The legacy of Fraud

Isn’t it precious?  Even though thousands of scientists, facts and evidence have said loud and clear for years that Global warming is a hoax,  our President and world climate gurus ignored the rather hot mountain of evidence betraying their calls for international taxation and cap and trade type treaties.  They continued to believe and follow like orphaned lap dogs their heroes at the UN and Al Gore… know,  the Internet inspiratioNow,  the International tower of lies and deceit is falling into the very cool sea.  Even Inhofe has asked Senator Boxer to probe the potential of a scientific conspiracy.   In the news this week was the shocking announcement that all the original data from the global warming scientist geniuses was destroyed or lost.  All they had were summaries.  Of course that is all our country needs is a ‘summary’ to be taxed to the point of total ruin.  Why confuse everyone with something like the facts and truth?

So, how is the Obama legacy going so far?

Let’s see,  Cap and Trade and any global warming legislation is swirling down the drain in Willy Wonkas factory….except its not a lake of chocolate.  It is smelly sewage.  Australia’s Parliament defeats a global warming bill and the world is waking up quickly to this HUGE fraud against the people and freedom.  I’d say a big fat zero for Obama so far.   They will continue to spin their environmental lies so as to steal billions from the masses.  We must scream, write, call, not allow it and STAND.

Maybe forcing compromised health care will work…..NOT

Just as most of us have screamed fraud with the global warming nightmare for ages,  it is just as much, if not more fraud what Obama and the liberals in congress are trying to pull with the Frankenstein health care bill.  The Senate is trying to cram a bill into place even before Christmas with the endless “we need coverage for all, speeches.”

If you want to have a clue as to just how a Government controlled healthcare program would work, look at other similar bureaucracies such as the VA.   Recently on my radio show I interviewed Dick Phenneger  a vet and business man who has uncovered the unbelievable.  16,000 applications of Vets lost or destroyed. Thousands more in various shredders and unprocessed.  He also found that there were big bonus plans built into the system where an employee is paid a bonus for turning down an application.  Apparently,  there is a wide spread plan to turn down all applicants the first time, and many the second and third attempt at help.  It is a given and most VETS experience a 6 to 18 month delay for care.

The bottom line is that the system doesn’t respect their contract with the VETS when they come home from war and NEED care.  The VA instead plays a cruel, cat and mouse game with our troops.  Did you happen to notice the part about the lines and HUGE DELAYS for care due to disorganization,  lack of money and poor planning and management?  If you ever wondered what national health care will look like………just look at the VA.  Expect health care rationing,  months of lines and mad Government scientists….no czars, deciding what that health care will look like.  At least we have the supreme hope that it will be run by the ever so wonderful IRS.

So,  what is the legacy of this President in his first year?  Two words come to mind…POWER and CONTROL.  His control tools so far are being exposed as fraudulent and unpopular with the masses, thus the endless marches and T parties.  We are watching closely the contrived environmental concerns and Government health care schemes.  These must not pass.

As far as I’m concerned Obama’s legacy so far is one big fraud.  At least he got the Nobel Peace Prize, but then so did Yasser Arafat and Al Gore.  Who will get the peace prize next…..Pee Wee Herman?

Obama’s 911 The Sequel “The Islamic Response to the Government’s Nine Accusations” 911doc

Dec. 10, 2009

Atlas Shrugs published


Skin crawling moment. Obama’s war on America blasts off our bloodied backs. Here is the preview, the overture, if you will, to the Islamic public spectacle of the NYC terror trial. Christians meet lions.

Read the document below, the “Islamic response to Government’s Nine Accusations”. There are many informing Koranic lessons in this document. This is Islam. This is what inspires thousands of Islamic jihadists across the world annually. Learn everything.

This is the most immoral presidency in American history.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed sounds like Obama in this document. It will make you sick. (hat tip Jake)

[

Copenhagen’s political science

By Sarah Palin

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

With the publication of damaging e-mails from a climate research center in Britain, the radical environmental movement appears to face a tipping point. The revelation of appalling actions by so-called climate change experts allows the American public to finally understand the concerns so many of us have articulated on this issue.

// <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
var rn = ( Math.round( Math.random()*10000000000 ) );
document.write('‘) ;
// ]]>
“Climate-gate,” as the e-mails and other documents from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia have become known, exposes a highly politicized scientific circle — the same circle whose work underlies efforts at the Copenhagen climate change conference. The agenda-driven policies being pushed in Copenhagen won’t change the weather, but they would change our economy for the worse.

The e-mails reveal that leading climate “experts” deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, and tried to silence their critics by preventing them from publishing in peer-reviewed journals. What’s more, the documents show that there was no real consensus even within the CRU crowd. Some scientists had strong doubts about the accuracy of estimates of temperatures from centuries ago, estimates used to back claims that more recent temperatures are rising at an alarming rate.

This scandal obviously calls into question the proposals being pushed in Copenhagen. I’ve always believed that policy should be based on sound science, not politics. As governor of Alaska, I took a stand against politicized science when I sued the federal government over its decision to list the polar bear as an endangered species despite the fact that the polar bear population had more than doubled. I got clobbered for my actions by radical environmentalists nationwide, but I stood by my view that adding a healthy species to the endangered list under the guise of “climate change impacts” was an abuse of the Endangered Species Act. This would have irreversibly hurt both Alaska’s economy and the nation’s, while also reducing opportunities for responsible development.


// <![CDATA[// // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
if ( show_doubleclick_ad && ( adTemplate & INLINE_ARTICLE_AD ) == INLINE_ARTICLE_AD && inlineAdGraf )

‘) ;
// ]]>

Our representatives in Copenhagen should remember that good environmental policymaking is about weighing real-world costs and benefits — not pursuing a political agenda. That’s not to say I deny the reality of some changes in climate — far from it. I saw the impact of changing weather patterns firsthand while serving as governor of our only Arctic state. I was one of the first governors to create a subcabinet to deal specifically with the issue and to recommend common-sense policies to respond to the coastal erosion, thawing permafrost and retreating sea ice that affect Alaska’s communities and infrastructure.

But while we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can’t say with assurance that man’s activities cause weather changes. We can say, however, that any potential benefits of proposed emissions reduction policies are far outweighed by their economic costs. And those costs are real. Unlike the proposals China and India offered prior to Copenhagen — which actually allow them to increase their emissions — President Obama’s proposal calls for serious cuts in our own long-term carbon emissions. Meeting such targets would require Congress to pass its cap-and-tax plans, which will result in job losses and higher energy costs (as Obama admitted during the campaign). That’s not exactly what most Americans are hoping for these days. And as public opposition continues to stall Congress’s cap-and-tax legislation, Environmental Protection Agency bureaucrats plan to regulate carbon emissions themselves, doing an end run around the American people.

In fact, we’re not the only nation whose people are questioning climate change schemes. In the European Union, energy prices skyrocketed after it began a cap-and-tax program. Meanwhile, Australia’s Parliament recently defeated a cap-and-tax bill. Surely other nations will follow suit, particularly as the climate e-mail scandal continues to unfold.

In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to “restore science to its rightful place.” But instead of staying home from Copenhagen and sending a message that the United States will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices, the president has upped the ante. He plans to fly in at the climax of the conference in hopes of sealing a “deal.” Whatever deal he gets, it will be no deal for the American people. What Obama really hopes to bring home from Copenhagen is more pressure to pass the Democrats’ cap-and-tax proposal. This is a political move. The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs — particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science.

Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen.

The writer was the 2008 Republican nominee for vice president and governor of Alaska from 2006 to 2009.