Will Obama Keep Power ‘by Any Means Necessary’?

American Thinker

Let’s  go there: if Obama thinks he’s losing, will he allow safe and fair elections on  November 6?  And if he does lose, will he peacefully turn over power to  Mitt Romney on January 20, 2013?  Or will he cling to power “by any means  necessary,” as a highly placed insider alleges?

Now,  I’m truly sorry to raise such disgusting, un-American, crazy-sounding questions,  but, alas, they’re not crazy, and I’ve got a disquieting amount of  evidence.  The Democrats have already accused Romney of murdering a woman  with cancer, financial felonies, and not filing  taxes for ten years — the last charge delivered by Senate Majority  Leader Harry Reid on the Senate floor, on the basis of absolutely no evidence  whatsoever.

By  Democrat standards, I’ve got enough proof to put away Obama, et al. for life  without parole.

Whatever  chicanery Obama and his investors may be contemplating, it will probably unfold  against some gargantuan crisis, manufactured or otherwise.  So cast your  mind back to September 11, 2001, the day of the New York mayoral  primary.

In  the chaos after the attacks, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who was term-limited from  running, pleaded that his leadership was essential and that he should be granted  an extra three months in office after his  term ran out on January 1.  Giuliani’s unprecedented power-grab was  rightfully scorned by his eventual successor, Michael Bloomberg.  So what  did Bloomberg do when he ran into term limits?  He deployed his  multi-billion-dollar fortune to manipulate the  law and buy himself a quasi-legal third term, claiming that only he had  the expertise to handle the 2008 financial crisis.

My  point?  Politicians a great deal more conventional than Obama have loathed  giving up power, and they have used crises and unethical machinations to try to  keep it.

Now,  let’s look at just some of the disturbing evidence that indicates that Obama and  his investors are plotting something big:

Super-High-Level Trial  Balloons

USA  Today reported  that on September 27, 2011, Governor Beverly Perdue, Democrat of North Carolina,  told a Rotary Club audience, “I think we ought to suspend, perhaps,  elections for Congress for two yearsand just tell them we won’t  hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this  country recover[.] … You want people who don’t worry about the  next election.”  When outrage greeted her suggestion, she retreated to  the standard defense: she was just joking.  What a  kidder!

Meanwhile,  that same month, Peter Orszag, Obama’s former director of the Office of  Management and Budget, published an article  in The New Republic titled “Too Much of A Good Thing: Why We Need Less  Democracy.”  In it, he posited that the country was too polarized; hence,  “radical as it sounds, we need to counter the gridlock of our political  institutions by making them a bit less democratic.”

Please  note that these suggestions to suspend elections and radically reduce democratic  control did not come from basement-dwelling bloggers.  They came from the  governor of the very state in which the Democrats are holding their national convention and from one of Obama’s most prominent  Cabinet members.  Their close timing suggests that these ideas were  circulating at the highest levels of the Democrat power elite.

“Whom Does the Government Intend to  Shoot?”

That’s  the question recently posed by retired Major General Jerry Curry in the Daily  Caller, in light of horrifying reports that the Social Security  Administration is buying 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for distribution  to 41 locations in the U.S.

According  to Major General Curry, Social Security’s ammo spree follows the purchase by the  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of 46,000 rounds of  hollow-point ammunition.  Will they be shooting fish in a  barrel?

Most  terrifying of all, Major General Curry reports that the Department of Homeland  Security ordered 750 million rounds of hollow-point ammunition in March, then  subsequently ordered an additional 750 million rounds, including bullets capable  of penetrating walls.

“This  is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American  citizen,” writes Major General Curry, who wonders what plan might require “so  many dead Americans.”

I  strongly suggest that you read Major General Curry’s article  for yourself, so you can appreciate the full horror of what he describes.   After pointing out that Congress has done nothing to investigate these weapon  purchases, Major General Curry, a 40-year veteran, concludes with these chilling  words:

This  is a deadly serious business. I hope I’m wrong, but something smells rotten. And  If the Congress isn’t going to do its duty and investigate this matter fully,  the military will have to protect the Constitution, the nation, and our  citizens.

900-plus Executive  Orders

Obama  may not be fond of governing, but he certainly does enjoy issuing executive  orders — more than 900 so far.  As American Thinker‘s Warren  Beatty points out, these little-reported edicts reveal an  all-too-predictable pattern: concentrating all national power and resources in  Obama’s hands, in case of “emergency.”

So  far, Obama has granted himself the right to control all transportation,  including highways, airports, seaports, and railroads, and all modes of  communication, storage facilities, electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and  minerals.


Should you resist any of these emergency measures, rest assured that the U.S.  government is now well supplied with bullets.

