- Another Journalist Dies after Exposing Big Gov Extremes
- Time to Impeach Obama
- Obama Islamist Outreach Overview
- Obama’s Father’s Day Freudian Slip
- General Carter Ham to testify for the first time about Benghazi
- Am I a traitor?
- FLASHBACK: Syrian Rebels Pledge Loyalty To Al-Qaeda Emir Ayman Al-Zawahiri…
- IS THIS THE BIG EVENT THAT GLENN BECK MIGHT NOT ALLOW TO KEEP THE UNION STANDING?
- First Head to Roll? New Report Claims Top IRS Official Fired, Has ‘Dropped Off the Edge of the World’
- Only in America!
Run Barry Run
Log In/Log Out
- 237,447 hits
Conservative Blog Network
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
Crescent Moon & Star
The U.S. Constitution
1dragon on Obama’s Father’s Day Freudian… upaces88 on Obama’s Father’s Day Freudian… upaces88 on Obama’s Father’s Day Freudian… upaces88 on Obama’s Father’s Day Freudian… upaces88 on Time to Impeach Obama
Tag Archives: Resident in Chief
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General.
There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it’s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama’s oddities — including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up.
But first — why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?
Aided by his non-stop demagoguery.
President Barack Obama gave a shout out to Hispanic Americans in Mexico City on Friday — an electorate with ever-growing clout widely considered to have propelled the 44th president to a comfortable re-election in 2012.
“In fact without the support of Latinos including so many Mexican Americans, I would not be standing here today as president of the United States. That’s the truth,” Obama said, speaking before a group of students at the National Museum of Anthropology.
Latinos voted for Obama over Republican Mitt Romney 71% to 27% in 2012, according toCNN. In 2008, Obama received 67% of the Latino vote.
In Obama’s Audacity of Hope, he stated, “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in any ugly direction.” He also asserted in Bob Woodward’s Obama’s Wars, “We can absorb [another] terrorist attack.” These are two straightforward statements that raise the question of whether a man who has been seemingly obsessed with reaching out to “the Muslim world” since taking office is capable of fulfilling his duty as commander-in-chief to keep America safe and secure.
The negative implications of Obama’s time in office will be felt for decades, but one thing is clear. The U.S. President who does not recognize America’s exceptionalism and who has promised to stand with Muslims has been unable to keep Americans safe from Islamic terror — both at home and abroad. Asserting that “The Obama Years are Synonymous with Terrorism,” a recent IBD editorial chronicled the terrorist attacks, both failed and successful, during Obama’s term. From Little Rock and Ft. Hood to Benghazi and Boston, terrorism directed at Americans is far from waning despite Obama’s never-ending claims of al-Qaeda’s decimation. And unless Obama’s policies of appeasement, political correctness, government dependency, leading from behind, and willful ignorance regarding the Islamic threat to the West will lead to further terrorism.
If the conduct of our executive branch wasn’t treasonous before, during, and after Benghazi, maybe this will qualify:
Terrorism expert Steven Emerson just dropped the bombshell on Hannity that Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi has been deported to Saudi Arabia for reasons of “national security.”
Who is Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi? Let Walid Shoebat explain:
We know that federal, state, and local authorities took interest in a Saudi national named Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi after the Boston marathon bombings. We also know that he was injured and that those authorities searched his apartment and hauled away bags of stuff.
Add to that the fact that not long after Secretary of State John Kerry secretly met with the Saudi Foreign Minister after an open meeting with a photo spray was abruptly changed to a closed-door meeting. Not long after this meeting, Alharbi was no longer a person of interest.
Ok, so authorities are not denying that Alharbi was injured in the blast and they are not denying that he is a Saudi national (don’t look for them to even acknowledge that six members of the Alharbi clan are with Al-Qaeda and five were detained at Gitmo, to include one on the list of six). These authorities are, however, denying that Alharbi had anything to do with the bombings.
That leads to what appears to be three Saudis being spotted near the scene of the explosions.
What a coincidence, one was wearing a backpack:
Shoebat asks, “Smell coverup yet?” You might smell something even worse.
If this report is true, all the government–media axis needs now is a Richard Jewell type to frame, preferably one with an NRA sticker on his pickup truck.
Since he first became a presidential candidate, President Obama must have spent millions of dollars in legal expenses to combat dozens of so-called “birther” challenges seeking the original documents pertaining to his birth. As president, he famously issued an electronic document on the White House website in 2011; the document purported to be his long-form birth certificate, though it is apparently a forgery. In addition, he has taken great pains to hide the paper trail of passport records, college transcripts, and other data — all of which a prospective employer might require of a job applicant.
The public’s right to know is but a minor consideration. Our overriding concern should be what unfriendly foreign intelligence adversaries, particularly Russian, may have obtained on our president’s background.
We’re not sure if Obama went golfing yesterday before, after, or during receiving news about 6 Americans being slaughtered in Afghanistan at the hands of Islamist Jihadis. If anyone out there knows the timeline please let us know.
It looks like, despite the sequester, this is going to be a banner year – it’s already his seventh time playing and we’re barely into spring.
It certainly wouldn’t be the first time Obama received news about a dead diplomat and then selfishly went off to recreate. Last time it was Benghazi, when after learning of the death of US Ambassador Stevens, Obama took a nap and then flew to Vegas
for hookers and choom to raise money for himself.
How exactly do you fight a war from the 9th fairway?? Does Obama call the families of the victims before or after visiting the snack bar at the turn?