Michael Savage: Obama may be foreign ‘usurper’

Michael Savage, the nation’s No. 4-rated radio talk show host, blasted America for either disregarding or covering up questions of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve in the Oval Office and the possibility that “the presidency may have been usurped by a foreign power.”

Savage says Obama is a foreign usurper

“To have elected an unknown man of unknown origin, a man who’s probably not even an American citizen – How can the whole military not know this?” Savage asked on air this past week. “How could the entire military establishment not be asking the same question that millions of Americans are asking?

“Do you think it’s plausible that the entire United States military complex does not understand the extreme dangers of having a commander in chief with dual allegiances in the White House?” Savage asked of Obama, who has publicly admitted he was born to a British father and therefore born a dual citizen. “Do they not understand that the presidency may have been usurped by a foreign power?”

Source:

16 thoughts on “Michael Savage: Obama may be foreign ‘usurper’

  1. The US military knows that Obama was elected 69 million to 59 million. The US military knows that the Electoral College also elected Obama, giving him all 365 votes that he had won in the general election (despite a campaign by birthers and two-fers to have electors change their votes, and that in fact NOT ONE elector changed her or his vote0. The US military knows that Obama’s election was confirmed UNANIMOUSLY by the US Congress (despite a campaign by birthers and two-fers against), and the US military knows that Obama was sworn in by the Chief Justice of the United States.

    The US military also knows that neither the citizenship of the father or dual nationality has any effect on Natural Born Citizen status.

    “Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

    Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:

    “Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)

    Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:

    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)

    • I see a kool-aid drinking, Obama can do no wrong, Liberal has found my site. You are so wrong on all counts, but keep thinking the way you do. This is going to be fun.

    • 1. August 4, 1961: Obama born in Hawaii

      2. August 5, 1961: Nordyke twins born in Hawaii

      3. Nordyke birth certificate number on top of birth certificate:

      4. One twin: 61 10637

      5. Other twin: 61 10638

      6. Obama birth certificate number: 61 10641

      7. The information above has been displayed on the Internet, so it is part of the public record.

      8. If the above information is displayed all over the internet for anyone to see, then why can’t the Hawaii government be forced to legally explain the following controversy:

      9. That is, if Obama was born one day BEFORE the Nordyke twins — Aug. 4 vs. Aug, 5 — then why is Obama’s birth certificate number 3 numbers higher — 10638 vs. Obama’s 10641 — than the Nordyke’s number?

      10. So why can’t Hawaii officials, like Dr. Fukino, be forced to legally explain why Obama’s birth certificate number is higher than the Nordyke twins’ number, if the numbers are already part of the public record?

    • It’s been more than two years since Obama announced his candidacy for President, and five months since he was elected President, yet Obama has repeatedly refused to provide any proof that he is Constitutionally qualified to be president. Despite what you may have heard, Obama’s eligibility issue has never been settled. If you are looking for reasons why, there is only one reason that you should know:

      Barack Hussein Obama flat-out refuses to show the one document that would confirm or deny his true identity, parentage, and birth origin — his original, “vault” birth certificate.

      In March 2008, a lawsuit was filed to remove John McCain, the GOP candidate, from the ballot because his natural-born status was also in doubt. John McCain immediately responded by showing his actual, original birth certificate to Congress.

      On June 12, 2008, about three months after John McCain settled his eligibility issue, the pressure on Obama to do the same led to the release of what was called his “original birth certificate” — an image copy, not a paper copy, by his campaign, not by himself, to the Daily Kos blog, not to Congress, or to anyone even remotely responsible for vetting him.

      Moreover, what Obama submitted for “release,” was not an image copy of his original birth certificate as claimed. It was an abbreviated transcript of a birth record called a “Certification of Live Birth.” HOWEVER, the image itself was a fabricated forgery intended to mimic this transcript. Since a forged birth document cannot represent a true birth record, it means that someone committed forgery just to keep Obama’s actual birth record from ever being known.

    • 1. A “natural born” citizen is any person born of US citizen parents (that’s two) in the U. S. mainland (includes Alaska and Hawaii) — think Ronald Reagan — in this case, parentage is important AND birthplace is important.

      2. A citizen “by statute” is any person born of US citizen parent(s) outside the United States — think John McCain — in this case, parentage is important AND birthplace is not important.

