Another Kenyan Minister states on 14 April 2010 that Kenya is Obama’s “home country”!

The Betrayal

Pile the above state on top of another Kenyan minister’s statement on 25 March 2010 that Obama “was born in Kenya” and is “not a native American” and the facts are obvious as is explained in this essay by Atty Mario Apuzzo. Obama was born in Kenya and not in Hawaii. Any birth registrations filed for Obama in Hawaii by his family back in 1961 was falsified.

When is the U.S. main stream media going to cover what is being said in Kenya and stop schilling and covering up for Obama. Obama is not even a native born American, let alone a “natural born Citizen” as is required for the office he usurps.

It is time for the 4th Estate of our Constitutional Republic the free press and media and/or the Republican Party to wake up and speak the truth to the fraud of Obama and call for congressional hearings to determine Obama’s true legal identity to constitutional standards and then take appropriate action. This disgrace to our nation cannot be allowed to continue.

CDR Charles Kerchner


“The intelligence report LTC Terry Lakin discovered on Obama’s Eligibility”

Western Journalism

In December ‘08 a retired CIA officer commissioned an investigator to look into the Barack Obama birth certificate and eligibility issue.  On July 21, 2009 obtained a copy of the investigator’s report and published it. Thousands have since read the report.  The report is featured as one of the Key Documents on the website that is maintained by the American Patriot Foundation that supports Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin.

The Truth About Obama’s eligibility or lack thereof

Lieutenant Colonel Lakin is refusing to deploy as ordered to Afghanistan until Obama permits the Hawaiian Department of Health to release his original birth certificate to support the claim that he is a natural born citizen and thereby meets the eligibility requirement for his office mandated by the Constitution. This may lead to Lakin’s facing a court-martial.

Much new information has surfaced since the original publication and the investigator recently submitted to us an updated version of the report. Even if you have read it before, please consider reading the updated version that includes this new information. The situation for Lt Col Lakin is grave and we salute his courage, and we reaffirm the accuracy of this important research.—The Editors

Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility

Most people think of an original birth certificate as a state or hospital document containing a statement by a doctor or midwife.  The hospital document usually is accompanied by a footprint.

No one has ever presented any evidence that such a document has ever existed in the United States for Barack Obama.  The Hawaii Dept of Health refuses to give a yes or no answer to the question whether they have such a document on file.

Read the full Report: The Western Center for Journalism

Memo to MSM: When You’ve Lost Jon Stewart… You’re Officially Irrelevant

Big Journalism

As you know, more young people get their news from Jon Stewart’s The Daily Show that anyplace else. For a sizable swath of the population, it hasn’t happened until they’ve seen it on Stewart’s Comedy Central show, and that includes reading about it in the New York Times. So when Stewart takes on the high-minded, but utterly false, media meme of those “racist tea-baggers,” so assiduously peddled by tired old white men of the Times like Frank Rich, people are going to notice.


Guess what?  They just noticed.

Click on the link and watch the opening segment with Wyatt Cenac, making good ribald fun of the MSM tropes that the Tea Partiers hate black people and gay people.  Of course, this being Stewart, there’s a good deal of Fox News bashing as well

But the larger point it this: when you’ve lost Jon Stewart — when a fake newscaster gets closer to the truth than the “real” newscasters — then the MSM’s fast-fading pretense to authority has just about disappeared.

Let the ridicule begin!


Filling the Jeremiah Wright gap

Power Line

In a famous speech, Barack Obama declared that he could no more disown Rev. Jeremiah Wright than he could disown the black community, or for that matter his white grandmother. Shortly thereafter, following more embarrassing comments by Wright, Obama did manage to disown Wright. However, the earlier message was clear – there is place in Obama’s inner circle for a radical black racist, as long as he doesn’t behave in too frightful a manner.

