Attorney General Eric Holder’s Department of Justice dumped documents related  to Operation Fast and Furious on congressional officials late Friday night.  Central to this document dump is a series of emails showing Holder was informed  of slain Border Patrol agent Brian Terry’s murder on the day it happened – December 15, 2010 – and that he was informed the weapons used to kill Terry were  from Fast and Furious on the same day.

An email from one official, whose name has been redacted from the document,  to now-former Arizona U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke reads: “On December 14, 2010, a  BORTAC agent working in the Nogales, AZ AOR was shot. The agent was conducting  Border Patrol operations 18 miles north of the international boundary when he  encountered [redacted word] unidentified subjects. Shots were exchanged  resulting in the agent being shot. At this time, the agent is being transported  to an area where he can be air lifted to an emergency medical center.”

That email was sent at 2:31 a.m. on the day Terry was shot. One hour later, a  follow-up email read: “Our agent has passed away.”

Burke forwarded those two emails to Holder’s then-deputy chief of staff Monty  Wilkinson later that morning, adding that the incident was “not good” because it  happened “18 miles w/in” the border.

Wilkinson responded to Burke shortly thereafter and said the incident was “tragic.” “I’ve alerted the AG [Holder], the Acting DAG, Lisa, etc.”

Then, later that day, Burke followed up with Wilkinson after Burke discovered  from officials whose names are redacted that the guns used to kill Terry were  from Fast and Furious. “The guns found in the desert near the murder BP officer  connect back to the investigation we were going to talk about – they were AK-47s  purchased at a Phoenix gun store,” Burke wrote to Wilkinson.

“I’ll call tomorrow,” Wilkinson responded.

This is hardly the first time new evidence has come out that directly  contradicts Holder’s congressional testimony. These new emails are written  evidence that Holder was aware of Fast and Furious about five months before he  testified in Congress that he had only learned of the gunwalking program a “few  weeks” before a May 3, 2011, House Judiciary Committee appearance.

Holder has since walked back that “few weeks” comment, amending it to more of  a “couple months.”

“I did say a ‘few weeks,’” Holder said during a November 8 Senate Judiciary  Committee hearing, responding to a question from its chairman Vermont Democratic  Sen. Patrick Leahy. “I probably could’ve said ‘a couple of months.’ I didn’t  think the term I said, ‘few weeks,’ was inaccurate based on what happened.”

There have also been a series of documents containing the intimate details of  Fast and Furious that were sent to Holder all throughout 2010 from several of  his senior aides. Holder claims he did not read his memos.

Holder will be appearing before the House Committee on Oversight and  Government Reform next Thursday, Feb. 2. Though Holder has already testified  before Congress three times about matters relating to Fast and Furious — twice  before the House Judiciary Committee and once before the Senate Judiciary  Committee — this is the first time the House oversight committee will have an  opportunity to question Holder himself.

“The Judiciary Committee has multiple issues with the Attorney General,” House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa said in an exclusive  interview with The Daily Caller last week. “We have one issue: the issue of  breaking the law in order to enforce the law.”

“The oversight committee is investigating the Department of Justice, which is  very different than his appearances before the Judiciary Committees in which  they’re asking how things are going at Justice. What we’ve discovered in our  investigations is a pattern of cover-up [and] delay. Ultimately Congress was  given false information and now we’ve had people both resign and take the Fifth  as we try to get to the basic elements of why and how was Congress lied to.”

A total of 103 members of the House have called for Holder’s resignation or  firing, expressed “no confidence” in Holder via a formal House Resolution, or  both. Two sitting governors, two U.S. senators and all the major Republican  presidential candidates join those 103 congressmen in not trusting Holder. Many  of those who have called for Holder’s resignation have pointed out that Holder  claiming that he didn’t read his memos is a sign that he’s admitting  incompetence to avoid charges of corruption.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/28/latest-friday-night-document-dump-shows-holder-was-informed-of-fast-and-furious-connection-to-brian-terry%e2%80%99s-murder-on-day-border-agent-died/#ixzz1krJKBbNX

Many people have sent this one to me.  I don’t know if it is true or not, but it is a fine example of socialism in action.

