NDAA: The Most Important Lawsuit in American History that No One is Talking About

Knowledge_Is_Power

Despite a mainstream media blackout on the topic, the alternative media is abuzz with this week’s hearing on the constitutionality of the clearly unconstitutional NDAA. In case you don’t remember, section 1021 of the NDAA, which Obama signed into law on December 31 of last year, allows the government to lock up U.S. citizens indefinitely without a trial. At the time of signing, Obama penned a pathetic letter to many of his outraged supporters where he basically said he signed it but he won’t use it. Thanks pal!

In any event, the Administration is showing its true colors by appealing an injunction that judge Katherine Forrest issued against it in May. The injunction was in response to the lawsuit filed by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges and others. While the NDAA clearly vaporizes the 5th and 6th Amendments of the Constitution, I believe the real target is the 1st Amendment.

ROMNEY HEEDS WARNING BY PICKING ELIGIBLE RUNNING MATE

OFF ON THE RIGHT FOOT:  After four years under an illegally ensconced Obama administration, Mitt Romney courageously heeds widespread warnings against choosing an ineligible vice-presidential candidate and wisely picks Paul Ryan as his running mate.

Commentary by Penbrook Johannson

Editor of The Daily Pen

NEW YORK, NY – After four painful years, America will finally get a second chance to vote for a constitutionally eligible administration.

Mitt Romney’s announcement that Paul Ryan will be his 2012 running mate not only establishes unassailable legitimacy to his candidacy, it violently casts his lawless opponent into outer otherness and essentially brands Obama as the illegitimately elected political enemy of America that he is, while stripping him of the protection provided by a psychotic liberal media.