The lesson has not been lost on radical black racist Rev. Al Sharpton. As the Washington Post reports, Sharpton has become a “partner to the Obama White House.” In fact, “Sharpton has had a voice in some of the most important policy debates affecting the black community.” More than that, Obama seems to use him as a moral litmus test for key aspects of his domestic policy. “I know if I’m doing it right, Reverend Sharpton will be right here to let me know,” Obama has reportedly said. In short, Sharpton seems to be Obama’s moral compass, the role that Wright, the president’s former spiritual mentor, might well have played had he been a little more diplomatic.

The Post wants to convey the impression that it’s a mellow version of Sharpton that has captured the president’s ear. But the only evidence it offers that Sharpton has changed consists of the fact that he has lost weight and now wears business attire instead of track suits. As Sharpton explains, “you have to have core principles and everything else is a tactic.” In other words, his core principles remain the same. And they fit seamlessly in the Obama administration.

Joe Biden kicked off his presidential campaign by calling Barack Obama “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” Biden was, of course, differentiating Obama from Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

Biden had to apologize for this statement. There’s no question, however, that part of Obama’s appeal to white voters was the fact that he seemed so different from Sharpton and Jackson. Obama understood this very well. As the Post notes, he persuaded Sharpton to keep his distance from the presidential campaign.

But now that the slimmed-down, well-dressed Sharpton has become an important and visible force in the Obama administration, I wonder what the differences would be between a Sharpton presidency and the one Obama is serving up.


A Chronology of Deceit

Every now and then I get an e-mail that has to be shared,  this is one of those e-mails.                    1 Dragon

One can now ask an important question which has not yet been emphasized enough:  “Just when did Obama begin to publically claim he was born in Hawaii?” This question is distinct from the question, “Just where in fact was Obama born?”, and from the other question, “What do official documents say about where he was born?”

Regarding his claims, we can summarize what is known:

1. As of Monday, Aug. 28, 2006, Obama’s Campaign was putting out that he was born in Hawaii.  This is known from the introductory speech given by Prof. George A. O. Magoha, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Nairobi, on the occasion of a speech given there by Senator Obama that day. (One presumes that the Vice-Chancellor was given notes from the Obama campaign, as is customary on such occasions)

2. From the newspaper reports above, it is clear that the Obama campaign was putting out that he was born in Kenya, or overseas, during the period of June 27, 2004, until January 8, 2006.

3. In October of 2004, during the ABC Chicago Affiliate’s broadcast of the Obama-Keyes debates, Obama openly admitted — he conceded — that he was not a natural born citizen. (C-Span aired the uncut version of the debates, which contained this exchange, in the second half of April, 2005)

4. It is known from a classmate of Obama at Harvard University, that while at Harvard, Obama at least on one occasion admitted that he was born in Kenya. (This friend went on record on a call in radio program in Idaho in early July, 2009)

If any reader can find a link which documents a claim to a birth location before Aug. 28th, 2006, which differs from this timeline or which supports it; please let The Post & Email know of it, by posting it in the comment section below.

In a follow up report, The Post & Email has published a brief analysis of the Google Newspaper archive, which shows that Obama’s story changed after June 27, 2004.

Finally, that the AP did cover this story, reprinted by the East African Standard, can be seen from the citation made to AP stories about it (Jack Ryan dropping out of the race), in the following contemporary news articles, which however are incomplete:

June 25, 2004 —,2933,123716,00.html

June 26, 2004 — Bellview News Democrat

June 26, 2004 — AP Online Story by Michael Tarm

June 25, 2004 — AP Syndicated Story by Maura Kelly Lannan

(Second Source on June 26, 2009, which cites Associated Press Special Correspondent David Espo and reporter Dennis Conrad as contributors to this report)

(Third Source, The Ledger, print edition of June 26, 2009: partial republication)


Here is another interesting mystery. World net daily today reports on this story and they have a screenshot of a Ghanese newspaper that has the line … this presidential visit to the continent of his birthplace.

But the ghanese paper inself looks like it has cleaned up it’s article since it was published because that article NOW says… the presidential visit to the continent of his fathers birth.