An economics professor at Texas Tech said he had never failed a single student, but had once failed an entire class.

The class (students) insisted that socialism worked since no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer. The professor then said, “OK, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism.”

“All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will receive an A.”

After the first test the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who had studied hard were upset while the students who had studied very little were happy.

But, as the second test rolled around, the students who had studied little studied even less and the ones who had studied hard decided that since they couldn’t make an A, they also studied less. The second Test average was a D.

No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around the average grade was an F.

The scores never increased as bickering, blame, name calling, all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for anyone else.

To their great surprise all failed.

The professor told them that socialism would ultimately fail.

The harder people try to succeed the greater their reward (capitalism) but when a government takes all the reward away (socialism) no one will try or succeed.

Source:

by: Lawrence Sellin

Be assured that the far left-controlled Democratic Party, its anti-American financiers like George Soros and its partners in the biased, liberal mainstream media will use any tactic, tell any lie, violate any law and support any, even violent movement to ensure the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama.

Republicans can unseat Obama at any time simply by telling the truth, but they won’t.

Actually they can’t, because it would also reveal their complicity in Obama’s violation of Constitution, their willful ignorance of his felonies and their perpetuation of the greatest election fraud and Constitutional crisis in American history.

Rather than tell the truth, Republicans have chosen to succumb to political blackmail and have endorsed permanent corruption in Washington, D.C.

Even Conservative media and talk show hosts have decided in favor of safety and political correctness in order to protect their personal financial interests.

History will note that in 2012, against the combined opposition of the Republican and Democratic Parties and the mainstream media, a relative handful of American patriots brought down an illegal President, exposed the corrupt political system and a compliant press that protected and facilitated Obama.

They vigorously opposed the efforts of patriotic Americans because the Republican and Democratic Parties and the mainstream media financially benefit from the corrupt status quo.

Barack Hussein Obama is a Constitutionally illegal President. He does not meet the natural born citizen eligibility requirement outlined in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the binding Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett (1874), which defines natural born as a US citizen born of citizen parents at the time of the child’s birth.  (Link, at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com)

In addition, Obama has committed felonies by forging his birth documents and his Selective Service registration and using a Social Security Number not issued to him.  (Link, at scribd.com)

Because Obama, whose father was Kenyan, is not a natural born citizen and, therefore, has never been eligible for the Presidency, a lawsuit was filed against him by ordinary American citizens and heard on January 26, 2012 in Atlanta, Georgia by administrative judge Michael Malihi. (Links A, B, C, D at GulagBound.com)

Neither Barack Obama nor his attorneys appeared at the hearing.

According to preliminary reports, Judge Malihi issued a default judgment against Obama and will recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s name not appear on the Georgia ballot starting with the March 6th Georgia Democratic primary.

Undoubtedly, that decision and others like it will be challenged by the Obama Administration, the Democratic Party and its press arm, the mainstream media.

It will not, however, end there.

Expect to see all forms of intimidation: race baiting, threats from union thugs, menacing of voters by Black Panthers and violent Occupy Wall Street mobs.

George Soros has promised as much. He predicts that, although the Occupy Wall Street “is an inchoate, leaderless manifestation of protest,” it will grow.

“Yes, yes, yes,” Soros says, almost gleefully to the inevitability of rising anger and riots on the streets of American cities. (Link, at thedailybeast.com)

In the face of such threats, the Republican leaders and the Conservative media remain paralyzed by fear.

It will be the task of patriotic American citizens to act to preserve the Constitution and restore the rule of law in government.

We will continue the fight to expose Obama’s ineligibility and his crimes. We will never give up.

As Obama goes, so go the corrupt Republicans and Democrats and their stooges in the mainstream media.