Openly War-Gaming against American  Citizens

A  recent issue of the well-respected Small Wars Journal featured an article titled  “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future.”   Written by retired Army Col. Kevin Benson of the Army’s University of Foreign  Military and Jennifer Weber, a Civil War expert, the article helpfully  game-played, in full operational detail, how the Army would destroy a local Tea  Party insurrection.

The  authors claim that should Tea Party rebels take over a City Hall, “Americans  will expect the military to execute without pause and as professionally as if it  were acting overseas”; therefore, “the Army cannot disappoint the American  people, especially in such a moment.”

The  brazenness of this scheme for the U.S. military to kill Americans created a  small, temporary stir.  The Washington Times editorialized,  “This is a dark, pessimistic and wrongheaded view of what military leaders  should spend their time studying.”  The Washington Times also  noted:

A  professor at the Joint Forces Staff College was relieved of duty in June for  uttering the heresy that the United States is at war with Islam. The Obama  administration contended the professor had to be relieved because what he was  teaching was not U.S. policy. Because there is no disclaimer attached to the  Small Wars piece, it is fair to ask, at least in Col. Benson’s case, whether his  views reflect official policy regarding the use of U.S. military force against  American citizens.

Active Partnership with America’s Foreign  Enemies

Many  spectacles have enlivened presidential elections over the years, but 2012 marks  the first time that high-level military personnel have felt compelled to  publicly tell the president to stop leaking national security  secrets.

A  group of former U.S. intelligence and Special Forces operatives created a  22-minute video, “Dishonorable  Disclosures,” to shame Obama into shutting up about priceless intelligence  related to bin Laden’s death, British-Saudi penetration of al-Qaeda, and the  Israeli-American Stuxnet virus attack on Iran’s nuclear  program.

Normally,  presidents don’t want to endanger American citizens and military personnel by  leaking top-secret information — but aiding and abetting the enemy is  apparently all in a day’s work for Obama.

And  so, if he wants to stir up trouble before the election, either at home or  abroad, he’ll have plenty of enemy partners to help.  First, he’s got the  Russians, to whose president he was caught whispering on a hot mic about missile  defense, “This is my last election[.] … After my election, I have more  flexibility.”

Second,  Obama is this close to the Muslim  Brotherhood, who are world-class experts on unleashing political  violence.  Obama helped the Muslim Brotherhood ascend to power in Egypt,  Tunisia, Morocco, and Libya, and he’s placed its operatives in the highest  levels of the American government.  Surely, such clever characters as Huma  Abedin, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, and Mohamed  Elibiary, a Homeland Security Advisory committee member, can be trusted to  think up some exciting turmoil to apply where needed.

And  finally, close to home, Obama can rely on the Sinaloa  drug cartel in Mexico, whom he supplied with thousands of guns.   Gratefully, they used their American taxpayer-funded AK-47s to wipe out rival  drug gangs and to murder Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.  Attorney General  Eric Holder is presently in contempt of Congress for refusing to turn over  documents on Operation  Fast and Furious, and Obama (“President Transparency”) has claimed executive  privilege to withhold them.

Sending  hordes of expensively armed drug gang members across our border should be a  snap, now that Obama has crippled  our Border Patrol.  Just think of all the headline-grabbing distractions  these energetic young men can unleash!

Active Partnership with Domestic Criminal  Groups

When  Louis Farrakhan met Ahmadinejad: now there’s a romance made in the bowels of  hell.  Toss in the head of the New Black Panthers and fifty radical imams,  and you’ve got the “Beast Axis” that was forged in a Manhattan hotel on  September 27, 2010, according to The  Blaze.

New  Black Panther Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz boasted on Black Panther Radio  thathe “stands on solid ideological ground” with “His  Excellency, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,” who understands “the dynamics and the politics  of world revolution.”

Apparently,  Obama approves of these antics, because his attorney general, Eric Holder,  dropped charges against the New Black Panthers, even though they were caught on  tape allegedly intimidating Philadelphia voters in the 2008 elections.   Naturally, Holder’s Department of Justice then lied  about its actions, covering up its political motivations.

Holder  specifically protected King Samir Shabazz, who now serves as national field  marshal for the New Black Panthers.  Shabazz spearheads the Panthers’  ambitious new plan  to “create inner city militaries that would go into nurseries and kill white  babies and murder white people in the street.”

Let’s  hope this “inner city military” is not what candidate Obama mysteriously  referred to in 2008 when he pledged, “We cannot  continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security  objectives that we’ve set.  We’ve got to have a civilian national  security forcethat’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Imagine,  for one monstrous moment, the destructive potential of this burgeoning alliance  between the Obama-protected New Black Panthers, Obama’s old  Chicago associate Louis Farrakhan, and the genocidally obsessed  Ahmadinejad.  If your blood didn’t run cold, you weren’t imagining hard  enough.

