Unreal. New York Times Is Now Promoting Shariah Law


Gateway Pundit

Wow.  Now this is crazy.
Just when you thought the anti-American New York Times could not get any nuttier they start promoting Sharia Law.
The New York Times reported:

MORE than a dozen American states are considering outlawing aspects of Shariah law. Some of these efforts would curtail Muslims from settling disputes over dietary laws and marriage through religious arbitration, while others would go even further in stigmatizing Islamic life: a bill recently passed by the Tennessee General Assembly equates Shariah with a set of rules that promote “the destruction of the national existence of the United States.”

Supporters of these bills contend that such measures are needed to protect the country against homegrown terrorism and safeguard its Judeo-Christian values. The Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has said that “Shariah is a mortal threat to the survival of freedom in the United States and in the world as we know it.”

This is exactly wrong. The crusade against Shariah undermines American democracy, ignores our country’s successful history of religious tolerance and assimilation, and creates a dangerous divide between America and its fastest-growing religious minority.

The suggestion that Shariah threatens American security is disturbingly reminiscent of the accusation, in 19th-century Europe, that Jewish religious law was seditious. In 1807, Napoleon convened an assembly of rabbinic authorities to address the question of whether Jewish law prevented Jews from being loyal citizens of the republic. (They said that it did not.)

In case you were wondering what exactly they are promoting here.

Under Sharia law, the clothes you wear, music you listen to, and television you watch would all be censored. Behavior in public is legally restricted and controlled. And Sharia is the ideal social system for those that preach Radical Islam. Sharia is an Arabic term referring to a legal framework to regulate public and private aspects of life based upon specific Islamic teachings. Sharia is an intolerant system that threatens the western ideals of “liberty and justice for all”. Sharia views non-Muslims as second class citizens, sanctions inequality between men and women, prescribes cruel and unusual punishments for crimes, and promotes a restrictive business environment that strangles the freedoms of capitalism.

Then again these nuts at the NY Times did support Barack Obama so really anything is possible with these kooks.

Source:

8 thoughts on “Unreal. New York Times Is Now Promoting Shariah Law

  1. Well you know what they say about opinions…This is clearly written by an ignorant fool or a member of CAIR. There is no way Islam will change, it’s goal is worldwide dominance. There is no Constitution, the only law is the word of Allah as set forth by Mo in the Qur’an……Submit or die….I prefer, GTFOH rag heads….J.C.

  2. THIS JUST GOES TO PROVE WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PEACEFUL MUSLIM. THE SYSTEM OF LAWS THAT GOVERN THEM SHOWS THIS. WHAT THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT STATE IS THAT ANYONE WHO DOES NOT CONVERT TO ISLAM IS AN INFIDEL. SHARIAH GOES ON TO STATE THAT ALL INFIDELS MUST CONVERT OR BE KILLED. IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE ME, READ IT FOR YOURSELF. I DARE YOU TO DO IT. I DARE YOU TO FIND PROOF IN SHARIAH LAW, WHICH IS THE ONLY LAW SYSTEM OF ISLAM, THAT ANYONE WHO DOES NOT BELIEVE IN ISLAM, AND WON’T CONVERT, IS ALLOWED TO LIVE AND BELIEVE WHAT THEY WANT TO. AND THESE IDIOTS WANT TO GOVERN OUR COUNTRY, THIS PLANET, BY THIS SYSTEM OF LAWS. IT IS MORE THAN A SET OF RULES LAID DOWN BY A RELIGIOUS SYSTEM. IT IS A COMPLETE SET OF RULES AND REGULATIONS TO RUN CIVILIZATIONS WITH. THIS IS WHAT OBAMMA WANTS TO BRING TO THIS COUNTRY. AND YOU ASSHOLES VOTED FOR HIM– AND THIS.

  3. I AM ABSOLUTELY FED UP WITH ALL THESE BASTARDS.
    If they don’t like it then get the HELL OUT.———–

    • They hated their country so they come over here and try to change our country to be more like theirs. There is a room waiting for them at Club Gitmo.

  4. The author foolishly regards Islam as a legitimate religion. As I have stated in the past, Islam has spread under the pretense of being a religion for more than a thousand years, but it has never attempted to transcend cultural barriers or differences by espousing brotherly love and acceptance of said differences in order to win over new converts as legitimate religions do. Instead, Islam chooses to punish ideological differences, operating as a totalitarian system of bigotry, violence, and murder—even condoning such within its own ranks in the name of “honor.” Terrorism should never be interpreted as a valid religion or political system.

  5. Beck said it would come to this. A marriage between the left and radical Islam. No surprise here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s