from Michelle Bachmann to Rand Paul all know Barry Soetoro aka Obama is an illegitimate president. They know because all received a package with the proof.
Jon Christian Ryter, a relentless and accurate researcher has put together a ‘whole’ piece on Soetoro’s crimes. I hope you will share it with your mailing lists.

On Monday, a criminal will be sworn into office. Again. An individual who committed fraud to get on the ballot, perjury when he was sworn in, using forged documents, wire transfer fraud and in your face lying to the world when he released that fake birth certificate.

NRA: America Speaks For Itself

When NRA suggested putting armed security in every school across America, mainstream media sharply criticized Wayne LaPierre — calling him everything from “laughable” and “tone deaf” to “whacked,” “evil” and “out of step with America.” Unfortunately for the media, America disagrees. Most citizens support armed security in schools — and the NRA, as evidenced by its 250,000 new members over the past month. So the media can go speaking for elites, but America will speak for itself.