A Tsunami of Voter  Fraud

On  June 15, 2012, Obama bypassed Congress and issued de facto amnesty  to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens.  Suddenly, whole new vistas of  voter fraud opened up to the Democrats.  Admittedly, they’ve got to ramp up  quickly for November, but this gang should prove up to the  challenge.

Helping  matters along, Holder is busy suing  states that require photo ID to vote and attempting to disenfranchise  the military.  Together, these well-coordinated efforts should provide  Obama with the means to pull off staggering amounts of voter  fraud.

“By Any Means  Necessary”

If  all else fails, Obama and his investors may be prepared to keep power “By Any  Means Necessary.”  This information comes from an uncannily predictive  website called The Ulsterman  Report.  Those who have followed its fascinating interviews over the  last couple of years with two anonymous sources, Wall Street Insider and White  House Insider, have seen its scoops confirmed again and  again.

Well  over a year ahead of any other media, The Ulsterman Report was informing readers  that Valerie Jarrett ran the White House and that Obama was strangely disengaged  from the actual tasks of governing.  It predicted the emergence of obscure  figures — Kamala D. Harris, who’s now attorney general of California, and her  brother-in-law, Tony West, the newly named acting associate attorney general at  the Department of Justice, who’s being groomed as Holder’s  successor.

Most  crucially, shortly after the bin Laden operation, the Ulsterman Report revealed  that Valerie Jarrett had canceled three previous bin Laden raids.  That  information now has been confirmed by Richard Miniter in his book, Leading from Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for  Him.

Recently,  a source known as Military Insider (MI) met with Ulsterman (UM) at the urging of  Wall Street Insider (WSI) to issue a warning.  A section of their conversation  follows below:

MI:  Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information  pertaining to an election contingency plan.  For 2012.  After the 2010  elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama  administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need  to secure a second term for President Obama.  That document’s title  was…(pauses)

WSI:  He can be trusted – I give you my word.  Please proceed.

MI:  That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”.  It was unofficial –  but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration.   We confirmed that.

UM:  What channels?  Who are you talking about?

MI:  We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein.  Reviewed and approved  by Valerie Jarrett.  Preparations for implementation are being done in part  by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the  Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S.  military.

We  could dismiss the anonymous Military Insider’s warning as overheated, unsourced  hysteria.  Or we could examine it as one more piece of evidence to place  alongside all the evidence I’ve described above.

The  greatest asset of Obama and his investors has been their warp-speed  audacity.  We’re too stunned to believe what’s happening in front of our  eyes, and too embarrassed to mention it.  Who wants to speak up and be  ridiculed as an unhinged paranoid, marching with the tinfoil hat  brigade?

But  our best bet — perhaps our only bet — is to frankly confront this ugly  reality.  As Iran prepares to go nuclear and the global economy teeters,  any number of “national emergencies” can suddenly erupt, demanding unprecedented  measures by Obama to “save” us.  We must be prepared with skepticism,  outrage, and defiance of any actions to deprive us of our Constitutional  rights.

America  remains the last best hope on earth.  And We the People must keep our  power, by any means necessary.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/will_obama_keep_power_by_any_means_necessary.html#ixzz24Dm2Tafx

4 thoughts on “Will Obama Keep Power ‘by Any Means Necessary’?

  1. Yes. HE will have power and control AT ANY COST.

  2. People know whats coming. I was just at a Gun Show Saturday- it was shoulder to shoulder. Ive lived in my particular area awhile- its NEVER been like this. Guns, Ammo, Tactical Gear, Body Armour- all being bought by everyday citizens, off duty cops, discharged military, Americans. A fight is coming, and we are getting ready.

    • During the last Christmas season, instead of buy the newest HD TV, etc., people were buying guns. They sold m ore guns during the Christmas Season than they did all year. People are going to you tube to find the video(s) ” How to make your own bullets.”

      These new customers….many of them are just average, everyday citizens who are very scared. I wish I had the statistics to back myself up with. I just happened to be in a local pawn shop selling some things because I hadn’t been able to find a job. I got to talking to the Pawn Shop owner, and he had sold out at Christmas time.

  3. Oh! I forgot to tell you something important. On the same day I was in the pawn shop, a man was standing in front of me. I was talking to the owner of the shop and asked him if the gun laws in Texas had changed. I was interrupted by the man standing next to me.
    His face turned paste white when he said (paraphrase) “I just got home from D.C. I quite my job. I couldn’t take it anymore. You don’t know who this man is!”
    He turned and ran…NOT walked…he ran out of the Pawn Shop and didn’t even finish his business.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s