Their demise will usher in an American political Renaissance.

Source:

Yep, pretty much sums it up:

Complete with teleprompters and adoring media crowds – all in Fantasyland!

Source:

CFP

First the good news.  Yesterday—26 January—I watched live feed of an extraordinary event.  The setting was a courtroom in Georgia and the presiding jurist was Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi.  The case centered around and on Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot in the upcoming 2012 General Election(s).  During the hearing, 3 attorneys—Orly Taitz, Van Irion and J. Mark Hatfield—presented their witnesses and individual ineligibility cases brought against Mr. Obama.  Neither Obama nor his attorney Michael Jablonski were in attendance—both having opted to avoid and skip the proceedings altogether—and none of the court’s required production of Obama’s eligibility was provided.

Note: Jablonski seems to be perpetuating the long-standing myth that his client is above the law and now—by association—he appears to be operating under the delusion that he is, also.  This brings up the interesting possibility of Atty. Jablonski—having provided no apparent legal reason for his non-attendance—being subject to revocation of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia.  But, that’s a discussion for another time.

The evidence presented was strong and there appears to be, at least, a 50-50 chance of Judge Malihi and the State of Georgia ruling in plaintiffs’ favor.  Judge Malihi will file a report, including his recommendations, with the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.  When a decision is given by Judge Malihi, this will be the first time that any ruling on the merits of Obama’s eligibility will have been rendered.  Note:  After yesterday’s hearing there was some indication that Judge Malihi was planning to rule for the plaintiffs.  But, I have been unable to confirm the report.

Now the extremely bad news for US citizens.  First, on 19 January 2012, multiple videos were made of a shipment—via rail—of hundreds of Bradley armored vehicles and related equipment moving from Northern California Southward.  Then, a few days later, the US military, DHS and local LAPD leaders advised of military drills on the streets of Los Angeles.  Note:  Said streets, we are advised, will remain secret and no one will be allowed in or out while the ’drills’ are going on.  If that’s true and civilians are cordoned off and allowed nether entry nor exit, Martial Law will already be in place.

The US military, Department of Homeland Security and LOCAL Police are conducting “urban warfare exercises” in recent and unprecedented “showings of force” under the now undeniable (by any intelligent beings) Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama.  These military forces are inhabiting the streets and air of and over Los Angeles, Boston, Little Rock, Miami and Colorado amongst others.   At a joint meeting between DHS, US Army Garrison-Fort Carson and IMCOM (Installation Management Command) in June 2011, the reason for the seminar was given as:  “The focus of the two-day seminar was to evaluate installation performance and develop corrective action plans to improve and maintain emergency preparedness, prevent hostile acts, protect Soldiers, Family members and civilians, and improve response and recovery capabilities.”  Hostile acts?  If this true “emergency preparedness” to what hostile acts might they be referring?  And what would cause these hostile acts?  Certainly not the supposed ‘weather emergencies’ they are trying to push onto the American people.  When did a tornado cause hostile acts from the American public?

Black Hawk helicopters were filmed flying around and over bank buildings in both Los Angeles and Miami.  Military personnel are seen flying in position-ready mode to shoot at targets (that’s people) on the ground.  Yet, these exercises are billed as ‘for some future foreign adventure’.  Really?  We are going to fly our Black Hawks over the banks of foreign countries, in order to protect them while, in actuality, hundreds of armored vehicles (at least a Brigade) are being sent to our own cities?  No.  As Judge Judith Sheindlin (aka Judge Judy) often says:  “If it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true.”

Is Obama’s violent Martial Law almost upon us?  It sure looks as if the positioning under the guise of “exercises” is underway and being implemented.  And…what about those armored vehicles that appear to have been sent to Los Angeles?  Wonder where they’re being stored?  So do I.

