The Sea Change: Obama’s Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

American Thinker

For  several years, an Orwellian-type fear of being “marginalized” held reporters and  pundits back from questioning Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency.  To raise  an eyebrow at the bizarre secrecy of Obama was off-limits.  To question  whether the historic definition of “natural born citizen” applied to Obama was  taboo.

The  era of fear, however, is happily winding down.  It will take some time for  this realization to fully take hold.  But make no mistake: the tables have  turned.

Like  it or not, the ground has shifted, and it cannot shift back.  The evidence  of Obama’s forgeries is not going away.

Up  until this point, Mr. Obama controlled everything, including the talking points  and burden of proof.

Rather  than simply produce certified paper copies for state election officials and make  the original available for officials to inspect in Hawaii, Obama played games  with his purported birth certificate.  We were told for three years that Obama’s birth certificate  had been posted online in 2008 — though it turns out that it was a scant  certification.  In  2010, when confronted with the alarming doubts of the American people, Mr.  Obama lamented to a sympathetic Brian Williams of NBC: “I can’t spend all my  time with my birth certificate plastered on my forehead.”  The following  year, out of left field, on April 27, 2011, Obama “released” the elusive birth  certificate by posting a now-discredited file image online.

This  time he wasn’t teasing.  It was “proof positive.”  Mr. Obama, in his  robotic style, barked that it was time to stop the “silliness” and move  on.

No  one ever wanted Obama to get all crazy and walk around with his birth  certificate plastered on his forehead.  But many took the reasonable  position of wanting the mysterious birth certificate produced, not plastered or  uploaded to a computer.  Many wanted Obama to produce certified copies for  state officials and make the original available for  inspection.

But  because no authority forced him to comply with basic legal standards, Mr. Obama  was able to create a sideshow atmosphere by selecting non-experts to verify his  internet postings behind  closed doors.  His media sycophants were able to make those who  questioned Obama’s staunch secrecy appear as the unreasonable ones.   Somehow the burden of proof was erroneously placed on the citizenry to  prove that Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii.

Well,  the burden never actually rested with the people to prove anything.  That  was all smoke and mirrors.  No conspiracy theories are needed to demand  that Obama comply with basic legal standards — especially in context of a state  with a history of certifying foreign births as Hawaiian.

After  Obama “released” the birth certificate in 2011, nonpartisan  computer software experts immediately recognized that the embarrassing image had  been computer-assembled.  Of course, few in the free press dared to report  on the “silliness.”  Fox News quickly summonsed  Adobe-certified expert Jean-Claude Tremblayto to conclude, nothing fishy  here (but his ORC explanation has been demonstrably debunked by the  control-test findings of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigative team — see  below).

It’s  simply unfathomable to the consensus  media that the One they worked so hard to elect could be a fraud — or, at  minimum, could have something to hide.

Unfortunately,  Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s team of law  enforcement and investigative experts were able to prove by a  preponderance of the evidence that forgeries have been committed.  It turns  out that the sheriff simply confirmed the “open secret” shared by technical  document experts across the country.  As with many crimes, if not for  their abject carelessness, the forgers might have gotten away with it.  But  the strength of the evidence is such that local law enforcement was able to  conclude that “probable  cause” exists to show that the White House uploaded a computer-generated  forgery of a birth certificate.  Ditto with Obama’s Selective Service registration form: it is also a crude  forgery.

Who  would have thought that Obama’s illegal immigration nemesis, Sheriff Joe Arpaio,  could turn the tables on Obama?

With  the help of his friends in the consensus media, Mr. Obama had been afforded the  luxury of effectively remaining silent for years.  Obama was able to sit  back as a third-party onlooker as the media attacked, maligned, and ignored  those who raised valid  questions.

But  the recent findings are similar to the events of a trial in which the burden of  proof shifts from one party to the other.  In our context, the burden of  proof was absurdly placed on the people, but finally it has shifted to Obama.   The six-month investigation by trained law enforcement and forensic  experts has resulted in a compelling case-in-chief.

Anyone  who views the video  presentations of the law enforcement team can plainly observe the sea change  which shifted the burden to rebut to Obama.

Even  though crimes were allegedly committed, at this point, what is taking place is  comparable to a civil trial.  As such, it is time for Mr. Obama to produce  competent evidence.  If he has no evidence to produce, he’s in public  opinion trouble.  If a court or Congress forces the production of his  original documents, it’s over for Obama.

Simple  little mistakes: hastily uploading an assembled image without first printing and  scanning, and cutting a “2008” rubber stamp to create the appearance of “1980.”   And the Selective Service forgery alone is enough to end Obama’s  presidency.

Sheriff  Arpaio is under personal attack, but curiously, the control-test findings of his  team are not being refuted.  Apparently oblivious of the fact that the  White House tried to cover its tracks by quickly replacing  its original file image, NPR naively reports:  “For the record, we opened the file using Adobe Photoshop and found that [the  birth certificate] contained only a single layer of information.”   Fortunately, thousands have the original White House posting preserved for  perpetuity.

The  establishment media are trying every way they can think of to discredit Sheriff  Joe.  As president Joseph Farah recently wrote, “[t]hey are no  longer just protecting Obama. They are now protecting their own reputations.”   The problem, of course, is that after all the attacks on Joe Arpaio are  exhausted and after all the dust settles, the evidence of Obama’s forgeries will  remain.

The  problem for Obama and his enablers is that the evidence  is objective.  And it’s there for everyone to see.  Generations from  now, professors in Adobe Photoshop and journalism classes will be discussing and  analyzing the evidence of Obama’s forgeries.

The  very result that timid conservatives and liberal reporters feared will  eventually catch up with them: loss of credibility.

On the flipside, those who questioned Obama’s bizarre secrecy  eventually will be vindicated.

Read more:

4 thoughts on “The Sea Change: Obama’s Confirmed Forgeries Are Not Going Away

  1. The truth will only be revealed when it is no longer damaging to the Kenyan fraud.

  2. S. Elliot…it won’t matter how much more of his past comes out. It won’t matter if everything is brought to the public’s attention.
    Had this happened 10-12 years ago, he would have been impeached; but nothing will happen to him.

    ldragon… there is a bigger plan….He will take his place as the downfall of America and “IF” he succeeds, we will see the flag of Islam over the WH. That is his goal.

  3. If it happens, it won’t last. Details cannot be put in print.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s