      3. A “native born” citizen, is any person born in the United States mainland — think Barack Obama — parentage not important AND birthplace important — a.

      4. Parentage not important AND birthplace not important — a “naturalized” citizen is a citizen as the result of a process — think Arnold Schwarzenegger.

  2. Dear Mr. Granite,
    Question: Who exactly backed Him and totally scrubbed His history and WHY?
    Can you not understand The Power Elites found their NWO guy, then created the marketing illusion you see?

    No one in His graduating class at Columbia even remembers Him?
    Sir (or maam), with all due respect, is that how you prefer to see things done in this country?
    In words even a liberal can understand, “You’ve been played.”

    • Senator Lindsey Graham is also a RINO and is not to be trusted.
      We also need to question as to WHY he has signed an EX Order sealing all of his files. If he has nothing to hide, then why would he do this? Maybe he never attended Columbia, that could be why no one remembers him.

  3. Re: “WHY he has signed an EX Order sealing all of his files. If he has nothing to hide, then why would he do this?”

    Answer: He didn’t. the executive order he signed makes it HARDER for presidents and vice presidents to seal their files. Harder than under Bush. AND, it applies only to the federal executive files of presidents and former presidents. It does NOT apply to state birth files, or any state files in fact, or to college or university files, or to private business files.

    The files that you think are sealed are simply private. They were private before the order and private after the order. They are private because state birth certificate files and college/university files have always been private.

    • I’ll bet you believe everything the mainstream media tells you, in fact you probably get a thrill up your leg when you see Obama. Check your facts, I have done more research on this guy then the entire media. You are probably using a playbook from Alinski.

    • Obama’s First Executive Order was to SEAL his records. — Now for all of you who commented on our previous articles that we were no more that right-wing nut jobs, that this thing about Obama’s birth certificate was a non-issue, and those of you who tried to shift the focus of the stories, doesn’t this strike you as just a little odd? —- That the first order of business Obama took care of on day one of his Presidency was to sign off on an Executive Order that states that only the records he chooses to be made public will be released? — This is the subject that was at the absolute top of his agenda? — If this isn’t proof that Obama is hiding something, I don’t know what is. ——– http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1712.pdf

      Click to access E9-1712.pdf

  4. Re: “No one in His graduating class at Columbia even remembers Him?”

    But he did graduate from Columbia because that is how he got into Harvard Law School, and for that matter because Columbia University said that he graduated from Columbia.

    http://www.wikicu.com/Barack_Obama
    http://www.wikicu.com/Phil_Boerner
    And this

    http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan05/cover.php

    And this:

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-05-15-3144401415_x.htm

    And this

    http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/recollections-of-obamas-ex-roommate/

    And this:

    http://www.politico.com/static/PPM116_obamaessay.html

    And this:

    http://www.college.columbia.edu/news/barack-obama-83-becomes-first-college-alumnus-to-win-presidency

    • Obama’s first act as President EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 banning release of any of his records
      Fewderation of American Scientists ^

      Posted on Thursday, July 30, 2009 12:19:37 PM by kaizen

      THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary

      For Immediate Release January 21, 2009

      EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489 – – – – – – –

      PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS

      By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows: Section 1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

      (a) “Archivist” refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee. (b) “NARA” refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.

      (c) “Presidential Records Act” refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.

      (d) “NARA regulations” refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.

      (e) “Presidential records” refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.

      (f) “Former President” refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.

      (g) A “substantial question of executive privilege” exists if NARA’s disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.

      (h) A “final court order” is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.

      Sec. 2. Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records. (a) When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege. However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative. (b) Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice. If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

      Sec. 3. Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President. (a) Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.

      (b) The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified. The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.

      (c) If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.

      (d) If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates. After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.

      Sec. 4. Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President. (a) Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist’s determination as to whether to honor the former President’s claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege. Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist’s determination with respect to the former President’s claim of privilege.

      (b) In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order. The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations. Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel). The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

      Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

      (i) authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.

      (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

      Sec. 6. Revocation. Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.

      BARACK OBAMA

      THE WHITE HOUSE, January 21, 2009.

  5. Pingback: Tweets that mention Michael Savage: Obama may be foreign ‘usurper’ | Socialism is not the Answer -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s