One thing is now very clear.  Obama, his DHS, the US Military and local law enforcement (who by the way would NOT be deployed to foreign soil) appear to be working to take down US citizens in fairly short order.  Soon they will come for any and all of our weapons.  Hitler did it in Germany under the pretense of “It will help us protect you” in the 1930s.  After that came the (at least) six-million Jews’ Holocaust.  Although I have heard many times that US citizens won’t allow it, I have strong doubts.  US citizens are already allowing their small children and the elderly to be sexually groped and prodded by perverse TSA employees—their own CHILDREN, folks!

Will you be courageous enough to fight against the tyranny that has, already, almost totally encompassed us?  Or, will you submit to the imposition of your complete slavery?  The decision shortly will be forced upon us all.

“Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today’s world do not have.”—President Ronald Reagan

VIDEO: Military Helicopters Conduct Covert Exercises Over U.S. Bank Building: Military Exercises in Downtown LA: Joint military exercises in Boston, LA, Little Rock in past six months: HOMELAND SECURITY REAL EXERCISES IN MIAMI: Exercise tests homeland security in Colorado: BREAKING! MILITARY EQUIPMENT Filmed 1\19\12 near Santa Cruz, Southbound: Brigade:  “A brigade is a major tactical military formation that is typically composed of four to five battalions, plus supporting elements depending on the era and nationality of a given army and could be perceived as an enlarged/reinforced regiment. Usually, a brigade is a sub-component of a division, a larger unit consisting of two or more brigades.”

Source:

Western Journalism

Today’s proceedings generally were about the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution, and more specifically about Obama’s eligibility to be on Georgia’s 2012 Presidential Election state ballot. Three separate challenges were made to said eligibility, including one by “birther” rock star Orly Taitz. It is safe to say that history was made today.

Big shocker: Obama did not even show up today. Guess he was too busy campaigning in Nevada and Colorado for his re-election bid. Heck, he didn’t even bother to send his attorney Mr. Michael Jablonski to deliver the necessary documents to the courthouse. But apparently, a lot of concerned Americans did show up, as the Atlanta courthouse was crowded.

To recap what has happened with this case during the past few weeks, Mr. Jablonski has tried very hard to stop this case one way or another. First he attempted to have the case dismissed, then he said it simply was not relevant to the president, then he argued that as the law stands the states do not actually have the power to determine who appears on their individual ballots (yeah, and the Pope is a Muslim), and finally said that his client was simply too preoccupied with his responsibilities as President to give a damn about the case. In short, he found himself continually having to change the story of his client.

However, the Georgia court rejected every one and all of these excuses. Just yesterday, Mr. Jablonski sent out a letter to the secretary of state in which he declared that the case was simply not to be heard and that he and his client would effectively boycott these proceedings. Hours later, Mr. Brian Kemp, Secretary of the Great State of Georgia, responded by saying that Obama and Jablonski were free to not show up at court but would nevertheless be doing so at their own peril.

Of course, Mr. Kemp is wrong since Obama is the president, right? Shouldn’t he be above the law? I mean, it is pretty likely that someone like you or I would get away with behaving like them if we were subpoenaed to appear in court, right?

Court was in session at 9 am sharp; proceedings began with the judge meeting privately with all attorneys associated with the case (you know, at least those who  showed up) for more than twenty minutes. According to various sources, he told them that since Obama was not present that he would be issuing a default judgment in their favor; he also initially wanted to end the case right then and there. However, the attorneys insisted on holding speedy hearings in which witnesses could testify and evidence would be entered into the court’s records. The judge honored their request.

Much of the evidence presented in court today was obtained with the help of several Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Among evidence entered into the court’s records: Obama’s digital “birth certificate” placed on the whitehouse.gov website, his father’s place of birth (Kenya), a few pages from Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father” in which he mentions that his father’s passport had been revoked (and subsequently could not leave Kenya”, and Immigration Services documents about Obama Sr.

