by: Andrea Ryan
Americans finally found their taste buds. Peggy Noonan, the head speech-writer for Ronald Reagan, and, inexplicably, a once-supporter of Obama, published an article in today’s Wall Street Journal calling our president “creepy“, “devious”, and “dishonest”. She says Americans have moved from not liking Obama’s policies to, now, not liking him.
Via Drudge, the WSJ’s “Not-So-Smooth Operator,
What is happening is that the president is coming across more and more as a trimmer, as an operator who’s not operating in good faith. This is hardening positions and leading to increased political bitterness. And it’s his fault, too. As an increase in polarization is a bad thing, it’s a big fault.
The shift started on Jan. 20, with the mandate that agencies of the Catholic Church would have to provide services the church finds morally repugnant. The public reaction? “You’re kidding me. That’s not just bad judgment and a lack of civic tact, it’s not even constitutional!” Faced with the blowback, the president offered a so-called accommodation that even its supporters recognized as devious. Not ill-advised, devious. Then his operatives flooded the airwaves with dishonest—not wrongheaded, dishonest—charges that those who defend the church’s religious liberties are trying to take away your contraceptives.
What a sour taste this all left. …
Events of just the past 10 days have contributed to the shift. There was the open-mic conversation with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in which Mr. Obama pleaded for “space” and said he will have “more flexibility” in his negotiations once the election is over and those pesky voters have done their thing. On tape it looked so bush-league, so faux-sophisticated. When he knew he’d been caught, the president tried to laugh it off by comically covering a mic in a following meeting. It was all so . . . creepy.
Next, a boy of 17 is shot and killed under disputed and unclear circumstances. The whole issue is racially charged, emotions are high, and the only memorable words from the president’s response were, “If I had a son he’d look like Trayvon” At first it seemed OK—not great, but all right—but as the story continued and suddenly there were death threats and tweeted addresses and congressmen in hoodies, it seemed insufficient to the moment. At the end of the day, the public reaction seemed to be: “Hey buddy, we don’t need you to personalize what is already too dramatic, it’s not about you.”
Now this week the Supreme Court arguments on ObamaCare, which have made that law look so hollow, so careless, that it amounts to a characterological indictment of the administration. The constitutional law professor from the University of Chicago didn’t notice the centerpiece of his agenda was not constitutional? How did that happen? …
And so the relationship the president wanted never really knitted together. Health care was like the birth-control mandate: It came from his hermetically sealed inner circle, which operates with what seems an almost entirely abstract sense of America. They know Chicago, the machine, the ethnic realities. They know Democratic Party politics. They know the books they’ve read, largely written by people like them—bright, credentialed, intellectually cloistered. But there always seems a lack of lived experience among them, which is why they were so surprised by the town hall uprisings of August 2009 and the 2010 midterm elections.
…Mr. Obama has a largely nonexistent relationship with many, and a worsening relationship with some.
Really, he cannot win the coming election. But the Republicans, still, can lose it. …
This has all “left a sour taste”. Yes, it has. Americans finally taste the Obama Kool-Aid for what it really is…a slurry of deception, lies, and Socialism. And we’re spitting it out.
Want to share a video with you on how fraud is “pre-programmed” into voting machines. Let’s say you cast a vote for Newt. The program is set up to change the vote to go to someone else:
This is what happened in 2008:
VATICAN CALLS: Video: This Hoax Affects Everyone–RIGGED!!
“Media Knows the Results in Advance-takes a “guess as to the outcome”. The entire thing is a Hoax
You really need to ask yourself, ‘how is soetero so sure is is going to be re-elected’ ? SIMPLE… He is going to rig the elections… With the republicans help.. The same reason they are not even starting an investigation into his eligibility… WE, The People, need to figure out what can be done to change history and TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY…..
Look what he did when he ran against Jack Ryan.