England and Canada have national health care
A recent “Investor’s Business Daily” article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U.S. 65%
England 46%
Canada 42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
U.S. 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months;
U.S. 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
U.S. 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S. 71
England 14
Canada 18
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in “excellent health”:
U.S. 12%
England 2%
Canada 6%
I don’t know about you, but I don’t want “Universal Healthcare” comparable to England or Canada.
Moreover, it was Sen. Harry Reid who said, “Elderly Americans must learn to accept the inconveniences of old age.”
SHIP HIM TO CANADA OR ENGLAND!
He is “elderly” himself but be sure to remember his health insurance is different from
yours as Congress has its own high-end coverage! He will never have to learn to accept “inconveniences”!
AND THE WINNER IS VERY INTERESTING!
The percentage of each past president’s cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what? The private business sector is a real life business, not agovernment job. Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt 38%
Taft 40%
Wilson 52%
Harding 49%
Coolidge 48%
Hoover 42%
F Roosevelt 50%
Truman 50%
Eisenhower 57%
Kennedy 30%
Johnson 47%
Nixon 53%
Ford 42%
Carter 32%
Reagan 56%
GH Bush 51%
Clinton 39%
GW Bush 55%
And the winner of the Chicken Dinner is:
Obama 8%
This alone can explain the incompetence of this administration!
How can the president of a major nation and society the one with the most successful economic system in world history stand and talk about business when he’s never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And neither have 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers! They’ve spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as “community organizers” when they should have been in an employment line.
Pass this on because we will NEVER see it in the main street media!