Van Irion, one of the attorneys went into more detail about the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution, citing the decision reached in the 1875 US Supreme Court Minor vs. Happersett. Using visual aids and copies of the Court’s decision, Mr. Irion distinguishes the term “citizen” from “natural born citizen.” It is explained that the 14th Amendment does not change the meaning of a natural born citizen, and that any and all lower court verdicts do not conflict with that specific Supreme Court ruling.

What one should take away from this specific testimony, if not the proceedings in general, is that a natural born citizen has two parents who also citizens of the United States at the time of said citizen’s birth. As Obama Sr. was clearly NOT an American citizen, the case can clearly be made that our president, constitutionally speaking, is not eligible to serve as our president.

Among those who testified was a former law enforcement officer, a state-licensed PI, and an IT/PhotoShop expert. They have concluded that Obama has likely engaged in social security fraud, that his father is NOT an American citizen, and that the official birth certificate released by the Obama Administration in April is fake, beyond a reasonable doubt.

All evidence and testimony has been officially entered into court records. This leaves the door open for similar cases pending or future cases to be brought in other states as well. Also, any appeal (if one is even possible in this case) would have to be based on evidence presented by the lawyers in each case. Plaintiff Carl Swenson said in an e-mail to supporters that both “Van Irion (another plaintiff) and my lawyer Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in these two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with ‘Birther’ Orly Taitz.”

What everyone is awaiting now from the judge is an official publishing of today’s ruling, again a default judgment for the plaintiffs. Swenson says “we won” and that it is now “time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.”

One question every American should be asking themselves now that these eligbility proceedings in Georgia are over is simply: “who the hell is this guy?”

Although obvious, it is important to note that not even the slightest mention of these proceedings will be heard in the mainstream liberal media. And this is for good reason; they obviously want to protect their guy Obama. When his administration’s lackeys vocally attacked Fox News in 2009, viewership of Fox News did not go down; it skyrocketed. Likewise, if the media tries to attack Orly Taitz, these witnesses, or anyone else associated with these proceedings, the so-called “birther” movement will only get stronger.

In short, the “birthers,” who have been ridiculed if not ignored by the media and much of the American public for the past three years, have officially been vindicated today.

—

A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama eligibility movement and what results we might see. In the meantime, read the following blow by blow account:

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

Source:

Classified U.S. government information was found in the cells of high-value detainees at the Guantanamo Bay military prison that houses the world’s most dangerous terrorists, according to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The alarming revelation comes just days after lawyers for an al-Qaeda operative—USS Cole bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri—jailed at the facility tried convincing a military judge that monitoring detainees’ mail violates attorney-client privilege. Judicial Watch covered the pretrial hearing at the U.S. Naval station in Cuba last week.

Ironically, a large portion of the two-day proceedings involved security measures put in place to ensure that contraband does not make it into the facility that houses 171 prisoners. Attorneys for al-Nashiri argued at length to convince the military tribunal judge hearing the case, Army Colonel James Pohl, that al-Nashiri’s mail not be monitored. The admiral (David Woods) who runs the prison took the stand to explain that detainees’ legal mail is promptly marked after being identified and not read to preserve attorney-client privilege.

This was not satisfactory to al-Nashiri’s extensive legal team or the leftwing civil rights groups that attended the hearing in a top security courtroom built to try terrorists. Most mainstream media outlets were also critical of the screening process, which military officials say is necessary to intercept contraband before it gets in the hands of the prisoners.

Supporting the argument is this week’s DOJ announcement that an agent with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has been criminally charged for repeatedly leaking classified information, including the identities of covert agency operatives involved in the capture and interrogation of terrorists. Some of the materials were actually seized from the cells of Guantanamo detainees, according to the DOJ.

The disgraced CIA officer (John Kiriakou) divulged the classified information to journalists who, in turn, disclosed it to an investigator working for the taxpayer-funded defense team of an incarcerated terrorist. Authorities subsequently found some of the files, including photographs of certain government employees and contractors, in the cells of high-value detainees at the military prison.

Source: